SELF-ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK MODULE 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
District Improvement Facilitators Network August 5,
WELCOME! Elementary Math Building Leads / Coaches Please complete the ORANGE information sheet. Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Kathleen Wilson - Math Program.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
WELCOME to the QSNY Portal Public School Self-Study 1.
Crown Point Schools Systems Accreditation November 24, 2014.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Presented by Dr. Jonathan Leff Parent iZone Meeting, 11/12/2015.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Your instruction - differentiated. Student learning - personalized.
Geometry – Prentice Hall (Pearson)
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
NC Star Check-In Where have we been? Where are we going?
Please review these important Webinar Etiquette guidelines
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
District Accreditation
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Catoosa County Schools
Core Competencies: Summative Self-Assessment
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Differentiation in Instruction
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
1.
AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Supporting Beginning Teachers
SCALED LEADERSHIP MEETING
ELA Teacher Leader Network Meeting March 29, 2012
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Deer Valley USD Work Team November 15, 2017
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
CCRS Leadership Session
Transition Resources for Youth
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Continuous Improvement Diagnostic Due September 24, 2018
Catholic Identity Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic Workshop
PART II: The Application Process
STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK MODULE 2
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Teams November 2014
Team Planning Time: Bringing It All Together 2015–16 CAASPP Institutes
COED SLO Reporting.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Critical Element: PBIS Team
Indistar Upgrades January 2019 ®.
Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers 2.5 Information & Instructions
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
CSI Human Resource (HR) Data Collection Prep
SCITT Mentor Training Spring 2018
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

SELF-ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK MODULE 1 In our previous meetings, we have promised modules for how to complete portions of the documentation required for Accreditation. Today we are going to walk you through Module 1. And if we have time, we will move on to Module 2. Self-Assessment Scores and narratives must be entered into ASSIST by September 23rd SELF-ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK MODULE 1

Standards Teams Self-Assessment Process Goal: Participants will develop a deep understanding of the AdvancED Standards and Indicators and the capacity to lead school-based Standards Team through the process of self-assessment 4 Able to lead standards teams with confidence, and support other school based leaders through the process 3 Complete understanding of the standards, indicators and process and can successfully implement in my building 2 Understand accreditation process and basic deliverables due; need assitance with process 1 Little or no understanding These are our goals for today. We are going to model a process for you.

Standards Teams Self-Assessment Process 5 Deliverables: Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic Self-Assessment (scores and narrative) Student Performance Diagnostic Executive Summary Assurances (after completion of SIP) *Evidences and Artifacts are embedded within the narrative One of the first things to cover are the 5 deliverables for which each school and the District are responsible . You will see this information again and again. In your agenda you will find 2 pieces of important information. On the bottom left are all the deliverables for AdvancED and School Improvement. On the bottom right, are open lab dates for which we will be available to help. Please register in iLearnU. If no one registers, we won’t go down to the meeting place. You will notice that on July 13th we will have a virtual meeting. At that meeting, we will discuss Student Performance Data – Module 4.

Standards Teams Self-Assessment Process Organizing to Interact with New Content: Standards Teams: 5 Standards Teams composed of teachers from various grade levels and content areas As a group Unpack the Standard and discuss indicators Rate each indicator on standard – enter into Survey Monkey List Powerful Practices and Opportunities for Improvement Discuss artifacts that will support the ratings of the indicators For today’s work. We are going to work through each of the standards, unpack and model the process to be used at your school site. If you have already completed the process in your school, please assist those at your table who may not have gone through this process. Please complete the survey monkey even if you have scored your indicators at your school. District Standards Teams will use your scores to guide our scoring. Our District Folks will work through this process as well with the Self Assessment for Systems. In your packets you have Module I Self- Assessment Workbook – it has been highligthed for key words and to more easily differentiate between the levels of the rubric. You also have the same document in a different format. It too is highlighted, and we have created a cross-walk with Marzanos Leadership evaluation. This is to help you make the connections between the work we are doing, it is also to facilitate the identification of documentation. So if you have documents you have used for your CLEM teams, you may use the same for your accreditation artifacts. AND CONVERSELY, the artifacts you use for the indicators may be used for your CLEM documentation in the furture. Two birds – one stone.

Standards Teams Self-Assessment Process Helping to Process New Content Using the Standard 1 template for Self Assessment Workbooks for Schools: Review and discuss each indicator Score the indicators individually Enter scores into Survey Monkey at school site use either Excel spreadsheet or Survey Monkey Discuss averages Check artifacts At the end of the Standard List Powerful Practices Opportunities for Improvement https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CCPS-AdvancED-Schools https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CCPS-AdvancED-District You may use either the QR code or the URL to log into Survey Monkey. As you discuss the Standard, the Indicators, and rubrics , determine a score for your school. Come to a consensus on the score and only enter one score per school Now at your school site, you may have each person enter their scores individually. It depends on the dynamics of the team. Then you would determine the average, and then have the discussion as to where the score should fall. Should it be a 2 or a 3. What best represents your school. My assumption here is that you all are of like minds for the most part. Also, This will allow us to pull the averages of all schools and they will be equally weighted. Next: Check artifacts within Survey Monkey you will locate when you return to your building List any additional artifacts you feel might reflect your level of accomplishment Contact us when you want results of survey monkey

Standards Teams Self-Assessment Process Reviewing Content: Standard deviation sheet +1 Standard Deviation = Powerful Practice -1 Standard Deviation = Improvement Priority Opportunities for Improvement AEN Average = AdvancED Network Average Artifacts Types Locations System in place In your packet is a copy of the Standard Deviation spreadsheet. It is also located on our website, for your use. You may use this for your teams to enter scores and determine averages. Or you may use this Survey Monkey. Jodi will send you a link if requested. The AEN is the AdvancED Network Average – so these are the average scores of over 34,000 schools and school systems So the averages and Standard Deviations are constantly updating. Btw now and February 20th – there could be 1000 reviews and those scores will be averaged in. 1+ Powerful Practices -1Improvement Priority Artifacts – as we go through the process we will help you to determine your artifacts – our plan is to have a location on our District Website for you to upload your artifacts We will work on that soon and communicate that information For now, if you are going to begin the work, create folders and place your artifacts in them We will send naming conventions and instructions at a later date

Standard 1: The school maintains and communicates a purpose and direction that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning. Let’s get started: 8:20-8:40 We will come around and assist you. You have 20 minutes per Standard. In the comment sections at the end of the Standards: This is the section to begin listing areas of strength and opportunities for improvement (not this exercise stinks and I wish I was in my building looking at my test scores) So after you go down through the indicators, begin your list

Standard 2: The school operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness. Note: on 2.1; 2.2; and 2.3 refer to the School Board 8:40 – 9:00 For the Artifacts, you will need to produce only those for which you would be responsible – for example: School handbooks. Don’t forget to enter your comments at the end

Standard 3: The school’s curriculum, instructional design and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning. For Standard 3 – This is probably the most important of all. Really take some time to analyze where you are along the continuum and where are areas of strength and 9:00-9:20 Opportunties for improvement

Standard 4: The school has resources and provides services that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. 9:40 – 10:00 BREAK

Standard 5: The school implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and school effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement. 10:20-10:40

Process at School Sites Establish Standards teams – cross representation from departments or grade levels Break out and follow process modeled Reconvene and report out Establish consensus on scoring

For more information or assistance, please contact Dr For more information or assistance, please contact Dr. Terrie Mitev at 70022 mitevte@collierschools.com ~or~ Jodi Cronin at 70028 cronij@collierschools.com