Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Eligibility ARC Chairperson Training 1. Special Education Cycle Interventions EligibilityIEPPlacementInstruction Annual Review InterventionsReferralEvaluation.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Response to Intervention New roles for Reading Teachers in the newly authorized IDEA.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
 Description of Title I  Review of Needs Assessment and Goals  Role of Academic Administrators and Instructional Specialists  Introduction of staff.
Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.
Best Practices and Compliance
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Identifying and Supporting English Learners with
American Institutes for Research
Response to Intervention
Exceptionalities Guideline
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Supporting Student Success
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
Teaching Students with Disabilities
The ABCs of Student Support Services
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
The Speech Language Pathologist’s Role in Schools
EXPLORING THE LEARNING SAFETY NET
Student Needs Assessment Committee
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
LIEPing to Excellence for ELs
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Special Education Review
Exceptional Children’s Program
Presentation transcript:

Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion Marie Ireland, M.Ed., CCC-SLP, BCS-CL Maribel Saimre, Ed.S. Virginia Department of Education

VDOE Intended Outcomes Review evaluation and eligibility requirements and guidance LEAs identify opportunities to improve consistency LEAs identify needs and develop a Local Action Plan

Take a moment to identify your intended outcomes and questions

Regulations, Policy and Guidance Regulations must be followed Federal and state considerations Compliance LEA Policy and Procedures Guidance

Interpretive Authority Once a law or regulation is written, LEAs have “interpretive authority” The right to interpret regulations and provide clarification to assist in the implementation of the regulation Cannot conflict with law or regulations Consider carefully any unintended exclusions or limitations

Interpretive Authority Local interpretations may be written as: Policy Procedures Guidance

 It is the LEA’s responsibility to provide interpretation.  Individual interpretation leads to inconsistency.

Team Processing and Notes

Identify two examples of how your LEA has provided a local interpretation (policy, procedure, or guidance) to assist teams. Identify at least one area where developing a local interpretation or resource would lead to increased consistency among staff and teams.

Sources of Data Existing Data includes: Evaluations and information provided by the parent(s) Current classroom-based data, assessments, and observations by teachers and related services providers Screening Data Grades Historical information

Sources of Data Newly Gathered Data Sources Standardized Assessments Informal Observations Outside information Data from school & community

Types of Assessment Data Standardized and Norm-referenced tests Criterion-referenced measures Dynamic assessments Development scales Play-based assessments Portfolio review and review of student file

Which types of assessment tools are recognized by the LEA? What guidance is available to staff?

Educational Identification vs. Medical/Clinical Diagnosis Medical clinical diagnosis is not sufficient for determining eligibility Groups should address the difference between educational identification under IDEA and medical/clinical diagnosis Students may meet criteria without having a medical/clinical diagnosis

Others Areas of Impact Cultural, socio-economic and environmental impact Limited English proficiency and/or speaker of a socio-cultural dialect

What guidance is available to staff on these topics?

Thoughts? Concerns?

Eligibility Determining if a child is or continues to be a child with a disability There is no ‘dismissal criteria’ in Virginia

Virginia Eligibility Criteria For any disability area the team must provide documentation that: Meets the federal definition Impairment Educational Impact Need for Specially Designed Instruction See Guidance on Evaluation and Eligibility (2009) or Virginia Regulations

For any disability area the team must provide documentation that: Addresses all exclusionary criteria Lack of instruction in reading or math or LEP Provided high quality instruction Addresses all required components Any ‘disability specific’ criteria Observation in learning environment Hearing screening

Team Review of Data for Eligibility Look at all data for trends Consider outside reports and information Observation required for any eligibility Examine any inconsistencies Review criteria Discuss educational need

Eligibility Reminders “No single measure or assessment is used as the sole criterion” 8 VAC 20-81-70 C 11

Examining Thresholds and Documentation Requirements Some included in regulation Criteria Evaluation components Some are set by the LEA Thresholds Documentation sources

What is “adverse educational impact”? Not just grades Behaviors, social emotional and other issues are permitted Impact is on student – not family or teacher

Educational Impact Examples Academic Grades Difficulty with school work Functional/ Social/ Emotional/ Behavioral Ability to interact in school setting is impacted Emotional state impacts ability to participate Behaviors impact ability to participate

Data Considered What is sufficient data? Academic performance Social interactions Emotional functioning Behavioral functioning

How is “Adverse Educational Impact” documented in the division? What data sources are considered? What is sufficient data (threshold)?

What is “need for specially designed instruction”? Instruction that is distinctly different from general education in: Content Methodology Delivery Intensity Setting Not just “accommodations”

Data Considered What is sufficient data? Evidence of methods already attempted and associated data Data showing responsiveness to strategies from dynamic assessment Progress monitoring data from tiered interventions

How is Specially Designed Instruction documented in the division? What data sources are considered? What is sufficient data (threshold)?

Thoughts? Concerns?

Specific Disability Criteria: Establishing Local Thresholds and Methods

General Process Review specific disability criteria What opportunities exist to: Establish data sources Set thresholds Provide guidance Clarify procedures or policy

Identify Opportunities Identify staff leaders or resources Strive for consistency Develop guidance or resources Seek additional professional development

SLD

SLD Team Discussion

Additional Areas Consider developing guidance or establishing thresholds for: Related services OT; PT; Assistive Technology Testing accommodations Read aloud Manifestation determination review

Action Planning

Resources Materials from today’s session are available on the VDOE Special Education web page.

Thank you for coming!