The Shifting Sands in Federal, State, & Accreditation Policies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MARCH 18, 2011 PRESENTED BY DR. JUDY C. MINER PRESIDENT, FOOTHILL COLLEGE EMBRACE.
Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations Jack O. Burns, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs & Research January 25, 2005.
Hot Topics and Accreditation Issues in Distance Education Financial Aid, Correspondence, Authentication…Should We Go On? Dennis Bailey-Fournier, Cabrillo.
SACS: Gatekeeper to the Flow of Federal Aid. UK’s Accrediting Body The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), Commission on Colleges, is.
Fred Lokken Chair, Instructional Technology Council (ITC) & Associate Dean, WebCollege & ASC Truckee Meadows Community College Reno, Nevada An Update on.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
The NJ Registry Career Lattice NJ Instructor Approval Orientation Lesson #3.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Policy Council and Program Planning. The Head Start Program Planning Cycle National Center on Program Management and Fiscal Operations (PMFO)
Accreditation of eLearning Degree by Prof.Dr.Srisakdi Charmonman.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Keeping Up-to-Date with SACSCOC MAC Meeting Fall 2013.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.
SACS Coordinators Meeting April 25, 2012 Cheryl Gater - Director, SACS Accreditation Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment.
SACS: Gatekeeper to the Flow of Federal Aid. UK’s Accrediting Body The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), Commission on Colleges, is.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Higher Education Reauthorization Act.  The language of the law is Part H- Program Integrity in section 496 related to Regional Accrediting Agencies directing.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University Medical Center Introduction When designing courses for the higher education.
Competency Based Education August 4, Definition In general, competency-based education (CBE) is an outcomes-based approach to earning a college.
The Infrastructure of Accreditation: The Department of Education and The Regional Accreditors ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA.
Federal Reviews: What to Expect Laura Lawrence Lavonne Juhl.
CONNECT Events and Groups LEARN News and Views ADVANCE Policies and Practices New Federal Regulations on State Authorization of Distance Education Distance.
State Authorization Updates on Regulations, Reciprocity, and Complaint Notifications Council of College and Military Educators – February 2016.
Overview of the Supplemental NPRM: Distance Education.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
SACS-COC Fifth-Year Interim Report
Are You Ready? SSH Accreditation and Certification
Early Childhood Education
Purpose of this Presentation
Course Review 2017.
State Approving Agencies: Core Functions
Private Institution Regulation by SCHEV
Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Senate and Union Purview
US Department of Education Federal Student Aid (FSA)
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
The Infrastructure of Accreditation:
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere
All About Resources: Standard III
State Approving Agencies: Core Functions
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
MASFAA Conference November , 2015
Approval Criteria – Part II
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Evaluation of Distance Education Curriculum
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
Creating a More Effective Senate by Establishing Strong Relationships
ASPA Update for Association of Accrediting Agencies of Canada
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Curriculum and Distance Education
Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

The Shifting Sands in Federal, State, & Accreditation Policies OLC Collaborate New York City, NY August 7, 2018

WCET is the leader in the practice, policy, & advocacy of technology-enhanced learning in higher education

Russ Poulin Director, Policy & Analysis WCET rpoulin@wiche.edu

Who’s In the Audience? – Roles Faculty Instructional designers Higher ed administrator Corporate representatives Government or lawmakers Accreditation staff Other?

Distance Education Enrollments Fall 2016, what % of all U.S. higher ed students: Enrolled exclusively at a distance? Of those enrolled exclusively at a distance, enrolled in a for-profit institution? Department of Education data: http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html

Distance Education Enrollments Fall 2016, what % of all U.S. higher ed students: Enrolled exclusively at a distance? 14.9% 2,974,836 students Of those enrolled exclusively at a distance, enrolled in a for-profit institution? – 23.5% Enrolled distance & face-to-face? – 16.7%. Total of 31.6% taking at least one DE course.   2012 2016 % Growth All Students 20,237,911 20,209,781 -0.1% Exclusive DE 2,287,168 2,974,836 30.1% Some DE 2,694,715 3,325,743 23.4% At least one DE 4,981,883 6,300,579 26.5% No DE 15,256,028 13,909,202 -8.8% Department of Education data: http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html

Today’s Discussion Federal Regulations What’s Happening in States? And What About Accreditation?

Federal Regulations: Higher Education Act

Federal Regulations Higher Education Act Enacted 1965 “Reauthorized” periodically Not since 1998

Federal Regulations Higher Education Act

Federal Regulations Higher Education Act

Federal Regulations: Negotiated Rulemaking

Federal Regulations Negotiated Rulemaking Release: July 31 Clarifying regs Committee of affected parties Need to reach “consensus”

Federal Regulations Negotiated Rulemaking Issues in this NegReg: Core functions of accreditation, State authorization, Definition: “regular & substantive interaction”, Definition of the term “credit hour”, The relationship between length of program and entry-level requirements for the recognized profession, Underlined items are of particular interest to our community

Federal Regulations Negotiated Rulemaking Institution partnering with another institution or organization to provide part of a program, Responsibilities regarding teach-out processes, Barriers to innovation or student completion, graduation, employment…., Program requirements regarding TEACH grant, Competency Based Education, and Faith-based entities participating in Title IV. Underlined items are of particular interest to our community

Brief Primer on Policy and Regulations Federal: Negotiated Rulemaking Comment! Comment!! Comment!!! Volume counts https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/31/2018-15929/negotiated-rulemaking-committee-public-hearings

Federal Regulations: Regular and Substantive Interaction

Federal Regulations Regular and Substantive Interaction “We (OIG) did not assess whether the school’s model was improving educational quality or expanding access to higher education. We are not withdrawing our findings or the corresponding recommendations.” https://wcetfrontiers.org/2012/04/20/correspondence-definition/ https://wcetfrontiers.org/2017/09/22/wgu-interaction/

Federal Regulations Regular and Substantive Interaction “Distance education means education that uses one or more of the technologies listed in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this definition to deliver instruction to students who are separated from the instructor and to support regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor, either synchronously or asynchronously…” ECFR: Title 34, §600.2  http://bit.ly/2DyoMzI

Federal Regulations Regular and Substantive Interaction Interaction must be: Initiated by the instructor. “Regular” and (probably) somewhat frequent. “Substantive” – of an academic nature. With an instructor that meets accrediting agency standards. From a WCET Frontiers analysis by Russ Poulin, WCET and Van Davis, Blackboard: https://wcetfrontiers.org/2016/09/30/interpreting-regular-and-substantive-interaction/

Federal (and State) Regulations: State Authorization

Federal (and State) Regulations State Authorization is something you should check if you are crossing a state line to perform ANY activity.

Federal (and State) Regulations State Authorization The SAN Federal Regulation Pledge I (state your name) will remind anyone who cares to listen that state laws and regulations predate any federal regulations and remain in force in the absence of federal regulations.

What’s Happening in States?: Student Affordability

What’s Happening in the States? Student Affordability Let’s start with a question about money…

What’s Happening in the States? Student Affordability Does it cost institutions: more, the same, or less to develop, offer, support, and maintain distance education courses?

What’s Happening in the States? Student Affordability Change Magazine, Volume 50, 2018, Issue 1: https://wcet.wiche.edu/initiatives/research/price-cost-distance-ed

What’s Happening in States?: Creating New Options

What’s Happening in the States? Creating New Options

And What About Accreditation? Institutional Review Criteria

And What About Accreditation? Institutional Review Criteria (1) The agency's accreditation standards effectively address the quality of the institution or program in the following areas: (i) Success with respect to student achievement in relation to the institution's mission… (ii) Curricula. (iii) Faculty. (iv) Facilities, equipment, and supplies. (v) Fiscal and administrative capacity as appropriate to the specified scale of operations. (1) The agency's accreditation standards effectively address the quality of the institution or program in the following areas: (i) Success with respect to student achievement in relation to the institution's mission, which may include different standards for different institutions or programs, as established by the institution, including, as appropriate, consideration of State licensing examinations, course completion, and job placement rates. (ii) Curricula. (iii) Faculty. (iv) Facilities, equipment, and supplies. (v) Fiscal and administrative capacity as appropriate to the specified scale of operations. (vi) Student support services. (vii) Recruiting and admissions practices, academic calendars, catalogs, publications, grading, and advertising. (viii) Measures of program length and the objectives of the degrees or credentials offered. (ix) Record of student complaints received by, or available to, the agency. (x) Record of compliance with the institution's program responsibilities under Title IV of the Act, based on the most recent student loan default rate data provided by the Secretary, the results of financial or compliance audits, program reviews, and any other information that the Secretary may provide to the agency; and Title 34, §602.16   Accreditation and preaccreditation standards. https://bit.ly/2n2P3ja

And What About Accreditation? Institutional Review Criteria (vi) Student support services. (vii) Recruiting and admissions practices, academic calendars, catalogs, publications, grading, and advertising. (viii) Measures of program length and the objectives of the degrees or credentials offered. (ix) Record of student complaints received by, or available to, the agency. (x) Record of compliance with the institution’s program responsibilities under Title IV of the Act…” Title 34, §602.16   Accreditation and preaccreditation standards. https://bit.ly/2n2P3ja

And What About Accreditation? Innovation and Quality Assurance

And What About Accreditation? Innovation and Quality Assurance New Approaches to Judging Quality in Higher Education. Tafaya Ransom, Erin Knepler, and Claudia Zapata-Gietl. Council of Higher Education Accreditation. 2018.

And What About Accreditation? Innovation and Quality Assurance “Institutions, however, do not always know what their accreditor will allow them to do when they seek to innovate—or what resources they may have to expend to convince an accreditor that an innovation should be permissible. The seeming randomness casts a pall over innovation across the sector.” Innovation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Michael Horn & Alana Dunagan. Christensen Institute. June 2018.

Beyond the Shifting Sands…

Questions. Russ Poulin Director, Policy & Analysis WCET rpoulin@wiche Questions?? Russ Poulin Director, Policy & Analysis WCET rpoulin@wiche.edu