Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ivy Tech Adjunct Faculty Conference April 4, 2009.
Advertisements

1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Vertical Scale Scores.
ACCESS for ELLs® Interpreting the Results Developed by the WIDA Consortium.
Jasmine Carey CDE Psychometrician Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results September 2014.
 Closing the loop: Providing test developers with performance level descriptors so standard setters can do their job Amanda A. Wolkowitz Alpine Testing.
So Much Data – Where Do I Start? Assessment & Accountability Conference 2008 Session #18.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Using the Iowa Assessments Interpretation Workshops Session 3 Using the Iowa Assessments to Track Readiness.
INTERPRETING SMARTER BALANCED SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Medlock Bridge Parent Coffee Georgia Milestones Testing December 9, 2015.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
LaKenji Hastings, NWLC Assessment Program Specialist Georgia Milestones Parent Informational.
Kansas College and Career Ready Academic Assessment OR Kansas Assessment Program (KAP) Results.
May STAR Reports Preview1 May 26, 2010 Webcast starts at 9:00 a.m.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
Understanding the Results Ye Tong, Ph.D. Pearson.
LEAP 2025 Practice Test Webinar for Teachers
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
Interpreting Assessment Results CMAS and CoAlt Science and Social Studies, CMAS English Language Arts and Mathematics (PARCC), Colorado Spanish Language.
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
Student Assessment Data Portal
Assessment and Reporting Without Levels February 2016
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Update on Data Collection and Reporting
AIR Ways Training Module
Release of PARCC Student Results
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
New Teacher Orientation August 25, 2016
Welcome to the New SAT By: Mrs. Winard.
Getting Ready for the PreACT
PRMSP/AlACiMa Project
AIR Ways Training Module
CoAlt: Science and Social Studies Administration
Understanding Results
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
ATTENTION This presentation may be used for Spring 2016 CoAlt Test Examiner trainings. Districts/schools may need to be update slides with local assessment.
[Insert State Name] State Assessments: What do families need to know?
PARCC for ELA and Literacy
Interpreting Assessment Results CMAS and CoAlt Science and Social Studies CMAS Mathematics and English Language Arts, including Colorado Spanish Language.
Cardinal Convo April &
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
Georgia Milestones Online Testing Program
Medlock Bridge Parent Coffee
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT Results
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Goals for Tonight Present the new Georgia Milestones Assessment System
Goals for Tonight Present the new Georgia Milestones Assessment System
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
Testing Schedule.
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Module 4: The Highlights!
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results Jasmine Carey CDE Psychometrician Carey_j@cde.state.co.us September 2014

CMAS Science and Social Studies Reports 2

Types of Scores Appearing on CMAS Reports Performance Level: Top two levels are indicators of being on track for college and career Distinguished Command Strong Command Moderate Command Limited Command 3

CMAS Performance Levels and Policy Claims Distinguished Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They are academically well prepared to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Strong Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a strong command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They are academically prepared to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Moderate Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They will likely need academic support to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Limited Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a limited command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They will likely need extensive academic support to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. 4

State Level 2014 CMAS Performance Level Results Social Studies: Approximately 15% of students scored at the Distinguished or Strong Command level Science: Approximately 30% of students scored at the Distinguished or Strong Command level 5

Types of Scores Appearing on Reports (cont.) Overall scale score Comparisons within year and across years can be made Subscale score Percent correct Comparisons within year can be made 6

Levels for Reporting Total Test Standard Level (Reporting Category) Prepared Graduate Competency (PGC) Grade Level Expectation (GLE) Item Type State District School Subgroups Individual student 7

CMAS Science and Social Studies Reports Student Performance Report Intended for Parents and Teachers Content Standards Roster School and District level Performance Level Summary School and District Level Item Analysis Report Only if the number of students is greater than 15 8

CMAS Student Performance Report Individual Student Performance Intended audience is Parents and Teachers Reports individual student performance down to the PGC/GLE level Scale Scores Overall “Reporting Category” Content Standards and Scientific Inquiry/Nature of Science Item Type (constructed response and selected response) Percent Correct PGC GLE, if there is more than one GLE in a PGC 9

CMAS Overall Scale Score and Performance Level This graph shows the overall scale score for the assessment and the performance level Range of 300 to 900 Arrows around students scores are the standard error of measurement 10

CMAS Subscale Performance 1 SD Around State Average 11

CMAS PGCs and GLEs Prepared Graduate Competencies and Grade Level Expectations Not shown if only one GLE in a PGC Text for PGCs and GLEs 12

CMAS Percent Correct Scores Percent correct scores are based on the particular items given in that year’s test Cannot be compared across years Can compare to District and State to spot trends Based on a small number of items (between 6 and 8) Don’t necessarily hit the whole breadth of a topic Should not be the sole basis for instructional adjustments 13

CMAS Selected-Response and Constructed-Response Nearly half the points on the CMAS assessments come from Constructed-Response items This is a scale score and can be compared across years 14

CMAS Content Standards Roster School level report For the Spring 2014 administration the District will receive all their school rosters in a single PDF Includes student performance on: Overall assessment Content Standards PGCs/GLEs 15

CMAS Content Standards Roster (Page 1) Key: Lists performance levels with scale score ranges Explains Content Standards Performance Symbols School Summary # and % of Students in school at each Standards Performance Indicator 16

CMAS Content Standards Roster (Page 1) Scale Scores by State, District , and School Individual Student Performance 17

Content Standards Roster (Page 2) Page 2 reports the PGC and GLE Performance The header includes the points possible and the average % for State, District, and School PGC and GLE numbering is the same as on the SPR The language and numbering on the SPR will be included in the Interpretive Guide for easy reference 18

CMAS Performance Level Summary State, District, and School levels Percent of students meeting each performance level No Scores are NOT included in the denominator for the % in each level Disaggregated by group Gender Race/Ethnicity Language Proficiency Disability, etc. 19

Performance Level Summary Includes data for the state on the district level report and state and district on school reports Average Scale Scores Performance Levels Distribution 20

CMAS Item Analysis Report School, District, and State level Performance on individual items 1 point items: % of students answering correctly 2-3 point items: average points earned divided by the number of possible points Includes item information 21

CMAS Item Analysis Report (Page 1) Graph: Each item for State, District, and School Ordered by Difficulty from Most to Lease Difficult (at the State level) Label on the bottom has the Standard and GLE 22

CMAS Item Analysis Report (Page 2) Item Information Ordered by Difficulty - matches the order on Page 1 Location on the test – Section/Item number Related PGC and GLE Item type 23

CoAlt Science and Social Studies Reports 24

CoAlt Scoring 4 point items (selected response) 4 points – answered correctly independently 3 points – answered correctly with an additional prompt 2 points – answered correctly after being told the correct answer 1 point – answered incorrectly after being told the correct answer 0 points – did not respond to the question 2 point items (in groups of 3) 2 points – answered correctly 1 points – answered incorrectly 25

Interpretation of Overall CoAlt Scores CoAlt measures both entry skills and content Points available for demonstration of entry skills: On a 17 item test (all but 8th grade Science) 36 points can be earned with no evidence of content knowledge These points allow students to demonstrate consistency in entry skills (responding when asked a question and repeating an answer) CoAlt is intended to measure content knowledge All performance levels above Exploring require evidence of some content knowledge Cut scores for the performance levels are at the higher end of the point/scale range due to the way the items are scored 26

CoAlt Performance Levels CoAlt has four performance levels Novice Developing Emerging Exploring Novice and Developing are considered ready to continue academic study in this area Inconclusive Designation Students who attempt the assessment, but do not respond to any items 27

CoAlt Performance Levels CoAlt Performance Levels and Policy Claims Novice Students performing at this level demonstrate a solid understanding of the concepts and skills represented by the Extended Evidence Outcomes (EEOs) of the Colorado Academic Standards (CAS). They are academically well prepared to engage in further studies in the content area with appropriate supports. Developing Students performing at this level demonstrate a foundational understanding of concepts and skills represented by the EEOs of the CAS. They are academically prepared to engage in further studies in the content area with appropriate supports. Emerging Students performing at this level demonstrate a limited understanding of concepts and skills represented by the EEOs of the CAS. They will likely need moderate academic supports to engage successfully in further studies in the content area. Exploring Students performing at this level demonstrate an initial understanding of concepts and skills represented by the EEOs of the CAS. They will need extensive academic supports to engage successfully in further studies in the content area. 28

State Level 2014 CoAlt Performance Level Results In Social Studies, approximately 40% of students are in the Developing or Novice level In Science, approximately 42% of students are in the Developing or Novice Level 29

CoAlt Science and Social Studies Reports Student Performance Summary Intended for Parents and Teachers Content Standards Roster School and District level Performance Level Summary District Level Only 30

CoAlt Student Performance Report Individual Student Performance Scale Score Overall test score Percent Correct Content Standards 31

CoAlt Overall Scale Score Range of 1 to 250 First 100 are compressed Arrows around student scores are the SEM 32

CoAlt Content Standard Performance Compares student percent correct to state average percent correct Points earned and points possible are listed Content Standard Descriptions are from the Colorado Academic Standards and are the same as CMAS 33

CoAlt Content Standards Roster Average Overall Scale Score and Content Standards % Correct for State, District, and School Individual Student level 34

CoAlt Performance Level Summary Only at the District level Includes the Inconclusive designation Those students are in the denominator for the Performance Level % 35

Format of CMAS and CoAlt Results Schools and Districts will receive Electronic Files – available through PearsonAccess Student Data File Summary File Electronic PDF reports – available through PearsonAccess Performance Level Summary Reports Content Standards Roster Reports Student Performance Reports Item Analysis Reports Hard copy reports – Sent to DACs Student Performance Reports (two copies) CDE will provide sample letters for use with parents and staff that can be modified as districts deem appropriate. 36

The Usual Disclaimers Only scaled scores can be compared across years Overall, Content Standards and Item Type for CMAS Overall only for CoAlt Scores cannot be compared across grades No vertical scaling Percent scores cannot be compared across years, grades or PGCs/GLEs Items in a PGC/GLE will change between years 37

Questions? 38