Georgia College & Career Academies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Advertisements

“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
The School Counseling Program
TEM and LEM District Report For redelivery to staff.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Teacher Orientation Training for teachers FY15 July 28,
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Los Angeles Unified School District Human Resources Division Teacher and Administrator Development Branch New Administrator Program.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
Colorado Alternative Cooperative Education (ACE) CTE Redesign CACTE July 2017 Key Messages for Early Implementation & Change Management in SY
Student Growth What does it Mean for Principals and Teachers?
What it means for New Teachers
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Dissemination Training
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Comprehensive Planning
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Teacher -Leader Advisor
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Supporting Beginning Teachers
OCTEO Conference ODE Update ∙ October 27, 2017.
Sonoraville Elementary School
Expecting the Best for Students
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
TKES and SLO assessments
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Race to the Top: What was Accomplished?
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Mountain Park Elementary School
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
LEADER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Using data for instructional decision-making
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Mountain Park Elementary School
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Georgia College & Career Academies TKES and LKES: Where Are We? Georgia College & Career Academies CEO Workshop Cindy Saxon February 8, 2016 11/12/2018

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System 6/1/2014 Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure   Student Growth Teachers of Tested Subjects Student Growth Percentiles Surveys of Instructional Practice Grades 3-5, Grades 6-8, Grades 9-12 Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards Observations and Documentation   Support and Documentation Let’s take a moment to review the three components of the Teacher Keys Effectiveness System, which provide a comprehensive evaluation system based on multiple sources of data. The three components of Teacher Keys consist of: Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards, or TAPS, Student Growth, and Surveys of Instructional Practice. Each component contributes to the overall Teacher Effectiveness Measure.   Teachers will receive a Teacher Effectiveness Measure, or TEM, based on documentation and data from the three components of Teacher Keys.   Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects LEA-Developed, DOE-Approved Student Learning Objectives 6/1/2014

TAPS Domains and Standards 6/1/2014 Planning 1. Professional Knowledge 2. Instructional Planning Instructional Delivery 3. Instructional Strategies 4. Differentiated Instruction Assessment Of And For Learning 5. Assessment Strategies 6. Assessment Uses Learning Environment 7. Positive Learning Environment 8. Academically Challenging Environment Professionalism and Communication 9. Professionalism 10. Communication 5 Domains 10 Standards These are the main components of TAPS. There are ten performance standards, or duties, and five domains, or categories, which serve as the basis for TAPS. Performance indicators are examples of the types of performance that  may occur if a standard is being successfully met.  ‘will’ makes it appear as a checklist and I know we want to move away from that   yes 6/1/2014

Overall TAPS Summative Rating TEM Decision Table Overall Student Growth Rating Level IV Needs Development Proficient Exemplary III II Ineffective I Level I Level II Level III Level IV Overall TAPS Summative Rating 11/12/2018 4

Leader Keys Effectiveness System   Support and Documentation Leader Keys Effectiveness System Generates a Leader Effectiveness Measure Leader Assessment on Performance Standards Performance Goal Setting Documentation of Practice Governance and Leadership Climate Survey Student Attendance Retention of Effective Teachers Student Growth and Academic Achievement Student Growth Percentiles LEA Developed, DOE Approved Student Learning Objectives Achievement Gap Reduction

LAPS Domains and Standards 6/1/2014 LAPS Domains and Standards School Leadership 1. Instructional Leadership 2. School Climate Organizational Leadership 3. Planning and Assessment 4. Organizational Management Human Resources Leadership 5. Human Resources Management 6. Teacher/Staff Evaluation Professionalism and Communication 7. Professionalism 8. Communication & Community Relations 4 Domains 8 Standards 6/1/2014

Overall LAPS Summative Rating LEM Decision Table Overall LAPS Summative Rating Achievement Gap I II III IV Overall Student Growth Rating ND P E 11/12/2018 6/23/2014 7

2014-2015 Implementation Summary How did we do? 2014-2015 Implementation Summary More than 108,000 TKES Summative Assessments More than 6,000 LKES Summative Assessments 11/12/2018

What’s New? Modified Implementation Calibration Training SLO Flexibility and Resources GaPSC, Professional Learning, and the TLE Electronic Platform Regional P-20 Collaboratives State Equity Plan Partnership 11/12/2018

Modified Implementation Business Rules have been established to determine eligibility. Criteria include: Two full years of district-wide implementation 45% district-wide implementation/school-wide implementation 51% or less ratings uniformity Correlation between TAPS ratings and growth ratings 11/12/2018

Modified Implementation Who Seven districts 26 schools Modification 2 fifteen minute walkthroughs 1 thirty minute formative observation Which teachers Teachers rated proficient or exemplary are eligible for modified implementation 11/12/2018

Calibration Training Description Designed to increase fidelity of implementation and consistency of ratings. Seeks to increase objectivity and eliminate bias. Participation 1,300 plus evaluators and district representatives from 106 districts have registered to attend. More than 1,000 have completed the training to date  11/12/2018

Flexibility is an option – not a requirement. SLO Flexibility All cohorts may opt to administer SLOs to ensure each teacher has one growth measure. Flexibility is an option – not a requirement. 11/12/2018

Charters and SLOs Due to differences in resources and tools, charters may work with the LEA and GaDOE Division of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness to develop and implement charter specific SLOs. Contact Michele Purvis, Program Manager, for information. Charter Guidance http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/Teacher-and-Leader- Effectiveness/Documents/FY15%20TKES%20and%20LKES%20Documents/SLO %20Resources/2015-2016%20Charter%20Schools%20SLO%20Guidance.pdf 11/12/2018

SLO Resources & Supports SLO Attainment and Target Diagnostic Tool Professional Development Modules 222 Exemplars SLO Resource Library 823 volunteered assessments from districts and RESAs 40 Public Domain Assessments Item Bank - Test Pad 118 Courses with 3844 items available 9/2/2015

GaPSC & Professional Learning Beginning July 1, 2017 all Georgia educators will use PL goals or plans to renew their certificates Professional Learning Communities will be required. All PL goals and plans will be entered into the TLE Electronic Platform. 11/12/2018

Regional P-20 Collaboratives These collaboratives: span nine areas of the state include districts, GaPSC, GaDOE, IHEs, & RESAs focus on supporting teachers pre-service through induction connect educator preparation programs with school districts 11/12/2018

Georgia’s Equity Plan Based on the most current data available and seeks to support districts who are experiencing equity gaps Seeks to ensure all students have access to effective teachers and school leaders. 2016-2017 district equity plans will align with the new work in equity 11/12/2018

Our Partnership An effective partnership ensures fidelity of implementation, prevents unnecessary human resources entanglements, and ensures sustainability. TLE will continue to provide ongoing training and support. Districts and charters must develop and implement processes and protocols to support fidelity and sustainability. 11/12/2018

Ensuring success… User Guides PL Opportunities Guidelines and Protocols – “Frequently Occurring Issues” HR Reports District Credentialing 11/12/2018

What’s Next? This body of work is constantly changing. Research base is critical. Data set large enough to provide reliable information is essential. TLE will continue to support districts, schools, leaders, and teachers…as long as we have personnel to do so. 11/12/2018

Questions 11/12/2018

Contact Information Avis King Deputy Superintendent Office of School Improvement aking@doe.k12.ga.us Cindy Saxon Associate Superintendent Teacher and Leader Effectiveness csaxon@doe.k12.ga.us 11/12/2018