Efficiency of incomplete split-plot designs A compromise between traditional split-plot designs and randomised complete block design Kristian Kristensen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPM in wheat. The EU requires IPM by what does this mean??? 1.Blind Chemical control –Schematic and routine treatments 2.Chemical control based.
Advertisements

Split-Plot Designs Usually used with factorial sets when the assignment of treatments at random can cause difficulties –large scale machinery required.
Split-Plot Designs Usually used with factorial sets when the assignment of treatments at random can cause difficulties large scale machinery required for.
Types of Checks in Variety Trials One could be a long term check that is unchanged from year to year –serves to monitor experimental conditions from year.
Statistics in Science  Statistical Analysis & Design in Research Structure in the Experimental Material PGRM 10.
Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments
INTRODUCTION Kenya is a food insecure Economy reliant on rain-fed agriculture(by a factor of 1.6) Key intervention: irrigation Irrigation challenged by.
Design and Analysis of Augmented Designs in Screening Trials
Experiences with incomplete block designs in Denmark Kristian Kristensen Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.
Case Studies of Batch Processing Experiments Diane K. Michelson International Sematech Statistical Methods May 21, 2003 Quality and Productivity Research.
“Managing Applied Nitrogen on Winter Canola in the Pacific Northwest” Idaho Oil Seed Conference February 12, 2009 Moscow, Idaho Don Wysocki, Tom Chastain,
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Statistics: The Science of Learning from Data Data Collection Data Analysis Interpretation Prediction  Take Action W.E. Deming “The value of statistics.
Nested and Split Plot Designs. Nested and Split-Plot Designs These are multifactor experiments that address common economic and practical constraints.
Introduction to the design (and analysis) of experiments James M. Curran Department of Statistics, University of Auckland
Principles of Experimental Design
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Testing New Products 13WMG16 Bill Bowden and Dave Gartner West Midlands Group Crop updates March 7, 2014 Badgingarra.
Factorial Experiments
Chapter 8Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference,
Fixed vs. Random Effects
INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Introduction to Design of Experiments.
Much of the meaning of terms depends on context. 1.
European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research COST is supported by the EU RTD Framework Programme ESF provides the COST Office.
Conducting Experimental Trials Gary Palmer. Scientific Method  Formulation of Hypothesis  Planning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis.
Statistical Aspects of a Research Project Mohd Ridzwan Abd Halim Jabatan Sains Tanaman Universiti Putra Malaysia.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Variables, sampling, and sample size. Overview  Variables  Types of variables  Sampling  Types of samples  Why specific sampling methods are used.
Past and Present Issues in the Design of Variety Trials IAMFE, Denmark 2008 Johannes Forkman Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Evaluation of the System of Rice Intensification in Bhutan Karma Lhendup Faculty of Agriculture College of Natural Resources Royal University of Bhutan.
Control of Experimental Error Blocking - –A block is a group of homogeneous experimental units –Maximize the variation among blocks in order to minimize.
A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T Faculty of Agricultural Sciences Efficiency of incomplete split-plot designs A compromise between traditional split-plot.
Learning Objectives After this section, you should be able to: The Practice of Statistics, 5 th Edition1 DESCRIBE the shape, center, and spread of the.
Two Sample Problems  Compare the responses of two treatments or compare the characteristics of 2 populations  Separate samples from each population.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY Central tendency means average performance, while dispersion of a data is how it spreads from a central tendency. He measures.
Sampling.
Analysis of Definitive Screening Designs
EXPERIMENT DESIGN.
Statistical Quality Control, 7th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery.
Statistical Core Didactic
PLANT BREEDING Introduction
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Graduate School of Business Leadership
(Rancangan Petak Terbagi)
Precision Farming Profitability
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Basic Training for Statistical Process Control
Basic Training for Statistical Process Control
Past and Present Issues in the Design of Variety Trials
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error and plot size in wheat field experiments Coefficient of variation: Relative.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Experimental Design All experiments consist of two basic structures:
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Introduction to the design (and analysis) of experiments
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
VARIABILITY IN TRIALS Adapted fr M Gunther.
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Much of the meaning of terms depends on context.
DOE Terminologies IE-432.
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Efficiency of incomplete split-plot designs A compromise between traditional split-plot designs and randomised complete block design Kristian Kristensen, Federica Bigongiali and Hanne Østergård IAMFE Denmark 2008 Koldkærgård, June 30th to July 3rd 2008

Outline Introduction What is an incomplete split-plot Compared to traditional split-plot and randomised complete block design Performed experiments Efficiency of incomplete split-plot designs Discussion and conclusions

Introduction Example of trial to be performed 2-factorial design Treatment factor 1 with few levels (e.g. ± Herbicides) Treatment factor 2 with many levels (e.g. a large number of varieties) Some possible designs Split-plot Randomised complete block designs Incomplete split-plot

Introduction Split-plot Very convenient Easy to apply herbicides to many plots in one run Needs only guard area around each whole-plot Inefficient comparison of treatments Herbicides: few and large whole plots, large replicates and thus large distance between whole plots Varieties: large whole plots and thus large distance between some sub-plots

Introduction Randomised complete block Inconvenient Difficult to apply herbicides to each individual plot May need guard area around each plot Efficiency of treatment comparisons Herbicides: many whole plots increase efficiency but large replicates and thus large distance between most plots decrease efficiency Varieties: large replicates and thus large distance between most plots decrease efficiency

What is an incomplete split-plot Small example: ±Herbicide, 9 varieties

What is an incomplete split-plot Practical compromise Easier than RCB, more difficult than split-plot May require guard-area around each pair (group) of incomplete blocks Efficiency Herbicides: several whole plots, comparison within pair (group) of incomplete block and thus moderate distance between incomplete “whole-plots”: More efficient than split-plot Varieties: few plots within each incomplete “whole plot” and thus small distance between sub-plots: More efficient that RCB and split-plot

Incomplete split-plot Construction Can be based on different types of incomplete block designs We choosed to use to use -designs (generalised lattice) -designs Are resolvable Are available for almost any number of varieties and replicates in combination with a broad range of block sizes

Performed experiments Trial A-D: From the project “Characteristics of spring barley varieties for organic farming (BAR-OF)“ Trial E: From the project “Screening of the potential competitive ability of a mixture of winter wheat cultivar against weeds”

Performed experiments, trial A Each plot is 1.5 m × 11.0 m Each block is 12.0 m × 11.0 m

Performed experiments, trial E Each plot is 2.5 m × 12.5 m Each block is 10.0 m × 12.5 m

Measure of efficiency Depends on the comparisons of interest

Efficiency of the designs, Yield

Efficiency of the designs, %Mildew

Efficiency of the designs, other variables

Discussion and conclusions Efficiency Compared to randomised complete block design Incomplete split-plot were most often less efficient when comparing the main effect of treatments Larger number of independent plots/smaller blocks Incomplete split-plot most often more efficient for other comparisons Compared to traditional split-plot Incomplete split-plot were most often more efficient for all types of comparisons Especially for comparing treatment means (many more degrees of freedom and smaller blocks)

Discussion and conclusions Increase in efficiency In most cases larger for grain yield than for mildew Probably because mildew is less sensible to soil fertility Small for trial E when comparing mean of varieties and varieties within treatment Relative small reduction in block sizes Small for trial B when comparing mean of varieties and varieties within treatment Reason unknown

Discussion and conclusions Practical considerations Treatment applications Easier than randomised complete block design More difficult than split-plot design Guard areas Less than for randomised complete block design More than for split-plot design Design and statistical analysis More complex than both randomised complete block design and split-plot design Appropriate software are available and with today's computer power this should not be a problem