The Choice Among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHY DO FIRMS BOTH MAKE AND BUY? AN INVESTIGATION OF CONCURRENT SOURCING Anne Parmigiani | Strategic Management Journal (2007)
Advertisements

Ishva Minefee September 25, 2012
Silverman – 1999, MS TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND THE DIRECTION OF CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION: TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW AND TRANSACTION.
Bowman, E. H. and D. Hurry (1993) Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process.
An Empirical Examination of Transaction- and Firm-Level Influences on the Vertical Boundaries of the Firm Leiblein, Michael and Miller, Douglas
An Empirical Examination of Transaction- and Firm-Level Influences on the Vertical Boundaries of the Firm Leiblein, Michael and Miller, Douglas
WHY FIRMS MAKE UNILATERAL INVESTMENTS SPECIFIC TO OTHER FIRMS: THE CASE OF OEM SUPPLIERS Kang, Mahoney and Tan (2009) Presented by Hui Chen (Fall 2014)
Jim Hsieh (George Mason) Dolly King (UNC Charlotte) NTU, 12/10/2010.
MNC Strategies Entry and expansion decision Intra-company relations Inter-company relations Dunning chapter 7-9, Caves chapter 3.
Agenda for November 2 Review of Chapter 8 International Strategy
Chapter 9.
Transparency 9-1 Building Alliances Key Functional Areas R&D Marketing Production Logistics Service Cooperative Modes Joint Coordinated Complementary Independent.
Diversification Strategy Introduction: The Basic Issues The Trend over Time Motives for Diversification - Growth and Risk Reduction - Shareholder Value:
Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource- based View and Transaction Cost Economics.
Real Options and Investment Mode: Evidence from Corporate Venture Capital and Acquisition Tony W. Tong & Yong Li (2011) Organization Scienc, 22(3):
WHY DO FIRMS BOTH MAKE AND BUY? AN INVESTIGATION OF CONCURRENT SOURCING Anne Parmigiani | Strategic Management Journal (2007) Made by Hyeran Choi (2012.
Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm, Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services.
Real Options in Equity Partnerships Author: Timothy B. Folta & Kent D. Miller Source: Strategic Management Journal (2002), Vol. 23, pp Presented.
Author: Villalonga, B. and McGahan, A. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (13): Presented by Nan Zhang.
DEVELOPING STRATEGIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Session 8 Diversification Strategy Session 8 Diversification Strategy 1.
Page 1/20 The Choice of Organizational Form: Vertical Financial Ownership Versus Other Methods of Vertical Integration Joseph Mahoney, SMJ, 1992 Presented.
BA 5201 Organization and Management Managing the environment Instructor: Ça ğ rı Topal 1.
CHAPTER 6 CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGY
University of Cagliari, Faculty of Economics, Business Strategy and Policy A course within the II level degree in Managerial Economics year II,
Contractual Commitments, Bargaining Power, and Governance Inseparability: Incorporating History into Transaction Cost Theory Argyres & Liebeskind (1999)
The Independent and Joint Effects of the Skill and Physical bases of Relatedness in Diversification Farjoun, 1998, Strategic Management Journal Presented.
1 Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions in Information Systems.
A signaling theory of acquisition premiums: evidence from IPO targets Jeffrey Reuer Tony W. Tong Presented by Carla Fernández-Corrales, Fall 2014 Academy.
The changing geography of banking – Ancona, Sept. 23 rd 2006 Discussion of: “Cross border M&As in the financial sector: is banking different from insurance?”
Tony W. Tong, Yong Li Presenter: Wen ZHENG.  Tony W. Tong is an assistant professor of management of the Leeds School of Business at the University of.
International Manufacturing Network Embeddedness and Innovative Performance Guannan Xu.
Real Options in Equity Partnership Timothy B. Folta and Kent D.Miller SMJ,23; ( 2002)
Board Incentive, Director Experience, and Outcomes of Joint Venture Investment Jung-Ho Lai National Taipei College of Business I-Ju Chen Yuan-Ze University.
Testing Altermative Theories of The Firm: TRANSACTION COST, KNOWLEDGE-BASED, AND MEASUREMENT EXPLANATIONS FOR MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS IN INFORMATION SERVICES.
The Independent and Joint Effects of the Skill and Physical Bases of Relatedness in Diversification. Moshe Farjoun SMJ,Vol.9,611 – 630 ( 1998)
Hitt, M. A., Franklin, V., & Zhu, H Culture, institutions and international strategy. Journal of International Management 報告人洪一碩 D January.
Young Li, Barclay James, Ravi Madhavan, & Joseph Mahoney 2007 Advances in Strategic Management REAL OPTIONS: TAKING STOCK AND LOOKING AHEAD.
NRU HSE International Laboratory for Applied Network Research
Chapter 9 Strategic Alliances.
Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy?
The Choice Among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures
Real Options and Investment Mode: Evidence from
A signaling theory of acquisition premiums: Evidence from IPO targets
An Empirical Examination of Transaction- and Firm-Level Influences on the Vertical Boundaries of the Firm Leiblein, Michael.
Effective corporate governance mechanisms for the banking industry
Chapter 8: International Strategy
Author: Konstantinos Drakos Journal: Economica
Bowman and Hurry (1993) Academy of Management Review
Diversification Strategy
REAL OPTIONS: TAKING STOCK AND LOOKING AHEAD
The Choice of Organizational Form: Vertical Financial Ownership versus Other Methods of Vertical Integration (Joe Mahoney, SMJ 1992) I-Chen Wang.
Discussion Demian Berchtold July 6, 2018.
The Independent and Joint Effects of the Skill and Physical Bases of Relatedness in Diversification. Moshe Farjoun (1998), SMJ Weihao Li.
Testing alternative theories of the firm: transaction cost, knowledge‐based, and measurement explanations for make‐or‐buy decisions in information services.
GLOBAL MARKET ENTRY STRATEGIES Chapter Nine
FROM TRANSACTION COST TO TRANSACTIONAL VALUE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES Edward J. Zajac & Cyrus P. Olsen Journal.
Chapter 9.
A signaling theory of acquisition premiums: Evidence from IPO targets
Vertical and Horizontal Integration
Firm-Specific Human Capital, Organizational Incentives, and Agency Costs: Evidence from Retail Banking Douglas Frank and Tomasz Obloj Strategic Management.
From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: implications for the study of interorganizational strategies Edward J. Zajac & Cyrus P. Olsen Journal.
Diversification Strategy
A Review of Foreign Literature of Capital Structure Adjustment and Prospects 魏冰冰 
Prepared by: Enrique, Lihong, John, Jongkuk
Chapter 6.
Testing Alternative Theories of The Firm:
Moshe Farjoun (1998) Strategic Management Journal
Joint Ventures and the Option to Expand and Acquire
Joseph T. Mahoney and Lihong Qian Strategic Management Journal (2013)
The Choice of Organizational Form: Vertical Financial Ownership V. S
Presentation transcript:

The Choice Among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures Villalonga, B. and McGahan, A. 2005. Strategic Management Journal

Background Objective of paper is to examine the motives behind the acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures of Fortune 100 firms in the 1990s Continuum of governance modes Ties to literature on boundary choice and alternative governance structures In specific industries Acquisitions vs. alliances Decisions to form alliances and/or merge Authors study a broad range of strategic options and draw from a variety of theoretical perspectives e.g. TCE, RBV, Agency theory, Internationalization theory

Determinants of Boundary Choice

Focal Firm Attributes (1) Intangible resources (TCE and RBV) H1a: The firm’s technological resources are associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H1b: The firm’s marketing resources are associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures Ownership structure (Agency theory) H2a: The level of insider ownership of the firm is associated with the choice of divestiture over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions H2b: The level of blockholder ownership of the firm is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions H3c: The level of institutional ownership of the firm is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions

Focal Firm Attributes (2) Acquisition, alliance, divestiture experience (Organizational learning) H3a: The firm’s acquisition experience is associated with the choice of acquisitions over both alliances and divestitures H3b: The firm’s divestiture experience is associated with the choice of divestitures over both alliances and acquisitions H3c: The firm’s alliance experience is associated with the choice of alliances over both acquisitions and divestitures Diversification (TCE, RBV, Agency) H4a: The firm’s diversification level is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H4b: The firm’s diversification level is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions

Relationship Between Focal and Target/Partner Firms Industry activity (TCE, RBV, and Asymmetric information) H5: The relatedness between the focal firm and the target (or partner) firm is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures Size balance (‘Digestibility’ theory) H6: The size balance between the focal firm and the target (or partner) firm is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions Prior alliances (Social embeddedness, Real options, and Corporate refocusing) H7: The number of prior alliances between the firm and the target (or partner) firm is positively associated with the choice of alliances over both acquisitions and divestitures

Transaction – Focal Firm Relationship Attributes Relatedness (TCE, RBV, and Asymmetric information) H8: The relatedness between the firm and the activity that is subject to the transaction is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures) Governance form specialization H9a: The firm’s governance specialization is insignificantly associated with the choice of governance form H9b: The firm’s governance specialization is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H9c: The firm’s governance specialization is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions Recency of same-form governance experience H10a: The recency of the firm’s same form governance experience is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H10b: The recency of the firm’s same form governance experience is associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions

Target/Partner Firm Attributes and Transaction Attributes Intangible resources (RBV) H11a: The target (or partner) firm’s technological resources are associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H11b: The target (or partner) firm’s marketing resources are associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures Market transaction costs and internal organization costs (TCE) H12a: The interaction between uncertainty and asset specificity is associated with the choice of acquisitions over alliances, and alliances over divestitures H12b: The internal organization costs of integrating the target firm into the focal firm are associated with the choice of divestitures over alliances, and alliances over acquisitions

Summary of Hypotheses

Data and Sample 9,276 acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures announced and completed by 86 members of the Fortune 100 between 1990 and 2000 Data are from the SDC (Joint Ventures and Alliances; Mergers and Acquisitions) Deal types grouped into three, seven, and nine categories for refined analysis Dependent variable: governance form

Results (1) I’m going to discuss one of the three tables of analysis

Results (2) Boundary-expanding and boundary-contracting forms

Conclusions Varying levels of theoretical support for hypotheses e.g, TCE, RBV and internationalization (+/-); Agency theory (+/-); Organizational learning (+) Results imply that a multi-theoretical approach is needed to study firms’ boundary choices Limitations Emphasis on the Fortune 100 firms Validation of proxies (i.e,. governance form specialization, recency of same-form experience)? Future research Alliances vs. divestitures (boundary-contracting choices) Exploration of organizational learning explanations