Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mr. Weiss Shoes For Dago Pictures Mr. Weiss Shoes For Dago Pictures.
Advertisements

PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
An appeal to ignorance is an argument for or against a proposition on the basis of a lack of evidence against or for it. If there is positive evidence.
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question
Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy By: Cole Mutter & Ashley Hart.
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning
Ad populum/appeal to popularity/Bandwagon
Bandwagon By: Deanie Pedigo.
Circular Reasoning By: Logan Witty and Kacie Martin.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
Begging The Question Kelsey Turner and Chelsey White.
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/ False Dichotomy: is a fallacy in which a person uses the following pattern of reasoning. 1. Either Claim X is true or claim Y.
Post Hoc Kelsy Mullins. Definition Post Hoc- the fallacy of assuming that temporal succession is evidence of causal relation. A fallacy in which one event.
The CRUCIBLE Fallacy Project: Slippery Slope.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
FALSE DILEMMA/EITHER-OR Logical Fallacy Power-point. By: Shelby Caudel.
By: Samantha Hammer & Trevor Baise. Defined Hasty Generalization – a conclusion formed without evidence, often the product of an emotional reaction. A.
Morgan Atwell Stephanie Tolliver. A writer will deliberately lead you to a conclusion by providing insufficient, selective evidence. A writer will deliberately.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
Appeal to Ridicule ASHLEY STEPHENS. Appeal to Ridicule is…  A fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument.”
Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By: Ella Settle. DOGMATISM The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Circular Reasoning Joshua Meador, Rilee Mathews, and Rebekah Thompson.
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
The Crucible Characterisation- Act One. Reverend Parris “evidently in prayer” “evidently in prayer” “seems about to weep” “seems about to weep” Look at.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
Circular Reasoning. What is Circular Reasoning? A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what a person claims to.
BEGGING THE QUESTION/ CIRCULAR REASONING BY: Jessica Greenwood And McKenzie Pedigo.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
What Is Dogmatism? Dogmatism is the tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others.
Straw Man Fallacy By: Taylor Hudson and Rachel Fields.
Act III Comprehension Questions
Act II Comprehension Questions
By: Maria Metzger Devon Stuart Veronika Matthews
The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Appeal to Ridicule By:Cassidy Patriarca.
Dialogue Reading Strategies: Dialogue As Action
Errors in Reasoning.
The Crucible Act 2- Reputations and Hearsay
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible
TOD and discussion questions
Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question
Informal Logical Fallacies
Makayle Botts and Kaitlin Graves
The Crucible Fallacies: Post Hoc
Ad Populam By: Cassie Glass and Cassandra Cochran
The Cruicble Red Herring fallacies
Begging The question/circular reasoning
By: Skyla Robbins & Caitlin Ramsey
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy
The Crucible fallacy project
Dogmatism BY: Kennedy ludwig.
Logical fallacies The Crucible, Act 1 & 2.
Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.
Katie Trulock and Courtney Sexton
Dogmatism By: Taylor Montgomery.
Appeal to Ignorance By: Amber Cline.
The Crucible Act I Review
D19 – Bellringer Define Pathos. What might be an example of being persuasive via pathos? Examples: “Caravan of Migrants: Look at how diligent / sad / helpless.
Presentation transcript:

Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis

Definition The fallacy that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proved false or that it is false simply because it has not been proved true.

The man in the picture assumes since aliens have not been discovered that they exist. He jumps to conclusions without proof which makes this Appeal to Ignorance.

Examples from The Crucible Act 1, page 172: Mrs. Putnam: How high did she fly, how high? Parris: No, no, she never flew- Mrs. Putnam: Why, it’s sure she did. Mr. Collins saw her goin’ over Ingersoll’s barn, and come down light as a bird, he says! Mrs. Putnam assumes that Betty did fly simply because someone told her it happened that it is true. Unless someone brings her evidence that it didn’t happen she will continue to believe it.

Continued Act 3, page 207 Martha Corey’s voice: “I am not innocent to a witch I know not what a witch is.” Hathorne: “How do you know, then, that you are not a witch.” Hathorne’s logic is that because Martha does not know what a witch is that she cannot say whether or not she is.

Universal Example Many people assume that since there is no evidence against the possibility of a god that one exists.

"Pics For Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy "Pics For Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy." Pics For Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2015.