CMAS 2018 conference Chi-tsan Wang

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David J. Sailor1 and Hongli Fan2 1. Portland State University
Advertisements

NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
Modeling the Role of Oil and Gas Emissions on Regional Ozone in the Intermountain West: Using CAMx HDDM for W126 Ozone Mike Barna, NPS-ARD Tammy Thompson,
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Sensitivity to changes in HONO emissions from mobile sources simulated for Houston area Beata Czader, Yunsoo Choi, Lijun Diao University of Houston Department.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.
Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds by Plants Carbon Metabolism and Atmospheric Chemistry Kolby Jardine Amazon-PIRE Field Course June 2010.
Future prediction of tropospheric ozone over south and east Asia in 2030 Satoru Chatani* Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc. Markus Amann and Zbigniew Klimont.
New York City Case Study: Methods of Analysis David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Syracuse, NY.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
The Net Effects of Vegetation on Air Quality June 28, 2001.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Determining Alternative Futures - Urban Development Effects on Air Quality Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin and Darko Koracin May 2007 Zagreb, Croatia.
UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT OPTIONS UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
BVOC profiles at the Amazonian Tall Tower Observatory site.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Updates to model algorithms and inputs for the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) model Jesse Bash, Kirk Baker, George Pouliot, Donna Schwede,
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Forecasting Air quality in China Using CAMS Boundary Conditions: the PANDA Project Guy P. Brasseur and Idir Bouarar June 206.
Ozone Sensitivity to Nitric Oxide Emissions in WRF-Chem
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Off-line Air Quality Modeling Paradigms:
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Andrea Fraser DIAC PhD student Supervised by Prof. H ApSimon
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
High-resolution air quality forecasting for Hong Kong
Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U. S
Photochemical Modeling of Industrial Flare Plumes with SCICHEM 3.1
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
Source apportionment of reactive nitrogen deposition
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
17th Annual CMAS Conference
Wildfires Impacts on Regional Air Quality A Case Study on Colorado
Lindsey Gulden Physical Climatology December 1, 2005
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Lily Li, Qing Lu, Jingyu An, Cheng Huang
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
5th Annual CMAS Conference Friday Center Chapel Hill, NC 10/17/2006
Development of a 2007-Based Air Quality Modeling Platform
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Increasing Canopy Cover in Urban Areas
GOME HCHO JULY 1996 (molec cm-2)
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Biogenic Emissions in Southeast Texas
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
Georgia Institute of Technology
UNCERTAINTIES IN ATMOSPHERIC MODELLING
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Potential applications of small sensor technology at the nexus of land-atmosphere-society Kirsti Ashworth, Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellow,
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

CMAS 2018 conference Chi-tsan Wang The predicted impact of VOC emissions from Cannabis spp. cultivation facilities on ozone concentrations in Denver, CO. Chi-tsan Wang1, Christine Wiedinmyer2, Kirsti Ashworth3, John Ortega4, Peter Harley, William Vizuete*1 CMAS 2018 conference Chi-tsan Wang Oct 24, 2018

Cannabis industry status in the US and Colorado 2018 CDOR

Can Cannabis industry impact regional air quality? The biogenic VOC concentrations range are reported in the Cannabis Cultivational Facilities (CCF) (Martyny 2013) : Vegetative rooms is 50-100 ppb Flower room: 800ppb Trim room: 6ppm (Martyny 2013) https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/commercial-marijuana-grow-operation-631014320?src=4fLy_muzSLGlLQDXBvVUBQ-1-7 https://images1.westword.com/imager/u/original/9206625/den_011217_veritas_grow_slentz009.jpg http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129956/20160202/this-is-what-happens-when-you-use-marijuana-every-day-for-five-years.htm

The cannabis emission capacities (µgC g-1 hr-1 ) The BVOC emission compositions are vary by different growth stages and different strains. The emission capacities EC (µgC g-1 hr-1 ) for all terpenoids among the three strains is about 5-9 (µgC g-1 hr-1 ) (Wang 2018 accepted)

Why the BVOC emissions from CCFs are important in Denver? Marginal (2015) Moderate (2016) Moderate (2017)

The Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) model Air Quality Model (WAQS2011b) This model was developed in 2017 and it’s the latest model for state implementation plan (SIP). CAMx6.10, 90days(6/15~9/15), from Intermountain West Data Warehouse (IWDW) Emission : 2011 NEI, MEGAN Meteorological data: WRF Chemical mechanism : CB6r2 Process Analysis was enabled We can not compare the model result with monitoring data, because the model year is 2011 and the cannabis industry started in 2014. The 36km x 36km Western Air Quality Model Study (WAQS) and nested inner 12km x 12km domains (dark green) and 4km x 4km domains (light green) for the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx).

The Cannabis emission estimate for the model: What factors should be considered for emission estimate? Emission factors and emission composition for flower plant (µgC g-1 hr-1 ) Dry plant weight (g) Cannabis strains Plant counts for each facility Ventilation rate (scfm) Operating condition: light, temperature, humidity. The type of facilities and their locations. https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/commercial-marijuana-grow-operation-631014320?src=4fLy_muzSLGlLQDXBvVUBQ-1-7

Model study assumption for cannabis industry All Monoterpenes emissions from Marijuana are simplified to a single TERP species in the CB6r2 mechanism. We assumed the temperature is 30ºC and light energy is 1000 mol m-2 s-1 , 24/7 at same condition. The emission rate is constant. We assumed all Biogenic VOCs from the plants are directly released into atmosphere, there are no chemical loss, wall loss and No emission control in CCF.

Ensemble Model scenarios setup The factors for each facility : Emission Capacities, Dry plant weight, Plant count Scenario name EC (ug/g/hr) Dry biomass weight (g/plant) Plant count in Retail MCF Plant count in Medical MCF BC 1_EC 10 1500 1800 3600 2_EC 50 3_EC 100 4_DW 750 5_DW 2500 6_PC 1000 7_PC 6000 8_PC 10000 9_MAX Terpene emission rate in each facility = EC x Dry plant weight x plant count

How the cannabis industry emission rate affect the Biogenic VOC emission in Colorado and Denver? +14% +0.15% +1.2%

How the cannabis industry emission rate affect the Biogenic VOC emission in Colorado and Denver? +8500% +1301% +894% +781% +745% 22458 +447% +90% +154% +224%

8-hour ozone difference in 90days Day time 8-hr ozone change : 0.1-6.4 ppb Night time 8-hr ozone change : 0.3-8.7 ppb

Maximum hourly ozone difference in 90 days

Case study for daytime and night time ozone Case description Date DM8H in AQS (ppb) DM8H in model base case Day time increase at 9AM(ppb) Night time increase at 1AM (ppb) Early morning increase at 6 AM (ppb) Max daytime ozone increase Jul 18 86 91.05 12.7 8.7 5.3 Max nighttime ozone increase Jul 31 83 76.08 3.5 10.6 8.1 Early morning ozone increase Aug 28 70 71.73 6.7 8.2 13.4

Conclusion: Yes, the model prediction suggest that 0.13-6.4ppb impact on daytime 8 hour ozone.(one hour ozone impact is 0.3-13ppb) Lacking of data for plant count, emission rate data for different strains and dry plant weight. There is a lot of uncertainty in this model study. (Terpene emission range in Colorado is from 490 - 49000 ton/year) Daytime ozone increase is driven by the injection of Highly reactive VOC (terpene) emission in urban area. Nighttime terpene react with NO3 , and generate more organic nitrate and RO2 radicals. This additional terpene emission impact the NOx budget, and remove N2O5 at night.

Thank you Acknowledgement : NCAR Advanced Study Program(ASP) Fellowship Intermountain West Data Warehouse (IWDW) Advisor: Dr. William Vizuete Dr. Christine Wiedinmyer Dr. Kirsti Ashworth Dr. Peter Harley Dr. John Ortega Dr. Jason Surratt Dr. Michael Barna Dr. Feng-Chi Hsu(David Hsu) Grant Josenhans