Inverse Lorentz transformation from primed to unprimed system

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relativistic mechanics
Advertisements

1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #7 Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Momentum and Energy Relationship between relativistic quantities.
Classical Doppler Shift Anyone who has watched auto racing on TV is aware of the Doppler shift. As a race car approaches the camera, the sound of its engine.
Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Einstein’s.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations
1 2.1The Need for Ether 2.2The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3Einstein’s Postulates 2.4The Lorentz Transformation 2.5Time Dilation and Length Contraction.
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 39 Relativity (Cont.)
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
Physics 334 Modern Physics Credits: Material for this PowerPoint was adopted from Rick Trebino’s lectures from Georgia Tech which were based on the textbook.
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity
Announcements Homework: Supplemental Problems 2 nd Project is due at the final exam which is Tuesday May 5 at 1:30 – 3:30pm. A list of potential projects.
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations defining velocities as: u x = dx/dt, u y = dy/dt, u’ x = dx’/dt’, etc. it is easily shown that: With similar relations.
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
2.1The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3Einstein’s Postulates 2.4The Lorentz Transformation 2.5Time Dilation and Length Contraction.
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
The Special Theory of Relativity. Galilean-Newtonian Relativity Definition of an inertial reference frame: One in which Newton’s first law is valid Earth.
Announcements Exam 3 is Monday April 13. Will cover the rest of Chapter 4, all of Chapters 5, 6, 7 & 8. New Sample Questions that include Chapter 8 are.
Special Relativity: “all motion is relative”
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition The Twin Paradox Space-time.
Special Relativity The Failure of Galilean Transformations
It’s all Relativity. March, 1905: Twenty six year old Albert Einstein demonstrates the particle nature of light by explaining the photoelectric effect.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Relativity: QuarkNet Lecture. What we know circa 1900: Light travels at a finite velocity. Ole Rømer Galileo was among the first to try and measure.
Wed., Sept. 12, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Spacetime Diagram&
Phy 107 Fall From Last Time Physics changed drastically in the early 1900’s Relativity one of the new discoveries –Changed the way we think about.
Module 10Energy1 Module 10 Energy We start this module by looking at another collision in our two inertial frames. Last time we considered a perfectly.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions will be on CULearn by 5pm today. Next weeks.
Of the four fundamental forces choose the weakest one? a)Strong force b)Gravitational force c)Electromagnetic force d)Weak force.
Chapter 39 Relativity. A Brief Overview of Modern Physics 20 th Century revolution 1900 Max Planck Basic ideas leading to Quantum theory 1905 Einstein.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. Inertial frame Fig1. Frame S’ moves in the +x direction with the speed v relative to frame S.
Visual Guide to Special and General Relativity. This is about to get weird…
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Galilean Transformation Do we need Ether? Michelson-Morley Experiment Einstein’s.
1 Review: Special Relativity – Chapter 1 Postulates of relativity: 1. All physical laws are the same in all inertial reference frames 2. The speed of light.
PHYS344 Lecture 6 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
PHYS344 Lecture 7 Problem set 2 due on Wednesday the 16 th in class. Krane, Chapter 2: Problems 25, 26, 32, 33, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42 We will cover relativistic.
PHYS 342: More info The TA is Meng-Lin Wu: His is His office hour is 10:30am to 12pm on Mondays His office is Physics.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
Course Business: PHYS344 Lecture 6
Administrative Details: PHYS 344
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #9
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
The complete Lorentz Transformations Including the inverse (i
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5
Special Theory of Relativity
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Lecture 4: PHYS 344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 25 Modern Physics Relativity
Relativistic Momentum
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity
Chapter 37 Relativity.
Review for exam1.
Newtonian Relativity A reference frame in which Newton’s laws are valid is called an inertial frame Newtonian principle of relativity or Galilean invariance.
Special Relativity Jeffrey Eldred
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #7
M.Sc. Integrated Phsics (Ist Semester) Special Theory of Relativity
Relativistic Momentum
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
The Galilean Transformation
PHYS 3700 Modern Physics Prerequisites: PHYS 1212, MATH Useful to have PHYS 3900 or MATH 2700 (ordinary differential equations) as co-requisite,
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5
Chapter 37 Special Relativity
Special Relativity Chapter 1-Class4.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
2.11: Relativistic Momentum Because physicists believe that the conservation of momentum is fundamental, we begin by considering collisions where.
Presentation transcript:

Inverse Lorentz transformation from primed to unprimed system

The Lorentz Velocity Transformations defining velocities as: ux = dx/dt, uy = dy/dt, u’x = dx’/dt’, etc. it is easily shown that: With similar relations for uy and uz:

The Lorentz Velocity Transformations In addition to the previous relations, the Lorentz velocity transformations for u’x, u’y , and u’z can be obtained by switching primed and unprimed and changing v to –v:

The Lorentz Velocity Transformations: an object moves with the speed of light u’x = c (light or, if neutrinos are massless, they must travel at the speed of light)

Doppler effect source and receiver approaching λ=(c-v)t/n=λ0(1-v/c) f=1/T=1/(λ/c)=f0/(1-v/c) source receiver Light wave proper period seen in the source frame T0 (f0=1/ T0) v period in the observer’s frame T=T0 light, x=ct=n source, x=vt x=(c-v)t=nλ’ Source and receiver receding: Astronomical redshift

Another example with Doppler effect: laser cooling of atoms Example: DOPPLER EFFECT IN Fast ion beam precision laser spectroscopy IN collinear and anti-collinear Geometries referenced TO a frequency comb Another example with Doppler effect: laser cooling of atoms

Cancellation of relativistic frequency shifts by combining collinear and anticollinear measurements Frequency of light perceived by a moving ion   Laser tuned to resonance; the perceived frequency equals the transition frequency Thus, the resonance frequencies for collinear geometry and for anticollinear geometry To obtain the transition frequency we take the product and this is an exact relativistic formula!

Closest star to the solar system( 4.37 light years)

RV search for exo - Planets Radial Velocity Variations induced by exo-planets ~860 discovered in 12 years with RV technique A planet orbiting a star will induce a wobbling motion of the star around their common center of gravity. The period of the modulation is given by the planet’s orbital period P, and the modulation depth is dependent on the mass ratio of star and planet Mp/M

StoRy of GoldiLocks & the 3 bears Once upon a time, there was a little girl named Goldilocks. She went for a walk in the forest. Pretty soon, she came upon a house. She knocked, and when no one answered, she walked right in… At the table in the kitchen, there were three bowls of porridge. “This porridge is too hot!” “This porridge is too cold!” “This porridge is just right!” She also tried out each of the three chairs and three beds. Too big, Too small, Too hard, Too soft, and Just Right

Ion traps used for studies of ions, ion crystals and their interactions with light Quadrupole ion traps Ion crystal Cooling Laser 100µm Vacuum ~5.8E-10mbar Trap RF Vpp ~32V Copied from “2009MURI-dCorr.ppt”

Fluorescence images of separate ions, forming ion crystals in a quadrupole ion trap The long linear chain ion crystals contain sympathetically cooled molecular ions such as MgH+,H2+ and H3+ in the dark spots. Mg+ ion crystals at about 1 mK. Copied from “2009MURI-dCorr.ppt” t=0 Min Evolution of an ion crystal. Vacuum ~2.8E-10mbar Trap RF Vpp ~550V t=30 Min t=60 Min 100µm Cooling Laser

2.6 #31

2.6 #32 Solution:

2.7: Experimental Verification Time Dilation and Muon Decay Figure 2.18: The number of muons detected with speeds near 0.98c is much different (a) on top of a mountain than (b) at sea level, because of the muon’s decay. The experimental result agrees with our time dilation equation.

v=0.98c

Atomic Clock Measurement Figure 2.20: Ttwo airplanes took off (at different times) from Washington, D.C., where the U.S. Naval Observatory is located. The airplanes traveled east and west around Earth as it rotated. Atomic clocks on the airplanes were compared with similar clocks kept at the observatory to show that the moving clocks in the airplanes ran differently.

Flight time (41.2 h) (48.6 h) The time is changing in the moving frame, but the calculations must also take into account corrections due to general relativity (Einstein). Analysis shows that the special theory of relativity is verified within the experimental uncertainties.

2.11: Relativistic Momentum Because physicists believe that the conservation of momentum is fundamental, we begin by considering collisions where there do not exist external forces and dP/dt = Fext = 0

Relativistic Momentum Frank (fixed or stationary system) is at rest in system K holding a ball of mass m. Mary (moving system) holds a similar ball in system K that is moving in the x direction with velocity v with respect to system K. Add paragraph from figure 2.29

Relativistic Momentum If we use the definition of momentum, the momentum of the ball thrown by Frank is entirely in the y direction: pFy = mu0 The change of momentum as observed by Frank is ΔpF = ΔpFy = −2mu0

According to Mary (the Moving frame) Mary measures the initial velocity of her own ball to be u’Mx = 0 and u’My = −u0. In order to determine the velocity of Mary’s ball as measured by Frank we use the velocity transformation equations: (we used velocity summation formula with ux=0)

Relativistic Momentum Before the collision, the momentum of Mary’s ball as measured by Frank (the Fixed frame) becomes Before For a perfectly elastic collision, the momentum after the collision is After The change in momentum of Mary’s ball according to Frank is (2.42) Spaced a bit more evenly (2.43) (2.44)

Relativistic Momentum (con’t) The conservation of linear momentum requires the total change in momentum of the collision, ΔpF + ΔpM, to be zero. The addition of Equations (2.40) and (2.44) clearly does not give zero. Linear momentum is not conserved if we use the conventions for momentum from classical physics even if we use the velocity transformation equations from the special theory of relativity. There is no problem with the x direction, but there is a problem with the y direction along the direction the ball is thrown in each system. ΔpF = ΔpFy = −2mu0

Relativistic Momentum Rather than abandon the conservation of linear momentum, let us look for a modification of the definition of linear momentum that preserves both it and Newton’s second law. To do so requires reexamining mass to conclude that: Relativistic momentum (2.48) u=speed of particle

With modified (relativistic) momentum Now ΔpF + ΔpM =0 and momentum conserved!

Relativistic Momentum: two points of view physicists like to refer to the mass in Equation (2.48) as the rest mass m0 and call the term m = γm0 the relativistic mass. In this manner the classical form of momentum, p=mu, is retained. The mass is then imagined to increase at high speeds. other physicists prefer to keep the concept of mass as an invariant, intrinsic property of an object. We adopt this latter approach and will use the term mass exclusively to mean rest mass.

Behavior of relativistic momentum and classical momentum for v/c->1

2.11 #60 (a)

Spacetime diagrams(Minkowski) For two events lightlines Spacetime interval lightlike spacelike Causality: cause-and-effect relations Invariant: timelike Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons and John Walker

Twin Paradox (Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons)