MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Mathematical Tasks*
Advertisements

Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
THE INSTRUCTION Highly Effective Services, Inc
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
2013 Mathematics Standards of Learning Institutes Analyzing and Modifying Assessments Examining How We Assess in K-2.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Day Three. What standards were addressed yesterday? MELT wiki: melt-institute-resources.wikispaces.commelt-institute-resources.wikispaces.com.
More Rigorous SOL = More Cognitively Demanding Teaching and Assessing Dr. Margie Mason The College of William and Mary Adapted from
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh February 15, 2007
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
SHIFTING FROM MATHEMATICAL WORKSHEETS TO MEANINGFUL TASKS FACILITATED BY: CYNTHIA BELL NUMERACY SPECIALIST LITERACY ASSISTANCE CENTER.
Allegheny Valley Curriculum Writing
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Teachers in Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting on Mathematics Instruction.
Laurel County SSA Day 4 High School Breakout Session Jim Moore Jennifer McDaniel
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Problem Based Learning 102 How can we ensure maintenance of a high level of cognitive demand from our students?
The Mathematics Problem Solving Model A Professional Development Program Presented by Sarah Enoch September 10, 2011.
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
The Mathematical Education of Inservice Teachers: Lessons Learned Opportunities & Challenges Diane J. Briars NCSM Immediate Past President Co-Director,
5 Practices for Leading Productive Math Discussions in Class Peg Smith and Mary Kay Stein University of Pittsburgh.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
SWVA Math Specialist – Teacher Leaders Mini-Conference
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
CHAPTER 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
3-5 Math Best Practices workshop 2018
Functioning Mathematically
Making the best use of pre-teaching and assigning competence.
Reflecting on Practice TLP/PCMI 2016
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Lesson Structure From September we will be using Maths No Problem text books. Text books have been developed based on excellent mastery practise across.
2013 Mathematics Standards of Learning Institutes General Session
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Lesson Structure  As with last year, we will be using Maths No Problem text books. Text books have been  developed based on excellent mastery practise.
Presentation transcript:

MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS Dr. Betti Kreye Virginia Tech Dr. Jean Mistele Radford University March 21, 2016 Southwest Virginia Higher Education Center Session 2C

Please complete the provided task individually without collaboration.

Why Focus on Tasks? Classroom instruction is generally organized and orchestrated around mathematical tasks The tasks with which students engage determines what they learn about mathematics and how they learn it The inability to enact challenging tasks well is what distinguishes teaching in the U.S. from teaching in other countries that had better student performance on TIMSS

The Importance of Mathematical Tasks There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics is than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics. Lappan & Briars, 1995

Differences Matter Not all tasks are created equal, and different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking. Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

Differences Matter The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn. Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Oliver, & Human, 1997

Categorizing Tasks Low-Level Tasks memorization procedures without connections High-Level Tasks procedures with connections doing mathematics The TASK ANALYSIS guide in your packet, provides what we think of as the hallmarks of tasks at each level of demand. The TAG can be a helpful tool as you consider the level of demand of tasks that you use. BUT I WANT TO ARGUE THAT WHILE COGNITIVE DEMANDS ARE A PRIMARY CONSIDERATION, THEY ARE NOT THE ONLY CONSIDERATION.

Characteristics of Rich Tasks High cognitive demand (Stein et. al, 1996; Boaler & Staples, 2008) Significant content (i.e., they have the potential to leave behind important residue) (Hiebert et. al, 1997) Require justification or explanation (Boaler & Staples, 2008) Make connections between two or more representations (Lesh, Post & Behr, 1988) Open-ended (Lotan, 2003; Borasi & Fonzi, 2002) Allow entry to students with a range of skills and abilities Multiple ways to show competence (Lotan, 2003) Fenciing task has these characterisitics Consider the Patio Tiles as another example of a rich task.

Factors Associated with the Maintenance and Decline of High-Level tasks Decline Maintenance Routinizing problematic aspects of the task Shifting the emphasis from meaning, concepts, or understanding to the correctness or completeness of the answer Providing insufficient time to wrestle with the demanding aspects of the task or so much time that students drift into off-task behavior Engaging in high-level cognitive activities is prevented due to classroom management problems Selecting a task that is inappropriate for a given group of students Failing to hold students accountable for high-level products or processes Scaffolding of student thinking and reasoning Providing a means by which students can monitor their own progress Modeling of high-level performance by teacher or capable students Pressing for justifications, explanations, and/or meaning through questioning, comments, and/or feedback Selecting tasks that build on students’ prior knowledge Drawing frequent conceptual connections Providing sufficient time to explore

Group Activity Form two groups based on grade levels taught: one for teachers of grades K-7, the other teachers of grades 8 – high school. Work together with partners within the group to complete the following activity.

Differences Matter If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve then we need to start with high- level, cognitively complex tasks. Stein & Lane, 1996

Mathematical Tasks: A Critical Starting Point for Instruction …a teacher of mathematics has a great opportunity. If he fills his allotted time with drilling his students in routine operations he kills their interest, hampers their intellectual development, and misuses his opportunity. But if he challenges the curiosity of his students by setting them problems proportionate to their knowledge, and helps them to solve their problems with stimulating questions, he may give them a task for, and some means of, independent thinking.” Polya, 1973/1945

An addition to the mathematical Instructional model When trying to ensure that students progress from their engagement in mathematical tasks to developing the required skills – make sure that the movement from the pictorial representation to the symbolic clearly develops the algorithm: concrete pictorial development of a generalization/procedure/algorithm algorithm / symbolic fluency (with understanding)

Discussion Prompt As a mathematics teacher leader within a building, without any release time from your classroom obligations, how might you be able to assist teachers within your building to implement effective instructional changes?

Take - Away Using one of the provided index cards, please record one new idea that you will take away from this session.

Dr. Betti Kreye Dr. Jean Mistele bkreye@vt.edu jmistele@radford.edu