Team Decision Making Engineers Leadership Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Teamwork
Advertisements

1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Agenda Introduction/Syllabus Review Introduction/Syllabus Review Exercise Review Exercise Review Discussion/Comparison of Lists Discussion/Comparison of.
Group Dynamics Stages of Group Development. Group Dynamics O This week we will be looking at the importance of working in groups O Positive and negative.
A Matter of Motivating People to Prepare and Work as a TEAM
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
TOGETHER EVERYONE ACHIEVES MORE
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Chapter 9: Teams and Teamwork
Leadership Development Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota December 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota.
ADMINISTRATIVE THEORY AND PRACTICE Factors contributing to effectiveness of the administrative practices within organisations EFFECTIVE TEAMS.
Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making
1 Pg 120 INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY A scientific study of human behaviour in the production, distribution and use of goods and services in society. Leads to.
Leadership Development Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota.
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Authored by Andrea White, PhD for the C3 Initiative.
Ms. Eberhard HGD – Spring What is teamwork? A joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Cooperative Learning and Problem- Based Learning: Working with Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Building and Managing Successful Teams for Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Team Building Presentation. How does a Team Work Best? A Teams succeeds when its members have: a commitment to common objectives defined roles and responsibilities.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/ Civil Engineering.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting Students.
Chapter 6 Working and Writing in Teams Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Developing teamwork in emergencies Session
Evaluating Teamwork BTEC LEVEL 1 & 2 FIRST AWARD in MUSIC UNIT 2: Managing a Music Product NAME HERE NAM E RE.
AG Leadership Fall Semester Test Review. Unit 1 Terms Ethics- behavior or conduct that is morally correct; following principles of fairness, honesty,
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Purdue University/ University of Minnesota Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society for Professional.
WEEK 1: INTRODUCTION TO GROUPS AND TEAMS MR. O’LEARY: GE347 – Group Dynamics.
Working in Groups * “People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defences, or the problems of modern society." Vince Lombardi.
Prepared By :ANJALI. What is a Team? Two or more persons work together to achieve same goal or complete a task. Teams make decisions, solve problems,
High Performance Teamwork
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
An Introduction to Teamwork
Teams and Communication
WORKING WITH OTHERS Teamwork, Supervision, Delegation
Communication Styles Ch. 3
Developing a Learning Organisation
Success Through Teamwork
Team Building and Leadership Standards 8.21 and 8.22
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Nanyang Business School
High Performance Teamwork
High Performance Teamwork
Leadership in management
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Nanyang Business School
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Team Building.
Teamwork in the Workplace
Innovation in a Team Environment High-Performance Teamwork
Panther Prep North Central High School
Building Team Relationships
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Work Teams.
Multimedia Communication
Leadership for Safety Through the Case Method
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
High-Performance Teamwork
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Chapter 14 Creating High Performance Teams
Teamwork.
Problem-Solving Communication
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
Structuring Cooperative Learning:
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Presentation transcript:

Team Decision Making Engineers Leadership Institute Karl A. Smith Purdue University/ University of Minnesota ksmith@umn.edu Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society for Professional Engineers November 18, 2011

Teamwork Skills Communication Listening and Persuading Decision Making Conflict Management Leadership Trust and Loyalty

Decision-Making Approaches Objective Deterministic Stochastic Multiple Ranking AHP SMART MAUT Single B/C LP Optimization Decision Tree (EV) Simulation

Team Decision Making – Ranking Tasks Typically “survival” tasks First was Moon Survival, “Lost on the moon” developed by Jay Hall for NASA in 1967 Many survival tasks available – desert survival, lost at sea, winter survival, … Individual followed by team ranking Different decision-making conditions in each team

Team Member Roles Observer/ Process Recorder (non participant role) Facilitator/Time Keeper Task Recorder Skeptic/Prober 5

6 Action Name 1 Name 2 Name 3 Name 4 Total Contributes Ideas Describes Feelings Encourages Participation Summarizes, Integrates Checks for Understanding Relates New To Old Learning Gives Direction To Work 6

Postdecision Questionaire How understood and listened to did you feel in your group? Not at all 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Completely 2. How much influence do you feel you had in your group’s decision making? None 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 A great deal How committed do you feel to the decision your group made? 4. How much responsibility do you feel for making the decision work? 5. How satisfied do you feel with the amount and quality of your participation in your group’s decision making Dissatisfied 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Satisfied 6. Write one adjective that describes the atmosphere in your group during the decision making

Team Decision-Making Process How Individual Mathematical Consensus Iterative – H, M, L Both ends toward the middle Assumptions/Biases Family/Friends News Youth Geographic location

Methods of Decision Making (Johnson & Johnson, 1991) Decision by authority without discussion Expert member Average of member’s opinions Decision by authority after discussion Majority control Minority control Consensus See Table Summarizing Characteristics – Smith (2007), p. 46

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. 1991. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Prentice-Hall

Choice of Decision-Making Method Depends On: 1. The type of decision to be made. 2. The amount of time and resources available. The history of the group. The nature of the task being worked on The kind of climate the groups wishes to establish The type of setting in which the group is working Johnson & Johnson, 1991

Characteristics of Effective Decisions: The resources of the group members are well used. Time is well used. The decision is correct, or of high quality. The decision is put into effect fully by all the necessary members' commitment. The problem-solving ability of the group is enhanced. Johnson & Johnson, 1991