BEYOND STANDARDS. BEYOND STANDARDS Expand knowledge of learning targets; Identify and compare learning targets and standards statements; Engage in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Advertisements

Current Comfort Level with Learning Targets
Copyright ©2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Gary D. Borich Effective Teaching Methods, 6e Gary.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Classroom Assessment FOR Learning Focus for Today Key 2: Clear Targets.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership September 23, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
WeLCOME! Winter 2015 Elementary Learning Labs
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Learning Targets January 21, 2008 Londa Richter & Jo Hartmann TIE.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Sheltered Instruction: Making Content Comprehensible for ELLs London Middle School April 18, 2008.
A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching Specialists Milwaukee Public Schools
Framework for Teaching Effective Lesson Planning.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Formative Assessment and Feedback to Improve Writing CONVENING III, SECTION I.
Growing Teachers to Grow Students: Part I October 9, 2015.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Target Goals in The Classroom By: Bethany Cocchi.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Learning Assessment Techniques
Student Centered Coaching
academic language development
Assessment.
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
Nature of questioning in the classroom
Assessment.
Foundational Services
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
As You Enter Take a moment to network and exchange contact information from those in the room you do not have yet.
The Learner Centered Classroom
Meeting the Reading Standards in Secondary Classrooms
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Understanding by Design
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Direct-Reach Teachers
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
The Art and Science of Teaching
Respect for People March 22, 2018.
FACULTY MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2017.
Assessment and Instructional Planning
CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Personalize Practice with Accelerated Math
GRADE LEVEL MEETINGS Fri., Sept. 15, 2017
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Do nows & Exit Tickets.
EFFECTIVE QUESTIONING
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Planning and Preparation
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
AVID Professional Learning
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Listening For Accountable Talk
Pre-Kindergarten Performance Assessment: Story Retelling
Nevada Educator Performance Teacher Framework
Exploring the Instructional Shifts Inherent in the 2020 CAS
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
Presentation transcript:

BEYOND STANDARDS

Expand knowledge of learning targets; Identify and compare learning targets and standards statements; Engage in PLC discussions about learning targets and their role in determining “What is this lesson’s reason to live?”

What is your definition of a learning target? Now ENGAGE with a shoulder partner and EXPLORE the concept of learning targets by EXPLAINING your definition of a learning target. ENGAGE

EXPLAIN On this slide, you will see an expanded definition of a Learning Target. This definition is based on research by Danielson, Stiggins, Moss and Brookhart. As you can see, there are several components of the definition, and we are already familiar with some of them. We typically have used Learning targets to guide instruction and inform students about what they will be learning which we believe empowers students in the learning process. This definition expands on our previous knowledge by adding several additional and essential components. These components are Unpacked, lesson-size amounts of learning that are performance based and part of a rigorous learning trajectory, reflecting different types of learning.

EXPLORE how this definition is similar to the one that you wrote and how it may differ from past practices. Ask the participants to take a few minutes to EXPLORE how this definition is similar to the one that they wrote and how it may differ from past practice by sharing with a shoulder partner. Next we will be talking about four key understandings. As you listen consider how these key understandings expand your definition of a learning target. EXPLORE

 Setting and committing to specific, appropriate, and challenging goals lead to increased student achievement and motivation to learn. Key Idea #1 Our first key understanding is “Setting and committing to specific, appropriate, and challenging goals lead to increased student achievement and motivation to learn.”   (Thinking Pause = 5 seconds) As mentioned before, we typically have used Learning targets to guide instruction and inform students about what they will be learning which we believe empowers them in the learning process. From here we will expand our own understanding. (Point out the two hexagons that meet this key understanding.) EXPLAIN

Learning targets describe exactly what students will learn, how well they will learn it and what they will do to demonstrate that learning. Key Idea #2 Our second key understanding is that “Learning targets describe exactly what students will learn, how well they will learn it and what they will do to demonstrate that learning.”   (Thinking Pause = 5 seconds) Typically, our learning targets have stated what students will learn. This key understanding recognizes two additional aspects of learning targets that we have not considered previously, namely, how well student will learn and what they will do to demonstrate that learning. Learning targets go beyond our Standards. The components of the definition that relate to this key understanding include guiding instruction through a rigorous learning trajectory with a performance-based outcome. (point out the 3 hexagon components on the slide) You may notice the connection between the Defour PLC questions and this key understanding about learning targets. EXPLAIN

Learning targets reflect different types of learning: (Stiggins)knowledge, reasoning, skills and products. Danielson also indicates that outcomes reflect a variety of types of learning. Key Idea #3 Education Services In this key understanding, “learning targets reflect different types of learning: (Stiggins) knowledge, reasoning, skills, and products. Danielson also indicates that outcomes reflect a variety of types of learning.”   (Thinking Pause = 5 seconds) We recognize that learning targets should reflect different kinds of learning. This means that while knowledge is essential, students must also be expected to think, reason, demonstrate skills and create products. Knowledge: Knowledge targets represent the factual underpinnings in each discipline. Often stated using verbs such as knows, lists, names, identifies and recalls. Reasoning: Reasoning targets represent both deductive and inductive processes such as predicts, infers, classifies, hypothesizes, compares, concludes, summarizes, analyzes, evaluates and generalizes. Performance Skill: a performance that must be demonstrated and observed, heard or seen to be assessed. Product: artifact that represents the knowledge, reasoning and skills learned Learning targets convey to students the learning that is valued and how it will be measured. The components of the definition that relate to this key understanding include performance based assessments that empower students as they reflect on different types of learning (point out the 3 hexagon components on the slide). EXPLAIN

What is this lesson’s reason to live? Lessons with learning targets reflect rigorous and transparent expectations. They serve a purpose in a longer learning trajectory toward a larger learning goal. Key Idea #4 What is this lesson’s reason to live? In this final key understanding, “lessons with learning targets reflect rigorous and transparent expectations. They serve a purpose in a longer learning trajectory toward a larger learning goal”   We ask the question: What is this lesson’s reason to live? (Thinking Pause = 5 seconds) Learning targets establish meaningful chunks of learning on a continuum along the way and over a long trajectory toward a larger goal. An effective LT must be clear to students and provide them with a rationale for why what you are asking them to do will demonstrate their understanding. Learning targets go beyond our Standards The components of the definition that relate to this key understanding include all components of the learning target definition as shown in the graphic. EXPLAIN

Handout the article “How to Design Targets” and give the participants 5 minutes to read the article up until the STOP sign. At that point you will ask the participants to engage in table talk.   Give approximately 5 minutes for table talk. Talk about the connection between standards, learning objectives and learning targets EXPLORE EXPLORE

STANDARDS VS. LEARNING TARGETS EVALUATE Explain activity: In pairs, participants sort activity cards into standards versus learning targets. Pass out a baggie with the activity cards to each pair. Let them know that the examples are both elementary and secondary. Allow approximately 10 minutes.   Have about a 5 minute share out of what they found to be learning targets.

Direct participants back to the article Direct participants back to the article. Give them 5 minutes to read the article starting after the STOP sign.   Give approximately 3 minutes for table talk. Talk about how this feels similar or different from what you have been preparing learning targets to drive instruction and assessments in your classroom. EXPLORE ELABORATE

Connie M. Moss and Susan M. Brookhart “An effective learning target must speak to students, express the essentials of the lesson, and provide students with a rationale for why what you are asking them to do is in fact a performance of understanding.” Connie M. Moss and Susan M. Brookhart Learning Targets: Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Today’s Lesson Quote: p.32 Learning targets go beyond our Standards. Learning Target

Additional Resources Moss, Connie M., and Susan M. Brookhart. Learning Targets: Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Today's Lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2012. Print.   Moss, Connie M., Susan M. Brookhart, and Beverly A. Long. "Knowing Your Learning Target." Educational Leadership 68.6 (2011): 66-69. Web. Chappuis, Jan. Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2009. Print. Stiggins, Richard J., Judith A. Arter, Jan Chappuis, and Stephen Chappuis. Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right -- Using It Well. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2007. Print. Resources cited: Moss, Connie M., and Susan M. Brookhart. Learning Targets: Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Today's Lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2012. Print. (CAN BE FOUND IN OUR GALE VIRTUAL)   Moss, Connie M., Susan M. Brookhart, and Beverly A. Long. "Knowing Your Learning Target." Educational Leadership 68.6 (2011): 66-69. Web. Chappuis, Jan. Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2009. Print. Stiggins, Richard J., Judith A. Arter, Jan Chappuis, and Stephen Chappuis. Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right -- Using It Well. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2007. Print. Gale Virtual Library: book Learning Targets: Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Today’s Lesson by Susan Brookhart and Connie Moss Knowing your Learning Target article Brookhart -attached to PD package