Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Advertisements

Linear Collider Damping Rings Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
KEKB Design 1.Parameters 2.Collider Ring 3.Interact Region 4. Magnet, RF, Instabilities 5.Recent progress with crab crossing.
Analytical Estimation of Dynamic Aperture Limited by Wigglers in a Storage Ring J. GAO 高杰 Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Analytical Treatment of Some Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Problems in Storage Rings J. Gao Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE Journées.
Analytical Treatment of the Nonlinear Electron Cloud Effect and the Combined Effects with Beam-beam and Space Charge Nonlinear Forces J. Gao IHEP, China.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
Analytical Estimation of Dynamic Aperture Limited by Wigglers in a Storage Ring 高傑 J. Gao 弘毅 Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Chaos and Emittance growth due to nonlinear interactions in circular accelerators K. Ohmi (KEK) SAD2006 Sep at KEK.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
2 Report at HEAC 1971 CBX layout (1962) 1965, Priceton-Stanford CBX: First mention of an 8-pole magnet Observed vertical resistive wall instability With.
Effect of high synchrotron tune on Beam- Beam interaction: simulation and experiment A.Temnykh for CESR operating group Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Collision with a crossing angle Large Piwinski angle
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Round beams experience at BINP … and other ideas
HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I)
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Crab Waist at DAFNE: Numerical Simulations versus Experimental Results
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
DAFNE experience with compensating wires
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
J. Gao, M. Xiao, F. Su, S. Jin, D. Wang, S. Bai, T.J. Bian
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Lecture 32 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture HT13 Beam-Beam I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Study on Emittance Reduction with a Robinson Wiggler in HEPS
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Some Issues on Beam-Beam Interaction & DA at CEPC
The Lepton colliders Data Base
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Summary of JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Electron Rings 2 Eduard Pozdeyev.
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire Analytical Treatment of Some Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Problems in Storage Rings J. Gao Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE 30th Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity e+e- Colliders Stanford, California, Oct. 13-16, 2003.

Contents Dynamic Apertures of Multipoles in a Storage Ring Dynamic Apertures limited by Wigglers Limitations on Luminosities in Lepton Circular Colliders from Beam-Beam Effects Nonlinear Space Charge Effect Nonlinear electron cloud effect

Dynamic Aperturs of Multipoles Hamiltonian of a single multipole Where L is the circumference of the storage ring, and s* is the place where the multipole locates (m=3 corresponds to a sextupole, for example).

Important Steps to Treat the Perturbed Hamiltonian Using action-angle variables Hamiltonian differential equations should be replaced by difference equations Since under some conditions the Hamiltonian don’t have even numerical solutions

Standard Mapping Near the nonlinear resonance, simplify the difference equations to the form of STANDARD MAPPING

Stochastic motions When stochastic motion starts. Statistical descriptions of the nonlinear chaotic motions of particles are subjects of research nowadays. As a preliminary method, one can resort to Fokker-Planck equation .

General Formulae for the Dynamic Apertures of Multipoles

Super-ACO Lattice Working point

Single octupole limited dynamic aperture simulated by using BETA x-y plane x-xp phase plane

Comparisions between analytical and numerical results Sextupole Octupole

2D dynamic apertures of a sextupole Simulation result Analytical result

Wiggler Ideal wiggler magnetic fields

One cell wiggler One cell wiggler Hamiltonian One cell wiggler limited dynamic aperture

Full wiggler and multi-wigglers Dynamic aperture for a full wiggler or approximately where is the beta function in the middle of the wiggler

Full wiggler and multi-wigglers Many wigglers (M) Dynamic aperture in horizontal plane

Numerical example: Super-ACO Super-ACO lattice with wiggler switched off

Super-ACO (one wiggler)

Super-ACO (one wiggler)

Super-ACO (one wiggler)

Super-ACO (one wiggler)

Super-ACO (two wigglers)

Maximum Beam-Beam Tune Shift in Circular Colliders Luminosity of a circular collider where

Beam-beam interactions Kicks from beam-beam interaction at IP

Beam-beam effects on a beam We study three cases (RB) (FB) (FB)

Round colliding beam Hamiltonian

Flat colliding beams Hamiltonians

Dynamic apertures limited by beam-beam interactions Three cases Beam-beam effect limited lifetime (RB) (FB) (FB)

Recall of Beam-beam tune shift definitions

Beam-beam effects limited beam lifetimes Round beam Flat beam H plane Flat beam V plane

Important finding Defining normalized beam-beam effect limited beam lifetime as An important fact has been discovered that the beam-beam effect limited normalized beam lifetime depends on only one parameter: linear beam-beam tune shift.

Theoretical predictions for beam-beam tune shifts Relation between round and flat colliding beams For example

The roles for higher order poles

First limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine) or, for an isomagnetic machine where Ho=2845 *These expersions are derived from emittance blow up mechanism

Second limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine) Flat beam V plane where xy should be replaced by 0.0447 xy / xy,max,1

Some Examples DAFNE: E=0.51GeV,xymax,theory=0.043,xymax,exp=0.02 BEPC: E=1.89GeV,xymax,theory=0.04,xymax,exp=0.04 PEP-II Low energy ring: E=3.12GeV,xymax,theory=0.063,xymax,exp=0.06 KEK-B Low energy ring (with crossing angle!): E=3.5GeV,xymax,theory=0.0832,xymax,exp=0.069 CESR: E=5.3GeV,xymax,theory=0.048,xymax,exp=0.025 LEP-II: E=91.5GeV,xymax,theory=0.071,xymax,exp=0.07

Some Examples (continued) PEP-II High energy ring: E=8.99GeV,xymax,theory=0.048,xymax,exp=0.048 KEK-B High energy ring: E=8GeV,xymax,theory=0.0533,xymax,exp=0.05

Beam-beam effects with crossing angle Horizontal motion Hamiltonian Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling

Crossing angle effect Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling Total beam-beam limited dynamic aperture Where is Piwinski angle

KEK-B with crossing angle KEK-B luminosity reduction vs Piwinski angle

The Limitation from Space Charge Forces to TESLA Dog-Borne Damping Ring Total space charge tune shift Differential space charge tune shift Beam-beam tune shift

Space charge effect Relation between differential space charge and beam-beam forces

Space charge effect limited dynamic apertures Dynamic aperture limited by differential space charge effect Dynamic aperture limited by the total space charge effect

Space charge limited lifetime Space charge effect limited lifetime expressions Particle survival ratio

TESLA Dog-Borne damping ring as an example Particle survival ratio vs linear space charge tune shift when the particles are ejected from the damping ring. TESLA parameters

Nonlinear electron cloud effect Relation between differential electron cloud and beam-beam forces

Nonlinear electron cloud effect Normalized dynamic aperture due to electron cloud

Combined nonlinear beam-beam and electron cloud effect Normalized dynamic aperture due to combined beam-beam and electron cloud effects

Combined nonlinear beam-beam and electron cloud effect Beam lifetime due to the combined effect where is the damping time of positron in the vertical plane

PEP-II positron ring as an example Machine parameter

PEP-II positron ring as an example Machine parameter

PEP-II positron ring as an example If the beam-beam alone limited maximum beam-beam tune shift is with the maximum beam-beam tune shift will be reduced to

Conclusion Various nonlinear effects are the main limiting factors to the performance of storage rings. In addition to numerical simulations, analytical treatments are very helpful in understanding the physics behind the phenomena, are very economic.