Options for PBCC 22 Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
1 Lab. 13 SISO Wireless System I  In a typical communication system, receiving starts with synchronization.  For a packet-based system, it includes –
Submission doc.: IEEE /384r1 Chris Heegard, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 November 2000 Texas Instruments 141 Stony Circle, Suite 130 Santa Rosa California.
Doc.: IEEE /188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
802.11b PHY Wireless LANs Page 1 of 23 IEEE b WLAN Physical Layer Svetozar Broussev 16-Feb-2005.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0929r1 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE /0929r0 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary PHY.
Doc.: IEEE /618 Submission November 2001 Srikanth Gummadi, TI High performance encoders: What must be added to an IEEE b transmitter Srikanth.
802.11n MIMO-OFDM Standard  IEEE n group  MIMO-OFDM  Increased performance  Transmitter  MAC Enhancements  Results.
March 2002 Jie Liang, et al, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /0207r0 Submission Simplifying MAC FEC Implementation and Related Issues Jie.
Doc.: IEEE /0929r2 Submission September 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE /0213r1 Submission Slide 1 David Tung, et al. (Ralink Technology) March 2005 On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles David Tung,
Doc.: IEEE /390 Submission November 2000 Mark Webster and Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Reuse of b Preambles with HRb OFDM Mark Webster.
Doc.: IEEE /257 Submission Slide 1 May 2001 Coffey et al, Texas Instruments Multipath comparison of IEEE802.11g High Rate Proposals Sean Coffey,
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. Anuj Batra, Ph.D.
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September, 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Complexity and Performance Analysis.
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 January 2004
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
doc.: IEEE /xxx Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D.
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
PBCC-22 Chris Heegard, Ph.D.,
Options for PBCC 22 Proposal
PBCC-22 Chris Heegard, Ph.D.,
Partial Proposal: 11n Physical Layer
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
The PBCC 22 Mbps Extension of IEEE b
Error Rate Results of OFDM from Bluetooth Interference
Reed-Solomon Coding for IEEE
doc.: IEEE /304 Mark Webster Steve Halford
Comparison of IEEE g Proposals: PBCC, OFDM & MBCK
Backwards compatibility
FDMA WUR Generation Date: Authors: May 2018 Month Year
Higher Rate b: Double the Data Rate
Texas Instruments Incorporated
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Rake Span.
Wireless Mesh Networks
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
GCM Communications Technology
<month year> doc.: IEEE <04-106> March 2004
July 2010 doc.: IEEE July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Multipath comparison of IEEE802.11g High Rate Proposals
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Questions Concerning the PBCC-22 Proposal for High Rate b
July 2010 doc.: IEEE July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
WWiSE Pilot Scheme Performance
On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
20us effective preambles for MIMO-OFDM
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
September 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested Improvements to SUN FPP Proposal]
4 Channel Special Committee Report
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
20us effective preambles for MIMO-OFDM
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Presentation transcript:

Options for PBCC 22 Proposal January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Options for PBCC 22 Proposal Anuj Batra Ph.D., Chris Heegard Ph.D., Eric J. Rossin Ph.D., Matthew B. Shoemake Ph.D., and Srikanth Gummadi Texas Instruments 12500 TI Boulevard, MS 8653 Dallas, TX 75243 (214) 480-4220, batra@ti.com Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Increasing Throughput with a High Performance Preamble January 2001 Increasing Throughput with a High Performance Preamble Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Current Preamble and Header (P/H) January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Current Preamble and Header (P/H) Long PLCP PPDU Format: PLCP PREAMBLE 144 BITS @ 1Mbps PLCP HEADER 48 BITS @ 1Mbps PSDU 192 ms Short PLCP PPDU Format: SHORT PLCP PREAMBLE 72 BITS @ 1Mbps SHORT PLCP HEADER 48 BITS @ 2Mbps PSDU 96 ms Preamble and header contains no information - overhead Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Motivation for a Shorter P/H January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Motivation for a Shorter P/H For short packets: preamble and header spans a large portion of the packet Large P/H wastes valuable resources and decreases the network throughput Can reduce overhead by: defining a new preamble, and increasing the data rate for the header Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

New High Performance P/H January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 New High Performance P/H ~38 ms TIMING SYNC 88 symbols @ 11Msps FRAME SYNC 72 symbols @ 11Msps CHANNEL EST 168 symbols @ 11Msps HEADER 48 BITS @ 5.5Mbps PSDU 5.5 – 33 Mbps PREAMBLE Timing Synchronization Sequence: tones complex tone at f0 = ±8.25 MHz allows for easy detection of packet, carrier frequency offset, symbol timing requires that the clocks to be locked Frame Synchronization Sequence: PN sequences can be used to determine the location within packet can also be used for receiver diversity – select the antenna with best gain Channel Estimation Sequence: deterministic sequence first 160 symbols of a length 255 PN sequence sequence is generated by using a minimal polynomial over GF(4) Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Key Points of High Performance P/H January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Key Points of High Performance P/H Increases throughput by reducing overhead Designed to work at SNRs as low as 3–4 dB Preamble can be used to estimate the channel Supports most legacy rates: 5.5 and 11 Mbps Also supports newer rates: 16.5, 22, 33 Mbps High performance Preamble/Header can also be clocked at 16.5 MHz (more later) Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Throughput with ACK January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

Throughput with NO ACK January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

January 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/066 January 2001 Increasing the Data Rate to 33Mbps in Wireless Ethernet via Clock Switching Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments

January 2001 Clock Switching The existing IEEE 802.11b standard, and the TI proposed 22 Mbps extension to the standard, is based upon an 11 Msps symbol rate and a bandwidth occupancy of 20 MHz. In terms of modern digital communications techniques such as pulse shaping and adaptive equalization, a more aggressive symbol rate in the same bandwidth is practical. However, in order to deal with inter-operability with existing networks, the structure of the preamble, including the symbol rate of the preamble, must not change. A viable method to address these issues is to transmit an 11Msps preamble followed by a higher symbol rate encoded data rate. Means and issues involving the switch in the clock are addressed in this presentation. The suggested increase in rate by 50% to 16.5 Msps yields a data rate of 33 Mbps. Reference: IEEE 802.11-00/386 Anuj Batra et al., Texas Instruments