Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of a Ternary Transcription Activation Complex
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Hubert Kettenberger, Karim-Jean Armache, Patrick Cramer  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selection by T7 RNA Polymerase
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Structural Basis of Core Promoter Recognition in a Primitive Eukaryote
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages 901-912 (March 2001) Structural Mechanism for Rifampicin Inhibition of Bacterial RNA Polymerase  Elizabeth A. Campbell, Nataliya Korzheva, Arkady Mustaev, Katsuhiko Murakami, Satish Nair, Alex Goldfarb, Seth A. Darst  Cell  Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages 901-912 (March 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0

Figure 1 The Rif-Resistant Regions of the RNAP β Subunit The bar on top schematically represents the E. coli β subunit primary sequence with amino acid numbering shown directly above. Gray boxes indicate evolutionarily conserved regions among all prokaryotic, chloroplast, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic sequences (labeled A–I at the top; Allison et al., 1985; Sweetser et al., 1987). Red markings indicate the four clusters where RifR mutations have been identified in E. coli (Ovchinnikov et al., 1983; Lisitsyn et al., 1984a, 1984b; Jin and Gross, 1988; Severinov et al., 1993; Severinov et al., 1994), denoted as the N-terminal cluster (N), and clusters I, II, and III (I, II, III). Directly below is a sequence alignment spanning these regions of the E. coli (E.c.), T. aquaticus (T.a.), and M. tuberculosis (M.t.) RNAP β subunits. Amino acids that are identical to E. coli are shaded dark gray, and those that are homologous (ST, RK, DE, NQ, FYWIV) are shaded light gray. Mutations that confer RifR in E. coli and M. tuberculosis are indicated directly above (for E. coli) or below (for M. tuberculosis) as follows: Δ for deletions, Ω for insertions, and colored dots for amino acid substitutions (substitutions at each position are indicated in single amino acid code in columns above or below the positions). Color coding for the amino acid substitutions (for reference to subsequent figures) is as follows: yellow, residues that interact directly with the bound Rif (see Figure 4); green, residues that are too far away from the Rif for direct interaction (see Figure 5); purple, three positions that are substituted with high frequency (noted as a % immediately below the substitutions) in clinical isolates of RifR M. tuberculosis (Ramaswamy and Musser, 1998). Below the three prokaryotic sequences is a sequence alignment of three eukaryotic sequences with shading as above. The dots indicate a gap in the alignment Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)

Figure 2 Rif Inhibition of Taq RNAP (a) Autoradiographs showing the radioactive RNA produced by Taq (lanes 1–7) and E. coli (lanes 8–13) RNAP holoenzymes transcribing a template containing the T7 A1 promoter and the tR2 terminator, analyzed on a 15% polyacrylamide gel and quantitated by phosphorimagery. In the absence of Rif (lanes 1 and 8), the major RNA products from each RNAP correspond to a trimeric abortive product (CpApU), a 105 nt terminated transcript (Term), and a 127 nt runoff transcript (Run off). Lanes 2–7 and 9–13 show the effects of increasing concentrations of Rif. The quantitated results are shown on the right, where the amounts of each product (normalized to 100% for the Run off and Term transcripts in the absence of Rif, and for CpApU at the highest concentration of Rif) are plotted as a function of Rif concentration. (b) The distance between the bound Rif and the initiating substrate (i-site) of E. coli and Taq RNAP holoenzymes was measured using chimeric Rif-nucleotide compounds as previously described (Mustaev et al., 1994). Rif-nucleotide compounds (Rif-(CH2)n-Ap) with different linker lengths, n (indicated above each lane), were bound to RNAP, then extended in a specific transcription reaction with α-[32P]UTP by the RNAP catalytic activity. The products were analyzed on a 23% polyacrylamide gel, visualized by autoradiography, and quantitated by phosphorimagery. The quantitated results are shown directly below, where the product yield (as % activity normalized to 100% at the highest level) is plotted as a function of the Rif-nucleotide linker length (n) Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)

Figure 3 Rif-RNAP Cocrystal Structure (a) Stereo view of the Rif binding pocket of Taq core RNAP, generated using O (Jones et al., 1991). Carbon atoms of the RNAP β subunit are cyan or yellow (residues within 4 Å of the Rif), while carbon atoms of the inhibitor are orange. Oxygen atoms are red, nitrogen atoms are blue, and sulfur atoms are green. Electron density, calculated using (|FoRif − Fonat|) coefficients (Rif denotes the Rif-RNAP cocrystal, native denotes the native core RNAP crystal), is shown (orange) for the Rif only (contoured at 3.5 σ), and was computed using phases from the final refined RNAP model with the Rif omitted. (b) Three-dimensional structure of Taq core RNAP in complex with Rif, generated using GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991). The backbone of the RNAP structure is shown as tubes, along with the color coded transparent molecular surface (β, cyan; β', pink; ω, white; the α subunits are behind the RNAP and are not visible). The Mg2+ ion chelated at the active site is shown as a magenta sphere. The Rif is shown as CPK atoms (carbon, orange; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue). (c) Structural formula of Rif. Features of the structure discussed in the text are color coded (ansa bridge, blue; napthol ring, green). The four oxygen atoms critical for Rif activity (Brufani et al., 1974; Lancini and Zanichelli, 1977; Arora, 1981, 1983, 1985; Sensi, 1983; Arora and Main, 1984) are shaded with red circles Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)

Figure 4 Detailed Interactions of Rif with RNAP (a) Stereo view of the Taq RNAP Rif binding pocket complexed with Rif, generated using RIBBONS (Carson, 1991), showing residues that interact directly with the inhibitor. The view is from the top of the RNAP in Figure 3b, above the β subunit, looking down through β to the Rif, but with obscuring parts of β removed. The backbone of the β subunit is shown as a cyan ribbon. Side chains (and backbone atoms of F394) of residues within 4 Å of Rif are shown. Carbon atoms are orange (Rif), magenta (three residues substituted in M. tuberculosis RifR clinical isolates with high frequency, see Figure 1), or yellow; oxygen atoms are red; nitrogen atoms are blue. Potential hydrogen bonds between protein atoms and Rif are shown as dashed lines. (b) Schematic drawing of RNAP β subunit interactions with Rif, modified from LIGPLOT (Wallace et al., 1995). Residues forming van der Waals interactions are indicated, those participating in hydrogen bonds are shown in a ball-and-stick representation, with hydrogen bonds depicted as dashed lines. Carbon atoms of the protein are black, while carbon atoms of Rif are orange. Oxygen atoms are red and nitrogen atoms are blue Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)

Figure 5 Rif Binding Pocket and RifR Mutants Stereo views of the Taq RNAP Rif binding pocket complexed with Rif. The view (the same in [a] and [b]), rotated approximately 180° about the horizontal axis from the view of Figure 4a, is as if one was in the middle of the main RNAP channel in Figure 3b (between β and β′, looking up towards the Rif, with the β subunit behind). (a) The backbone of the β subunit is shown as a cyan ribbon, but with a highly conserved segment of region D (443–451, see text) colored red. Side chains (and backbone atoms of F394) of residues where substitutions confer RifR (see Figure 1) are shown. Carbon atoms are orange (Rif), magenta (three residues substituted in M. tuberculosis RifR clinical isolates with high frequency, see Figure 1), yellow (other residues that interact directly with Rif, as in Figure 4), or green (all other RifR positions). Oxygen atoms are colored red; nitrogen atoms are blue. Generated using RIBBONS (Carson, 1991). (b) The β subunit is shown as a cyan molecular surface, with a highly conserved segment of region D colored red, and surface-exposed RifR positions colored yellow (within 4 Å of the Rif) or green. Generated using GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991) Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)

Figure 6 Mechanism of RNAP Inhibition by Rif (a) The RNAP active site Mg2+ (magenta sphere) and the 9 bp RNA/DNA hybrid (from +1 to −8) from a model of the ternary elongation complex (Korzheva et al., 2000) are shown. The RNAP itself and the rest of the nucleic acids are omitted for clarity. The incoming nucleotide substrate at the +1 position is colored green, the −1 and −2 positions, which can be accommodated in the presence of Rif, are colored yellow. The RNA further upstream (−3 to −8), which cannot be accommodated in the presence of Rif, is colored pink. The template strand of the DNA is colored gray. Also shown is a CPK representation of Rif as it would be positioned in its binding site on the β subunit (carbon atoms, orange; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue). The Rif is partially transparent, illustrating the RNA nucleotides at −3 to −5 that sterically clash. Generated using GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991). (b) The structure of the minimal scaffold systems with RNA lengths from 3–7 nt (labeled above the RNA chain; Korzheva et al., 2000). The results are presented below as autoradiographs of the radioactive RNAs produced by E. coli (lanes 1–15) or Taq (lanes 16–30) core RNAPs transcribing the minimal scaffolds with the indicated lengths of RNA (“X =”) and analyzed on a 23% polyacrylamide gel. Lanes 1–10 and 16–25 demonstrate the effect of Rif inhibition of transcription when it was bound by RNAP either before (lanes 1–5 and 16–20) or after (lanes 6–10 and lanes 21–25) addition of the scaffold. Lanes 11–15 and 26–30 show elongation of the same scaffolds in the absence of Rif. The RNA with the critical length of 3 nt, which cannot be elongated by E. coli RNAP in the presence of Rif regardless of the order of Rif and scaffold addition (lanes 1 and 6), is colored red. The RNAs of 4–7 nt (colored green) were extended by E. coli RNAP when added before Rif (lanes 6–10) Cell 2001 104, 901-912DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0)