MDL0L02 Dipole Field July 6, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I I. Magnetic field similar to a bar magnet For a very long solenoid, the magnetic field can be considered to be confined to the region inside the coils.
Advertisements

ALICE Magnets Ben Shepherd MaRS Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
Can we re-use existing magnets to build a 350(450) keV beam line? No.Type 115 deg dipole 1Spectrometer dipole 1NEG solenoid (2.5” ID) 5SW/CW solenoid 1Wien.
SLAC, 5-Dec-2006 Magnets and Magnetic Measurements for Prototype Energy Spectrometer T-474.
1 My Chapter 19 Lecture Outline. 2 Chapter 19: Magnetic Forces and Fields Magnetic Fields Magnetic Force on a Point Charge Motion of a Charged Particle.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement. MICE solenoid includes 5 coils First solenoid expected at FNAL for magnetic field measurements in April Measurements.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 27 Magnetism.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
Page 1 Christian Grefe, DESY FLC Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Annual EUDET Meeting Paris, Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Christian.
MI Large Aperture Quad (WQB) Project Part 2 – Installation & Operation Beams-doc #2479.
ATLAS Inner Detector Magnetic Field I am responsible for providing the magnetic field map for the ATLAS Inner Detector.  6m long x 2m diameter cylindrical.
Generator and Transformer. Moving Conductor If a straight conductor is moved in a path perpendicular to a magnetic field, a current is induced in the.
Magnetic Field Chapter 28 opener. A long coil of wire with many closely spaced loops is called a solenoid. When a long solenoid carries an electric current,
Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011PHYS , Fall 2011 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #18 Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Torque on a Current.
MICE magnetic measurements: AFC considerations Alain Blondel see a previous discussion for reference in CM35 (Feb 2013 slides by V. Blackmore, A. Blondel.
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
Magnet Measurement for the Hall A Compton Dipole Ken Baggett
HINS ProtonSource/LEBT Beam Measurement Meeting on HINS Beam Dynamics and Diagnostics March 13, 2009 Salah Chaurize Vic Scarpine Wai-Ming Tam.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Lecture 27 Magnetic Fields: II
Torque on a Current Loop
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 27 Magnetism.
ConcepTest 19.1a Magnetic Force I 1) out of the page 2) into the page 3) downward 4) to the right 5) to the left A positive charge enters a uniform magnetic.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Bernward Krause MEA WP-12: Warm Magnets WPL: B. Krause.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
8.1 Induced Emf p. 300 Magnetism, EMF, and Electric Current An Englishman, Michael Faraday ( ) and an American, Joseph Henry ( ), working.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Update: Puck and Gun Magnet March 1, Magnetized Gun 2 K 2 CsSb Preparation Chamber HV Chamber.
Design Update Puck and Gun Magnet February 16, 2016.
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
Nighttime exam? If we have the exam in the evening of July 3 rd, we would cancel class on July 5 th and you get a long weekend. Would you prefer to have.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Starter What effect does an iron core have on the magnetic field of a coil? ( What role does the nail play?) What effect does an iron core have on the.
A New, Robust Beam Modulation Strategy for Hall-C and Hall-A Nuruzzaman ( Advisors: Dr. Dipangkar Dutta (
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd edition
Motivation We would like to be able to scale the SHMS Golden Tune we determine this Fall from 2.2 GeV/c to other momenta with linearity errors less than.
Test of a Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Placed in a Dipole Field
Magnetic Fields and Forces
MDL0L02 Dipole and Environmental Fields
MDL0L02 Dipole Field Offset
Beam dynamics of Super-FRS and MM requirements
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Electron Beam Setup for Bubble Chamber
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
HRS at small angles for e+/ e- pair for APEX
MDL0L02 Dipole Hysteresis Loop Study
Beam Energy Measurements for Mott Run II : Dry run for Bubble
Bubble Chamber – Beam Requirements
Magnetic Monopoles Does there exist magnetic charge, just like electric charge? An entity which carried such magnetic charge would be called a magnetic.
ConcepTest 19.6a Magnetic Force on a Wire I
Measurement and Characterization of a 5T Solenoid Field
One Coil Gun Magnet February 2, 2016.
SCU Phase Shifter Meeting
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Andrew Hutton Concept suggested independently by Haipeng Wang
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

MDL0L02 Dipole Field July 6, 2016

Field Map Meas. Date: 8/29/2014 Coil used: Hall Probe Stepper Current (A) Strength (Gauss-cm) -------------- ------------------- -9.992 -23944.2 -8.996 -21569.6 -7.991 -19169.0 -6.990 -16769.5 -5.990 -14360.7 -4.993 -11954.6 -3.994 -9542.8 -2.989 -7116.1 -1.989 -4698.2 -0.990 -2283.6 0.003 126.0 1.009 2548.4 2.009 4960.8 3.009 7374.6 4.010 9785.8 5.010 12192.0 6.010 14589.8 7.011 16980.4 8.013 19360.4 9.015 21720.5 10.014 24038.1

Field Map Effective Length Meas. Date: 8/29/2014 Coil used: Hall Probe Stepper Current (A) Eff. L (cm) -------------- ------------------- 10.00 12.88 9.00 12.89 8.00 12.89 7.00 12.90 6.00 12.90 5.00 12.91 4.00 12.92 3.00 12.93 2.00 12.95 1.00 13.01 0.00 16.39 -1.00 12.73 -2.00 12.81 -3.00 12.83 -4.00 12.85 -5.00 12.85 -6.00 12.86 -7.00 12.86 -8.00 12.86 -9.00 12.86 -10.00 12.87

0 BdL

Distance from dipole center (cm) <By> (G) (Upstream) -15 0.4 -14 -13 0.3 -12 -11 0.2 -10 0.1 -9 0.0 -8 -0.6 -7 -2.2 -6 -3.7 -5 -3.9 -4 -4.1 -3 -2 -4.2 -1 -3.8 1 2 3 -4.0 4 5 6 -2.1 7 8 9 10 11 0.6 12 13 14 (Downstream) 15 Dipole Survey (March 20, 2016) On Hysteresis I = -0.0489 A BdL = 0.000 G-cm Hall Probe = -3.98 G* Zero is center of dipole and survey was done along 0L Region using a hand-held Hall probe *Accuracy: ±(0.03% of reading +0.006% of full scale) max Hall Probe = -3.98 G ± 0.18 G

0 Current

Degaussed

Degaussed

Test at Magnet (March 15, 2016) With cables from trim card swapped at magnet (after degaussing), Hall Probe = -0.26 G With current cables disconnected, Hall Probe = -0.06 G With cables back to normal at magnet (after degaussing), Hall Probe = +0.50 G With current set to zero and magnet degaussed, the Hall Probe measures +0.5 G. At this setting, we measured about +1.3 mA of current to magnet using KEITHLEY DMM7510 in series with MDL0L02.

Trim Card Set Current DMM Measured Current 0.0 +0.0011 1.0 1.0008 2.0 2.0002 3.0 3.0010 4.0 4.0009 5.0 5.0014 6.0 6.0014 7.0 7.0018 8.0 8.0034 9.0 9.0042 9.0044 8.0044 7.0034 6.0030 5.0030 4.0025 3.0024 2.0013 1.0009 +0.0016 -1.0 -0.9984 -2.0 -1.9985 -3.0 -2.9992 -4.0 -3.9988 -5.0 -4.9986 -6.0 -5.9982 -7.0 -6.9980 -8.0 -7.9987 -9.0 -8.9986 +0.0013 Use KEITHLEY DMM7510 in series with MDL0L02 to measure current powering magnet For Bubble Chamber, we are especially interested in momenta around 5.5 MeV/c (fluorine measurement) and 8.5 MeV/c (oxygen measurement) Corresponding magnet currents are 3.2 A and 5.0 A. At these currents, Trim card is good to about 1 to 2 mA.

Beam Momentum in 5D (opera – Jay) BdL = -4.811 + 1416.2*p - 1.2399*p2 + 0.1646*p3 - 0.009795*p4 + 0.00021257*p5 Jay's Tech Note TN-15-017, page 9.

March 20, 2016 Scanned Dipole current from 9.0 to -9.0 A (with ON hysteresis) and recorded Bdl and Hall Probe readings

From Field Map From Current Scan Current (A) Hall Probe (G) Core Field (G) 10.01 1863.40 9.01 1682.70 8.01 1499.15 7.01 1314.35 6.01 1128.70 5.01 942.75 4.01 756.15 3.01 569.25 2.01 382.25 1.01 195.15 0.00 7.40 -0.99 -179.45 -1.99 -366.65 -2.99 -554.15 -3.99 -742.50 -4.99 -929.65 -5.99 -1116.25 -6.99 -1302.90 -7.99 -1489.25 -9.00 -1675.60 -9.99 -1860.05 Current (A) Hall Probe (G) 9.0 1676.84 8.0 1494.811 7.0 1311.098 6.0 1126.72 5.0 941.599 4.0 755.813 3.0 569.625 2.0 382.975 1.0 196.247 0.0 9.73 -1.0 -176.974 -2.0 -363.63 -3.0 -550.311 -4.0 -736.641 -5.0 -922.818 -6.0 -1108.806 -7.0 -1294.494 -8.0 -1480.191 -9.0 -1665.526 From Current Scan

Field Ratio BdL / Hall Probe

(i.e., added small offset to field map) (BdL+8.0) / Hall Probe (i.e., added small offset to field map)

May 11, 2016 Scanned Dipole current from 9.0 to -9.0 A (with ON hysteresis) and recorded Bdl and Hall Probe readings

From Field Map From Current Scan Current (A) Hall Probe (G) Core Field (G) 10.01 1863.40 9.01 1682.70 8.01 1499.15 7.01 1314.35 6.01 1128.70 5.01 942.75 4.01 756.15 3.01 569.25 2.01 382.25 1.01 195.15 0.00 7.40 -0.99 -179.45 -1.99 -366.65 -2.99 -554.15 -3.99 -742.50 -4.99 -929.65 -5.99 -1116.25 -6.99 -1302.90 -7.99 -1489.25 -9.00 -1675.60 -9.99 -1860.05 Current (A) Hall Probe (G) 9.0 1679.413 8.0 1497.175 7.0 1313.228 6.0 1128.575 5.0 943.145 4.0 757.186 3.0 570.716 2.0 383.856 1.0 196.884 0.0 10.084 -1.0 -176.862 -2.0 -363.784 -3.0 -550.767 -4.0 -737.396 -5.0 -923.895 -6.0 -1110.12 -7.0 -1296.09 -8.0 -1481.945 -9.0 -1667.458 From Current Scan

Field Ratio BdL / Hall Probe

(i.e., added small offset to field map) (BdL+12.0) / Hall Probe (i.e., added small offset to field map)

Due to errors in measuring environmental fields Summary - I Hints that there are problems with Field Map: Measured Hall Probe field in Injector is a bit too large when BdL is set to zero Effective Length from Field Map depends on magnet current Recommend to use spare magnet to resolve this problem For magnet currents below 6 A, Trim Card is good to 2 mA Is MPT-231 Hall Probe mounted right inside MDL0L02? Should use G10 to hold probe parallel to magnet Hall Probe MPT-231 measurements at very small fields vary by about 0.2 – 0.3 G, due to exact hysteresis history Jay’s model is good to 0.1% (see Tech Note TN-15-017) Due to errors in measuring environmental fields

For Mott Energy Measurements Summary - II For Beam Energy Measurement: CEBAF : BdL ≠ 0 (due to field map error), instead: BdL = Hall Probe * Magnetic Length (or use my field survey) BdL ~ -3.6 G * 12.9 cm = -46 G-cm. Treat as another horizontal corrector. Spectrometer Lines (2D, 3D, 5D): magnet currents between 2 A and 6 A are most relevant. Till we check field map, we will assume a 46 G-cm error on field measurements. Error Trim Power Supply 2 mA Magnet Model 0.1% Field Map 46 G-cm For Mott Energy Measurements