Critical Needs ChapterS webinar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

Your Project Report is a record of how the problem was solved It provides guidance to your company to implement what you have done It is one of the assessment.
Adult HIV Outpatient PBR Tariff Development National Reference Group Meeting 21/05/10.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Writing Reports Ian McCrum Material from
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
BSBIMN501A QUEENSLAND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Academic Essays & Report Writing
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
EMME Users’ Group Meeting NSW Modelling Guidelines - Highway Assignment 27 May 2011.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Systems Analysis and Design 8 th Edition Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
1 VISSIM Protocol ITE Oregon Traffic Simulation Roundtable May 31, 2012 Chi Mai.
Design Report – Fall Semester. Title Page List name of project and team number List date List team members, advisor, sponsor Team logos.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
The MnDOT Metro District Microsimulation Experience Kevin Sommers, PE Minnesota Department of Transportation
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
National Center for Civic Involvement (NCCI) Grant Advisory Council on Citizen-Friendly Reporting Last Meeting! August 30, 2005.
Scale and Scope of Highway Safety Manual Implementation in the Project Development Process For the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) By Science Applications.
NCHRP 7-22 Planning & Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide for the HCM Kittelson & Associates 01/12/15 1 Status Report.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Traffic Simulation L3b – Steps in designing a model Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
L08: INCORPORATING RELIABILITY INTO THE HCM FREEWAY AND MULTILANE SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 22, 2012 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Cambridge Systematics Dowling.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Use Cases Discuss the what and how of use cases: Basics Examples Benefits Parts Stages Guidelines.
Traffic Simulation L2 – Introduction to simulation Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
1 January 31, Documenting Software William Cohen NCSU CSC 591W January 31, 2008.
The Role of Simulation in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual ITE Western District Annual Meeting June 28, 2010 Loren Bloomberg/CH2M HILL Santa Ana, CA
CHAPTER 2 SYSTEM PLANNING DFC4013 System Analysis & Design.
TSSM BI-WEEKLY MEETING and Stakeholder Update
Quality Assurance processes
Project Planning: Scope and the Work Breakdown Structure
The current TSSM Presentation for TSSM Stakeholders and FHWA
QA/QC in the United Kingdom National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) Task Force for Emissions Inventories and Projections – QA/QA Workshop, Krakow,
TSSM State of the Practice & TAT Virtual Roundtables
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Document Development Cycle
Use Cases Discuss the what and how of use cases: Basics Benefits
Network Attributes Calculator
Working in Groups in Canvas
State-of-the-practice webinar
I-280 Corridor Study and I-280/Winchester Blvd Project
FHWA Webinar on Traffic Analysis Tools
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FINAL QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
WG Belgian Grid Implementation Network Codes.
Project Charter <Project Name>
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
TSSM BI-WEEKLY MEETING and Stakeholder Update
A summary of part 1 of Chapter 7 CEP 812 Kay Paff March 24, 1999
School of Civil Engineering
Writing reports Wrea Mohammed
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Introduction to Web Authoring
Project Plan MS Project Example (Optional)
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Site (e.g., LARC Embakasi)
TECHNICAL REPORTS WRITING
Presentation transcript:

Critical Needs ChapterS webinar Presentation for TSSM Stakeholders and FHWA 4th in the series of 6 06 December 2017 George List, Shannon Warchol, NC State David Hale, Leidos Brandon Nevers, Kittelson Rob Bertini, USF

Deliverables Schedule Task Deliverable Due Date 4 Final Annotated Outline 04/21/2017 5 Draft Critical Need Chapters 11/21/2017 Stakeholder Webinar #4 12/21/2017 Stakeholder Webinar Meeting Minutes 01/06/2018 Final Critical Need Chapters 01/21/2018 6 Draft Intermediate Need Chapters 03/21/2018 Stakeholder Webinar #5 04/21/2018 05/06/2018 Final Intermediate Need Chapters 05/21/2018 7 TRB Annual Meeting Materials December 2017 and December 2018 Meeting Minutes from TRB Annual Meeting 4 weeks after TRB Annual Meeting Stakeholder Webinar #6 -- PFS/Task Force Review Webinar of TRB Annual Materials 07/21/2018 08/06/2018 Draft Volume V 08/21/2018 Final Volume V 09/21/2018 8 Problem Statements 10/21/2018 Government Review Period Four months added to ensure document clears 508 compliance

Summary of Feedback http://tssm.kaiproject.com/ Chapter 5: 115 comments Chapter 6: 120 comments Chapter 7: 106 comments Chapter 8: 191 comments Chapter 9: 66 comments

Overarching Feedback (all chapters) Too technical, too academic Need example problems, case studies Too product-specific in some cases… …too product-agnostic in other cases Prefer step-by-step guidance Too focused on microsimulation

Chapter 5 (Defining the Problem) Chapter Themes: Bounding the problem wisely is key to successful simulations Performance measures are needed to: Evaluate design and operation alternatives Determine if you have a good simulation model Simulation is often a key part of the solution to many analysis problems, but it is not the solution to all problems

Chapter 5 (Defining the Problem) Selecting performance measures Alternatives analysis Calibration Setting study bounds 1. Initial ID based on existing conditions 2. Review for future conditions 3. Continuing check of simulation results Scoping the role of simulation

Chapter 5 (Defining the Problem) Major Comments Received Differences in terminology and content between chapters Refer to overall technical editor to resolve conflicts/redundancies in content. FHWA reliability calibration method is not clearly described in Chapter 5. Refer reader to Chapter 8 for more info on calibration using FHWA method. FHWA reliability calibration method is not cost-effective for most users. Highlight method is to be used only if simulating reliability. Need more material on meso and macro simulation Avoided use of “micro” where guidance applies to all levels. Add bullets on meso simulation DTA Discussion not clear Clarified distinctions between DTA and mesoscopic simulation modeling

Chapter 6 (Data) INTRODUCTION DATA TYPES AND SOURCES Geometric Data | Traffic Count Data | Traffic Signal Ops Data | Calibration Data | Safety Data First-Gen Probe Data | NPMRDS Data | Big Data Sources DATA TYPES AND SOURCES Signalized Intersections/Arterials | Transit Priority Lanes | Roundabouts | Non-traditional intersections | Ped-Bike Lanes | Freeways/Interchanges | Two-lane highways | Multilane highways | Work Zones | Toll Plazas | Managed Lanes/Ramp Metering | Safety Analyses DATA REQUIREMENTS (ANALYSIS TYPES) Macroscopic | Mesoscopic | Microscopic DATA REQUIREMENTS (MODEL TYPES) Data Comprehensiveness and Reliability | Data Accuracy | Data Fusion and Aggregation | Data Quality Control DATA CHALLENGES Freeway Corridor | Freeway Interchange | Highway Corridor | Reliability | Sampling | Simulation Runs | Data Measurements with NGSIM SAMPLE DATA CASE STUDIES/ APPENDICES

Some Excerpts… Connected Vehicle Data https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16072/index.htm https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16072/index.htm

Reviewer Comments Summary No of reviewers: 8 Total comments received: 120 Responses to comments up on the Kittelson project website Chapter updates based on comments and discussions on-going

Chapter 7 (Creating the Model) Fill time, equilibrium, spatial-temporal limits Network development Geometric data Control data Traffic data Operating condition data Typical calibration data

Chapter 7 Material One-page tech briefs with visuals Fundamentals (e.g., link, node, equilibrium) Approaches to data entry (e.g., link-connector, demands vs. volumes, O-D flows, conditional turns) Concepts that overlap with other chapters

Chapter 7 Feedback Quality of diagrams and images Tool specific vs. tool agnostic Step-by-step instructions Overlapping material Add new material: Volume balancing, global vs. local parameters Optimize discussion of: Volumes vs. demands, equilibrium, editing “raw” data, Monte-Carlo analysis, diagonal movements, results-oriented analysis

Chapter 8 (VCV) Introduction Performance metrics Verification Basic tenets of the VCV process Performance metrics Options for micro, meso, and macroscopic models Verification Important considerations in checking the simulation software’s capabilities and the completeness of the input data Calibration Perspectives to consider, sequence options, assessment metrics Validation Checking robustness, assessing limitations Step-by-Step Process Recap previous material in a “do this” fashion Summary

Chapter 8 Focus (VCV) Verification Calibration Validation Software logic reflects system behavior (software developers) Input data correctly describe the system (users) At the end: logic is okay and the input data are nominally clean. Calibration Software parameters are tuned to predict observed behavior Input and output for site-specific and global system performance metrics At the end: model parameters allow the observed performance to be matched Validation Check the robustness of the model’s predictive capability Use data for scenarios not employed in calibration At the end: model robustness and limitations have been assessed.

Chapter Highlights

Chapter Highlights (2)

Chapter 8 Comments More examples Be more mindful of the audience – writing style Move as much of the dense technical material as possible to appendices Break down the introduction into smaller sections Place more stress on macro- and meso-scale modeling Clarify why certain practices are deemed important Ex-situ tests, for example, and hypothetical facility tests OD calibration/adjustment Why the ideas of warm-up, operating, and cool-down periods may be problematic

Chapter 9 (Processing, Analysis, and Presentation) Running simulation models Run times, random seeds, keeping track of model runs Data processing Output methods, data types, aggregation issues, data synthesis Analysis Definitions, statistically understanding the results, interpretation Presentation Multiple metrics, tables, charts, figures, visualization options, visualization tools, written documentation

Chapter 9 Guiding Principles Short paragraphs Heavy use of figures/tables/examples Discrepancy in comments between usefulness of seeing “staged” figures versus screenshots Internal & external links Statistics from the ground up

Chapter 9: Comments Formatting / Links to Tables & Figures October review was mid-process; formatting will be standardized for the draft review Adjustments & Additions to Examples Will be incorporated as able; figures cleaned up by editor Addition of other procedure options Will incorporate as possible while maintaining impartial to software Further explanation of statistical assumptions Incorporate while maintaining usability

Timeline Review Today July 10th ~1/3rd checkpoint Traffic analysis PFS TRB Task Force August 15th ITE SimCap Today December 6th Webinar #4 Stakeholder webinar #3 (annotated outline) April 21st Webinar #5 Start date Jan 2017 Jan 2018 Jan 2019 January 7-11 TRB Task force meeting Today Interviewed 16 PFS states TRB Mid-Year HCQSC (Sturrock) March 21st Draft intermediate need chapters November 21st Draft critical need chapters January 21st Final critical need chapters

Activities at TRB Sunday Monday Tuesday Workshop 130: Data-Driven Simulation 9:00 am – 12:00 pm Report from TSSM team Chapter Liaisons 1:00 pm – 6:00 pm One hour per chapter - With TSSM team SimSub 7:30 pm – 9:30 pm Report from TSSM team Task Force 8:00 am – 12:00 pm Brief report from liaisons Report from TSSM team Also, members of the TSSM project team will be attending: Simulation subcommittee meeting, HCQS Simulation subcommittee meeting, Freeway Ops Simulation subcommittee meeting, Traffic Signals

Questions and Answers Thank You