Chrono::FEA Validation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FE analysis with shell and axisymmetric elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Advertisements

Higher-order Linked Interpolation in Thick Plate Finite Elements
FE analysis with beam elements
STRUCTURAL WRINKLING PREDICTIONS FOR MEMBRANE SPACE STRUCTURES
LOCKING IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Beams and Frames.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
Finite Element Primer for Engineers: Part 2
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
Experimental Study on the Damage Evolution of Re-bar Concrete Interface Lu Xinzheng SCE, THU CSE, NTU 1999/2000.
FE analysis with bar elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Hydro-Forming a Steel Tube Finite Element Model Design Greg Wilmes Finite Element Method MIE 605 – Spring 2003.
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Fracture and Fragmentation of Thin-Shells Fehmi Cirak Michael Ortiz, Anna Pandolfi California Institute of Technology.
Identified Company (CompositeX) to manufacture Custom Composite Pressure Vessel ● Working pressure 1000psi ● Holds 8 kg Nitrous Oxide ● 700 cubic inch.
ME300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods Finite Element Analysis of Plane Elasticity.
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
MECH593 Introduction to Finite Element Methods
Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.
Finite Element Modeling and Analysis with a Biomechanical Application Alexandra Schönning, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering University of North Florida ASME.
Outline Lesson 1. Introduction to ANSYS Lesson 2. Basics Lesson 3. Solution phases Lesson 4. Modeling Lesson 5. Material Lesson 6. Loading Lesson 7. Solution.
Technical University of Łódź Department of Strength of Material and Structures M.Kotelko, Z. Kołakowski, R.J. Mania LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY OF THIN-WALLED.
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A one-field discontinuous Galerkin formulation of non-linear Kirchhoff-Love shells Ludovic Noels Computational.
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
Analytical Vs Numerical Analysis in Solid Mechanics Dr. Arturo A. Fuentes Created by: Krishna Teja Gudapati.
Geometrically Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of a Composite Reflector K.J. Lee, G.V. Clarke, S.W. Lee, and K. Segal FEMCI WORKSHOP May 17, 2001.
1 Exact 3D Stress Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells by Sampling Surfaces Method G.M. Kulikov and S.V. Plotnikova Speaker: Gennady Kulikov.
Tutorial 3: Plane Beam.
Crashworthiness Simulation of ET2000 Guardrail Extruder Terminal.
1 3D Exact Analysis of Functionally Graded and Laminated Piezoelectric Plates and Shells G.M. Kulikov and S.V. Plotnikova Speaker: Svetlana Plotnikova.
1 A New Concept of Sampling Surfaces in Shell Theory S.V. Plotnikova and G.M. Kulikov Speaker: Professor Gennady M. Kulikov Department of Applied Mathematics.
GIGATRACKER SUPPORTING PLATE COOLING SYSTEM SIMULATION 1Vittore Carassiti - INFN FECERN, 11/12/2007.
A New Discontinuous Galerkin Formulation for Kirchhoff-Love Shells
Analysis of Gossamer Space Structures Using Assumed Strain Formulation Solid Shell Elements Keejoo Lee and Sung W. Lee Department of Aerospace Engineering.
A New Concept of Sampling Surfaces and its Implementation for Layered and Functionally Graded Doubly-Curved Shells G.M. Kulikov, S.V. Plotnikova and.
1 Non-Linear Piezoelectric Exact Geometry Solid-Shell Element Based on 9-Parameter Model Gennady M. Kulikov Department of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods Chapter 6 Finite Element Analysis of Plane Elasticity.
ME 160 Introduction to Finite Element Method-Spring 2016 Topics for Term Projects by Teams of 2 Students Instructor: Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor, Dept. of Mechanical.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
APPROACH FOR THE SOLUTION OF A SIMPLIFIED REISSNER THEORY OF ELASTIC PLATES - APPLICATION IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY- ICSAT
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
Summary Chapter 13. Training Manual March 15, 2001 Inventory # Chapter Objectives In this chapter, a review will be given of the basic concepts.
Overview, structure, capabilities
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Outer Shell (fuel grain housing) Inner Shell (NOS/rocket housing)
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Overview, structure, capabilities
SECTION 8 CHOICE OF ELEMENTS: INTEGRATION METHODS.
Explicit Methods in Quasi-Static Analyses of Rubber-Like Materials
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Physical-Model-Based Data Interpretation
Fig 6. Procedure for generating NURBS mesh at a junction of fibers
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
326MAE (Stress and Dynamic Analysis) 340MAE (Extended Stress and Dynamic Analysis)
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
FIDAP Numerical Modeling
Numerical Analysis of a Beam
3D-Light-Trans Project
Dragan RIBARIĆ, Gordan JELENIĆ
University of Liège Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
ME 323 Final Lecture – April 2012
Anomalous Flexural Behaviors of Microtubules
Finite element analysis of the wrinkling of orthotropic membranes
Presentation transcript:

Chrono::FEA Validation

ANCF Cable ANCF cable elements validated against published literature (see unit test test_ANCFCable.cpp) *Chrono’s implementation has been verified against: Gerstmayr and Shabana, 2006, “Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation”, Nonlinear Dynamics 45: 109–130

ANCF Beam ANCF cable elements validated against published literature (see unit test utest_ANCFBeam.cpp) H = 0.5m; W = 0.1m; L = 2.0m; 4 ANCF finite elements E = 2.07e11 Pa; Poisson ratio = 0.3; k1,k2 Timoshenko coefficients Force = -5e5 0.53 N Results match up to numerical precision with published in the literature: "Structural and continuum mechanics approaches for a 3D shear deformable ANCF beam finite element: Application to static and linearized dynamic examples", Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, April 2013, Vol. 8/021004. Verified for small and large deformation

ANCF shell Isotropic test_ANCFShell_Iso.cpp Dimensions E (MPa) G (MPa) Density Vertical Force Simulation type Ansys element Converged disp 1mx1mx0.01m 210 80.8 500 kg/m3 -50N Dynamic Shell181 (EAS) -0.649m

ANCF shell Orthotropic and Composite test_ANCFShell_Ort.cpp Dimensions Ex (MPa) G (MPa) Ey=Ez (MPa) Density Vertical Force Simulation type Number of layers Thickness of each layer Fiber angle Converged disp. 1mx1mx 0.01m 200 38.5 100 500 kg/m3 -10N Dynamic 2 0.005m 20 degrees -0.80207m

EAS Brick element Isotropic and MR 8-noded brick element test_EASBrickIso.cpp test_EASBrickMooneyR_Grav.cpp 8-noded brick element Classical tri-linear element Implements Enhanced Assumed Strain formulation to alleaviate locking Constitutive equations: Linear isotropic and Mooney-Rivlin Dimensions C10 (kPa) C01 (kPa) Vertical Force Simulation type Converged disp. 1mx1mx 0.1m 50 10 -50N Dynamic -0.5762 m Plate geometry made up of brick elements

Brick 9: Capped Drucker-Prager –Punch Test Soil Material Properties Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Applied force : Contact stiffness : 165000 N/m Contact detection threshold : 0.009m Element number : 12*12*8 Soil box dimension : 0.48m*0.48*0.6m Rigid punch dimension : 0.2m*0.2m*0.1m Bottom node fixed Chrono verification parameters

Corotational Euler-Bernoulli beam: Princeton benchmark L =0:508m, T = 3.2024mm, H = 12.77mm, Young modulus E = 71.7GPa, Poisson ratio= 0.31, G = 27.37GPa. Three loading conditions are tested: P1 = 4:448N, P2 = 8:896N, P3 =13:345N for increasing values of the angle More info: Tasora, A. “Validation of Euler-Bernoulli corotational beams in Chrono::Engine”, Chrono white paper

Kinematically exact Reissner shell element Clamped half cylinder with sliding constraints at the sides Large bending in a rolled band Comparison with results in literature and with analytical solutions