ASTSWMO Annual Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Samples are stored in a cold room at optimal storage temperature and humidity.
Advertisements

UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
Landfill Legislation Richard Campbell. INTRODUCTION  Prior to the mid-1980's, waste disposal sites were: sites that no one wanted, ie they were holes.
Sampling: Your data is only as good as your field technicians.
Florida Pilot Initiative for the Performance Approach to Measurement Systems Stephen Arms Florida Department of Health.
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
DOW Laboratory Certification Program Update – 2015 Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2015 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet.
Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) Regulatory Determinations Water Quality Training Roundtable 2000 February 7, 2000.
Revised July 2015 Safe Drinking Water Program.
Intro to sampling Adapted from “Fundamentals of Environmental Sampling and Analysis” by Chunlong Zhang.
Implementing the New Reliability Standards Status of Draft Cyber Security Standards CIP through CIP Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team.
ERLN OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK EPA Quality Management Conference Presented By: Sean Kolb Schatzi Fitz-James and Terry Smith, OEM Sean Kolb and Lisa Modigliani,
Environmental Management System Definitions
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
1 Neptune and Company, Inc. Technical Guidance for Asbestos Risk in Soils Neptune and Company, Inc. Denver, CO
ME551/GEO551 Introduction to Geology of Industrial Minerals Spring 2005 SAMPLING.
1 Analytical Methods for Perchlorate: Current Technology and Possibilities for the Future David J. Munch Daniel P. Hautman Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
1 TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector Training October 2006 Alicia Diehl TCEQ Public Drinking Water Section UCMR Sampling TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector.
1 Emissions Measurement and Monitoring Projects Update Robin Segall Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Measurement.
The Safe Drinking Water Act By: Jonathan Besquin.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Misoperations Reduction Strategy
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
Major Changes Additional Updates
Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Pesticides in Groundwater
Instrument Maintenance
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
Janice L. Willey Senior Chemist
MRWA Annual Meeting Bangor, Maine
SW-846 Methods Program Update and Path Forward
A Short Update on Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS)
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
DuPont Barksdale Site Sampling and Analytical Presentation
SW/MW guidance Milestones
Daughter Groundwater Directive
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Method Publication Process Update VI Phase III – LEAF Methods
Chemical Monitoring mandate
Legislative Water Commission
Monitoring Guidance Johannes Grath Rob Ward 12th October 2005.
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Importance of Law and Policies in the Environmental Management System
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team Chair June 1, 2005
Misoperations Reduction Strategy
Western Regional Haze Planning and
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
O&G GHG Project Planning & Scheduling
Very special case/scenario David Schiessel, Senior Chemist
PFAS Background and Action Plan
Fort Valley State University
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
ACIL Environmental Sciences Section Technical Support Center (TSC)
SW-846 Methods Program Update and Path Forward
Clean Air Act Grants and Funding Update
American Council of Independent Labs
2019 AWOP National Meeting Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
California Water Boards PFAS Efforts
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
Presentation transcript:

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances Method Validation Update for Non-Drinking Water Samples ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 26, 2017 Introduce self Purpose of Cross-Agency Method Validation Workgroup Introduce tri-chairs Christopher A. Impellitteri-EPA-ORD Schatzi Fitz-James-EPA-OLEM Cynthia Caporale-EPA-Region 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 10/26/2017

Drinking Water Method 537 Six per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) under the 3rd Unregulated Contaminants monitoring rule (UCMR3) Eight additional PFAS not listed on UCMR3 Finished (treated) drinking water samples; potable groundwater For DW, Method 537 is the EPA validated method for drinking water available at the time of the UCMR3 process. Six PFAS were evaluated and the method has a total of 14 included. Evidence that labs in the US are using a “modified” 537 for non-DW samples. That means it is no longer “537”. With other water matrices being investigated needed a method that can be used for non-drinking water samples. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Non-DW Sample Methods Focus on: Simplicity Robustness Production lab use Minimizing sample transfers, extractions, filter steps, chemical additions (e.g. pH adjustments) Find a balance among sensitivity, ease of implementation, and monitoring requirements “Minimizing sample transfers…”- Contamination issues “Monitoring requirements”-vary for different states. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

PFAS Method Validation 24 PFAS (including all target analytes in EPA Method 537) Methods under consideration for water (all using LC/MS/MS) Direct injection Solid phase extraction (with and without radio-labeled internal standard correction) Target Reporting Limit: 10 ng/L Publish validated method in 2018 SW-846 8327, 8328, 8329 Evaluating Methods to include Solids Cross-Agency Validation Workgroup worked with program offices, regions and toxicologist to determine list of analytes. 24 PFAS were selected. Methods under consideration all include use of LC/MS/MS. The direct inject method is currently in the validation process with external labs expected to start in November. Solid phase extraction methods will follow. Detection limit goal is 10ppt. Some compounds might have higher DLs Plans are to have the first SW-846 method in draft by spring 2018. Currently workgroup is evaluating soil methods for various solid matrices. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

PFAS - Sampling and Storage Sampling/Storage Holding time studies Sample vessel materials (glass, polycarbonate, high-density polyethylene) Standard operating procedures for field sampling Initial focus on groundwater In addition to method validation efforts the cross-agency workgroup is also evaluating holding times and sample containers. This information will be used to prepare standard operating procedures to be used during field sampling. Currently the workgroup is developing protocols related to groundwater. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA Sampling Guidance for GW Draft PFAS Groundwater Sampling Guidance expected January 2018 Not a stand-alone document Use in conjunction with existing groundwater sampling guidance Covers specific actions and materials to use or to avoid to prevent PFAS Contamination or loss The outcome for these protocols is to have a guidance document drafted by January 2018. Note this will not be a stand-alone document but instead as a supplement to existing GW sampling guidance that address the specific techniques that prevent contamination or even loss of analytes. 5/23/2017

Questions? Comments? Contacts: OLEM-Schatzi Fitz-James: fitzjames.schatzi@epa.gov Region 3- Cynthia Caporale: caporale.Cynthia@epa.gov ORD-Chris Impellitteri: Impellitteri.Christopher@epa.gov Communications-Michelle Latham: latham.michelle@epa.gov Overall, the method validation workgroup anticipates completing the external multi-lab validation by February 2018 with a draft method available by spring. For specific information any of the individuals listed here may be contacted. Updates are also provide on epa.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency