T-Nexus – AEP’s new Network Model Management Solution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
Advertisements

© 2011 Siemens Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. Answers for energy. PSS ® ODMS a proven solution for CIM-based network modeling Anna Geevarghese T&D Service.
HP Quality Center Overview.
LEARN. NETWORK. DISCOVER. | #QADexplore Implementing Business Process Management: Steps to Success WCUG – November 18, 2014.
Charting a course PROCESS.
3rd Annual Energistics Standards Summit Standards – Benefits across Industries Michael Strathman Aspen Technology, Inc 23 October 2008.
EPRI CIM for Dynamic Models Project Report Terry Saxton Xtensible Solutions May 13, 2009.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
A Family of CIM EMS Exchange Standards based on CIM/XML ( ) - Static Network Model Exchange ( ) - Dynamic Model Exchange? - Schematic.
9/14/2015 IEEE Presentation Time-Based Management of Large Scale Network Models John Moseley P.E. Lead Network Model Engineer.
Common Information Model and EPRI Smart Grid Research
Doug Bellomo April 6, NFDA Retreat & Conference “Risk MAP--Foundation, Transition, Integration” Risk MAP: An Update to NFDA.
Save a Tree: Use an eForm Automating IT Change Request Management Processes (Concurrency IT Department)
European Model Exchange Standard based on - IEC , IEC (updated 2009) - IEC (updated 2009) Jay Britton
Assessing the influence on processes when evolving the software architecture By Larsson S, Wall A, Wallin P Parul Patel.
EMS User’s Group Presented By Margaret Goodrich Project Consultants, LLC Presented to EMS User’s Group Austin, TX September.
EMS Users Conference 1 September 23rd – 26th CIM in the Network Model Management System Joel Koepke Network Model Engineer, ERCOT.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Network Model Management System (NMMS)
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Core Workflows II - Concepts Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Core Workflows II - Concepts.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
Moderator: Randy Gillis, Black Knight Financial Services Panelists: Mark Kleingers, Black Knight Financial Services Mick Smothers, Capco September 12,
IT Vendor Management March, 2015 Peter Baskette Pratike Patel.
Eric Rinearson Director, Facilities Maintenance Services
Process 4 Hours.
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
John Philbrick PE, CCP, PMP
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Roles and Responsibilities
Utility Needs and Smart Grid for Major Storm Events
Using Games to Effect Organizational Change
[WP1] T1.2 User and Business Requirements
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Overview of MDM Site Hub
Delivering Risk Informed Engineering Programs (50.69) The OG Plan
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Pics from trips Alan Pears AM
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Software Configuration Management
Asset Health Data Modeling Update on Current Work
EOB Methodology Overview
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Deploying CIM to Bridge the Modeling Gap Between Operations and Planning Mike usa.siemens.com/digitalgrid unrestricted © Siemens AG 2017.
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
1. Define a Vision & Identify Business Scenarios
CUNY City College Kickoff Meeting November 2nd, 2017
Service Delivery and Support Program Update – Jan. 31, 2018
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Welcome to the CIM University
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
European CIM User Group Meeting Ljubljana, Slovenia June 7, 2018
Raytheon Missile Systems Steve Lacy
Project Ideation Agile Down-to-Earth © 2016.
TDL: The ETSI Test Description Language
Jason Ausmus, Jason Smith and Akshay Shivaram Peak Operations Planning
Seismic Implementation Kickoff
TDL: The ETSI Test Description Language
DMAIC Roadmap DMAIC methodology is central to Six Sigma process improvement projects. Each phase provides a problem solving process where-by specific tools.
The Network Model Management System
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
Integrated Program Management
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Security Policies and Implementation Issues
Executive Project Kickoff
IEEE Architecture Council Overview
Productivity Loop PowerWriter A systematic approach to world-class
WORKSHOP Establish a Communication and Training Plan
Time-Based Management of Large Scale Network Models
Presentation transcript:

T-Nexus – AEP’s new Network Model Management Solution Eric Hatter, American Electric Power Margaret Goodrich, Integration Lead New Albany, Ohio November 8, 2017

Network Model Management Improvement at AEP AEP’s Network Model Management Improvement Program (NMMI) Who is AEP? Why do it? and Benefits How did it happen? History and Success Factors What is AEP doing? Technical Foundation Phase II Implementation Strategy

American Electric Power (AEP) as a Utility Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio Serves customers in 11 U.S. states Maintains the largest transmission network in the U.S. with over 40,000 miles of transmission Member of three RTOs: PJM, SPP, and ERCOT Combined PJM, SPP & ERCOT state estimator cases exceed 14,000 substations and 22,000 buses. Who? Large, Transmission-Focused, Multiple Footprints

AEP T-Nexus Purpose Goals Revise network model management in the AEP Operations, Planning, Protection and Asset Management domains with the intent of gaining qualitative benefits across all AEP Transmission footprints Goals Unify modeling processes across the AEP Transmission footprints Reduce manual effort of mapping between applications Improve data governance Implement clear information flow throughout AEP Transmission organization Enable data analytics

AEP T-Nexus Program Benefits Improved efficiency and reduction in operating cost Eliminate existing duplicate processes Facilitate automation Decrease labor Improved overall accuracy of network models Reduced likelihood of serious operating / planning errors stemming from bad models Reduced time required to perform or update studies Support for post-event analysis Tracking of model changes with ability to recreate cases after changes Forward-looking solution positions AEP to effectively deal with future process or application changes (both internal and external) Why? Efficiency, Accuracy, Future Flexibility

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2013 Integrated Network Model Management EPRI project Scope: Operations (EMS and Outage Scheduling)

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2013 Integrated Network Model Management EPRI project Scope: Operations (EMS and Outage Scheduling) Existing information flows Network Model Manager (NMM) vision

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2013 Integrated Network Model Management EPRI project Scope: Operations (EMS and Outage Scheduling) Existing information flows Network Model Manager (NMM) vision …………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………….. 2014 NMM Tool Functional Requirements EPRI project Industry vision for Transmission NMM architecture and tool 8 utilities, 2 vendors 2015 AEP T-Nexus program launch Multi-year, multi-million dollar integration/procurement project Scope: Operations, Planning, Protection

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2013 Integrated Network Model Management project Scope: Operations (EMS and Outage Scheduling) Existing information flows Network Model Manager (NMM) vision EPRI “Guide to Exploring Centralized Network Model Management” (freely available at www.epri.com PID 3002000609) 2014 NMM Tool Functional Requirements project Industry vision for Transmission NMM architecture and tool 8 utilities, 2 vendors EPRI “Network Model Manager Technical Market Requirements” (freely available at www.epri.com PID 3002003053) 2015 AEP T-Nexus program launch Multi-year, multi-million dollar integration/procurement project Scope: Operations, Planning, Protection

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2016 T-Nexus Program progress Initiated Program Charter, stakeholder identification, groups & roles definitions Executive approval Consultants selected/engaged Completed exploration/documentation of AEP current state Articulated high-level design via Business Scenarios

AEP T-Nexus Program History 2016 T-Nexus Program progress Initiated Program Charter, stakeholder identification, groups & roles definitions Executive approval Consultants selected/engaged Completed exploration/documentation of AEP current state Articulated high-level design via Business Scenarios Identified requirements (especially for Network Model Manager tool) Held technical training (Common Information Model & integration) Started product/vendor selection process Initial demonstrations-Complete Request for Proposal - Complete Vendor trials upcoming

AEP T-Nexus Program Success Factors An ‘improvement’ mindset Goal was not ‘replacement’ or ‘new system’ A effective champion Persistence Continuous attention over multiple years Business alignment Transmission is AEP’s business focus Encouraged interest at all levels Engaging integration resources ‘early and often’ Integration expertise, knowledge of similar initiatives Engagement with CIM standards community Fortuitous timing Benefitted from other projects (ERCOT, ENTSO-E) Benefitted from NMM Technical Market Requirements work CIM readiness to support inside-the-utility data management How? Inspired Vision, Business Alignment, Humility, Luck

Network Model Management Improvement at AEP AEP’s T-Nexus Program Who is AEP? Large, Transmission-Focused, Multiple Footprints Why do it? Efficiency, Accuracy, Future Flexibility How did it happen? Inspired Vision, Business Alignment, Humility, Luck What is AEP doing? Technical Foundation Phase II Implementation Strategy

T-Nexus Functionality Overview- What we have today Architecture Layout – Siloes of Duplicated Information

T-Nexus Functionality Overview – Where We Are Going

Key Technical Drivers All engineering studies and operation centers derive models from the same core data building blocks. Any given grid element (like a transformer) will be represented in the same way in every study in which it is present. Consistent practices across AEP units in ERCOT, SPP, PJM. Different sets of data come from different sources. Each datum should have one authoritative source. Automated feed from engineering sources, including automated derivation of analytical models from detailed design. Repeatable build processes that minimize manual steps.

Network Model Management Improvement at AEP AEP’s T-Nexus Program Who is AEP? Large, Transmission-Focused, Multiple Footprints Why do it? Efficiency, Accuracy, Future Flexibility How did it happen? Inspired Vision, Business Alignment, Humility, Luck What is AEP doing? Technical Foundation Phase II Implementation Strategy

AEP T-Nexus Program Phases and Deployments Vendor/Product selection – Phase I Vendor Trials between 2 best products Contract negotiation Product deployment This was completed in January, 2017 Incremental Integrations – Phase II First Deployment – by January 2018 PSSE/MOD Integration (planning) EMS and Planning Model Alignment TGIS Population/Integration (transmission line engineering detail) TOA/DOL Population Integration (outage scheduling) Second Deployment – By September 2018 EMS Integration (operations) IPS Population/Integration (substation engineering detail) Third Deployment – By April 2019 Aspen Integration (protection) SCADA & ICCP Deployments – Phase III - 2020

T-Nexus Functionality Overview- Future Data/Project Flows

T-Nexus Functionality Overview- Model Building Base Model Jul 20, 2017 1:00 pm Jul 20, 2017 2:00 pm Sep 1, 2017 8:00 am Sep 1, 2017 9:00 am Sep 1, 2017 10:00 am Sep 30, 2017 9:00 am Nov 8, 2017 8:00 am A projection of all changes that are scheduled to occur on or before a given date/time on top of a “start of world representation of a electric grid” aka base model. Slide Courtesy of John Moseley of ERCOT

T-Nexus Functionality Overview- Testing Approach 5 Levels of Testing prior to Model/Case Release Level 1 Ran by User prior to “submission” Range Checks Association Checks Completeness Checks (may include Power Flow) Level 2 Model Coordinator Visual checks Additional Programmatic Sanity Checks Level 3 Engineer Review Assessment for Power Flow using the single project against the current As-Built Level 4 Power Flow test with the project incorporated with all other projects for a specified timeframe Level 5 EMS Testing in the EMS Staging Environment (includes attachment of external model and EMS Vendor validation processes)

AEP T-Nexus Siemens Solution – PSS®ODMS Chuck DuBose – Siemens PTI New Albany, Ohio November 8, 2017

PSS®ODMS Solution Overview Native Imports and Exports Project and Scenario Environment Extensibility and Customization Custom Imports and Exports Automation

The Flow of Data

The Flow of Changes

Data Viewing

Programmatically Generate and Manually Adjust Single Line Diagrams PSS®ODMS renders one lines from the connectivity stored in the model Content of one lines are driven by the stored Model Layout can be adjusted to suit the needs of the users

Ability to collapse topology to Bus Branch PSS®ODMS supports collapsing all switching devices to export bus-branch model for planning studies

Circuit Breaker in Operations and ZBR in Planning PSS®ODMS supports the CIM Standard retained switch Switching device is marked as retained and converted into a zero impedance branch in the PSS®E export

Add a Tap Station – UI Based Change

Project Management

Bulk Model Change

PSS®ODMS Extensions

Profile Controlled Export PSS®ODMS will export CIM XML files by profiles in CIMv16 (Equipment, Dynamics, etc) Each Profile contained in a separate file Exported files are zipped

APIs to extract and upload model data Modify a data attribute in the model