Laurie Eng Water Quality Standards Group Jill Csekitz Surface Water Quality Monitoring Team Guidance Advisory Workgroup Meeting June 16, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality in the Caddo Lake Watershed Caddo Lake Water Quality Cypress Creek Clean Rivers Program.
Advertisements

Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
CCGPS Coordinate Algebra
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Variation, uncertainties and models Marian Scott School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow June 2012.
Applying Conditional Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen Season Flow Applied to classified and unclassified streams found in Appendix A and D of the Water Quality.
Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.
Date/ event: Author: Overview of ETC Water data outputs 2010 Miroslav Fanta ETC Water data manager WISE TG Meeting Madrid Miroslav Fanta.
Use of Mechanistic Modeling to Enhance Derivation of Great Bay TN Criteria and Inform Restoration Strategy Thomas W. Gallagher,
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Evaluation of Volunteer Data – The Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program Review Daniel V. Obrecht Anthony P. Thorpe John R. Jones Department of Fisheries.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
Alabama’s Water Quality Assessment and Listing Methodology ADEM QA Workshop February 13, 2006.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Rules of Data Dispersion By using the mean and standard deviation, we can find the percentage of total observations that fall within the given interval.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
2015 Environmental Trade Fair and Conference Jill Csekitz Technical Specialist TCEQ Monitoring & Assessment Section Devils River State Natural Area Image.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
EXAMPLE 3 Standardized Test Practice SOLUTION From Example 2, you know the interquartile range of the data is 0.9 inch. Find 1.5 times the interquartile.
CHAPTER SEVEN ESTIMATION. 7.1 A Point Estimate: A point estimate of some population parameter is a single value of a statistic (parameter space). For.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Rivers Component of the National Monitoring Network Jerad Bales National Monitoring Conference.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection June, 2005 HYDROPORT RETRIEVAL APPLICATION FOR ASSESSMENTS.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Watershed and water quality assessment of the Allen’s Creek watershed David A. Tomasko, Ph.D. Cheryl Propst, M.S. May 16, 2012.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Potential Changes to Sections and 307.9: Standards Applicability and Attainment Gregg Easley TCEQ Water Quality Standards Team September 6, 2007.
Water Quality Standards History – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF OKLAHOMA 17th Annual Meeting October 1-3, 2008 Derek Smithee.
Changes to § Application of Standards and §307.9-Determination of Standards Attainment Gregg Easley Water Quality Standards Team Texas Commission.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
30 TAC Chapter 307 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Workgroup meeting March 7, 2007.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
BEACH Act and the EPA 2012 Recreational Criteria for Coastal Waters Joe Martin Water Quality Standards 1.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Presented to: Forest and Watershed Health Coordinating Group/Drought Task Force Watershed Management Subcommittee April 15, 2016 Heidi Henderson TMDL and.
Selenium: The Curse of the West
2014 NC Water Quality Assessment
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
Lower Laguna Madre Water Quality
Critical Conditions Review
Bar graphs are used to compare things between different groups
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
5 Number Summaries.
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update
Presentation transcript:

Laurie Eng Water Quality Standards Group Jill Csekitz Surface Water Quality Monitoring Team Guidance Advisory Workgroup Meeting June 16, 2011

Previous Assessments Screening levels for ammonia, nitrate, total phosphorus, ortho- phosphorus, chlorophyll a Concern identified when screening level exceeded > 20% of the time Freshwater streams Tidal streams Estuaries Reservoirs Narrative Criteria for Nutrient Enrichment

TCEQ WQS 2010 Nutrient Criteria Appendix F Site-specific Nutrient Criteria for Selected Reservoirs Adopted Chlorophyll a Criteria for 75 reservoirs Not yet approved by EPA Based on historical data for each reservoir at the specified station of the main pool or dam site

Chlorophyll a Nutrient Criteria Upper prediction interval, 99 th percent confidence level Minimum of 30 sampling dates Data from , older data if needed Outliers removed at greater than 1.5 interquartile range (boxplot) Less than values set at ½ detection limit Assumes normality with untransformed data Minimum default criterion of 5 micro grams per liter when the calculated criterion is lower than 5.

Reservoir Examples SegmentReservoir NameSite ID Chlorophyll a Criteria micro grams per liter 1212Somerville Lake Stillhouse Hollow Lake (2.07) 1403Lake Austin (3.58) 1408Lake Buchanan Choke Canyon Reservoir

Assessment – Site Specific General Uses / Nutrient Reservoir Criteria Method Assess only representative stations indicated in Appendix F Parameter codes – Chlorophyll a Fluorometric Method Spectrophotometric Method Results of site specific assessment will be applied to entire segment

Period of Record and Sample Size 7 /10 yr median of data associated with station N >= 10, adequate data to assess 4 – 9, limited data (concern, no concern) < 4, inadequate data

Example – Lake Somerville

Assessment – Screening Levels Identify concerns using existing screening levels in water bodies that do not have chlorophyll a criteria. Freshwater and Tidal Streams, Estuaries Ammonia, Nitrate, Ortho-phosphorus, Total phosphorus, Chlorophyll a. Concerns will not be assessed for reservoirs with numerical nutrient criteria in Appendix F.

Summary for Nutrients Use Support - Site Specific Nutrient Criteria Upon EPA approval, assessments using site specific nutrient criteria will be phased in. Median of chlorophyll a collected at station indicated in Appendix F Concern – Nutrient Screening Levels Identification of concerns using existing screening levels: only water bodies that do not have criteria. No change to these screening level values