Propositions & Arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Artificial Intelligence
Advertisements

Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
Identifying Statements The aim of this tutorial is to help you to distinguish statements from non-statements. Go to next slide.
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
Maxwell: Against Empiricism Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Refutation, Part 1: Counterexamples & Reductio Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
© Michael Lacewing Omnipotence and other puzzles Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
Logic programming ( Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence, Vol) by D. M. Gabbay, C. Hogger, J.A. Robinson. 1.
PHIL 120: Jan 8 Basic notions of logic
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.
The ubiquity of logic One common example of reasoning  If I take an umbrella, I can prevent getting wet by rain  I don’t want to get myself wet by rain.
Logic in School Program Creighton University Director: Dr. Jinmei Yuan Student Teachers: Mark Holmberg Andrew Trapp Jason Bodewitz.
Deduction, Induction, & Truth Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Debate: Claims. Claims Each claim is a statement within the argument that the arguer needs accepted. These statements are given to logically lead the.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Logic & Propositions Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
FALSE PREMISE.
Symbolic Language and Basic Operators Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
The Science of Good Reasons
Fallacies The proposition [(p  q)  q]  p is not a tautology, because it is false when p is false and q is true. This type of incorrect reasoning is.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
A logical puzzle Given situation: Three women stand behind each other. Each one carries a hat on her head and sees only the hats of the person(s) standing.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
(not about ships this time)
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
What is an argument? (What is a statement?)
Aquinas III: The Cause of God and the Argument from Contingency.
The Problem of the External World Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
Philosophy Here and Now: chapter two
Logic.
Omnipotence and other puzzles
Critical Thinking and Arguments
FALSE PREMISE.
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Debate: Claims.
Logic programming ( Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence, Vol) by D. M. Gabbay, C. Hogger, J.A. Robinson .
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Symbolic Language and Basic Operators
The Problem of Evil.
Logic – Bell Ringer.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning
Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proof, Sets, and Functions
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument
Omnipotent Deity Atheist Agnostic Omnibenevolent Polytheist Analogy
Introduction to Logic Lecture 1 What is Critical Reasoning?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2)
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
Persuasion Basics Persuasion is the use of words or images to influence the actions and opinions of others. It is trying to convince others that your opinions.
8th grade Review Persuasive Techniques Reviewed
Introducing Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

Propositions & Arguments Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College

Overview What is Logic? Propositions Arguments Exercises Bonus: Why Are Philosophy Majors So Successful?

What is Logic? Logic: the study of the methods and principles used to distinguish good from bad reasoning Synonyms for reasons: “backing up,” support, arguments, evidence, justification Distinguished from rhetoric and persuasion

Propositions Proposition: an abstract entity that asserts something is the case. Synonyms: statement, claim Is the kind of thing that is either true or false

Propositions ≠ sentences A sentence is a linguistic entity, i.e., it is made up of sounds or images; Declarative sentences express propositions, which are abstract entities. Ex. “It’s raining” and “Il pleut” are two sentences, but they express the same proposition, i.e., it’s raining.

Testing for proposition-hood Both sentences express propositions! Take a sentence. Attach “It’s true that” or “It’s false that” to it. If the resulting sentence is grammatical, then it’s a proposition. Ex. it’s raining. Ex. Khalifa is evil. But one might be misleading! It’s true that It’s false that

Sentences that do not express propositions This doesn’t make sense! Questions Ex. What time is it? Imperatives Ex. Do your homework. Exclamations Ex. Holy crap! It’s false that It’s true that It’s true that Holy crap! This is nonsense too!

How can imperatives be turned into propositions? Do your homework. You should do your homework. Doing your homework is good. Your homework is worth doing. Can you think of examples of questions or exclamations that express propositions?

Compound propositions Compound proposition: proposition composed of other propositions. Conjunctions (P and Q) Khalifa is smart and Khalifa is handsome. Disjunctions (P or Q) Either you do your homework or you go to the concert. Conditionals (If P then Q) If you do your homework, then you will pass. Under what conditions are these statements false?

Arguments Argument: a set of propositions such that one member of that set, the conclusion, can be affirmed on the basis of the others, the premises. Inference: the process of affirming the conclusion on the basis of the premises.

The canonical example of an argument If it’s raining, then the streets are wet. It’s raining. So the streets are wet. PREMISES CONCLUSION

What is Logic? (Redux) Ideally, we reason well with true beliefs. Logic is concerned with good and bad forms of reasoning. “Forms of reasoning” = “types of arguments” Good reasoning ≠ true beliefs Bad Luck: We can reason well but have false beliefs Good Luck: We can reason poorly and have true beliefs Ideally, we reason well with true beliefs.

Bad Luck: Good reasoning, false beliefs Example: A If C is longer than A, then C is not the shortest line. C is longer than A. Therefore C is not the shortest line. B C

Good Luck: Bad reasoning, true beliefs If it’s raining, the streets are wet. The streets are wet. So it’s raining.

By themselves, conditionals are NOT arguments! If you study hard, then you will pass the course. Because you study hard, you will pass the course. This statement asserts neither that you study hard nor that you pass the course. This one asserts both.

However, conditionals can be parts of arguments If you study hard, then you will pass the course. You study hard. So you’ll pass the course. In this case, the conditional is a premise If you study hard, then you’ll do well on the tests. If you do well on the tests, then you’ll pass the course. So if you study hard, then you’ll pass the course. Here, the first two conditionals are premises; the last is a conclusion.

Exercise #3 Aquinas argued that human intelligence is a gift from God and therefore “to apply human intelligence to understand the world is not an affront to God, but is pleasing to him.” Premise Conclusion

#5) (1) Standardized tests have a disparate racial and ethnic impact; (2) white and Asian students score, on average, markedly higher than their black and Hispanic peers. (3) [These disparities appear in] fourth-grade tests, college entrance exams, and every other assessment on the books. (4) If a racial gap is evidence of discrimination, then all tests discriminate.

Exercise #9 Houses are built to live in, not to look on; therefore, use [should] be preferred before uniformity.

Exercise #14 Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually incompatible. If God is omniscient, he must already know how he is going to intervene to change the course of history using his omnipotence. But that means he can’t change his mind about his intervention, which means he is not omnipotent. 1) If God is omniscient, he must already know how he is going to intervene to change the course of history using his omnipotence. 2) If God already knows how he will intervene, then God cannot change his mind. 3) If God cannot change his mind, then he is not omnipotent.

Exercise #15 Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has; (1) it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but more frequently than not (2) [reason] struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God.

Why Are Philosophy Majors So Successful?