KACST http://xellectip.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Advertisements

May 31, 2014 Copyright 2007 Xellect IP Solutions 1.
May 31, 2014 Copyright 2007 Xellect IP Solutions
™ May 6, 2015 Copyright
Building a Competitive Edge: Protecting Inventions by Utility Models and / or Patents : Case Studies By P. Kandiah KASS International Sdn.Bhd. KASS.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
Intellectual Property and Commercializing Technology Identifying, Protecting, Growing and Commercializing Intellectual Property in both Academic and Commercial.
Intellectual Property Portfolios in Business Strategy 22 th of February 2002 Innovation and Knowledge Management Anabela Piedade Ana Sofia Mascarenhas.
Dyson and the bagless vacuum cleaner
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
Part F – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS (3.1): Demonstrate understanding of how internal factors interact within a business that operates in a global.
“Inventing the Future” – The Role of Utility Models and Patents in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Kingston, Jamaica Jun 4 - 6, 2012.
Inventing the Future – The Role of Patents and Utility Models in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Ron Marchant CB FRSA Implementation.
Introduction to Intellectual Property by Britta Fromow.
 The Free Enterprise System.  Traits of Private Enterprise.
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
Patent Process and Patent Search 6a Foundations of Technology Standard 3: Students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies.
CH-4-Technology Management Assist Prof Banu OZKESER November, 2015.
Cultivating Innovative SMEs into Business Giant: the SME Supporting Program in Shanghai Shanghai Torch Hi-tech Industry Development Center July 2008.
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
Intellectual Property The Underdog of the Business World For More Details Please Visit:
Technology Transfer Office
Knowledge of the Marketplace
02. Detailed Overview of PATENTS
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
IP-INITIAL® द्वारा प्रस्तुत IP-INITIAL®
Intellectual Property and Incremental Innovation in OECD Countries An Overview 14 September Annual WIPO Forum on IP and SMEs in OECD countries.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business
Foresight Science & Technology, Inc.
Chapter 15 Technological Change
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
Welcome to IST e-Lab Entrepreneurship Lab, 3rd Session, 06 November 2017.
Japanese Management (1)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business
MGT 210 Chapter 9: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT & PLANNING
Copyright 2008 September 19, 2018September 19, 2018.
THE STRATEGY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
Contribution of Industrial Property to Business Development
Chapter 8: Selecting an appropriate price level
Capturing Creativity: Intellectual Asset Management and IP Strategy.
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property and Commercializing Technology
From Invention to Patent
Copyright 2008 November 14, 2018November 14, 2018.
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Production The Purpose of Manufacturing and
Chapter 2 Define the role of advertising within marketing
How much will I charge for MILK?
Department of commerce
Transfer of Medical Devices Manufacturing Technology
Basic Principles of Intellectual Property Rights at the KENGEN Eastern Hydro Communities of Practice & Innovation(COPI) Kamburu 16th March By.
How much will I charge for MILK?
Software Engineering with Reusable Components
BEST PRACTICES for Graduate Students
IP and legal issues Super-project.eu.
Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
BUSINESS CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT – ‘GETTING OFF THE GROUND’
Trademark, Patent, or Copyright?
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

KACST http://xellectip.com

WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM KACST WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM ON EFFECTIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT BY SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN DUBAI Riyadh, Jan 29 to Feb 2, 2011 Inventing the Future The Role of Utility Models and Patents in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Marketplace Rachna Singh Puri Xellect IP Solutions, India www.xellectip.com

Marketplace &Competitiveness KACST Defined as the ability of a firm to increase in size, market share and profitability. May be achieved by: Producing more cheaply, for example by finding ways to reduce labour costs Applying other non-price factors such as: Human resource endowments, such as skills and worker motivation Technical factors such as R&D capabilities, and the ability to adapt and use technologies Managerial and organisational factors

Innovation Ideas applied successfully in practice KACST Ideas applied successfully in practice Typically is expected to lead to a drastic change In the system By introduction of new products or services Expected to clear out the old and in with the new No limit to where innovations may be applied

Characteristics of Technical Innovation KACST Coupling (of changing technology, production and markets) Creating (new products, processes, systems and industries) Clustering (of groups of related innovations) Comprehending (new skills, new technologies, new markets) Coping (with the technical and market uncertainty of innovation) TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS Draft paper submitted to the OECD ad hoc group on science, technology and competitiveness. August 1982 C. Freeman

Drivers of Innovation Market Forces (Competition) KACST Market Forces (Competition) Consumers (Value-Add to Existing Products) Regulatory Requirements (Pollution Control by EHS, ISO Certification etc.) Quality (Process Improvements, Waste & Defect Reduction, Increasing Productivity)

Inventions Solves a problem Stems from a novel & non-obvious idea KACST Solves a problem Stems from a novel & non-obvious idea Subsequently, the working idea is applied to a specific or several applications Comes out of a business choice Determined by market needs Core competency taken into account High monetary returns expected Also typically one problem or application area

Innovation vs. Invention KACST Innovation vs. Invention Invention solves an existing problem by providing solutions Innovation utilizes the invention and brings it to practice Innovation does not require a problem Creates its own problem and provides solutions

Invention Methodology KACST Invention Methodology Problem Identification Problem Definition Appraisal of State-of-the-Art Identify Plausible Solutions Identify Best Mode of Operation

Invention Methods Systematic or Incremental Approach KACST Systematic or Incremental Approach Out-of-the-box Approach Breakthrough Serendipity

Patents KACST The term "patent" originates from the Latin word patere which means "to lay open" (i.e., make available for public inspection) Patent provides a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to a patentee for a fixed period of time in exchange for a full disclosure of an invention Encompasses any new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter Also included are any new and useful improvements thereof

Three Tenets of Patentability™ Industrial Applicability KACST Three Tenets of Patentability™ Novelty Non-Obviousness ≈ Inventiveness Utility/ Usefulness ≠ Industrial Applicability

KACST Utility Models Similar to Patents but only for “Minor improvements” to existing products The requirements for acquiring a utility model are less stringent than for patents “Novelty” requirement is always to be met, that of "inventive step" or "non-obviousness" may be much lower or absent altogether The term of protection for utility models is shorter than for patents and varies from country to country (usually between 7 and 10 years) In most countries where utility model protection is available, patent offices do not examine applications as to substance prior to registration Utility models are much cheaper to obtain and to maintain In some countries, utility model protection can only be obtained for certain fields of technology and only for products but not for processes.

KACST The Central Theme “How a Lone Inventor and an Unknown Company Created the Biggest Communication Breakthrough Since Gutenberg†” † Part of the title of the biography of Chester Carlson by David Owen

The Inventor Chester Carlson KACST The Inventor B.S. in Physics from California Institute of Technology in 1930 Research Engineer in Bell Laboratories Found work “Dull and Routine” Transferred to the Patent Department Laid off during the Great Depression Found work in an electronics firm Promoted to head of Patent Department in a few years Got his L.L.B degree in 1939 Chester Carlson

Problem KACST Mimeograph process made wet copies which then required a long drying time Photostats were adequate but too expensive Desirable to make “Xerographs” or “Dry Copies”

The Principle Electrophotography KACST Electrophotography Simple basic principle that led to a revolutionary technology: when light and shadow strike a charged plate, the dark parts attract a special powder while the light parts repel

The Patenting Strategy KACST The Patenting Strategy First patent filed in 1937 Developed the technology over 15 years Filed several patents along the way His training in patent law stood him in good stead

KACST Commercialization Tried to convince organizations to invest in the invention, unsuccessfully Included giants like General Electric, IBM, RCA and the U.S. Army Signal Corps Finally struck a deal with Battelle Memorial Institute in 1944 to prove feasibility of technology Subsequently licensed to Haloid Corporation for commercialization

Naming Haloid Corporation sold its first photocopier in 1950 KACST Haloid Corporation sold its first photocopier in 1950 Used Carlson’s concept of ‘Xerography’ Plain paper push button Photocopier first introduced in 1959 The parent company coined the term XeroX Short for Xerography Reinvented itself as Haloid Xerox in 1958 Renamed itself as Xerox Corporation in 1961

Revenues KACST The initial model Xerox 914 made $60 million in revenue in the year 1961 alone Met their long term sales target within 6 months Revenues leaped to more than $500 million within 5 years* Chester Carlson grossed about $150,000,000 from his invention eventually *: By this time, most of the original patents had expired

Currently Xerox Corporation has adapted to modern day demands KACST Xerox Corporation has adapted to modern day demands Reinvented itself as ‘The Document Company’ No more stand-alone copiers, but printers, scanners etc. associated with it Aware of environmental concerns of paper usage According to a study conducted by Xerox, around 40 percent of the pages printed are only viewed once before being thrown away In the process of developing “Erasable” Paper Redesigned the logo to reflect the changes in corporate strategy Xerox logo 1971–2008 Logos used herein are a registered trademark and/or copyrighted logo belonging to Xerox Corporation.

IP and the Big Picture Result Incident Introduction Damage Control KACST Incident Introduction In Fall 1982, 7 people died after ingesting Extra Strength Tylenol® Capsules deliberately contaminated with cyanide Killer never caught Brand sales collapsed immediately Tylenol®- a popular over-the-counter drug Comes in various grades Sold by McNeil Laboratories Now a subsidiary of J&J Damage Control Within a week, parent company recalled all products Estimated retail value of US$100 million Issued warning on all national media Offered to exchange all capsules purchased Reintroduced product with triple-seal package very quickly Helped develop tamper-resistant packaging Introduced heavy price promotions Result Within a few years, regained market dominance

Shrewd Businessman Using Patents to Get Initial Monopoly Making Room to Enjoy Business Success

“You press the button, we do the rest†” KACST Developed and patented a dry photographic plate in 1880 In 1884, patented a photographic medium Both in England and U.S.A Patented roll film camera in 1888 Filed key patents in all important facets Then, focused the company to making film when competition heated in the camera industry By providing quality and affortable film to every camera manufacturer, Kodak managed to turn all competition into more business George Eastman † Marketing phrase coined for the film roll camera created by Geaorge Eastman

“Next killer product is the patent itself†” Shifting Paradigms “Next killer product is the patent itself†” Copyright 2007 Xellect IP Solutions † Title of the article written by Rick Merritt in EETimes

The Organization Patriot Scientific Corp. KACST Patriot Scientific Corp. Based out of Carlsbad, CA, USA Six-person company Focused on establishing a new microprocessor architecture In the process filed several patents related to its core technology

KACST Shift in Focus The six-person company netted more than $24 million in 2005 by licensing seven U.S. patents fundamental to CPUs Advanced Micro Devices, Casio, Fujitsu, Intel, Hewlett-Packard Will be collecting more from royalties on sales of all microprocessor-based systems Virtually every electronic product is touched by this portfolio sales estimated at $200 billion a year Further, hundreds of companies have been put on notice as potential infringers

Repositioning the Organization KACST Then, clarified company’s strategy & acquired a strong IP portfolio Subsequently, outsourced enforcement of its patents in a joint venture Commissioned a study to look at how it might dispose of its CPU business Decided that "This company doesn't need to be manufacturing anything or marketing a product" Essentially relied on the licensing team to create revenue Are one of a rising number of Patent Licensing and Enforcement Companies (PLECs) Multiple venture funds are forming to bankroll the efforts of these PLECs Effort to carve out business models in the midst of a gold rush in intellectual property

Intellectual Property KACST “If you Think it, Protect it…” “Because if it is worth copying, it is worth protecting”

WIPO RESOURCES FOR SMEs KACST WIPO RESOURCES FOR SMEs