Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Colin Smith University of Sheffield, UK Director, LimitState Ltd UK
Advertisements

1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
20/05/2008 LimitState:GEO launch & technology briefing - ICE London 12/01/2015geo1.0 LimitState:GEO Eurocode 7 Colin Smith MA(Cantab) PhD Director & LimitState:GEO.
Prof. Roger FRANK CERMES (ENPC-LCPC) Tokyo IWM August 2004 PRESENT ISSUES IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUTION OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS.
September 20081Department of structural engineering The effect of Eurocode 5 on timber structure design in Norway Kolbein Bell and Kjell Arne Malo NTNU,
Chp12- Footings.
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
Investigation of Consolidation Promoting Effect by Field and Model Test for Vacuum Consolidation Method Nagasaki University H.Mihara Y.Tanabasi Y.Jiang.
Imperial College London First-Order Robustness, Higher-Order Mechanics Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
THE ENGINEERING OF FOUNDATIONS A BOOK BY RODRIGO SALGADO POWERPOINT RESOURCES FOR CHAPTER 2 Contains copyrighted material.
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
DESIGN OF GROUND ANCHORS – USE OF NEW SECTION 8 Eric R Farrell AGL Consulting.
Safety assesment of a steel frame using current code and SBRA method Petr Konečný, M.S. Structural Mechanics Division Department of Civil Engineering.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
A new assessment method for masonry arch bridges (SMART) Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of.
Horizontal Loading Tests on Model Foundations Retrofitted by Micropiles Masahiro NISHITANI Jiro FUKUI Takeshi UMEBARA IAI, PWRI Structures Research Group.
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES FOUNDATION DESIGN
TOPIC 3: DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION WEEK 12 PILE LOAD TEST AND ITS ANALYSIS.
Rehabilitation and maintenance of buildings - 02 Karel Mikeš.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Joint Research of Seismic Retrofitting Technology for Existing Foundations Masahiro Ishida Public Works Research Institute JAPAN “Design and Execution.
Providing Design Standards for Frictional Compression Ground Anchors Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Lab., Seoul Natl. Univ. Master Course Student Joo,
Topics on Micropiles in Japan
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
I. Truss Bridge Gussets Background
Reinforced Concrete Design
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
1 Presentation by: Jesse Conklin Group Members: J.P. Telemaque & Mike Milano First National Educational Competition on Predicting Progressive Collapse.
6 th International Workshop on Micropiles Tokyo, Japan, August 24-27, 2004 Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr. Donald.
16 Material properties for ultimate analysis Minute Exercise Open Democolumn.ads Run ULS STRENGTH for analysis cases 1 2& 3 Find out where in the.
FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA Vijay K Puri Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, ILLINOIS,
Simple Machines Simple Machines Activity Three: Other Lever Systems.
Petr Konečný, M.S. Parametric study of the Safety of a Steel Bar using SBRA Method Structural Mechanics Division Department of Civil Engineering VŠB –
Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France.
AFT STATNAMIC Load Testing of High Capacity Marine Foundations
PRACTICE AND RESEARCH ON MICROPILE GROUPS AND NETWORKS Prof. François SCHLOSSER ENPC - CERMES 2 nd LIZZI lecture Tokyo IWM August 2004.
1 MICROFOR Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and slOpe Reinforcement Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and.
Research at Northwestern University: End-bearing Micropiles in Dolomite.
The French National Research Project Soil Reinforcement by Micropile Systems François SCHLOSSER - Roger FRANK Ilan JURAN - Roger ESTEPHAN FOREVER.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
1 Limit State Design Concept. 2 Designer has to ensure the structures, he designs are: Fit for their purpose Safe Economical and durable INTRODUCTION.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ( ). 1. BHOL SUFIYAN [ ] 2. CHAVDA KRUNAL [ ] YEAR: 2 ND SEM: 3 RD CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRESENTED.
23/10/02TIS/TE-MC Gonzalo Micó Montava2 Structural Analysis of the Gantry Static Analysis (EuroCode 3) Seismic Analysis (EuroCode 3, PS 92) –Contents.
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
Settlement prediction for deep foundation piles using artificial neural networks Arshiya ABADKON1*, Muhammed Ernur AKINER1 1Bogazici University, Civil.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Introduction to EN 1990 – Section 6 Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow.
Design Factors The axial load on the casing can be either tensile or compressive, depending on the operating conditions.
Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
PS Internal Dump - actuation system
Foundations The function of a building foundation can be summarised as follows: To transmit the combined dead, imposed and wind loads from a building to.
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
«Development and analysis of heat exchanger combined with fire tank with a view of its application as part of geothermal heat pump»
Presenter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kerstin Lesny
European Standard prEN 14199
Topics on Micropiles in Japan
The French National Research Project
IWM 2000 Turku, Finland Pasi Korkeakoski
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS
Draft concept to assess quality of monitoring database
Quality assessment of the monitoring database on priority substances
Chapter 9 Transmission of Chains
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France

Eurocode 7-1 : check of axial capacity of pile foundations ULS compressive or tensile resistance failure of a single pile ULS of the pile foundation as a whole ULS of collapse or severe damage to a supported structure by excessive displacement or differential displacements of the pile foundation SLS in supported structure by displacements of the piles

Axial resistance of piles/micropiles The design shall be based on : - the results of static load tests - empirical or analytical calculation methods whose   validity has been demonstrated by static load tests - the results of dynamic load tests whose validity has   been demonstrated by static load tests - the observed performance of a comparable pile   foundation (provided that this approach is supported   by the results of site investigation and ground testing).

Basic relations for axial resistance The basic relations of Eurocode 7-1 are : Rk = Rm/x (1) Rd = Rk/gt (or Rd = Rbk/gb + Rsk/gs) (2) Or Rd = Rk/gst On the other hand : Fd = gFF (3)

The basic condition for all ULS is : Fd(ULS)  Rd (4) Eqs (1) to (4) lead to : Fd  Rm/ gF.gt.x = Rm/FS (5)

Eurocode 7- 1 : Characteristic resistance from static load tests Rk = Min { Rm,mean/1 ; Rm,min / 2 } where Rm : measured resistance(s) with x = x1 on the mean, or         x = x2 on minimum value function of the number of pile test(s) (n)

EC 7-1: Recommended values for the x - factors for Rk from n – static load tests French practice (Fascicule 62-V) : x ≤1.2 x for n = 1 2 3 4  5 x1 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00 x2 1.05

Factors on actions (EC 7-1 and F 62-V) ULS, permanent and transient situations : F = 1.35 to 1.5 ULS, accidental situations : F = 1.0 SLS : F = 1.0

Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V ULS persistent and transient situations s = 1.1 and st= 1.15 (approach 2 of EC 7-1) gs = gst = 1.4 (F 62-V) ULS accidental situations s = st = 1.0 (EC 7-1) gs = gst = 1.2 (F 62-V)

Factors for micropile side resistance : Eurocode 7-1 and Fascicule 62-V SLS characteristic combinations check the displacements (EC 7-1) gs = gst = 1.1 on Qcreep (F 62-V) SLS quasi-permanent combinations gs = gst = 1.4 on Qcreep (F 62-V)

Conclusion The main challenge is the prediction of displacements, whether for ULS or for SLS … Which model(s) to use : t-z approach or others ? How to collect the data ? Which are the tolerance criteria ?

Thank you for your attention !