Director of Training, Workforce Development and Diversity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REVIEW CRITERIA FOR NIH K01, K08, AND K23 (CAREER DEVELOPMENT) and K99/00 PATHWAY TO INDEPENDENCE AWARD GRANTS Liz Zelinski Former Reviewer and backup.
Advertisements

Department of Biostatistics Growth and Finance. Department as of December faculty (not including secondary and adjunct appointments) – 20 Tenured.
WORKSHOP SUMMARY NHGRI Training and Career Development Programs Workshop held April Fishers Lane Rockville, MD Presented by Training and.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Research.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Advances research methods and proposal writing Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology. September 2008.
Grants Facilitation -UCD SOM Office of Research Grant Research and Navigation Team Jeffrey Elias PhD - Erica Chedin PhD - Betty Guo PhD
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
1 NIH Grant-Writing Workshop Leora Lawton, Ph.D. Executive Director, Berkeley Population Center Summer 2015 Dlab Workshop Session 5: Human Subjects and.
4/17/2017 Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for New and Early Stage Investigators (R35) Jon Lorsch, Director, NIGMS Peter Preusch, Program Director,
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Overview of the Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences (CURE) Grant Mechanisms Dr. Peter Ogunbiyi Diversity Training Branch Center to Reduce Cancer.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Neuroscience Program Michigan State University Joe Lonstein Yanny Lau.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Gwen Latendresse, PhD, CNM Jane Dyer, PhD CNM, FACNM Linda Edelman, PhD, RN Ginette Pepper, PhD, RN, FAAN.
Biology Scholars Program Amy Chang American Society for Microbiology Goal: Develop faculty expertise in evidenced-based science education reform Seven.
IGERT at the National Science Foundation Carol Van Hartesveldt, Ph.D. Program Director, IGERT National Science Foundation.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
1 Judy Hewitt, PhD On Detail to Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health May 18, 2015 Center for Scientific Review Advisory Council.
Alexis Bakos, MPH, PhD, RN Branch Chief, Diversity Training Branch CRCHD, NCI October 19, 2010.
B - 1 October 2004 Eric Guilbeau, PhD  Department Chair, ASU, has overseen 4 visits to ASU (2 BME, 1 ChE, 1 Mat’ls Eng)  Lead 1 PEV visit (Bioengineering)
Rigor & Reproducibility: Back to Basics
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
T32 Administrative Supplement Shiva Singh, Kris Willis and Lisa Moeller National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
A CLOSER LOOK AT RECENT NIH APPLICATION CHANGES…. Revised May 5, 2016.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
NIGMS Investment in Graduate Biomedical Education Jessica Faupel-Badger
Rigor and Transparency in Research
Office of Extramural Programs RIGOR AND REPRODUCIBILITY: BACK TO BASICS MAY 13, 2016 PATRICIA VALDEZ, Ph.D. NIH EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH INTEGRITY OFFICER.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016.
Building Community for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Scientists: The Rochester Training Pipeline EXPERIENCE.
Rigor and reproducibility: back to basics
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
HIP Buffet: Mapping Your Career with NIH
NIH Fellowships Overview
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
The NIH perspective on rigor and reproducibility
Reproducibility of Research
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NIH GRANT PREPARATION WORKSHOP: A workshop for new investigators about putting together administrative portions of a grant and the NIH review panel. Tuesday,
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
Being an effective consumer of preclinical research
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
Meeting LIS Competences to Serve Inclusive Community through Curriculum: Case Study in LIS Study Program UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia Marwiyah.
Information Technology (IT)
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
NIH Requirements for Training in Responsible Conduct of Research
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
K R Investigator Research Question
VISION AND CHANGE IN UNDERGRADUATE BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A Call to Action
Extending “Scholarship” to Including Teaching in a Digital World
5/12/2019 Update from NIGMS Jon Lorsch.
NIGMS Training Programs – Opportunities for Synergies with SEPA
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Director of Training, Workforce Development and Diversity 11/11/2018 Perspectives on Enhancing Rigor and Reproducibility in Biomedical Research Through Training Alison Gammie, Ph.D. Director of Training, Workforce Development and Diversity

No Conflict of Interest to Report

Ensuring the Rigor and Reproducibility of Biomedical Research A Growing Challenge: Ensuring the Rigor and Reproducibility of Biomedical Research

Media Coverage (The Wall Street Journal Review, April 8-9, 2017) The Breakdown in Biomedical Research “Contaminated samples, faulty studies, and inadequate training have created a crisis in laboratories and industry, slowing the quest for new treatments and cures”

Survey Indicates a Number of Causes Contribute to the Problem 11/11/2018 Survey Indicates a Number of Causes Contribute to the Problem http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970

The “Reproducibility Problem” Issues related to three main areas: Training and education Methodology experimental design, reporting Sociology of science

The “Reproducibility Problem” Issues related to three main areas: Training and education Methodology experimental design, reporting Sociology of science

Some Underlying Systemic Issues: The Biomedical Research Incentive Structure Push for large labs Tenure and promotion Unstable funding Publish or perish! (Except negative data) Soft money positions Impact factor “Innovation” “One-word journals” Networking pressure “Novelty”

NIGMS MIRA Awards

The “Reproducibility Problem” Issues related to three main areas: Training and education Methodology experimental design, reporting Sociology of science

Cell line contamination & misidentification Cell Culture: A Case Study in the Challenges of Reproducibility  Cell line contamination & misidentification ~70% of researchers surveyed in 2014 had never checked the identity of their cell lines Major repositories report that 14-30% of submissions are contaminated Genomic instability Infections in stocks Mycoplasma Viruses Variability of growth conditions

A Call for New Tools to Improve Cell Line Identification

The “Reproducibility Problem” Issues related to three main areas: Training and education Methodology experimental design, reporting Sociology of science

Survey Indicates Training Can Play a Role in Enhancing Reproducibility 11/11/2018 Survey Indicates Training Can Play a Role in Enhancing Reproducibility http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970

New NIH Resources for Training and Education in Reproducibility and Transparency 11/11/2018 NIGMS clearinghouse: home for trans-NIH initiative to develop educational resources Experimental design Laboratory practices Analysis and reporting Culture of science

Resources for Training and Education in Reproducibility and Transparency NIGMS T32 administrative supplements to develop new local courses in experimental design and analysis: RFA-GM-15-006 and RFA-GM-18-002 - to develop training modules to enhance data reproducibility PA-15-136 and PA-16-060 - to develop local courses in experimental design & analysis

Training Modules and Local Courses in Experimental Design and Analysis 11/11/2018 Training Modules and Local Courses in Experimental Design and Analysis

Graduate Training Jointly Sponsored Neuroscience T32 (PAR-17-076) 11/11/2018 Graduate Training Jointly Sponsored Neuroscience T32 (PAR-17-076) Formal instruction in the strict application of the scientific method to ensure that trainees understand the practices that underlie robust and unbiased experimental approaches, methods, analyses, data interpretation and transparent reporting of results. Plan for training in statistical methodology that emphasizes the importance of considering statistical principles in research design; the appropriate use of statistics in data analysis, interpretation of results and forming conclusions; and the practical application of statistics to data in different experimental paradigms.

New NIGMS predoctoral T32 training grant mechanism emphasizing an integrated approach to improving rigor and transparency

New NIGMS predoctoral T32 training grant mechanism The Overarching Objective of the NIGMS Predoctoral Institutional Research Training Grant (T32) program is to develop a diverse pool of well-trained scientists who have the following technical, operational and professional skills: Technical Operational Professional Acquiring Information, Experimental Design & Data Interpretation Methods & Technology Quantitative & Computational Management & Leadership Communication & Teamwork 25 | EAWG October 2017

Proposed Trainee Focused Objectives: Technical/Operational Skills A broad understanding across biomedical disciplines and the skills to independently acquire the knowledge needed to advance their chosen field The ability to think critically, independently and to identify important biomedical research questions and approaches that push forward the boundaries of their area of study Technical Operational Professional Acquiring Information, Experimental Design & Data Interpretation Methods & Technology Quantitative & Computational Management & Leadership Communication & Teamwork 26 | EAWG October 2017

Proposed Trainee Focused Objectives: Technical/Operational Skills A strong foundation in rigorous research design, experimental methods, quantitative literacy & reasoning skills, data analysis & interpretation A commitment to approaching and conducting biomedical research responsibly and with integrity Experience initiating, conducting, interpreting, and presenting rigorous and reproducible biomedical research with increasing self-direction Technical Operational Professional Acquiring Information, Experimental Design & Data Interpretation Methods & Technology Quantitative & Computational Management & Leadership Communication & Teamwork 27 | EAWG October 2017

Proposed Trainee Focused Objectives: Professional Skills 11/11/2018 Proposed Trainee Focused Objectives: Professional Skills The ability to work effectively in teams with colleagues from a variety of cultural and scientific backgrounds, and to promote inclusive and supportive scientific research environments The skills to teach and communicate scientific research methodologies and findings to a wide variety of audiences (e.g., discipline-specific, across disciplines, and the public) The knowledge, professional skills and experiences required to identify and transition into careers in the biomedical research workforce Technical Operational Professional Acquiring Information, Experimental Design & Data Interpretation Methods & Technology Quantitative & Computational Management & Leadership Communication & Teamwork 28 | EAWG October 2017 EAWG October 2017

New NIGMS predoctoral T32 training grant mechanism emphasizing an integrated approach to improving rigor and transparency Principal Investigator(s) and Program Faculty must have a record of using rigorous and transparent methods in experimental design, data collection, analysis and reporting Biographical sketch. The personal statement should describe a commitment to scientific rigor, training, mentoring, as well as to promoting inclusive and supportive scientific environments. Program plans should describe how the program will ensure that program faculty employ the highest standards of scientific rigor and impart those standards to their trainees

A Required Plan for Instruction in Methods for Enhancing Reproducibility How trainees will be instructed in principles important for enhancing research reproducibility evaluation of foundational research underlying a project (i.e., scientific premise) rigorous experimental design and data interpretation consideration of relevant biological variables such as sex authentication of key biological and/or chemical resources data and material sharing, record keeping, and transparency in reporting  How instruction strategies are sufficiently well integrated into the overall curriculum taught at multiple stages of trainee development and in a variety of formats and contexts program faculty will reiterate and augment key elements of methods for enhancing reproducibility when trainees are performing research in their laboratories.

Letter of Institutional Support The letter should describe the commitment to “……developing and promoting a culture in which the highest standards of scientific rigor, reproducibility and responsible conduct are advanced.” Push for large labs Tenure and promotion Unstable funding Publish or perish! (Except negative data) Soft money positions Impact factor “Innovation” “One-word journals” Networking pressure “Novelty”

Review Criteria – Overall Impact Score Will the training program produce a diverse pool of well-trained scientists with the skills necessary to conduct rigorous and reproducible research, and transition into careers in the biomedical research workforce? Skills include: technical (e.g., appropriate methods, technologies, and quantitative/computational approaches), operational (e.g., independent knowledge acquisition, rigorous experimental design, and interpretation of data), and professional (e.g. management, leadership, communication, and teamwork)

Questions & Comments? alison.gammie@nih.gov 11/11/2018 Questions & Comments? alison.gammie@nih.gov