ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS IN ENFORCING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN FIRMS Yezdi Malegam Goa
PLAN Conceptual Base Corporate Governance in India Role of Institutional Investor
MAJOR IMPERATIVES Growing dissatisfaction with financial statements Growing dissatisfaction with boards Changing profile of the shareholder Birth of knowledge society Competition for larger share of international funds
MODELS ‘Outsider’ model – Anglo American ‘Insider’ model – European ‘Founding family’ model – East Asian
BASIC PRINCIPLES Accountability Transparency Equality of treatment for all stock-holders
KEY PLAYERS Management Board of Directors Shareholders
ATTRIBUTES OF BOARD MEMBERS Independent of management Minimum level of financial literacy Some members to have knowledge of the business Willing to devote necessary time and attention
MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE CODE Composition of Board Formation of Committee Audit Investor Protection and Grievance Management Analysis and Discussion Other Disclosures Matters which the management must mandatorily place before board
OTHER MAJOR SEBI INITIATIVES Disclosure in Offer Document Unaudited quarterly financial statements Half yearly reviews of financial statements Accounting Standards Insider Trading Code Take-Over Code
DIFFICULTIES IN COMPLIANCE Applicable only to listed companies Enforcement through listing agreements Compliance in form but nor always in substance
DIFFICULTIES IN COMPLIANCE …2 Some common abuses Non-executive directors not really independent Inter-group advances / investments with related parties Investments in non-core assets
ROLE OF THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS Do institutional investors need to get involved? What should be the nature of their involvement? How far have they been involved?
INVOLVEMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS - Pro Significant stakes in companies Can exercise significant influence on promoters and management and prevent abuses Better access to information and better monitoring capabilities Significant positive correlation between corporate governance and stock market performance
INVOLVEMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS – Pro …2 Research studies show countries and companies with weak corporate governance suffer larger collapses when hit by adverse shocks and are subject to greater volatility Major influence in attracting FDI
INVOLVEMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS – Con: Investment objectives and compensation system discourage participation Conflict of interest with primary fiduciary responsibility to own investors and beneficiaries Investors like MFs have short term performance measurement which works against active monitoring
NOMINEES ON BOARDS INEFFECTIVE Poor selection No formal reporting system Inadequately remunerated No clarity of role Unwilling to accept responsibility Generally averse to risk taking
ACTIVE ROLE SHOULD ENSURE Board members have adequate experience and are truly independent Executive remuneration, particularly for family members, is not excessive Early warning signals are detected from wealth of information made available to shareholders
ACTIVE ROLE SHOULD ENSURE …2 Companies funds are not diverted to non-core activities or for benefit of related parties Institutional investors lead shareholders in demanding corrective action where such action is warranted