Methodology to Distribute Target Loads

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Target Load Method CBP Principals Staff Committee Meeting July 22, 2009 Gary Shenk U.S. EPA CBPO Presentation No. 2 Update on Methods Plan for Resolution.

Advertisements

The School Level Committee The Central Parity Committee Role and Composition.

EPA response to hydrodynamic workshop and subsequent letters Gary Shenk 3/27/2012.

James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.

San Joaquin River Bedload Sampling summary January 4 and 5, 2011 April 1 and 2, 2011 Ledger Island.

INTRODUCING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL PROCESS TO VIRGINIA November 2009.

Carin Bisland, EPA Management Board Presentation 5/9/12.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: A CONVERSATION. Community Engagement is not an exercise in public relations It is a collaborative process aimed at reaching a shared.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.

Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.

March 28, 2013 GradingPracticesCommittee Report and Recommendations.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.

District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.

Effective School Council Meetings School Council Forums 2009.

Cardiology & OB Topic Updates Bree Collaborative Meeting March 27, 2013.

James W. Beever III Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, FL ( , ext 224)

Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.

What is Negotiated Rulemaking? Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution The University of Texas School of Law.

FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.

What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act

Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.

1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.

Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.

Slide 1 Drinking Water Subcommittee Greg Gartrell, Chair CALFED Bay-Delta Public Advisory Committee SWRCB Periodic Review Presentation January 2005.

The Skagit Alternative Futures Project How might the Skagit Valley develop over 50 years - through 2060? Given population growth, climate change, changing.

Suwannee-Satilla Drainage Basin: Flood Control Issues and Requested Action Suwannee-Satilla Regional Water Planning Council Douglas, GA December 8, 2010.

_name © 2009 KRONOS INCORPORATED I February 20, _name Kronos Early Adopters Meeting April 05, 2012 The University of New Mexico Kronos.

Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

Criteria Attainment and Assessing Management Effectiveness Peter Tango CBPO Co-chair Bob Hirsch USGS Staff Expert Katie Foreman May 20,

Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.

Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.

Housing Methodology Committee Meeting April 14, 2000 Housing Methodology Committee Meeting April 14, 2000.

Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.

1 Professional Services Committee and DNS Work Group Charles Stripling Woody Hicks George McMahon May 18, 2011.

Goal Lines for Monitoring Gary Shenk TMAW/NTWG 8/15/

Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017

Manchester Master Plan Committee (MPC) Planning Framework

Site Governance Team Basics

Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule

State Profile Maryland

2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections

State Profile Delaware

Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017

State Profile Pennsylvania

State Profile New York.

Fitting the pieces together

State Profile West Virginia

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.

Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due

Day 91 Learning Target: Students can use statistics appropriate to the shape of the data distribution to compare center (median, mean) and spread (interquartile.

What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?

Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation

Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт

Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.

James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager

Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2

Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0

Department of Environmental Quality

CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting

A brief class assessment

Pricing and Margins Manager National Grid Distribution

Status of the Resource Adequacy Forum

Chapter 13 Running Water Running water means……….

AGENDA ITEM 2. California Water Action Plan and The Delta Plan – How are They Working and What’s Next? RANDY: Introduce Agenda Item, Jessica and Mike.

Presentation transcript:

Methodology to Distribute Target Loads Principals’ Staff Committee 10/23/2009 Bob Koroncai - Gary Shenk

Review of Target Load Method

Relative Effectiveness is a combination of Watershed Delivery and Estuarine Delivery Low Delivery || \/ High Delivery Potomac Estuarine Effectiveness James Estuarine Effectiveness

10% 20% 34% 73% 69% 100% 81% 100%

Review of Target Load Method from April 2 2 2 2 2

How Many lines? Note: Basin-Jurisdictions have single target load no matter how many lines

Appropriate Slope?

Shape of the lines

Distance Between Lines

Preferences of WQGIT Number: 2 lines, WWTP and all else Shape: Open to all WWTP: Set WWTP at a high level and meet water quality goals with other loads Slope: 20% Considered 5 options and reached a unanimous recommendation to forward the 2 following options

4.5 mg/l 8 mg/l 20 percent slope Option A

4.5 mg/l 8 mg/l 20 percent slope Option B

0.22 mg/l 0.53 mg/l Option A 20 percent slope

0.22 mg/l 0.53 mg/l Option B 20 percent slope

Decision Requested . . . after lunch Does the PSC prefer option A or option B as the initial working target loads for the purpose of starting the watershed implementation planning?