M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Wake Fields and Beam Dynamics Kai Meng Hock. 2 Overview Research Interests –Wake fields Electromagnetic fields are induced by charged particles interacting.
Advertisements

Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
LONGITUDINAL (IN)STABILITY WITH BATCH INJECTION T. Argyropoulos, P. Baudrenghien, C. Bhat, J. E. Muller, T. Mastoridis, G. Papotti, E. Shaposhnikova,
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
PRISM experiment on EMMA Test Non-Scaling optics for PRISM ¼ of the synchrotron oscillation takes ~3 turns in EMMA and ~6 turns in PRISM. Experimental.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Strategy for SPS 200 MHz LLRF upgrade (1)  Each of the four cavities (2x 5 sections, 2x 4 sections):  1-T Feedback (loop around cavity and amplifier)
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
CAN WE BUILD A SINGLE BUNCH FEEDBACK Eric Plouviez ESRF Diagnostic group.
Elias Métral, CERN Accelerator School, Darmstadt, Germany, October 3rd, 2009 /221 TRANSVERSE INSTABILITIES E. Métral (CERN) Time (20 ns/div)  The purpose.
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Summary of Booster Dampers Systems Dave McGinnis December 7, 2010.
Fast feedback, studies and possible collaborations Alessandro Drago INFN-LNF ILCDR07 Damping Rings R&D Meeting 5-7 March 2007.
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
L. Ventura, H. Damerau, G. Sterbini MSWG MEETING, June 19 th 2015 Acknowledgements: S. Gilardoni, M. Haase, M. Migliorati, M. Paoluzzi, D. Perrelet. 1.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Coupled bunch instabilities in the CERN PS
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS IN THE LHC INJECTORS Discussion on Landau damping Ibon Santiago González Summer Student Session 2007.
Digital LLRF: ALBA and Max-IV cases RF&Linac Section - ALBA Accelerators Division Angela Salom.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Stéphanie Hustache-Ottini S LEIL SYNCHROTRON iWoRID 2011 – 140 – July 5 th Towards ps and fs diffraction with the XPAD detector S. Hustache-Ottini 1, J.-C.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Measuring Chromaticity Beam Dynamics meets Diagnostics Workshop Florence, Italy 4 th – 6 th November, 2015 Dr. Rhodri Jones Head of the CERN Beam Instrumentation.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Accumulation Experiments with Stochastic Cooling in the ESR
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Hofmann TU Darmstadt
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
First Idea on Bunch to Bucket Transfer for FAIR
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
Multiturn extraction for PS2
E. Métral, G. Rumolo, R. Tomás (CERN Switzerland), B
Limits on damping times
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
DEMONSTRATION OF TRIPLE BUNCH SPLITTING IN THE CERN PS
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Basic concept for a SIS100 longitudinal feedback system damping coupled- and within-bunch modes M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2) 1)GSI, Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, D-64291 Darmstadt 2)Hochschule Fulda, Marquardstraße 35, D-36039 Fulda Abstract Simulation of Operation Principle for m = 2 For SIS100, a bunch-by-bunch feedback system and a higher order mode damping system are planned. Flexible solutions using DSPs (Digital Signal Processing Systems) and FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Arrays) are desirable in order to cope with different types of instabilities. Therefore, a generic approach is discussed here and first simulation results for the quadrupole mode are presented. Problem Definition Fig. 3: ESME simulation result for understanding the physical principle. Left: Particle start configuration (length 14°); Right: Bunch length after 4 synchrotron periods (length 6°) in phase space [3] During oscillation the ion bunch becomes longer and shorter in time domain with 2 fS. In phase space this is equivalent to a rotation. Starting where the ion bunch has its maximum length ΔΦmax in phase space leads to the requirement to transfer the outermost particles to a lower constant Hamiltonian H to get a lower ΔΦ. The solution is to decrease the RF voltage during the first and third quarter of the synchrotron rotation and to increase it during its second and fourth quarter. This leads to a phase shift of 90° between the measured beam amplitude signal and the modulation voltage. An example for the effect of such an RF voltage modulation with 2 fS RF amplitude modulation is displayed in Fig. 3. Proposed System Topology Fig. 1: Within-bunch modes m = 1 to 2, coupled-bunch mode pattern n = 4. a) Mountain-range display; b) Superimposed; c) Phase space [1] Synchrotrons accelerating more than one bunch with high particle beam intensities are susceptible to coupled-bunch (CBM) and within-bunch coherent oscillation modes (n = 0...number of bunches - 1, m arbitrary). This causes an emittance blow up or may in the worst case destroy the ion bunches. Therefore such oscillations should be damped. Within-bunch modes with m odd lead to phase modulations of the bunch compared to the RF voltage phase. Within-bunch modes with m even lead to a length modulation of the ion bunch compared to its reference length. The oscillation frequency is a multiple of the synchrotron frequency (m fS). Coupled-bunch modes are defined by the phase correlation n of a special instability mode (e.g. m = 1) between the adjacent bunches. Fig. 4: Schematic configuration of the longitudinal feedback system in time domain [3] For amplitude oscillation detection one dedicated DSP system for every bunch in SIS100 (for h = 10 where 8 buckets will be filled, 8 separate systems will be needed) may be used. This will lower the required performance of each detection system. It is planned to use a system similar to the beam phase control system but with its own signal generation instead of the RF cavity DDS. The correction signal will be led to an additional broadband kicker cavity which shall modify the total RF voltage. Measurement in Time Domain Conclusion and Outlook The ESME simulations have shown that amplitude modulations of the RF voltage are in principle capable of damping quadrupole oscillations. During machine experiments it could be shown that the DSP system is usable to detect amplitude oscillations of the beam. Concerning the simulations the next step is to simulate more realistic situations like the damping of small deviations of the bunch from a matched one and to incorporate closed-loop control. Machine experiments are planned to establish a method to excite reproducible oscillations and to influence growth rates of quadrupole instabilities in SIS18 for future tests of the longitudinal feedback damping system. Fig. 2: Left: Block diagram of the DSP-based phase and amplitude detector [2] as basis for the amplitude detection in time domain; Right: Measured beam signal amplitudes (2 fS ≈ 3.333 kHz) In time domain within-bunch instabilities with m odd can be measured through their phase shift compared to the adjacent bunches (n > 0). For n = 0, m = 1 a beam phase control system will soon be commissioned.. Instabilities with m even can be measured through the amplitude modulation of the beam signal. The DSP subsystem usable for high-precision phase and amplitude detection and for fast closed-loop control algorithms shall be the basis for the detection of within-bunch amplitude oscillations. It includes analogue pre-processing in the IF range, ADC and DAC modules, suitable digital interfaces and comfortable diagnostics features. The picture on the right in Fig.2 shows an example for such an amplitude measurement of excited quadrupole modes (m = 2) that was accomplished on August 17, 2006 (SIS18). References [1] F. Pedersen, F. Sacherer: Theory and Performance of the Longitudinal Active Damping System for the CERN PS Booster, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. NS-24, No.3, June 1977 [2] H. Klingbeil: A Fast DSP-Based Phase-Detector for Closed-Loop RF Control in Synchrotrons, IEEE Trans. Inst. Meas., Vol. 54, No. 3, June 2005, p.1209-1213. [3] M. Mehler: Quadrupole instability damping in an ion particle bunch based on RF voltage modulations, GSI internal document, August, 2006