Identifying Key Performance Indicators: The Foundation of an Institutional Dashboard Jeffrey A. Seybert, Director National Higher Education Benchmarking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Driven Leadership Leading through Data Driven Planning.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) Standard One Institutional Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness Task Force Members Juanita.
1 Administrative Units - Compact Planning Details.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Msubillings.edu/futureu PROVOST FORUM October 15, 2012 msubillings.edu/futureu.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 Academic Departments - Compact Planning Details.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Columbia Basin College Plenary I: Mission and Mission Fulfillment Rich Cummins Melissa McBurney 1.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Strategic Planning Update
Committee Orientation
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
Stan DeJarnett, GSBA Mary Anne Charron, GLISI
The Year-one Report: Principles, Issues, Implications
The assessment process For Administrative units
Graduation Initiative 2025
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
Graduation Initiative 2025
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Online Teaching Conference
IEPI Indicators Workshop
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.
The Systemic Enrollment Management Matrix (SEM²) and Student Success Planning Oscar Joseph III, Ph.D., D. Mgt. Chief Enrollment Management Officer League.
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Action Plans Your teaching – individual
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
Organizational Consulting
Working with Student Success Data
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOPS
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Presented To: College Planning Council
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Conducting Needs Assessments for UF/IFAS Extension
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Strategic Enhancement
“All Hands” Meeting Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER)
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Presented To: College Planning Council
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Identifying Key Performance Indicators: The Foundation of an Institutional Dashboard Jeffrey A. Seybert, Director National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute Johnson County Community College & Lee Ann Nutt, Vice President, Instruction North Central Texas College

North Central Texas College Founded in 1924 – the oldest, continuously operating 2-year college in Texas One of 50 community college districts in Texas Multi-campus system serving three counties and an ISD in a fourth county 9,000+ credit students system-wide 3,000+ non-credit students system-wide Regionally accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges

Why Do We Need Dashboards in Higher Ed.? Institutional leadership has a responsibility to be accountable to both internal and external stakeholders Stakeholders want/need accurate, concise, easy-to-understand, up-to-date data & information about organizational performance Traditional communication sources in higher ed. (e.g., annual reports) are usually obsolete by the time they reach stakeholders and typically fail to provide necessary/sufficient detail about organizational performance

What is a Dashboard in Higher Education? A brief document that graphically displays critical institutional information in a succinct, easily understood, visually appealing format A tool to communicate the current health of the organization and its progress toward its strategic objectives

Purposes of Dashboards To communicate current information about major indices of organizational performance to primary stakeholders To provide information to assist in evaluation of organizational performance To provide a comprehensive analysis of how the organization’s achievement of its strategic objectives leads to effectively carrying out its mission and vision To provide information about organizational performance compared to appropriate benchmarks

Components of Dashboards A limited set of measures—usually referred to as “Key Performance Indicators” (or KPIs) An integrated data structure for that set of measures A source of comparative benchmarks for the measures Graphics for displaying the measures

Characteristics of an Effective Dashboard Operationally focused—tied to the institution’s mission and strategic plan Timely Accurate Easy to understand Represents the current state of the organization Provides a straightforward summary of organizational performance

Measure core inputs, outputs, and outcomes KPIs — What Are They? Data elements that : Measure core inputs, outputs, and outcomes Reflect the institution’s strategic plan and core business Measure high priority operations of the institution Measure institutional characteristics that are important and meaningful to stakeholders Measure institutional performance in areas in which it must be successful to survive and be competitive

Fall headcount enrollment Examples of KPIs Enrollment Fall headcount enrollment Percent of area high school grads enrolling subsequent fall Student progress Fall-to-fall persistence Term-to-term persistence Student success Graduation rate Transfer rate Workforce placement rate

Institution mission statement and strategic plan Sources of KPIs Institution mission statement and strategic plan For community colleges—”Core Indicators of Effectiveness for Community Colleges” (Alfred, Shults, & Seybert), published by AACC Identifies and describes 16 core indicators in six major categories: Student progress General education Outreach Workforce development Contribution to the public good Transfer preparation

Identification of KPIs—Who’s involved Effort usually led by a Dashboard Development Team Representative of senior leadership Representative of IR Representatives of key constituencies Faculty Student affairs Others Team solicits input from affected work groups and administrators Senior leadership (president’s cabinet?) makes final determination of which measures reflect key functions and are included in the dashboard

How KPIs are Identified They are an outgrowth of strategic planning Important and meaningful to stakeholders Viewed as important to the organization Linked to strategic plan and organizational priorities Help determine the extent to which the organization is progressing toward its stated goals Team can begin with a large number of potential KPIs and then whittle down to the vital few—no more than 15-20

The KPI Day-long Kickoff Workshop Selecting a facilitator Critical decision Internal or external Experience & expertise Team solicits input Pre-workshop “homework” Mission/vision/values statements Strategic plan AACC “Core Indicators of Effectiveness for community colleges”

NCTC KPI Workshop Agenda 8:00-9:15 Introduction to scorecards/KPIs 9:13-9:30 Break 9:30-10:30 Small groups—Identification of most important functions/core business 10:30-11:00 Report out 11:00-11:45 Lunch 11:45-12:45 Small groups—identification of major KPI categories 12:45-1:15 Report out 1:15-1:30 Break 1:30-2:30 Finalization of major KPIs 2:30-3:00 Report out

NCTC KPI Workshop Participants President & Members of President’s Cabinet Vice President of Instruction Vice President of Student Services Vice President of Institutional Advancement Dean – Bowie Campus Senior Director of Campus Operations Instructional Leadership Team Dean of Health Sciences Dean of Arts & Sciences Dean of Advanced & Applied Technology Dean of Lifelong Learning Department Chair – College Preparatory Studies

NCTC KPI Workshop Participants Other Administrators Dean – Corinth Campus Associate Dean of Student Services (Corinth Campus) Director of Admissions/Registrar Chief Information Officer Director of Institutional Research & Effectiveness Director of Academic & Student Support Services Coordinator – Student Success Center

The “work” Introductory presentation by facilitator (45-60 minutes) NCTC KPI Workshop The “work” Introductory presentation by facilitator (45-60 minutes) Divide into small groups Round 1 Goal is to identify the college’s “core business”/most important institutional functions/key mission components (60-75 minutes) Reconvene: groups report progress (30-45 minutes) Entire group comes to consensus on core functions (60 minutes) Lunch

The “work” (cont’d.) Round 2 Same groups or “shuffle”? NCTC KPI Workshop The “work” (cont’d.) Round 2 Same groups or “shuffle”? Each group assigned one core function Begin to derive KIs that measure each core function (60-75 minutes) Reconvene: groups report progress (30-45 minutes) Entire group comes to consensus on first-level KPIs (45-60 minutes)

NCTC’s first-level KPIs NCTC KPI Workshop NCTC’s first-level KPIs Access Resources Student Achievement Employee Achievement College Readiness

NCTC’s Draft Dashboard

NCTC’s Draft Dashboard

NCTC Draft Dashboard

NCTC Draft Dashboard

NCTC Draft Dashboard

Dashboard Example – St. Charles Community College

Gather baseline data (at least three years) Next Steps Derive 2nd, 3rd, and (maybe) 4th level KPIs to complete the dashboard/scorecard Gather baseline data (at least three years) Identify benchmarks for KPIs Set targets for improvement Continue to monitor and refine dashboard/scorecard

Jeff Seybert jseybert@jccc.edu Lee Ann Nutt lnutt@nctc.edu Contact Jeff Seybert jseybert@jccc.edu Lee Ann Nutt lnutt@nctc.edu