What does it mean to say that the results of an experiment are (or are not) statistically significant? The significance level,  (conventionally set to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Four girls soccer teams took a random sample of players regarding the number of goals scored per game. The results are below. Use a significance level.
Advertisements

Statistics Review – Part II Topics: – Hypothesis Testing – Paired Tests – Tests of variability 1.
CHAPTER 21 Inferential Statistical Analysis. Understanding probability The idea of probability is central to inferential statistics. It means the chance.
Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis is a claim or statement about a property of a population (in our case, about the mean or a proportion of the population)
9.2a Tests about a Population Proportion Target Goal: I can check the conditions for carrying out a test about a population proportion. I can perform a.
Inferential Statistics & Hypothesis Testing
Statistical Significance What is Statistical Significance? What is Statistical Significance? How Do We Know Whether a Result is Statistically Significant?
HYPOTHESIS TESTING Four Steps Statistical Significance Outcomes Sampling Distributions.
Statistical Significance What is Statistical Significance? How Do We Know Whether a Result is Statistically Significant? How Do We Know Whether a Result.
LARGE SAMPLE TESTS ON PROPORTIONS
Chapter 3 Hypothesis Testing. Curriculum Object Specified the problem based the form of hypothesis Student can arrange for hypothesis step Analyze a problem.
TESTING HYPOTHESES FOR A SINGLE SAMPLE
“There are three types of lies: Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics” - Mark Twain.
Section 7-2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (n  30)
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Choosing Statistical Procedures
Overview of Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The z-Test
Descriptive statistics Inferential statistics
Hypothesis Testing.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 29 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Tue, Oct 23, 2007.
Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing. 2 Major Points An example An example Sampling distribution Sampling distribution Hypothesis testing Hypothesis.
Claims about a Population Mean when σ is Known Objective: test a claim.
The Probability of a Type II Error and the Power of the Test
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II: two samples Test of significance for sample means (large samples) The difference between “statistical significance” and.
Inference and Inferential Statistics Methods of Educational Research EDU 660.
Statistical Hypotheses & Hypothesis Testing. Statistical Hypotheses There are two types of statistical hypotheses. Null Hypothesis The null hypothesis,
Physics 270 – Experimental Physics. Let say we are given a functional relationship between several measured variables Q(x, y, …) x ±  x and x ±  y What.
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing I. Significant Differences  Hypothesis testing is designed to detect significant differences: differences that did not occur.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 12 Analysis of Variance.
1 URBDP 591 A Lecture 12: Statistical Inference Objectives Sampling Distribution Principles of Hypothesis Testing Statistical Significance.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 29 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Fri, Nov 12, 2004.
Hypothesis Testing Errors. Hypothesis Testing Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 31 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Wed, Mar 22, 2006.
Statistical Inference Statistical inference is concerned with the use of sample data to make inferences about unknown population parameters. For example,
Hypothesis Testing. Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean μ = 120 and variance σ.
15 Inferential Statistics.
Logic of Hypothesis Testing
9.3 Hypothesis Tests for Population Proportions
Statistical Inference
Parameter Estimation.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
One-Sample Inference for Proportions
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
Module 26: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests for Variances for Two Samples This module discusses confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing
CONCEPTS OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Two-sided p-values (1.4) and Theory-based approaches (1.5)
Making Data-Based Decisions
Statistical inference
Hypothesis Testing.
Lecture 36 Section 14.1 – 14.3 Mon, Nov 27, 2006
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
Confidence Intervals.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
STA 291 Summer 2008 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Is this quarter fair?. Is this quarter fair? Is this quarter fair? How could you determine this? You assume that flipping the coin a large number of.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Section 8.2 Day 2.
How does one design an experiment and analyze the resulting data?
For a permutation test, we have H0: F1(x) = F2(x) vs
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
Lecture 43 Section 14.1 – 14.3 Mon, Nov 28, 2005
Presentation transcript:

What does it mean to say that the results of an experiment are (or are not) statistically significant? The significance level,  (conventionally set to .05) The test statistic, Z The critical value of Z The decision to reject, or not reject, the null hypothesis

Numerical and Graphical Summary of Data from the 68 Girls: Mean: 8.60 sec. 6.40 sec. Variance: 27.78 19.78 S.D.: 5.27 sec. 4.45 sec. Experimental group (N=34) Control group (N=34) Violent Nonviolent 10 8 6 4 2 Mean seconds on “hurt” button

Calculating Z from the given data: Group 1: N1 = 34 M1 = 8.6 S12 = 27.78 Group 2: N2 = 34 M2 = 6.4 S22 = 19.78

Two possibilities about the populations: HO or H1: Null hypothesis HO: 1 = 2 (Exp. Condition does not increase aggression.) Alternate Hypothesis H1: 1 > 2 (Exp. Condition does increase aggression.) Experiment to decide which of these is true: 1. Obtain data from two random samples of N = 34. 2. From the data, calculate the test statistic, Z. The larger Z is, the less likely the data arose by chance from two populations that have the same mean (HO).

The parallel example of coin tossing: Null hypothesis: Coin is “fair.” p = .5 Alternate hypothesis: Coin is “loaded.” p > .5 Experiment to decide which is true: 1. Toss the coin 20 times. 2. Record X, the number of heads. [The larger X is, the less likely the data arose by chance from tossing a fair coin.] Example: Suppose X=15. The probability of getting at least 15 heads in 20 tosses of a fair coin can be theoretically calculated to be equal to only about .02. This result is therefore “statistically significant.” We conclude that the coin is indeed “loaded.”

Underlying inferential model, assuming Ho: Assume that 1 = 2 Experimental Population (1) 1 Control Population (2) 2 Populations 1 and 2 (assumed): N1 = 34 N2 = 34 Hypothetical experiment 1: Compute M1 and S12 Compute M2and S22 Calculate Z N1 = 34 N2 = 34 Compute M1 and S12 Compute M2 and S22 Calculate Z Hypothetical experiment 2: Repeat indefinitely and keep track of the values of Z.

Normal distribution of Z: Mean of Z = 0 S.D. of Z = 1 ( = .05) .05 1.86 +1.65 (critical value of Z) Mean Z

 is called the significance level. If  is set to .05... then, on the normal distribution of Z, the critical value of Z is 1.65.

Four different ways to express the statistical conclusion: 1. The obtained Z, 1.86, exceeds the critical value of 1.65. Therefore we reject HO. 2. “The results are statistically significant at the .05 level.”

3. The data indicate that the. experimental condition produces 3. The data indicate that the experimental condition produces more aggression than does the control condition (Z = 1.86, p <.05). 4. Given HO, the probability of obtaining a difference between two randomly selected groups by chance as great as was obtained (yielding Z = 1.86) is very small, i.e. is less than .05.