所有患者 Co-PIs: Profs. Serruys, Silber, Windecker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Advertisements

PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INTERMEDIATE CORONARY STENOSES: The Functional or morphological Lesion Assessment for.
A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-eluting Stent with Biodegradable Polymer versus an Everolimus-eluting Stent with a Durable Polymer for Percutaneous.
Five-Year Follow-up of Safety and Efficacy of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program in Approximately.
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Clinical Result Overview
Arterial Revascularization Therapies Part II: a non- randomized comparison of contemporary PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with.
N Engl J Med 2010;363: CAMS PUMCH Shen zhujun, MD.
EXAMINATION Objective Assess the safety and performance of a new-generation DES vs. a BMS in the setting of primary PCI for treatment of patients with.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
RESOLUTE US One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
血栓吸栓:所有 STEMI 都需要吗? -TOTAL 研究的回答 徐亚伟 同济大学附属第十人民医院.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Disrupt CAD Study Design
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
A Novel Abluminal Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent as a Treatment Option for Diabetic Patients: Results from an All-Comers Multi-center Study: the En-ABL.
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Update on the BioMatrix Program
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
Did the LEADERS trial prove the superiority of biodegradable polymer?
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
The RESOLUTE Program: today and tomorrow
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
SPIRIT IV 2 Year Results and The SPIRIT Women Clinical Trial
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
REALITY: 8 month results
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
Large-Scale Registry Examining Safety and Effectiveness of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Western.
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
SORT-OUT III: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Michael.
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical care patients 36-month follow-up in the SORT OUT.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Presented at TCT 2006.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Presentation transcript:

所有患者 Co-PIs: Profs. Serruys, Silber, Windecker PCR 2010 1年结果 首次二代DES头对头真实世界对照试验 所有患者 Co-PIs: Profs. Serruys, Silber, Windecker N = 2,300 名患者 17 个中心 (100% monitored) 西欧 Resolute Stent n  1,150 Control Xience V Stent n  1,150 Clinical Endpoints 临床/TLF 30d 6mo 12mo 13mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 造影/OCT 460 (20%) QCA subset 50 (2%) OCT Subset = 主要终点观测点 = 次要终点观测点 The purpose of R-AC is to directly compare the Resolute stent platform with the Xience V stent platform in a prospective, multi-center, randomized, two-arm, controlled, open-label, international, noninferiority trial in patients undergoing PCI in everyday clinical practice. The all comers design of the trial with a primary “clinical” composite endpoint will allow a comparison of the angiographic parameters of both devices, together with a valid assessment of the long-term safety of both devices. A total of 2300 patients with symptomatic CAD including patients with chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, and acute coronary syndromes, who qualify for PCI, will participate in this study. These will be enrolled in 17 centers. Of note, inclusion criteria will be kept comprehensive to reflect routine clinical practice (“real world, all-comers” patients). 20% of the patients were randomly assigned to undergo repeat angiography at 13 months and 50 patients at selected sites underwent both an OCT and angiographic assessment. All patients will be followed for 5 years. Primary Endpoint is a device-oriented clinical composite endpoint (i.e. TLF) and includes the following components: • Cardiac death • Myocardial Infarction (not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel) • Clinically indicated/clinically driven target lesion revascularization Major secondary endpoint is a patient-oriented clinical composite endpoint and includes the following components: • All cause mortality • Any Myocardial Infarction (including non-target vessel territory) • Any Repeat Revascularization (including all target and non-target vessel) Should NOT be referred to as MACE due to the ambiguity of this acronym Secondary Endpoint also includes: angiographic and OCT (optical coherence tomography) at 13 months. 主要终点: TLF (复合终点包括:Cardiac Death, Target Vessel MI, Clinically driven TLR @ 12mo) 次要终点: Composite @ 30d, 6mo, 2 – 5 yr; angiographic & optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters @ 13 mo. 双重抗血小板治疗: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid >6 months (per guidelines)

试验入组充分反映临床实际 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

Resolute达到主要终点12个月TLF For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

Resolute:MACE和TVF发生率 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

Resolute:各个临床终点的出色表现 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10 靶血管心梗

Resolute和Xience V:血栓无统计学差异 早期的血栓对12个月的CD/TVMI无影响 p-values are based on Fisher's Exact Test. p-values for outcome differences are unadjusted for multiple comparisons. Per protocol, a statistical difference was declared if the two-sided p-value was less than 0.05 RESOLUTE All Comers was not specifically designed or powered to individually compare endpoints shown above.

Resolute:早期的血栓对12个月的CD/TVMI无影响 早期CD/TVMI血栓Xience V较高 Error bars indicate a point-wise two-sided 95% confidence interval (±1.96*SE). Standard Error based on the Greenwood Formula p-values for outcome differences are unadjusted for multiple comparisons. RESOLUTE All Comers was not specifically designed or powered to individually compare endpoints shown above

Resolute和Xience V: 13个月DS%和LL无差异 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

Resolute All Comers:70%的复杂病患 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

Resolute:在复杂病变中事件率 For distribution only in markets where Resolute DES has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2010 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201006397EE 5/10

RESOLUTE All Comers 和 LEADERS 相同的试验设计 RESOLUTE All Comers Co-PIs: Profs. Serruys, Silber, Windecker LEADERS PI: Prof. Windecker Real World All Comers with symptomatic coronary artery disease Stable and ACS Patients undergoing PCI N = 2,300 patients 17 sites (100% monitored) Western Europe N = 1,700 patients 10 sites (100% monitored) Western Europe Resolute Stent n  1,150 Xience V Stent n  1,150 BioMatrix Flex n  850 Cypher Select n  850 Clinical/TLF Clinical 30d 6mo 12mo 13mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 30d 6mo 9mo 12mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Angio/OCT Angio/OCT 420 (25%) QCA subset 46 (3%) OCT subset 460 (20%) QCA subset 50 (2%) OCT subset 1º Endpoint: TLF – Cardiac Death, TV-MI, clinically driven TLR @ 12-mo 2º Endpoints: Composite @ 30d, 6mo, 2 – 5 yr; angiographic & optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters @ 13 mo Drug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid >6 months (per guidelines) 1º Endpoint: Cardiac Death, MI, clinically-driven TVR @ 9-mo 2º Endpoints: Death, Cardiac Death, MI, TLR, TVR, ARC ST Drug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid recommended ³ 12 months

RESOLUTE All Comers 和 LEADERS 试验 Resolute DES N = 1140 Xience V DES N = 1152 LEADERS BioMatrix Flex DES N = 857 Cypher Select DES N = 850 Age (yr) 64.4 ±10.9 64.2 ±10.8 65  11 Men (%) 76.7 77.2 75 Diabetes mellitus (%) 23.5 23.4 26 23 ACS (%) 48.3 47.7 55% 56% Unstable Angina (%) 19.4 18.9 22% 20% Lesions treated per patient 1.46 ±0.73 1.48 ±0.77 1.5  0.7 1.4  0.7 Prior myocardial infarction 28.9% 30.4% 32% 33% Prior PCI 31.8% 32.1% 36% 37% Small vessel (RVD ≤2.75 mm) 67.8 67.4 68% 69%

12个月真实世界所有患者的对比:第一代 Vs.第二代 Data come from different trials and could differ in a head-to-head comparison.