Simulation of a shared fleet of autonomous cars in Canberra

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

Source : Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, August Tips on OIL Saving 1. Drive at max. 90 km/hr 2. Use Mass Transit instead.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
Partnership for Clean Fuel & Vehicles : (Side event, BAQ ) December 18th, 2002 Need for a partnership to promote alternate fuel vehicles N.V.Iyer.
An introduction to electric vehicles
Humber Bridge Review Results from the HUMBER ESTUARY TRANSPORT MODEL.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Quiz 1: Rail Transport Case Study, 2013 This quiz requires knowledge of the pre-release case study, the issues that lie behind it, and of the Unit 4b specification.
ECars - Now!.
Plug-In Vehicles are Here, More are Coming major auto manufacturers with 10 production models over 20 production models Consensus - 3.
Car2go GmbH – Andreas Leo, February 2012 From Pilots to Commercialization car2go.
Airport Shuttle Agreements Presented by: John McCarthy GO Airport Express.
Odysa ® Experiences with an individual “green wave” Marcel Willekens / Arjan Bezemer / Kristiaan Langelaar.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Our company and Product Our company makes and sell record players and repairs and distributes them with green vehicles Nick Brown and Chris Schermerhorn.
GO Airport Shuttle Don Eames The GO Group, LLC Board Member President/CEO GO The Airport Shuttle AGTA Meeting Ft. Myers, FL.
1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
PLUTO FOR WINDOWS P lanning L and U se and T ransport O ptions Dr. Csaba OROSZ associate Prof. Department. of Highway and Railway Engineering, BUTE.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Christian Hütter Wolfgang Kammerlander Nicole Schuster.
Buenos Aires, September 30th, 2014 Service Planning Improvements, a recent experience in Mexibus III.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “It’s time…New Zealand extended charging for public infrastructure” Proponent: Geoff Cooper.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
ITS and Electric Vehicles What is the nexus How does the topic relate to STWG.
The Stockholm trials – Emme/2 as a tool for designing a congestion charges system 1.The trials and the congestion charges system 2.Observed effects 3.Transportation.
Clean Cities / 1 WESTERN WASHINGTON CLEAN CITIES COALITION Workplace Charging Scott DeWees Clean Cities Co-Coordinator October 17.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
PPT of topic § Electric Cars and Hybrid vehicles - Electric Cars
SR 156 Level 2 Toll Study TAMC Board Meeting August 23, 2017
2.2 Energy performance of transportation
HS2 - What tests should be applied in evaluating the final business case ? Chris Nash.
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
Mattapan High Speed Line
The Road to Shared Autonomous Vehicles
Our Bus Service Konrad Pulé – October 2016.
Electric Vehicle (EV) Presentation
High way and Transportation 2(Lab) LCIV 3034
Martha’s Vineyard Transit Authority
Metro Railway How it began
Key Performance Indicators Year to Date June 30, 2017
Project Feasibility Analysis
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
STEPS Symposium UC Davis December 7, 2017 Lew Fulton, Co-Director
MaaS meets Travel Demand Modeling
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
Solar City: Effect of Solar Technologies on Network Performance
Rose Drive Friends Church Solar Project Proposal
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Electrification of the 16th St. Mall Shuttles
WHY AND WHEN WE TRAVEL Household Travel Surveys March 2018.
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
International Symposium on Road Pricing 2003 Evaluation of Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) System ( present) A P G Menon MSI Global.
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
02/05/2018 Providing a real alternative to car ownership Convenient | Cost Effective | Sustainable.
Mr. Ashok Agarwal : CEO - New Initiatives
Reducing Electrical Energy Consumption
Sample ‘Scheduling Process’
Kabinkový systém electrically powered - 2kW continuous
Gabe Taba | Naeem Farooqi
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
A film starts at 13:45 and lasts for 1 hour and 35 minutes
Lead Researcher: Constantine Samaras
Cost of Electricity & Energy Usage Energy Use Recall: Measured in Watts (W) Electrical power is the rate at which electrical energy is produced.
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Simulation of a shared fleet of autonomous cars in Canberra Kent Fitch Project Computing Pty Ltd 6th Australian ITS Summit August 2018

Key Result Company The most economical and efficient shared AV fleet will require journeys to be shared during peak periods.

35km 25km Only 400k people, but they are spread thinly

Tidal flows dominate periods of peak demand Morning ...

Tidal flows dominate periods of peak demand ... Afternoon

Convenience High Uptake Model Cost Service requirements for Door-to-Door 24x7 On demand (no booking) > 98% within 1 minute > 99.5% within 3 mins No slower, end-to-end, than private car Cost Cheaper than private car Service requirements for High Uptake Model 750,000 weekday journeys

Vehicle Base Model Cost: $40,000 Spares: additional 5% Life: 3 years zero residual value Range: 200 km usable Maintenance + cleaning: $2000pa + 2.5c/km Efficiency: 6km/kWHr

Charging stations Base Model Cost: $15,000 Life: 10 years zero residual value Rate: 75kW, 80% efficient (meter to motor) Maintenance + rent: $3000pa Electricity: 20c/kWHr

All capital is borrowed at 10%pa Base Model Financing All capital is borrowed at 10%pa $

Tariff Peak Weekdays 7-9am, 3-6pm 40c flagfall + 25c/km Base Model Off peak 20c flagfall + 25c/km Shared journeys 6-10am, 3-7pm Flagfall $0.40 Trip $2.75 Extras $0.00

23,000 Service outcome for 1,500 High Uptake Model 2.5GWHr Cars 23,000 (plus 5% spares) Charging stations 1,500 Energy 2.5GWHr per day Surplus after financing $75 million per year Service outcome for High Uptake Model 750,000 weekday journeys

57% Service outcome for High Uptake Model 22% km driven Cars in passenger use 57% over 24 hours Dead running (transfers) 22% km driven Ratio of total km travelled to passenger service km 1.15 Service outcome for High Uptake Model 750,000 weekday journeys

Passenger wait times Minutes <= 1 98.3% 1 - 2 1.5% 2 - 3 0.14% 3 - 4 0.04% 4 - 5 0.01% 5 - 10 Maximum wait 7 minutes % journeys with wait > 1 minute 1.7% % journeys with wait > 3 minutes 0.06%

Financial summary, one vehicle, weekday Revenue $ Expenses $ Fares 103 Capital & interest 44 Power & charger 22 Rego/insurance/comms/admin 6 Maintenance 12 84 Weekday surplus: $19 per vehicle Weekend-day loss: $12 per vehicle Annual surplus: ~$3400 per vehicle

But what about congestion?

2.1 most popular (congested) routes 1.8 - 2.0 to popular destinations Congestion Now 1.1 travellers/car 2.1 most popular (congested) routes 1.8 - 2.0 to popular destinations 1.5 network average Simulation during peak

Congestion Q. But don’t the extra vehicle km travelled due to unoccupied transfers increase congestion? A. No - journeys are unoccupied only in inverse proportion to demand for travel along that route. Unshared private vehicles Shared AV fleet

Shared journeys drive a virtuous chain... Better, cheaper service Higher uptake Faster response Higher utilisation Lower costs Less congestion Positive feedback Efficiency increases as average occupancy rises during peaks Vehicles required increases slower than number of passengers

http://canberraautonomouscars.info