Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short-range, high-LET recoil tracks in CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector E. R. Benton 1, C. E. Johnson 1, J. DeWitt 1, N. Yasuda 2, and E. V. Benton.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Nuclear Data in Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2011 Symposium on Nuclear Data Daiki SATOH Japan Atomic Energy Agency 1. Dosimetry calculations powered.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Title Nuclear Reaction Models in Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System PHITS Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Hiroshi Iwase:
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
P HI T S Advanced Lecture (II): variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code.
Title Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Hiroshi Iwase: GSI, Germany Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Yousuke Iwamoto, Norihito Matsuda, Yukio Sakamoto, Hiroshi Nakashima:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Radiological Design Considerations of Synchrotron Radiation Facilities P.K. Job Radiation Physicist National Synchrotron.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
Measurements of cross-sections of neutron threshold reactions and their usage in high energy neutron measurements Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute,
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Status of Neutronics Tools & Data for IFMIF-EVEDA U. Fischer, S. Simakov.
Studies of neutron cross-sections by activation method in Nuclear Physics Institute Řež and in The Svedberg Laboratory Uppsala and experimental determination.
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
JENDL/HE-2007 & On going Activities for JENDL-4 Japan Atomic Energy Agency S. Kunieda IAEA 1-st RCM of CRP on FENDL-3.0, 2-5 Dec Y. Watanabe Kyushu.
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Beam test possibilities at JINR and Fermilab V. Pronskikh Fermilab 02/15/2012.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Assessment of radiation shielding materials for protection of space crews using CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector J. M. DeWitt 1, E. R. Benton 1, Y.
EURISOL – Task 11 meeting 2007S. Chabod 1 OUR CONTRIBUTION INSIDE EURISOL TASK 11 OPTIMIZATION OF IN-TARGET NUCLEI YIELDS Target parameters: material (Al.
Fusion Neutronics Activity at JAERI from October 2000 to September 2001 Peseted by Takeo NISHTANI IEA International Work Shop on Fusion Neutronics The.
CERF simulation Mitsu 14th Feb Simulation components Production Transportation Detector response
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by deuterons at 1.6 and 2.52 GeV Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Nam-Suk Jung, Arim Lee, Hee-Seock Lee,
Induced-activity experiment:
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Neutron and 9Li Background Calculations
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Shintaro Hashimoto1, Yosuke Iwamoto 1, Tatsuhiko Sato 1, Koji Niita2,
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
Mitja Majerle NPI CAS Řež, The Czech Republic
Setting of various sources A
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Guidance for hands-on exercise Medical linac
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Fragmentation cross sections of Fe26+, Si14+ and C6+ ions of 0
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Design of A New Wide-dynamic-range Neutron Spectrometer for BNCT with Liquid Moderator and Absorber S. Tamaki1, I. Murata1 1. Division of Electrical,
Sheng Yang a, Yen-Wan Hsueh Liu b
In-situ determination
Presentation transcript:

Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2 SATIF-13, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf ( Dresden, Germany, 10-12 October, 2016 ) Benchmark calculation of the PHITS code for neutron attenuation in iron and concrete on shielding experiments at proton accelerator facilities Norihiro Matsuda1, Yosuke Iwamoto1, Tatsuhiko Sato1, Shintaro Hashimoto1, Tatsuhiko Ogawa1, Takuya Furuta1, Shinichiro Abe1, Takeshi Kai1, Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2 1 JAEA, Japan Atomic Energy Agency 2 RIST, Research Organization for Information Science and Technology 3 KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization

Introduction -1 For shielding designs and safety analyses of the J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex), accuracy of PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) were validated through benchmark calculations based on shielding experiments about 10 years ago. The PHITS has been upgraded especially in the past five years. Therefore, another round of benchmark calculations are required for the latest version of the PHITS.

Introduction -2 Dr. HIRAYAMA has studied neutron attenuation through the inter-comparison in SATIF. Neutron attenuation length is very important for shielding calculations involving high-energy accelerators. However, comparable experimental data is not exist. CONCRETE H. Hirayama, Inter-comparison of medium-energy neutron attenuation in iron and concrete (8), SATIF-10

PURPOSE In this study, benchmark calculations for shielding experiments at several proton accelerator facilities (TIARA, RCNP, AGS) are carried out with the latest version of the PHITS (ver. 2.82). Moreover, we try to evaluate neutron attenuation length for these shielding experiments with the help of the PHITS. TIARA: Takasaki Ion Accelerators for Advanced Radiation Application, JAEA RCNP: Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka Univ. AGS: Alternating Gradient Synchrotron, BNL

Models (default) in PHITS 2.82 INCL4.6 was introduced into PHITS version 2.52 (Dec., 2012) as substitute for Bertini model.

Difference of neutron attenuations For concrete, differences of neutron attenuations are observed for energies from 1 to 3 GeV. PHITS ver. 2.82 Max.(@ 3 GeV): ~10 g cm−2 ← Bertini H. Hirayama, Inter-comparison of medium-energy neutron attenuation in iron and concrete (8), SATIF-10

Tiara experiment Experimental geometry & the source spectrum Quasi-mono energetic collimated neutrons are a produced this experimental facility. 99% enriched 7Li 68-MeV protons 2.0×109 1.5×109 ~10 times 1.0×109 Ex.) Concrete shield 5.0×108 100-cm thick 150-cm thick 200-cm thick Peak region: 60-70 MeV

Calculation results (TIARA) TIARA (IRON) TIARA (CONCRETE) Expt. Calc. Overestimations are observed in the results at 100-cm-thick iron, and at 100- and 150-cm-thick concrete.

Calculation results with JENDL-4.0/HE TIARA (IRON) TIARA (CONCRETE) Expt. Calc. (JENDL-4.0/HE) C. Konno, JENDL-4.0/HE benchmark test with concrete and iron shielding experiments at JAEA/TIARA, ICRS-13 Overestimation was improved by using extended version of JENDL-4.0 (neutrons up to 200 MeV), JENDL-4.0/HE.

RCNP experiment Experimental geometry & the source spectrum Quasi-mono energetic collimated neutrons are a produced this experimental facility. enriched 7Li 140-MeV protons 4.0×109 3.0×109 ~10 times 2.0×109 Ex.) Concrete shield 100-cm thick 150-cm thick 200-cm thick 1.0×108 Peak region: 130-140 MeV Geometry of RCNP is about the same as that of TIARA.

Calculation results (RCNP) RCNP (IRON) RCNP (CONCRETE) Expt. Calc. Calculated results both in iron and concrete are in good agreement with the experimental data on the whole.

Attenuations of DOSE (TIARA & RCNP) We try to evaluate neutron attenuation length based on the measured data at TIARA & RCNP. (Dose equivalent rate is calculated from neutron spectrum with flux-to-dose conversion coefficient in inter-comparison.) RCNP experiment (IRON) Ex.) 100 g cm−2 Expt. Calc.

Attenuation length (TIARA & RCNP) Neutron attenuation length are summarized for the shielding experiments at TIARA and RCNP. If we want to put the obtained values of attenuation length on the figure, we must determine the incident neutron energy (horizontal axis in the figure) for the experiments. <= for TIARA, 60-70 MeV (peak energy ???) for RCNP, 130-140 MeV (peak energy ???) Att. Length (g cm−2) TIARA RCNP IRON 73 (70- to 130-cm) 100 (70- to 100-cm) CONCRETE 61 (150- to 200-cm) 70 (150- to 200-cm)

Peak and continuum spectrum Continuum spectrum is unnecessary components to determine the incident energy in the experiment. Hence, we analyzed contributions for dose equivalent rate from the peak and continuum spectrum separately. peak continuum

Calculation results (TIARA) 5.0×108 1.0×109 1.5×109 2.0×109 TIARA (IRON) continuum Expt. Calc. (continuum) The continuum spectrum decreases with the thickness (depth). However, the contribution for the dose equivalent rate from the continuum spectrum still remain about 7% at 100-cm thick. RCNP expt.: 63~77%

AGS experiment Experimental geometry & neutron spectrum Concrete Iron 2.83-GeV protons Mercury target lateral calculated by PHITS Iron spallation neutrons Activation detectors were installed in iron and concrete shield.

Calculation results (AGS) AGS (IRON) The calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental data. 149 g cm−2 149 g cm−2 Expt. Calc. AGS (CONCRETE) We evaluated the neutron attenuation length from these data. 88 g cm−2 93 g cm−2

Attenuation LENGTH (AGS) Neutron attenuation length is summarized for AGS experiment. Att. Length (g cm−2) 209Bi(n, 4n)206Bi 209Bi(n, 6n)204Bi IRON 149 (111- to 199-cm) CONCRETE 88 (229- to 320-cm) 93 (229- to 320-cm) AGS (IRON) We divide the spallation spectrum into some energy region. The Total dose attenuations from 100 to 200 cm depth depend on the attenuations by 100-300 MeV neutrons. Total 100-300 MeV 300-500 MeV 500-1,000 MeV 20-100 MeV

Attenuations of DOSE (AGS) AGS (IRON) Total 100-300 MeV 300-500 MeV 500-1,000 MeV 20-100 MeV Neutron attenuations (slope) in AGS experiments are gradually changed with the depth by the flux and energy of the spallation spectrum. We may obtain some attenuation length at different depth.

Attenuation length Attenuation length based on the measurements are summarized.

Conclusion In order to validate the accuracy of the latest version of PHITS (ver. 2.82), benchmark calculations were carried out for the shielding experiments at TIARA, RCNP, and AGS. The calculated results by the PHITS (INCL4.6) were in good agreement with the measured ones on the whole, except for TIARA experiments. Neutron attenuation length was summarized for each shielding experiment. It is possible to obtain neutron attenuation length experimentally. However, we need more and more shield.

Thank you for your attention. E-mail: matsuda.norihiro@jaea.go.jp

Attenuation length (CONCRETE) PHITS ver. 2.82 AGS Attenuation length (g/cm−2) RCNP TIARA Source neutron energy (MeV)

Models recommended to use in PHITS 2.24

Difference of neutron attenuations Neutron attenuations for iron make a slight change from 1 to 3 GeV. ← Bertini PHITS ver. 2.82 H. Hirayama, Inter-comparison of medium-energy neutron attenuation in iron and concrete (8), SATIF-10

Attenuation length (iron) Attenuation length (g/cm−2) AGS RCNP TIARA PHITS ver. 2.82 Source neutron energy (MeV)

Background A Japanese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (JENDL) special purpose file, JENDL-4.0 High Energy File (JENDL-4.0/HE), is an extended version of JENDL-4.0 for incident neutrons up to 200 MeV for 130 nuclei, and a nuclear data library for incident protons up to 200 MeV for 133 nuclei, which are relevant to high-energy applications. It was released in November, 2015. More than 20 years ago shielding experiments at the Takasaki Ion Accelerators for Advanced Radiation Application (TIARA) in Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) were carried out for concrete and iron with quasi-mono energetic 40 or 65 MeV neutrons.

Differences from the experiments Calculation conditions of the inter-comparison are different from those of the shielding experiments. Inter-comparison TIARA expt. RCNP expt. AGS expt. Neutron source Mono-energy Quasi-mono energy Spallation spectrum Shielding Iron, Concrete Iron, Concrete* Thickness (cm) Iron: 0-600 Conc.: 0-1200 Iron: 0-130 Conc.: 0-200 Iron: 0-100 Conc. : 0-200 Iron: 0-330 Conc.: 0-500 Detector type (Geometry) Surface cross (infinite) Counter (finite) Activation (≃infinite) *: Low-activationized concrete (Ca-rich) At least two data is needed to evaluate neutron attenuation length for the shielding experiments. For the measurements, we need to determine the energy of attenuation length.

Calculation results (TIARA) 5.0×108 1.0×109 1.5×109 2.0×109 peak TIARA (IRON) Expt. Calc. (peak) The peak spectrum decreases with the thickness (depth). And, the peak spectrum also make continuum spectrum.

Calculation results (TIARA & RCNP) For iron shield (20-, 40-, and 100-cm-thick) TIARA expt. RCNP expt. Expt. Calc. (peak) Calculated results (100-cm-thick) were approximately made by the peak spectrum.

Calculation results (TIARA) 5.0×108 1.0×109 1.5×109 2.0×109 5.0×108 1.0×109 1.5×109 2.0×109 peak continuum TIARA (IRON) Expt. Calc. (peak) Results around 100-cm depth is reliable. 10~35%@ 100 cm (Dose: ~7%)

Attenuation of DOSE (TIARA & RCNP) Attenuation of DOSE in iron and concrete was calculated with the models of the inter-comparison. TIARA expt. RCNP expt. Total Peak Continuum Peak (slow) Dose equivalent rate (Sv per n/cm2) Dose equivalent rate (Sv per n/cm2) Peak (slow) Continuum (fast) Continuum (fast) Depth in iron (cm) Depth in iron (cm) In a finite geometry (thickness), attenuation length using the neutron source in the experiments (Total) don’t reach the maximum one (peak energy).

Neutron spectrum (AGS) 100-300 MeV 300-500 MeV 20-100 MeV 500-1,000 MeV

Attenuation of DOSE (AGS) Neutron attenuation length is summarized for AGS experiment. Att. Length (g cm−2) 209Bi(n, 4n)206Bi 209Bi(n, 6n)204Bi IRON 149 (111- to 199-cm) CONCRETE 88 (229- to 320-cm) 93 (229- to 320-cm) AGS (IRON) The dose attenuation from 100 to 200 cm depth depends on the decreasing by 100-300 MeV neutrons. ⇒ Any attenuations up to 1,000 MeV may be obtained by the depth. Total 100-300 MeV 300-500 MeV 500-1,000 MeV 20-100 MeV

Material composition CONCRETE ← Silica stone ← Lime stone Nuclide TIARA (wt%) RCNP AGS Inter-comparison H 1.1 0.9 1.0 C --- 7.5 1.3 0.1 O 48.2 49.6 48.3 53.9 Na 2.0 0.3 Mg 0.6 0.2 Al 6.1 1.5 3.3 3.4 Si 23.2 9.1 26.3 34.2 K Ca 12.4 32.5 14.2 4.4 Cr Fe 6.0 0.8 1.4 ← Silica stone ← Lime stone

台車&検出器