Stormwater Control Transfer Program Overview January 31, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Corps/EPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds.
Advertisements

Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Washington State Department of Transportation Stormwater Discharge Permit January 2008.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Stakeholder Workshop #3 Stormwater Retrofit Planning Project for WRIA 9 a project funded by an USEPA Watershed Management Assistance Grant April 25, 2013.
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
Stormwater Retrofit Planning Project for WRIA 9 a project funded by an USEPA Watershed Management Assistance Grant February 10, 2011 Jim Simmonds King.
Stormwater Management 101: Implementation Options through Partnerships
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
Putting the “LID” on Water Pollution New Water Quality Requirements for Land Use County of Orange Mary Anne Skorpanich Richard Boon.
City of Puyallup Planning Commission Presentation February 8, 2012.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Non-point Source Update Marc T. Aveni Regional Manager.
Regulatory Developments Affecting Southwest Washington Land Use in Southwestern Washington Law Seminars International Vancouver, WA February 11, 2008 Bill.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Regulatory Refresher What Construction Site Inspectors Need to Know about the MRP Kristin Kerr, P.E., QSD EOA, Inc. Construction Inspection Workshop April.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Watershed Management Act ESHB 2514 by 1998 Legislature RCW Voluntary Process Purpose: to increase local involvement in decision-making and planning.
Operation & Maintenance of Permanent Stormwater Controls Overview of Inspection Requirements Laura Prickett, AICP, CPESC EOA, Inc. Construction Inspection.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Jeff Burkey King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Framework for CSO Control Planning
Nutrient Abatement Erosion and sediment control and urban stormwater program and Flexible options for nutrient management – point source. Sandra Avendano,
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Transaction costs of nonpoint source water quality credits:
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Dennis Stottlemyer WVDEP DMR Mitigation Coordinator
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Water Quality Credit Trading
North Dakota’s Alternative Plans
Planning Mitigation February 24, 2016
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Green Infrastructure Planning Update
Green Infrastructure Planning Update
Alternative Compliance for New Developments
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group Background Information Review
Presentation transcript:

Stormwater Control Transfer Program Overview January 31, 2018 Water Quality Program Dan Gariépy, P.E. Senior Stormwater Engineer

Stormwater Control Transfer Program (SCTP) Background Responds to: Recurring complaint that SW Req’mts discourage urban redev Building Cities in the Rain Initiative Stipulated Order in settlement of municipal permit appeal Articulates municipal permit flexibility Identifies Ecology expectations Consistent with PS Ecosystem Recovery Targets (improve lightly to moderately impacted basins)

Stormwater Control Transfer Program Overview: What it is Alternative approach to satisfy permit requirements associated with flow control at new and redevelopment sites that… Accelerates environmental improvements in priority watersheds and is… Implemented through a basin planning provision in Phase I and II Municipal Stormwater Permits in… Western Washington.

SCTP Overview: What it is not Relaxation of stormwater requirements Wetlands Mitigation Banking TMDL-driven pollutant trading An alternative to structural retrofitting required by Phase I permit Phase II permit does not require retrofitting existing development with flow control or treatment BMPs

SCTP Guidance Overview Section I: Overview General Principles Key Elements Specific Guidelines Section II: Prioritization Analysis Support & Principles Section III: Effectiveness Monitoring Plan Considerations Section IV: Determining Debits/Credits & Tracking Transfers

Section I: General Principles Environmental Goal: Full attainment of WQS NO increased stormwater impacts to any receiving water Directs stormwater improvements to “priority watersheds” Prioritization is science-based Ecology approval required Other, more stringent requirements may still apply TMDLs S4.F.3. adaptive management Future stormwater requirements

Section I: Key Program Elements Replaced and New Surface Transfers to high priority watershed Municipal permittee verifies facility long-term O&M Offsite facilities must be online before transfers allowed Always match pre-project condition at project site Only the “improvement” may be transferred

Section I: Key Program Elements, cont’d Permittee must track flow control transfers Annual reporting/accounting to Ecology Dedicated fee-in-lieu accounts + capacity tracking

Section I: Guideline Tables (ex.)

Section II: Prioritization Analysis Priority watersheds: Stormwater improvements provide more immediate environmental benefit Science-based Watershed-specific information Specific prioritization goal, data sources Input from natural resource agencies Includes “tribal natural resources agencies” Ecology concurrence

Section II: Prioritization Principles to Consider Prioritize watersheds with: Low to moderate impairment Relative to the municipality Permittee ability to influence Possible synergy with other rehabilitation efforts (e.g., salmon recovery)

Here’s a city. 2 creeks (A and B) each with 3 tribs

Section III: Monitoring Purpose Document effectiveness Design depends on Transfer Types (flow, treatment, etc.) Establish Baseline Condition Repeat Monitoring after significant retrofitting

Section IV: Capacity Credit Calculations & Facility Options Flow Control: Detention, Retention, Combination New or Expanded; Full size or undersized Full Dispersion Permeable Pavement; Bioretention Reforestation

Section IV: Facility Transfer Tracking Transfer currency is area by land cover type Transfer tracking rules Track to nearest 1/10 acre Track flow control at project site Track regional facility capacity used vs available Track use of regional capacity by projects

Where is this guidance now? Can submit a SCTP for approval under the current permit Guidance is listed as “draft” Provides good starting point for Ecology’s review Jurisdictions should contact their Ecology permit manager before beginning

Where is it heading? The wider principle may be something you want to have input on Draft framework released in December, 2017: Long-term municipal stormwater planning Comment until February 2, 2018 at: http://ws.ecology.commentinput.com/?id=tkx29 More to come: Formal Draft Schedule for late Summer 2018

Questions and Discussion Dan Gariépy dan.gariepy@ecy.wa.gov Abbey Stockwell abbey.stockwell@ecy.wa.gov