Intercalibration Results 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
River Fish Intercalibration group Coordination: D. Pont,Cemagref, France) N. Jepsen (JRC Ispra)
Advertisements

Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Lake Intercalibration: status of ongoing work Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
DRAFT Intercalibration of methods to evaluate river EQ using fish Niels Jepsen, JRC & Didier Pont, Cemagref.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
Lakes Intercalibration Results - July 2006 Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Lake Intercalibration Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
GIG plan updates GIG leads were requested to update their work plans
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
ECOSTAT, Bristol Hotel, Brussels,
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
IC network selection process
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
Working Group A ECOSTAT River GIG results Wouter van de Bund Vaida Olsauskyte Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
Results of the Coastal and Transitional Waters Metadata Analysis
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, 3-4 July 2006
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Summary progress report River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Lake Intercalibration
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
The normal balance of ingredients
Ecostat meeting - Ispra March 2006
Common Implementation Strategy for the
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
IC remaining gaps: overview and way forward
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River groups with extension
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
Lake Intercalibration
WFD CIS WG ECOSTAT meeting on 8-9 October 2007 Objectives What do we need to achieve during this meeting?
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
2nd phase intercalibration
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
MED-GIG: Mediterranean Coastal
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Intercalibration Results 2006 Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Ispra, Italy

MODERATE MODERATE HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD ECOLOGICAL STATUS HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD ECOLOGICAL STATUS ECOLOGICAL STATUS HIGH IC = to harmonise the understanding of ‘good ecological status’ throughout all member states HIGH GOOD Restore MODERATE POOR BAD Restore

Intercalibration results 2006/2007 GIG ↓ Biological quality elements → Macro-invertebrates Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll) Phytoplankton (composition & abundance) Phytobenthos Macrophytes Macroalgae Angiosperm Fish Rivers Alpine June 2006 Not applicable June 2007 Rivers Central Baltic Sep 2006 Rivers Eastern Cont. Rivers Mediterranean Rivers Northern Lakes Alpine Lakes Atlantic Lakes Central Baltic Lakes Mediterranean (reservoirs) Lakes Northern Coast/Trans NEA Coast/Trans Med Coast/Trans Baltic Sea Coast/Trans Black Sea

LAKES ?

ATL ALP C/B MED reservo NORD CHL 2006 PHY 2007 MACR Start Not applicable BENTHIC (acid.) 2007 (acid.) FISH

Chlorophyll boundaries

All GIGs have set : Reference values High/Good boundaries Good/Moderate boundaries (ATL has not agreed)

Mildly eutrophic Mesotrophy Transparency 1-3 m supportive of all swimmable/aesthetic uses but threatened Mesotrophy Transparency 3-6 m - Fully supportive of all swimmable/aesthetic uses

We have set reference conditions and quality aims for European lakes ! Eutrophication – most important pressure Chlorophyll – simple and reliable measure of eutrophication (The best possible) base for RBMP

2. Rivers ?

Sept 06 June 2007 Jun 07 (pilot) June 06 NO CB ALP MED EC Macro-invertebr. Phytoben-thos Macrophytes Fish NO Sept 06 June 2007 Jun 07 (pilot) CB ALP June 06 Not relevant MED EC

Focus on macroinvertebrates (all GIGs) Phytobenthos and macrophytes work initiated Strong focus on ‘general pressure’ Acidification included for Northern GIG Many of the national methods that will be intercalibrated are still in development

Raw data is not directly comparable between MS due to lack of standardisation All data normalised to reference conditions Comparison of classification results through Intercalibration Commom Metrics (ICM) Result: National classification systems – harmonized boundaries

Ecological Quality Ratios for the national classification systems Type and country Ecological Quality Ratios for the national classification systems High-Good boundary Good-Moderate boundary Type R-A1 Austria 0,80 0,60 France 0,93 0,79 Germany Italy 0,91 0,72 Slovenia Type R-A2 France alp 0,71 France pyr 0,94 0,81 Spain 0,83 0,51 0,75

3. Coastal waters ?

NEA Med Baltic Black Macro-invertebr Phyto chlor Compo sition Macro algae Angio sperms Fish NEA June 06 June 2006 June 2007 Med Baltic Sep 06 Sep 2006 Not relevant Black

IC steering group produces a draft Commission Decision a technical report on the results of the intercalibration exercise submitted for ECOSTAT and discussed on the meeting in October 12-13 delivered to SCG and WFD Committee

2. Continuation in 2007 Results – June 2007 SCG/ WFD Committe meeting Oct 2007 3. Maybe beyond 2007 ?