University of Pittsburgh

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
Advertisements

Financial Conflict of Interest July 2012 rev
Conflict of Interest Office A partner in promoting integrity in research, teaching, and administration.
Research Compliance NEW MEXICO THE UNIVERSITY of.
Conflict of Interest (COI) Objectives: Provide an overview of financial conflict of interest (FCOI) related to research activities at Gillette Describe.
Responsible Conduct in Research Conflict of Interest and Commitment.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Conflict of Interest: Dartmouth College. Why do we care about it ? Conflict of Interest in Research : Unbiased research: design, conduct, reporting Maintain.
 Why are you reading this? Both the Public Health Service and the National Science Foundation require WSU to provide all investigators training related.
Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Updates Office of Sponsored Programs April 2014.
David T. Wehrle, CPA, CIA, CFE/Director Khrys X. Myrddin, MPPM/Associate Director Benjamin T. West, BA/Compliance Coordinator Conflict of Interest Office.
University of Vermont Sponsored Project Administration New PHS Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Regulations Effective August 24th, 2012 Ruth Farrell,
NIH FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST REGULATIONS – 2012 Office of Sponsored Programs Research & Graduate Studies.
Conflicts of Interest in Research: Policies and Regulations Marie Barron, M.A., COI Program Specialist Rick Lyons, M.D., Ph.D., COI Committee C Chair.
Reviewer Disclosure Guide 1) Ensure disclosed information is complete Reviewer Responsibilities 2) Assign a conflict of interest category 3) Develop management.
Conflict of Interest and Technology Transfer Sherrie Settle Assistant Director, Research Compliance Program Institutional Conflict of Interest Officer.
Conflict of Interest Faculty & Staff of Instruction or Research Human Resources 2011.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Committee & Office Partners in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
ECOI electronic Conflict of Interest User Guide 1 Emory University, Office of Research Administration.
Presented by Jerome L. Rosenberg, PhD/Chair of the COI Committee & David T. Wehrle, CPA, CIA, CFE/Director of the COI Office September 10, 2012.
Conflict of Interest Michelle Stickler, DEd Office for Research Protections
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST PRESENTED BY THE UMMC OFFICE OF INTEGRITY AND COMPLIANCE.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
1 Conflict of Interest: A Tricky Issue for Universities Karen Hersey, Professor Franklin Pierce University Nonprofit Technology Transfer Course November.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
1 University of Pittsburgh Presentation to Department of Family Medicine Outside Engagements within the Industry Relationship Policy February 8, 2010 Barbara.
University of Pittsburgh Presentation to Schools of Pharmacy and Nursing: Consulting Requirements within the Industry Relationship Policy Presented by.
F S D P W o r k s h o p F S D P W o r k s h o p University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching,
Managing Conflicts of Interest at the IRB and Institutional Level: INSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Claudia R. Adkison, J.D., Ph.D. Executive Associate.
Faculty Council on Research April 11, 2012 Jeff Cheek, Ph.D. UW Associate Vice Provost for Research Compliance and Operations New PHS regulations on financial.
Partners Conflict of Interest Policy and Reporting October 11, 2012.
NEW PHS COI REGULATIONS CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE DECEMBER 4, 2012 University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office David T. Wehrle, CPA, CFE, CIA Director.
Friday, February 1, a.m. Herberman Auditorium UPMC Cancer Pavilion Presented by the University of Pittsburgh COI Office: Jerome L. Rosenberg, PhD.
F S D P W o r k s h o p F S D P W o r k s h o p University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching,
Copyright © Harvard Medical School. All Rights Reserved. Outside Activity Report: What Do I Need to Report?
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
Stanford Policy – Faculty ◦ Mission: Promote public good by transferring knowledge  Consulting  Technologies arising from research These activities can.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration.
Outside Consulting Relationships: Compliance Review & COI Management Khrys X. Myrddin, MPPM Associate Director, COI Office, University of Pittsburgh.
University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Objectivity in Research, Teaching, & Administrative Activities.
ARTS & SCIENCES ORIENTATION New Faculty
Conflict of Interest in Research
Overview of COI training requirements
eCOI electronic Conflict of Interest
2/10/2018 Conflict of Interest, Ethics, and Commercialization: The Conflict of Interest Committee (COIC)
myGRANT Conflicts of Interest (COI) Module
IRB Open House Conflicts of Interest and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research May 19, 2017 Office of Policy Coordination, Division of Outside.
Colorado State University Conflict of Interest Committee (COIC)
UW Conflict of Interest Program Manager Office of Research Policy
UCR PRO Reviewer Placemat
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Conflict of Interest in Research
Research Integrity Office (RIO)
Overview of COI training requirements
Conflict of Interest (COI)
University of Pittsburgh
New TRACKS COI System: Committee Member Training Guide
Research Compliance at Dartmouth
myGRANT COI NEW User Interface Effective
Financial Conflict of Interest Requirements
Conflicts of Interest and Management Plans
New TRACKS COI System: Committee Member Training Guide
University of Pittsburgh
Presentation transcript:

University of Pittsburgh F S D P W o r k s h o p University of Pittsburgh Conflict of Interest Office A Partner in Promoting Integrity in Research, Teaching, and Administration

INTRODUCTION TO THE SUPERFORM SYSTEM & FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST MANAGEMENT COI Office David Wehrle, Director Khrys Myrddin, Associate Director April 2, 2010

What is a Conflict of Interest? A potential Conflict of Interest (COI) may exist if an individual’s outside interests (especially financial) may affect, or perceive to affect, his/her research, teaching, or administrative activities at the University.

Examples of Potential Conflicts Professor Maureen Belstein, faculty member/researcher Consultant/speaker for National Tool Company (she earned $35,000 last year) NTC wants to sponsor university research to evaluate new technologies Professor Belstein wants to be PI on the study

Examples of Potential Conflicts (cont’d) Dr. William Monardo, faculty member/ researcher President/owner of Laboratory Solutions, Inc. (LSI) Dr. Monardo’s research group purchases scientific supplies and equipment from LSI.

Examples of Potential Conflicts (cont’d) The University was awarded a federal grant on which Dr. Ari Samuel serves as PI. He subcontracted a portion of the work to Scanware for installation of eye-movement analysis software. Dr. Samuel has an equity interest in this vendor.

Examples of Potential Conflicts (cont’d) Dr. Maryann Ruecken developed a back brace, which was patented by the University; she receives royalties for the device through Pitt The technology is licensed to Strait & Narrow, Inc., a non-publicly held company She holds equity in the company Dr. Ruecken is conducting federally sponsored research to further evaluate the technology.

Examples of Potential Conflicts (cont’d) Dr. Argus Hawkeye invented forceps for micro surgery of the eye; This device was licensed to Rod & Cone Corp by the University; Dr. Hawkeye has a right to licensing income (royalties) for the device through Pitt; Dr. Hawkeye wishes to be PI on a clinical trial to further develop the forceps.

Importance of COI Management Why is it important to identify and manage conflicts of interests?

Importance of COI Management (cont’d) If COI is not managed… protection of human subjects may be compromised; integrity of research may be at risk; the public may lose trust in the University and its research findings; the investigator/faculty member may lose the respect of the academic community; violation of scientific norms may result; University may lose public support and funding for academic science;

Importance of COI Management (cont’d) product or service may be inferior; price may be too high; may give actual or perceived improper preferential treatment to vendors; may violate terms of research grants and contracts (including failure to disclose COI) and federal regulations.

Importance of COI Management (cont’d) research results may be excessively delayed or not published; there may be a negative impact on students; University resources may be improperly used; increased government regulations may result; scandals or negative media attention may occur….

Today’s topics Departmental responsibilities Annual COI filing process Using the Superform system COI Oversight & Management

Today’s topics (cont’d) University-level COI Management Research protocols Entrepreneurial endeavors Purchasing Office of Research Additional Help with COI/Resources

Annual COI Filing Process University Policies 11-01-03 (COI – Research/Teaching) 07-05-02 (COI – Designated Administrators and Staff) Annual COI memo from the provost & executive vice chancellor Note: A new University COI policy has just been signed by the Chancellor.

Annual COI Filing Process: Who? Faculty/Researcher Form All individuals with regular faculty appointments Employees who direct or can materially influence research, or who are responsible for the design, conduct, and reporting of research

Annual COI Filing Process: Who? (cont’d) Designated Administrator/Staff form Employees classified as Administrator IV or above, and those of other classifications (including faculty) who are in a position to make, direct, or materially influence University business decisions (e.g., employees who have significant influence over the selection of outside vendors or providers of services) Deans, department chairs, division chiefs, and center directors with faculty appointments must complete both University forms.

Reporting Financial Relationships: When? Institutional Policies Policies 11-01-03 and 07-05-02 require reporting of the outside interests of faculty, administrators, and investigators upon appointment by April 15 of each year whenever new outside interests are accrued using the Superform system https://coi.hs.pitt.edu

What is the Superform system? The electronic Superform system must be used to file COI disclosures (there is no paper form). All forms filed become part of a secure COI database, accessible only to authorized individuals. The Superform system includes reporting forms for only the University of Pittsburgh. UPMC uses a separate system accessible through Infonet http://compliance.infonet.upmc.com/COI.htm

Who Has Access to the COI Database? IRB/IACUC/CORID Purchasing Office of Research Internal Audit General Counsel COI Office COI Committee Chair Regional Campus Presidents/Deans/ Department Chairs Research administrators/coordinators

Who Has Access to the COI Database? (cont’d) Research administrators can determine whether investigators have a current COI form on file Request access through the COI Office (requires name, HSConnect username, departmental affiliation, and level of access to be granted. i.e., basic or operational Send request to rogershn@upmc.edu

Making disclosures—Using the Superform system Returning users: Login using existing HSConnect account Retrieve forgotten password Do not create a new account! Update HSConnect profile Change e-mail address/password New users: Create an HSConnect account If no links to forms appear on Welcome screen, add University affiliation to profile

Making disclosures—Using the Superform system (cont’d) Select the form you wish to complete First-time users must answer every question Returning users will be taken to the Form Summary page Edit responses as applicable Review the Form Summary Click “Submit this form” Click “View and Print” next to the form you wish to print Print and sign Signature Page (SP)

Making disclosures—Using the Superform system (cont’d) Forward Faculty/Researcher SP to department chair for review and signature Forward Admin/Staff SP to the next higher administrator (who is at least at the level of director or department chair) for review and signature

COI Oversight by Supervisors Faculty/Researcher—Department Level Department Chairs review Faculty/Researcher disclosures Ensure that all required employees have signed and submitted the Signature Page by April 15

COI Oversight by Supervisors Faculty/Researcher—Department Level (cont’d) Prepare Management Reporting Forms (MRF) for individuals who disclosed outside interests Section E: Is disclosure alone of the individual’s potential conflict in abstracts, publications, presentations, press releases, and in proposals and applications for research funding sufficient to manage the conflict? Answer Yes, if an individual's outside activities create no conflict with his/her University work, i.e., s/he is not conducting research of commercial interest to any company or making purchases from any company with which s/he has a relationship

COI Oversight by Supervisors Faculty/Researcher—Department Level (cont’d) Answer No if any relationship requires COI management; describe actions taken; e.g., SMP has been invoked for a clinical trial; a data monitoring committee was established for the individual’s research program; entrepreneurial activities are being overseen by the COI Committee, etc.

COI Oversight by Supervisors Faculty/Researcher—Department Level (cont’d) Prepare departmental Annual Data Summary report Submit Signature Pages, related MRFs, and department’s Annual Data Summary Report to dean for review SPs on which no outside interests were disclosed do not need to be submitted to the dean

COI Oversight by Supervisors Faculty/Researcher—Dean’s Level Dean reviews forms received from chairs Approves or modifies any MRFs, as necessary Prepares School’s Annual Data Summary Report Submit Signature Pages, related MRFs, and Departments’ and School’s Annual Data Summary Reports to the provost or senior vice chancellor for the health sciences by Monday, May 17, 2010

COI Oversight by Supervisors Designated Administrators/Staff—Department Level Supervisor reviews Designated Administrators/Staff disclosures Ensures that all required employees have signed and submitted the SP by April 15 The supervisor should work with the employee to develop a plan to manage any potential COI and document it in the form of a memorandum (do not use the MRF) Prepares a brief memo summarizing disclosures made, and submits it to the next higher reporting authority within the responsibility center

COI Oversight by Supervisors Designated Administrators/Staff—Department Level Report unresolved conflicts to the provost, senior vice chancellor for the health sciences, or executive vice chancellor by Monday, May 17; SPs and management plans of resolved conflicts need not be forwarded, and should be filed in department

COI Oversight Signature Pages, Management Reporting Forms, and Annual Data Summary Reports are ultimately forwarded to the COI Office by the provost or senior vice chancellor for the health sciences Everything you need for the annual COI filing process can be found at http://www.coi.pitt.edu/directive.htm

Departmental COI Management Prospective approval from department chair or dean is required for Consultancies, speaking engagements, and membership on scientific advisory boards cannot use University facilities or resources total time expenditures in all outside professional activities cannot exceed one day per week Note: staff members must conduct all outside activities on their own time Involvement of students in outside entities or in research of interest to a company in which a faculty member has a financial interest Purchasing from, or subcontracting work to, a company in which an individual has a financial interest

Departmental COI Management (cont’d) Management Options Divestment or reduction of financial interest Disclosure of COI in publications, presentations, press releases, abstracts, and in proposals and applications for research funding Disclosure of potential COI to others involved in the research Establishment of an oversight committee Dilution of investigator’s role in study, i.e., cannot be PI, but may be co-investigator

Proper use of students/staff by faculty members with outside interests Prospective review and approval of activities by department chair or dean Formal notification of faculty members’ interest in an outside company Faculty members should distribute Student/Staff Notification Form for signature by students/staff Students/staff should discuss any concerns with faculty members’ non-conflicted supervisor and/or COI Committee

Proper use of students/staff by faculty members with outside interests (cont’d) Work under approved Corporate Research Agreement (CRA) should correspond to effort provided for in the CRA (e.g., no overtime) Cannot be compelled to perform work that will benefit the company Compatibility with academic interests of students Timely ability to publish research results for academic credit without hindrance by the company’s commercial interests

Proper use of students/staff by faculty members with outside interests (cont’d) Assurance that students’ inventions remain property of University Employment of students at faculty member’s company Salary must be commensurate with tasks performed Students/staff cannot perform work on University time or use University resources related to a faculty member’s outside professional activities (e.g., providing administrative assistance with faculty’s outside consulting activities)

Proper use of students/staff by faculty members with outside interests (cont’d) Reporting of troublesome COI issues by students/staff to department chair, dean, school’s representative in the Graduate and Professional Student Assembly and/or the Conflict of Interest Committee, or AlertLine, 1-866-858-4456: anonymous, 24 hours a day, accessible from any North American telephone.

SOHS/UPMC Industry Relationship Policy Covers interactions between faculty/ staff in the Schools of the Health Sciences and representatives of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and hospital equipment supply industry (“Industry”) Bans gifts & meals Prohibits participation in “Speakers Bureaus” Defines criteria for participation at off-site meetings

SOHS/UPMC Industry Relationship Policy (cont’d) Imposes certain requirements on consulting contracts Compensation must be tied to specific deliverables (i.e., no flat rate per month) Contracts for more than $10K/12 months must be approved by office of Senior Vice Chancellor for the Health Sciences, Dr. Arthur Levine

University-level COI Management—Research Protocols The COIC is responsible for managing potential conflicts involving the following: Human subject research overseen by the IRB Animal research overseen by the IACUC Research on the clinically brain-dead (CORID) Recombinant DNA research (rDNA/IBC) Human stem cell research (hSCRO)

University-level COI Management—Research Protocols (cont’d) COI questions appear on protocol applications; apply to PI, Co-Is, and research coordinators PI is responsible for ensuring that all Co-Is and research coordinators answer these questions Reporting must be kept current Whenever new outside interests are accrued, faculty members should notify the COI Office and the appropriate regulatory committee (e.g., IRB, IACUC, etc), and update their Faculty/Researcher forms. 42

COI Questions on Protocols Does the principal investigator or any co-investigator or research coordinator involved in this study (or in aggregate with his/her spouse, dependents or other members of his/her household): a. possess an equity interest in the entity that either sponsors this research or owns the technology being evaluated that exceeds 5% ownership interest or a current value of $10,000? b. receive salary, royalty or other payments from the entity that either sponsors this research or owns the technology being evaluated that is expected to exceed $10,000 per year? ……. 43

COI Questions on Protocols (cont’d) c. have rights to the intellectual property (IP) being evaluated as either the inventor of the IP for which a patent has been issued, or as the inventor of the IP that has been optioned or licensed to a company? d. have a financial relationship with a Licensed Start-up Company that has an option or license to utilize the technology being evaluated? 44

COI Questions on Protocols (cont’d) IRB only e. Receive compensation of any amount when the value of the compensation would be affected by the outcome of the research, such as compensation that is explicitly greater for a favorable outcome than for an unfavorable outcome or compensation in the form of an equity interest in the entity that either sponsors this research or owns the technology being evaluated.

University COI Management—Research Protocols Answering Yes to any of the questions on the IRB protocol requires use of the Standard COI Management Plan (SMP) for Human Subject Research Available w/in OSIRIS and from the COI Office Web site: http://www.coi.pitt.edu/Forms/StandardCOIMgmtPlan-HSR.htm

University COI Management—Research Protocols For IACUC, CORID, and hSCRO, investigator cannot be PI if s/he answers Yes to the questions asking about equity, remuneration, or a relationships with a start-up company. Management plan similar to SMP, less the items specific to HSR IBC did not adopt the PI-exclusion rule; reviewed on a case-by-case basis Financial relationships only in the IP being evaluated are reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

University-level COI Management—Licensed Start-up Companies The COI Committee is responsible for managing potential conflicts involving start-up companies (i.e., not publicly traded) that have an option or a license for University intellectual property in which equity (including stock options) is held by University employees or students, members of their immediate families, or by the University Special restrictions on individual relationships with these companies

University-level COI Management—Purchasing University Purchasing Services refers issues to the COI Office for review; e.g., if the requestor or approver of a Directed/Sole Source form has a financial relationship with the company from which a purchase is being requested Purchasing Services reports quarterly to the COIC on purchases made from licensed start up companies

University-level COI Management—Office of Research University must attest that the PI of a grant has a current COI disclosure on file; grants administrators query COI database Contracts officers query the database to see whether PI or other investigators have disclosed a relationship with an industry sponsor Refer to COI Office for review & management

Additional Help with COI Management Conflict of Interest Office COI Office Web site www.coi.pitt.edu includes sample management plans, case studies, oversight checklist for supervisors, COI-related forms, links to relevant policies and the Superform system, and the annual COI memo from the provost and the executive vice chancellor

Resources: Learning about COI COI management presentations tailored to specific departments, upon request ISER (Internet-based Studies in Education and Research) Conflict of Interest Module…

ISER COI Module: Who must complete it? Those who have disclosed outside interests on the University’s Faculty/Researcher form and/or those involved in industry-sponsored research are required to complete the ISER COI module (formerly RPF module 4).

Completing the ISER COI Module Go to https://cme.hs.pitt.edu/  click "All Modules" select "COI Module" from list Test out of module Take chapter quizzes Receive certification

Completing the ISER COI Module (cont’d) at this time, re-certification is not required (despite the “expired” note that may appear in system) access to the ISER database for appropriate individuals (to determine whether the COI module was completed) may be requested through Kathy Sidorovich (ksidorovich@hs.pitt.edu)

Questions?

Contacts/Assistance Jerome L. Rosenberg, PhD/Chair, COI Committee 412-624-3007 jrosenb@pitt.edu David T. Wehrle, CPA, CIA, CFE/Director, COI Office 412-383-1774 wehrledt@upmc.edu Khrys X. Myrddin/Associate Director, COI Office 412-383-2828 myrddink@upmc.edu Hannelore Rogers, MA/Coordinator, COI Office 412-383-1968 rogershn@upmc.edu COI Web site: www.coi.pitt.edu iTarget Team: 412-648-2222 for technical assistance with Superform system