Community Corrections Alternative Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ex-Offenders and Housing
Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Evidence-Based Intervention Services Community Corrections Partnership October 27, 2011.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Harri-Ann Ellis April 28 th, 2011 Meth and More Conference.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
O.P.E.N. Opportunity for Probation with Enforcement in Nevada Intermediate Sanction Program Nevada Department of Corrections Re-entry Services.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, ACE! Department of Criminology, Law & Society George Mason University Faye Taxman, Ph.D. University Professor.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Community Corrections Chapter 11 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Replicating the Concepts Behind Project HOPE Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Jail Diversion Programs
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Safety and Justice Challenge: An Effort to Reduce the Jail Population
Mental Health Diversion
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Unit III Flashcards Chapters 5 and 6.
What works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Community Justice Services a Division of the
CRJ 303 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CRJ 303 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
CRJ 303 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Department of Corrections
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Kristin Stainbrook, PhD
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Offender Management Plan
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Department of Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
The Judicial Branch’s Response to the Opioid Crisis
The United States has the highest incarceration rates of
Presentation transcript:

Community Corrections Alternative Program CCAP Community Corrections Alternative Program Operated at VADOC’s Detention & Diversion Centers

PURPOSE VADOC is transforming its Detention and Diversion Center programs to bring them in line with current evidence-based practices. The changes will provide enhanced, individualized services for offenders on probation and better meet the needs of the sentencing courts.

History Detention and Diversion centers were created in 1995 along with our Bootcamp Program which was for younger offenders. The general model for these facilities was based on military style regimen, coupled with remedial education, life skills and education. Boot Camp closed 2002 Chatham Diversion and White Post Diversion Closed

History Our objective was to identify non-violent felon offenders who needed more than regular probation but less than incarceration. All participants were technically probationers so if they did not comply with the program requirements they would be arrested on PB-15 and returned to court.

Program Evaluation In 2013, as a part of a Justice Reinvestment Initiative, the programs were evaluated by the Council for State Governments to determine effectiveness. Findings: Programming not sufficient to change behavior Groups not using evidence based practices Talking cures being used instead of sound practices Emphasis on sanctions rather than balance with positive behavioral reinforcements Acquisition of proven skills and pro-social thinking were not requirements of graduation Programming lacking fidelity

Program evaluation Most Important Findings: Over 40% of the population sentenced to the program was low risk to reoffend EBP Principle: Don’t mix Low risk and High Risk Offenders in program! EBP Principle: Don’t use intensive resources on Low risk offenders! 45% of Low risk offenders were rearrested within 2 years of release. 65% of High risk offenders were rearrested within 2 years of release.

Internal Evaluation In repeated internal studies, graduates of Detention and Diversion Centers did not perform as well as control groups sentenced to jail or prison. Overall Detention and Diversion Center Graduates’ two year re-arrest rate was 51.9% compared to 48.6% for the Jail Control Group and 46.4% for the Prison Control Group. Overall Detention and Diversion Center Graduates’ three year re-arrest rate was 59.9% compared to 56.9% for the Jail Control Group and 54.9% for the Prison Control Group.

Why Change? We want programs that reduce crime in our communities! We want to be good stewards of tax payers dollars! We want our employees to perform services that are effective! We want our courts and other critical stakeholders to have confidence in our treatment services!

What will remain the same Probation Officers will continue to coordinate the referral process and complete initial screening requirements Daily operations & facility structures will remain the same. Offenders will continue to be held accountable; if needed, they will receive institutional charges. Offenders are expected to communicate with staff and others in a professional manner. Offenders will continue to have opportunities to perform community service and/or work in the community

New Elements of CCAP Centralized Referral Unit Enhanced Programming to address individual risk, needs, and responsivity issues Program completion based on meeting minimum treatment dosage requirement for identified needs Expanded target population

Centralized Referral Unit All referrals will be processed through a central unit in Richmond Acceptance into CCAP and program assignment (to which Facility) will be based on individual risk, needs and responsivity Referral unit will oversee any transfers between CCAP facilities that become warranted to better meet treatment needs or noncompliance issues

Enhanced Programming Core programming at all facilities Substance Abuse Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Vocation/Education Intensive Substance Abuse Treatment Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Treatment

Dosage Requirements & Program Completion Offenders assessed to have moderate treatment needs must complete a minimum of 200 core treatment hours for successful program completion (approx. 22 - 28 weeks) Stafford Detention & Diversion Center Harrisonburg Detention & Diversion Center Chesterfield Women’s Detention & Diversion Center

Dosage Requirements & Program Completion Offenders assessed to have high treatment needs for Substance Abuse Treatment and/or Cognitive Behavioral Treatment must complete a minimum of 300 treatment hours for successful program completion (approx. 42 - 48 weeks) Cold Springs Detention & Diversion Center (Intensive Substance Abuse) Appalachian Detention & Diversion Center (Intensive CBT) Chesterfield Women’s Detention & Diversion Center (SA & CBT)

Expanded Target Population More inclusive medical admission criteria paired with increased medical coverage and treatment at all facilities Acceptance of offenders with mild mental illness at all facilities

CCAP Cold Springs Detention & Diversion Center Appalachian Detention & Diversion Center Stafford Detention & Diversion Center Harrisonburg Detention & Diversion Center Chesterfield Women’s Detention & Diversion Center

Appalachian detention & diversion center Specialization: Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Dosage: 300 treatment hours (approx. 42 - 48 weeks) Core Programming: Substance Abuse Treatment Vocation/Education Basic Computer training Welding Masonry

Cold springs detention & diversion center Specialization: Intensive Substance Abuse Treatment Dosage: 300 treatment hours (approx. 42 - 48 weeks) Core Programming: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Vocation/Education

Harrisonburg detention & diversion center Core Programming with a secondary work component Dosage: 200 treatment hours (approx. 22 - 28 weeks) Core Programming: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Vocation/Education

Stafford detention & diversion center Core Programming with a secondary work component Dosage: 200 treatment hours (approx. 22 - 28 weeks) Core Programming: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Vocation/Education

Chesterfield women’s detention & diversion center Multiple treatment tracks: Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Dosage: 300 treatment hours (approx. 42 – 48 weeks) 2. Intensive Substance Abuse Treatment Core programming with a secondary work component Dosage: 200 treatment hours (approx. 22 – 28 weeks) Core Programming: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Vocation/Education

TRANSITIONAL PERIOD Central Referral Unit began processing all referrals on 5/1/17 Facilities finalized their program schedule by 6/1/17

TRANSITIONAL PERIOD Offenders who were processed and accepted under the previous procedures (prior to 5/1/17) are placed into programming that best meets their criminogenic need profile These offenders are released based on time served (previous procedure), not based on program completion

Central Referral Unit DATA Total number of referrals screened from 5/1/17-8/04/17 = 461 209 offenders have been accepted in CCAP (45% acceptance rate) 252 true denials have been processed 89 additional denials due to being incomplete

Central Referral Unit DATA Acceptances Intensive Female Site (CDDC-300 hrs.) - 30 Moderate Female Site (CDDC-200 hrs.) - 17 Intensive Male Sites (300 hrs.) - 100 Moderate Male Sites (200 hrs.) - 62

CCAP OFFENDERS AT EACH SITE Intensive Female Site (CDDC-300 hrs.) - 6 Moderate Female Site (CDDC-200 hrs.) - 2 Intensive Male Site (ADDC-300 hrs.) - 1 Intensive Male Site (CSDDC-300 hrs.) - 22 Moderate Male Site (HDDC-200 hrs.) - 6 Moderate Male Site (SDDC-200 hrs.) - 7

Benefits of CCAP Better meet the needs of the sentencing courts Enhance level of programming to address driving factors that lead to criminal behavior Changes are in line with current research Improve communication between referring districts and facilities to enhance re-entry efforts Reduce co-mingling of high and low risk offenders Provides flexibility to modify length of stay based on treatment responsiveness Central referral unit will free staff from administrative screening of referrals, creating more time to provide programming and address probationer needs

Questions?