WHAT IS THE BEST Front-Line REGIMEN for Patients With CLL <60 YEARS OF AGE WHO MEET TREATMENT CRITERIA? Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Alessandra Ferrajoli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) Chemoimmunotherapy and Maintenance Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small.
Advertisements

What is the Optimal Approach to CLL, BR vs. FCR/FR?
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
New Data for Old Drugs in CLL Kanti R. Rai MD Joel Finkelstein Cancer Foundation Professor of Medicine Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine Hempstead,
Novel Agents for Indolent Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Spotlight on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: European and US Perspectives on the Evolving Standard of Care Bruce Cheson,
1O’Brien S et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Thompson PA et al.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ASHASH.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CLL (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Lessons from the CLL8 study Adapted from Hallek, oral presentation, ASH 2008 FCR is superior to FC in most cytogenetic subgroups with regard to: Response.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Kanti R. Rai, MD NSLIJ-Hofstra School of Medicine Long Island Jewish Medical Center New Hyde Park, NY Hematology Highlights 2013 Expert Reviews of the.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide as Initial Treatment of Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Xavier Badoux, William Wierda, Susan O'Brien,
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Increased Incidence of Therapy- Related Myeloid Neoplasia (t-MN) After Initial Therapy for CLL with Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (FC) vs Fludarabine (F):
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Safety and Efficacy of Abbreviated Induction with Oral Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C) Combined with Dose-Dense IV Rituximab (R) in Previously.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Second Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Study of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab (R) for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Efficacy Analysis in Patient.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Idelalisib and Rituximab for Previously Treated Patients.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida Phase III RESONATE-2: Frontline Ibrutinib.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
GALLIUM: Obinutuzumab- vs Rituximab-Based Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
Phase II SAKK 35/10 Trial: Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Shows Durable Activity in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Which is the optimal approach: BR or FCR/FR?
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Idelalisib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Is Superior to BR Alone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a.
Phase II PCYC-1121 Trial: Ibrutinib Monotherapy Active in R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage of ASH.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
REMARC: Lenalidomide vs Placebo as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With DLBCL Following R-CHOP Induction New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
Ibrutinib plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study1 Phase I Study of Rituximab,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Managing the Otherwise Healthy Patient With CLL
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Can Kinase Inhibitors and Immunomodulators Replace Chemotherapy? No
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Individualizing Therapy for Patients With CLL in the Community Practice Setting: Focus on Age and Comorbidities.
LBA-4 A Randomized Phase III Study of Ibrutinib (PCI-32765)-Based Therapy Vs. Standard Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (FCR) Chemoimmunotherapy.
CLL : Integrating novel therapies into frontline and salvage regimens
Presentation transcript:

WHAT IS THE BEST Front-Line REGIMEN for Patients With CLL <60 YEARS OF AGE WHO MEET TREATMENT CRITERIA? Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Alessandra Ferrajoli, M.D. Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Synthesized in East Germany in 1963) Alkylating group Benzimidazole ring (shares the antimetabolic properties of purine analogues) Butyric acid side-chain single agent (Knauf WU , J Clin Oncol, 2009) in combination with anthracyclines (Weide R, Leuk Lymph, 2002) in combination with rituximab (Fischer K, J Clin Oncol, 2011) Ferrajoli A. Haematologica 10:1300, 2005

Bendamustine Bifunctional Antineoplastic Agent CH3 N ClH2C N N CO2H Purine-like Benzimidazole Ring ClH2C Alkylating Group Available in Germany, 1971-1992 Unique in vitro anti-tumor profile Rummel M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3383-3389. 3

BENDAMUSTINE COMBINED WITH RITUXIMAB IN FIRST-LINE THERAPY OF CLL: TREATMENT SCHEDULE R = Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 0, cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 cycle 2-6, q4wks B = Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 day 1-2, cycle 1-6, q4wks Fischer et al. J Clin Oncol 30:3209-16, 2012 4

BENDAMUSTINE COMBINED WITH RITUXIMAB IN FIRST-LINE THERAPY OF CLL: RESPONSE RATE % ORR 103 88 CR 27 23.1 PR 74 64.9 SD 11 9.4 Fischer et al. J Clin Oncol 30:3209-16, 2012

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-line Design Patients with untreated, active CLL without del(17p) and good physical fitness (CIRS ≤ 6, creatinine clearance ≥ 70 ml/min) Randomization FCR Fludarabine 25 mg/m² i.v., days 1-3 Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m², days 1-3, Rituximab 375 mg/ m2 i.v. day 0, cycle 1 Rituximab 500 mg/m² i.v. day 1, cycle 2-6 BR Bendamustine 90mg/m² day 1-2 Rituximab 375 mg/m² day 0, cycle 1 Rituximab 500 mg/m² day 1, cycle 2-6 Non-Inferiority of BR in comparison to FCR for PFS: HR (λ BR/FCR) less than 1.388 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-line Consort Diagram 688 CLL patients screened centrally for: immunophenotype CIRS genomic aberrations (FISH) GFR IGHV sequencing 564 underwent 1:1 randomization FCR n = 284 BR n = 280 1 treatment before randomization 1 patient decision 1 misdiagnosis (MCL) ITT: FCR n = 282 ITT: BR n = 279 Median observation time: 27.5 months Eichhorst B. et al, ASH 2013

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-line Patients´ characteristics Baseline characteristics FCR n=282 BR n=279 p value Median age (y) 61.0 62.1 0.131 Age ≥ 65 33.7% 40.5% 0.098 Age ≥ 70 13.8% 21.5% 0.020 Male 71.3% 74.2% 0.450 Median time since diagnosis (months) 21.2 24.4 0.811 ECOG = 0 63.2% 64.1% 0.207 CIRS, median 2 0.689 Mean number of cycles 5.27 5.41 0.022 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-Line Patients´ characteristics: prognostic factors Baseline prognostic factors FCR n=282 BR n=279 p value Binet stage A 22.4% 22.2% 0.970 Binet stage B 37.4% 38.4% Binet stage C 40.2% 39.4% IGHV Unmutated 55.3% 67.8% 0.003 11q deletion 24.1% 22.6% 0.691 Trisomy 12 12.4% 12.2% 1.000 13q deletion 55.0% 52.7% 0.612 s- TK (U/L) ≥ 10.0 73.9% 74.3% 0.921 s- β2m (mg/l) ≥ 3.5 31.6% 39.5% 0.059 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in FrontLine Response to therapy (Best response) Response FCR n=274 BR n=273 p value CR (CR + CRi) 47.4% 38.1% 0.031 CR 40.1% 36.3% CRi 7.3% 1.8% PR 50.4% 59.7% ORR 97.8% 1.0 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in FrontLine Minimal residual disease (MRD) p=0.024 No. of patients: 72/180 44/156 137/185 107/170 75/129 31/98 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-Line Progression-free survival = Primary endpoint Median PFS FCR not reached BR 44.9 months P = 0.041 Eichhorst B. et al, ASH 2013

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in FrontLine Multivariate Analysis Prognostic factor Overall Survival Progression-free Survival HR CI p-value Treatment arm 1.649 0.831-3.272 0.153 0.704 0.505-0.981 0.038 No del(11q) 0.551 0.227-1.340 0.189 0.447 0.291-0.685 <0.001 Age ≥ 65 2.095 1.057-4.150 0.034 0.800 0.566-1.129 0.204 CIRS item score >1 2.267 1.146-4.484 0.019 1.256 0.879-1.794 0.210 Beta2-MG 2.546 1.294-5.009 0.007 1.425 1.074-2.072 IGHV unmutated 4.017 1.552-10.395 0.004 2.645 1.712-4.086 Eichhorst B. et al, ASH 2013

WHAT IS THE BEST Front-Line REGIMEN for Patients With CLL <60 YEARS OF AGE WHO MEET TREATMENT CRITERIA? FCR: End of the debate not quite, let’s look at details

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in Front-line Overall survival OS at 24 months: FCR 94.2% BR 95.8% P = 0.593 Eichhorst B. et al, ASH 2013

CLL10 Study: FCR VS BR in FrontLine Adverse Events CTC °3-5 (Interval 1st cycle until 3 months after Final staging) Adverse event FCR (% of pt) BR p value All 90.8 78.5 <0.001 Hematological AEs 90.0 66.9 Neutropenia 81.7 56.8 Anemia 12.9 9.7 0.28 Thrombocytopenia 21.5 14.4 0.036 Infection 39.0 25.4 0.001 TRM 3.9 2.1 0.23 Eichhorst et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 526.

WHAT IS THE BEST Front-Line REGIMEN for Patients With CLL <60 YEARS OF AGE WHO MEET TREATMENT CRITERIA? BR: older patients no difference in PFS and OS has less infection less mylosuppressive easier to administer easier to add new agents

GA101 + Bendamustine x 6 cycles GALTON: Study Design GA101 + FC x 6 cycles n=21 Previously untreated CLL (N=41) Non-randomized US, multicenter Each center selects one arm GA101 + Bendamustine x 6 cycles n=20 Cycle 1, Day Cycles 2–6, Day GA101 + FC GA101 1000 mg IV 1 (100 mg), 2 (900 mg) 8 (1000 mg), 15 (1000 mg) 1 Fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3 Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 IV GA101 + Bendamustine Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 2, 3 1, 2 Brown et al. ASH 2013, Abstract 523.

PCYC 1108 A Phase 1b Study of Ibrutinib With BR or FCR in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL Ibrutinib 420 mg orally, once daily in 28d cycles + BR (70 mg/m2 d1-d2 [B]; 375 mg/m2 cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 cycles 2-6 [R]) for 6 cycles N = 30 Ibrutinib 420 mg orally, once daily in 28d cycles + FCR (25 mg/m2 d1-3 [F]; 250 mg/m2 d1-3 [C]; 375 mg/m2 cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 cycles 2-6 [R]) for 6 cycles N = 3 Investigator Choice Primary endpoint Safety Secondary endpoints ORR PFS 12/11/2018 00:47

PCYC 1108 Overall Response Rate (ORR) Median treatment duration on this study was 16 months, with an ORR of 93.4% (28 responding patients [5 CR, 3 nPR]) 1 patient achieved a PR with lymphocytosis (not included in ORR)

PCYC 1108 Progression-Free Survival 18/21 patients who continued on ibrutinib within the extension study are still on treatment ~1 year after the data-cut off without evidence of progression 12/11/2018 00:47

PCYC 1108 TEAEs Grade ≥ 3 Occurring in ≥ 2 Patients 40% 7% 10%