Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Advertisements

Understanding Site Remediation in New Jersey Understanding Site Remediation in New Jersey NJDEP/Air & Waste Management Association Regulatory Update Conference.
Citizens Guide to Pennsylvanias Land Recycling Program.
June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES. PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES –PATH 2 AND 3 PROJECTS –PATH 4 AND 5 PROJECTS W/ WORK.
A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE NAS FINAL REPORT ON CCB PLACEMENT AT COAL MINES KIMERY C VORIES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING.
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
Flood Hazard Areas & the NJPDES Rule s © 2009 Fox Rothschild Land Use and Environmental Regulation in New Jersey October 14, 2009 Flood Hazard Areas &
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Revisions to Washington’s Cleanup Rules Martha Hankins & Chance Asher Toxics Cleanup Program Department of Ecology Water Quality Partnership May 20, 2010.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Martin Smith, Ohio EPA State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Workshop.
Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Proposed Amendments for Terrestrial Wind Regulation in the New Jersey Coastal Zone Kevin Hassell Coastal Management Office NJDEP.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
EPAs Proposed Ground Water Protection Standards 40 CFR 192 an Industry Perspective Peter Luthiger Mesteña Uranium LLC.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
Assessing Your School An Environmental Investigation You have been hired by Eagle Environmental, Inc. to perform an Environmental Assessment of South Hunterdon.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
The Role of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) Paul Sakson, LSRP Paul D. Sakson Associates, Inc.
Tritium: Fleet-Wide Assessment Program Zigmund A. Karpa Director Environmental and Regulatory Affairs.
Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Brandon Real Estate Board - June 19/20031 Your Logo Here ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I.
Vapor Intrusion and Environmental Liability Learning From Past Mistakes EDR Insight Webinar, February 12, 2013 Presented by: Joseph Maternowski Hessian.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update May 19, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Maryland Department of the Environment Harbor Point – Regulatory Overview Horacio Tablada, Director Land Management Administration November 14, 2013.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  All dischargers over 1-acre must develop a SWPPP  6 major portions of every SWPPP Site Evaluation and.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Public Meeting October 21,  Open House6 - 7 PM  Presentations7 - 7:50 PM  Break7: PM  Q & A8 – 9 PM  Conclude9 PM.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
New Life for Landfills One Man’s Trash Another Man’s Treasure.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Protecting Cultural Sites Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Environmental Waste Management Program By Zannita Armell.
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Stony Hill Road Contamination Wake County.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Minnesota CLE June Webcast Extravaganza Environmental Law Basics for the Business and Real Estate Practitioner Joseph G. Maternowski, Hessian & McKasy,
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
Welcome.
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
ASTM E AND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS (PA) NJAC 7:26E
Presentation transcript:

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program

How Rulemaking is Initiated n NJ Legislature writes a bill n Bill is passed by the Legislature and Assembly n Bill is signed by the Governor n Agency (DEP) does rulemaking

Administrative Procedures Act n Publish in the NJ Register n Rule proposal n Public comment period (30-60 Days) n Response to comments n Adoption (within 1 year of proposal) n 5 Year expiration (sunset)

Technical Rules: History Applies to All Contaminated Sites n 1992 First Proposal n 1993 First Adoption n 1997 Readoption w/Amendments n 1999 Brownfield Act Amendments n 2001 Proposed Readoption w/Amendments n 2002 Adoption

Who conducts remediations Person conducting remediation is: n Owner of a site n Operator of a site n Person responsible for the discharge n Volunteer not in any way responsible (prospective purchaser, developer, local government) n Department - Publicly funded remediations

Remediation Milestones n Preliminary Assessment n Site Investigation n Remedial Investigation n Remedial Action Work Plan n Remedial Action Report n Monitoring of Engineering and Institutional Controls

Preliminary Assessment (PA) n Purpose: Identify potentially contaminated areas n Diligent Inquiry – Site history – All materials used/produced, waste generated – Production processes – Listed areas of concern (AOC) – All federal, state, local environmental permits – Site visit

Site Investigation (SI) Purpose: Sample all potentially contaminated areas identified n Sampling biased to highest contamination n Sample and laboratory methods n Building interiors n Soil n Ground water n Surface water and sediments

Site Investigation n Areas specific requirements: Tanks, piping, impoundments, floor drains, etc. n Natural soil background levels - Arsenic, Thallium n Baseline Ecological Evaluation – Contaminants – Eco-receptor – Pathway n Historic contaminated fill material

Site Investigation If ground water contamination is identified investigation is expedited n Determine direction of flow n Conduct well search n Identify domestic wells in 1/2 mile n Identify industrial/supply wells in 1 mile n Contact Department n Sample identified wells n Expedite Remedial Investigation

Remedial Investigation Purpose: For each area of concern (AOC) n Delineate vertical and horizontal extent of contamination n Identify site characteristics n Identify migration pathways n Determine ecological impacts n Containment/stabilization needed

Remedial Action Work Plan Purpose: Demonstrate the proposed remedial action is appropriate n Description of remedy n Remediation standards to be achieved n If remedy will include an engineering or institutional control n Plan for monitoring controls

Remedial Action Work Plan n Area by area remediation plan n Specific area requirements -Tanks, piping, impoundments, floor drains, etc. n Quality assurance plan n Required permits n Soil and sediment erosion control n Health and safety plan n Soil reuse plan

Remedial Action Work Plan n Design engineering controls n Property owners written permission for deed notice n Draft deed notice n Provide data for ground water classification exception area (CEA) n Cost estimate n Schedule for progress report and completion

Engineering & Institutional Controls n Property is owned by individuals or corporation (the soil) – Residential soil standards – Non-residential soil standards n Engineering controls are used to reduce or eliminate exposure – Fences, capping w/soil, clay, or other materials

Engineering & Institutional Controls n Institutional controls - Deed notice n Provides notice of site conditions and engineering controls n Can limit access or type of land use n Identifies person responsible for maintaining, monitoring, reporting

Engineering & Institutional Controls n State holds the ground water in trust for New Jersey citizens n Department designates ground water use classifications n Ground water classification exception area – Type of Institutional control – Provides public notice – For specific contaminants – For a specified time frames

Remedial Action Work Plan n Post remedial action requirements: n Sampling n Identify extent of soil contamination left above most stringent standards n Confirm data supporting CEA

Remedial Action Report n Restore to pre-remediation conditions n Seal monitoring wells n Record deed notice n No further action required n Begin monitoring n Maintain controls n Report to Department every 2 years n Remove CEA when standards are achieved