Exhaust Emissions Light Duty-PMP-2017/2018 Sub23nm Round Robin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
Advertisements

WLTP drive trace normalization
PMP: SUB 23 NM MEASUREMENT RECOMMENDATIONS B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 3 April 2014.
Institute for Energy and Transport B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini
Revisions To Heavy Duty Validation Report General Numerous clarifications to text as requested at December meeting Partial flow systems referred to consistently.
K. B. Sutar, M. Ilyash, S. Kohli* & M. R. Ravi Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India Department of Mechanical.
GRPE 70th session PMP INFORMAL GROUP progress report TO GRPE
REGENERATION ISSUES Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre B. Giechaskiel, J. Andersson, G. Martini 3 April 2014.
WLTP DTP PM-PN Subgroup Activities, Progress & Future Plans 7 th DTP Meeting Bern 12 th – 14 th September 2011 Chris Parkin.
PMP Progress Report Activities since GRPE 58 Heavy Duty Validation testing Exercise completed in October Draft report and draft proposal to insert PN measurement.
PMP: SUB 23 NM REVIEW B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 8 January 2014 GRPE-PMP
GRPE 71 ST SESSION PMP INFORMAL GROUP PROGRESS REPORT TO GRPE 8 Jan 2015 Informal document GRPE st GRPE, 8-12 June 2015,
Deliverable 10 Contents  Vehicles/engines  Diesel passenger cars  Gasoline (PFI-DISI) passenger cars  Diesel heavy duty vehicles  Diesel heavy duty.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
37 TH PMP MEETING Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini 7 Oct 2015.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 38th UNECE IWG PMP MEETING Exhaust emissions.
JRC 30 March Particle Measurement Programme Exploratory work & Validation Exercise (JRC) First Validation Exercise comparisons B. Giechaskiel, G.
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service JRC Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc 72th UNECE GRPE session PMP IWG Progress Report.
RDE PN-PEMS programme Progress Update F. Riccobono, B. Giechaskiel, P. Bonnel STU, IET, JRC, European Commission.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service NON-EXHAUST PARTICLE EMISSIONS.
Submitted by the expert from Japan the secretariat
PMP IWG Progress Report
PMP IWG Progress Report
PMP IWG Progress Report
PMP Heavy Duty Validation Exercise
Particle Measurement Programme - Report
Institute for Energy and Transport B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini
Preliminary results of the OEMs HDV PN-PEMS validation study
76th UNECE GRPE session PMP IWG Progress Report
76th UNECE GRPE session PMP IWG Progress Report
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
77th UNECE GRPE session PMP IWG Progress Report
Light Duty-PMP-2017/2018 Sub23nm Round Robin
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
PMP IWG Progress Report
HD ENGINE RAW PN MEASUREMENT
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
WLTP DTP PM-PN Subgroup Activities, Progress & Future Plans
Pems route and parameters
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Report of 6th DTP Meeting to GRPE 9th June 2011 UNECE, Geneva (CH)
Exhaust Emissions Light Duty-PMP-2017/2018 Sub23nm Round Robin
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
Lemnos 11/9/03 Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing on a test track.
Report of 6th DTP Meeting to GRPE 9th June 2011 UNECE, Geneva (CH)
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
ACEA Comments from ACEA still does not understand the reasoning for this proposal. This proposal increases the test burden disproportionally.
Informal document GRPE Rev1
Inter-Laboratory Comparison Exercise CPC CALIBRATION
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Francesco Riccobono, Barouch Giechaskiel, Pierre Bonnel
PN-PEMS Progress update
78th UNECE GRPE session PMP IWG Progress Report
PN Counting from Raw Exhaust via Fixed Dilution and PMP Round Robin Project JRC and ACEA.
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
Current status All European laboratories (except 3rd JRC measurement) have conducted their measurements Equipment finally returned to JRC US, Japanese.
Proposed actions for gtr development
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
Informal document GRPE-79-20
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
PMP INFORMAL GROUP Exhaust particle emissions – progress report
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
WLTP Phase 1a Round Robin (European plan)
ACEA and JRC PMP meeting 7/11/2018
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-10e
Palais des Nations, Geneva
Presentation transcript:

Exhaust Emissions Light Duty-PMP-2017/2018 Sub23nm Round Robin

About the exercise Measurements conducted in 6 different laboratories Switzerland and Japan to be done Some problems with instruments and transportation Yet PN10 and PN23 Data with Heated Evaporation Tube and Catalytic Stripper (CS) from all of the laboratories (CS1 or CS2 ) Fuel (and other setup) transportation problems were always solved Until now only results from PMP vehicle

Average CO2 emission in (WLTP) Things to do: recheck labs normalization temperature To be solved Random order CO2 variability, normalized to mean (100) STD Lab1 Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 HOT 2% 100 99 98 104 COLD 1% 101 102 Emissions normalized to mean Reddish color |deviation| > std DRAFT

PMP (heated tube) PN23 variability WLTP COLD start AVE ± STD HOT start AVE ± STD PN Emissions normalized to mean Reddish color |deviation| > std Emissions normalized to mean, Lab5 background removed Cond. STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 COLD START 19% 95 128 110 82 86 HOT START 12% 106 117 93 99 DRAFT

PMP (heated tube) PN10 variability WLTC Issues with LabPMP PCRF

Emissions normalized to mean, Lab2 excluded PMP (heated tube) PN10 variability WLTC HOT start AVE ± STD COLD start Emissions normalized to mean, Lab2 excluded Cond. STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 COLD START 19% 243 113 101 114 72 HOT START 16% 549 109 96 116 79 DRAFT

CS1 PN variability WLTC CS1 23nm variability, WLTC Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 condition STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 COLD START 16% 86 124 109 95 HOT START 12% 119 105 96 91 90 CS1 10nm variability, WLTC condition STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 COLD START 18% 78 114 107 117 85 HOT START 8% 113 103 100 93 92

Steady speeds DRAFT STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 2 100 98 99 104 3 102 CO2 variability Speed/gear STD Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Lab5 Lab6 100/4 2 100 98 99 104 120/5 3 102 96 100/3 1 50/2 Things to do: recheck labs normalization temperature DRAFT

PN measurement variability between labs Steady speeds Issues with LabPMP PCRF, to be solved… Lab4 missing CS1 data PN measurement variability between labs Speed/ gear PMP23 STD CS 23 PMP10 CS 10 100/4 11% 13% 27% 14% 120/5 6% 10% 8% 100/3 4% 19% 5% 50/2 22% 7% Lab5 excluded due to background problem DRAFT

Conclusions 1/2 CO2 emissions so far 1% (cold) and 2% (hot WLTC) variability due to one lab (probably). Excluding this lab the variability decreases to <1% and <1%, respectively Also at Steady tests at the lab showed elevated CO2 Reason for the deviation unclear, to be solved PMP systems: WLTC: Variability of 10nm results (16-19%) similar with 23nm (21-23%) Steady: Variability of 10nm results (19-27%) higher than 23nm (5-11%) CS1 WLTC: Variability of 10nm results (8-18 %) similar with 23nm (12-16%) Steady: Variability of 10nm results (7-14%) similar with 23nm (6-13%) PMP 10nm variability higher than CS1 10nm in steadys Todo check if Lab2 PMP PCRF can be verified/corrected

Conclusions 2/2 PMP and CS1 systems comparison: WLTC and Steady: EMISSIONS Generally at the same level In one lab PCRF problem, and in another background problem CS1 23nm (absolute) levels a bit lower than PMP23nm CS1 10nm (absolute) levels a bit higher than PMP23nm

Next… Some details to be verified from labs: recheck results. Analysis continued: Sub23nm, CS2, cycle phases Exercise continues Switzerland this month Then all instruments collected to JRC, maintenance if needed Then Japan

Any questions? Tero Lähde, Barouch Gieckhaskiel, Giorgio Martini Tero.LAHDE@ec.europa.eu, +39 0 332 785 449 Barouch.GIECHASKIEL@ec.europa.eu, +39 0 332 785 312, Giorgio.MARTINI@ec.europa.eu, +39 0 332 789 293