Simulation results for

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1392r3 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
OFDMA performance in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Overall MAC Procedure for WUR
MAC Calibration results
Proposal on Simulation Scenario Document for 11ax PAR verification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Proposal on Simulation Scenario Document for 11ax PAR verification
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
Power Save Calibration
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Simulation Results of Box5
Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Enhancement on resource utilization in OBSS environment
Enhancement on resource utilization in OBSS environment
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Power Save Calibration
Simulation results for
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Power Save Calibration
Simulation results for
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation Results of Box5
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box 5 Calibration Result
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Simulation results for
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
Latency analysis for EHT
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on System Level Simulation
LC MAC submission – follow up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Performance evaluation of deterministic service for EHT
Presentation transcript:

Simulation results for May 2015 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: 2015-05-11 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Email Suhwook Kim LG Electronics 19, Yangjea-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea +82-2-6912-6589 suhwook.kim@lge.com Wookbong Lee wookbong.lee@lge.com Hyeyoung Choi hy0117.choi@lge.com Jeongki Kim jeongki.kim@lge.com Kiseon Ryu kiseon.ryu@lge.com HanGyu Cho hg.cho@lge.com Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2015 Abstract This submission provides updated simulation results for Box-5 calibration and reviews our Box-5 calibration work Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics John Doe, Some Company

Box-5 Calibration [1] Box 0, 1, and 2 calibration are almost done May 2015 Box-5 Calibration [1] Box 0, 1, and 2 calibration are almost done Box 3 calibration is now in progress Box 5 calibration was initially discussed in September meeting Box 5: Integrated system simulator calibration The objective is to align a combination of all PHY and MAC features Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Box-5 PHY Details [2] May 2015 PHY parameters BW All BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Channel model TGac D NLOS per link Shadow fading iid log-normal shadowing (5 dB standard deviation) per link Data Preamble Type [5GHz, 11ac], always decoded correctly after successful reception, duration is considered. STA TX Power 15 dBm per antenna  AP TX Power 20 dBm  per antenna AP number of TX/RX antennas 1/1 STA number of TX /RX antennas AP antenna gain 0 dBi STA antenna gain -2 dBi Noise Figure 7dB CCA threshold -56 dBm (measured across the entire bandwidth after large-scale fading) Rx sensitivity -76 dBm (a packet with lower rx power is dropped) Link Adaption Fixed MCS =5 (234.0 Mbps) Channel estimation ideal PHY abstraction RBIR, BCC [1, 5] Channel correlation Independent or time-correlated channel per packet Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Box-5 MAC Details [2] May 2015 MAC parameters Access protocol [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] Queue length A single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets Traffic type UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps (may not enough to model full buffer) MPDU size 1540 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 40 MAC header) Aggregation [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA], Max aggregation: 64 MPDUs with 4-byte MPDU delimiter Max number of retries 10 Beacon Disabled RTS/CTS OFF Traffic direction UL Only Output metric -CDF or Histogram of per non-AP STA throughput (received bits/overall simulation time) -PER of all AP/STA (1 - # of success subframes / # of transmitted subframes) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

11ac Scenario 6 – OBSS Enterprise [2][3] May 2015 11ac Scenario 6 – OBSS Enterprise [2][3] Fixed Location and Association STA1 (5,-9.5) STA2 (3.5,7.5) STA4 (-4.5,0.5) STA5 (-1.5,6) STA7 (-9,-5) STA8 (-8.5,8.5) STA10 (-3,0.5) STA11 (-0.5,8) STA13 (-4,-4) STA14 (7.5,-1) STA16 (8,-6) STA17 (0,-7.5) STA19 (-2.5,-4.5) STA20 (0.5,-2) STA22 (0,-4.5) STA23 (-1.5,7) STA25 (3.5,-5) STA26 (9,9.5) STA28 (-8,-5.5) STA29 (1.5,3.5) AP A (0,0) AP B (40,20) AP C (-40,-20) STA3 (7.5+xb, ‑9.5+yb) STA9 (7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA15 (3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA21 (-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA27 (‑6+xb, 2.5+yb) STA6 (-5.5+xc,4.5+yc) STA12 (7+xc,7+yc) STA18 (10+xc,0.5+yc) STA24 (3+xc,2.5+yc) STA30 (9.5+xc,3.5+yc) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

History on Box-5 Calibration May 2015 History on Box-5 Calibration We have discussed Box-5 calibration from September meeting Many issues have been agreed and addressed in DCN 1523r5 However, we still found big performance difference among members Simulator members agreed that we have to focus on 1 BSS UL case in March meeting (BSS B) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Focusing case No shadowing Fixed MCS = 5 instead of 7 currently used May 2015 Focusing case No shadowing Fixed MCS = 5 instead of 7 currently used Firstly calibrate 3 combinations of 2-STA case (3+9, 3+27, 3+15) Then we turn to 3-STA case (3+9+27, 3+9+15) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

One BSS Test Result BSS B (STAs 3, 9, 15, 21, 27) May 2015 One BSS Test Result BSS B (STAs 3, 9, 15, 21, 27) UL only, UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps Throughput [Mbps] PER 2 STAs STA 3, STA 9 STA 3: 98.25 STA 9: 98.13 11.2% 11.0% STA 3, STA 27 STA 3: 91.02 STA 27: 94.19 17.8% 17.2% STA 3, STA 15 STA 3: 98.36 STA 15: 98.95 9.7% 3 STAs STA 3, STA 9, STA 27 STA 3: 65.66 STA 9: 65.49 STA 27: 55.61 18.9% 18.4% 23.5% STA 3, STA 9, STA 15 STA 3: 60.16 STA 9: 62.89 STA 15: 66.01 19.6% 19.3% Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

May 2015 Conclusion In this submission, we provided updated simulation results for Box 5 calibration We focused on 1 BSS UL case Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Reference [1] 11-14/0571r5 Evaluation Methodology May 2015 Reference [1] 11-14/0571r5 Evaluation Methodology [2] 11-14/1177r2 Box5 Calibration Discussion [3] 11-09/0451r16 TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology [4] 11-14/1523r5 Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics