BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.
Advertisements

1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
BPS Location in CTF3/CLEX Area Mechanics with PCB Electronics Test Results BPS Linearity Error A linear fit of the wire test measures was done (left) for.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
CLIC-PACMAN: BPM-to-Quadrupole Alignment based on EM Field Measurements Manfred Wendt CERN BE-BI-QP.
Tesla Meeting Frascati 27/05/03 C. Magne Cold BPM for TTF2 Tesla prototype - low beam impedance - cooling to 2K without strain - Low beam coupling impedance:
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
CTF3 BPMs October 18-22/2010 IWLC2010 CTF3 BPMs Lars Soby 1.
Chris Adolphsen Main Linac Integration. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD/Correctors T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
Task 12.4: SRF HOM Beam Diagnostics R.M. Jones, U. van Rienen, T. Flisgen, N. Baboi (UMAN, UROS, DESY)
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.
N. Baboi, DESY EuCARD WP10 Kick-off Meeting, 24 Mar HOM-couplers (pick-ups) HOMBPM - Overview Purpose: on-line measuring device for 1. beam.
Tomoyuki Sanuki, Daisuke Okamoto, Yosuke Honda, Toshiaki Tauchi TB&SGC meeting.
Status of the ILC Main Linac BPM R&D Thibaut Lefevre CERN Claire Simon CEA Sacley Sebastien Vilalte LAPP Manfred Wendt Fermilab 11/19/20081ILC08 Main Linac.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
CLIC09 Workshop October 2009Drive beam BPM’sLars Søby 1 Drive Beam BPM’s CLIC 09 work shop, CERN, of October 2009, Lars Søby.
High resolution cavity BPMs in the context of the European XFEL
Status of the Cold BPM Developments at CEA Saclay and Fermilab L-Band Cavity BPM: Nathan Eddy, Andrei Lunin, Eric Pirtle, Gennady Romanov, Nikolay Solyak,
1 EuroTeV High Bandwidth Wall Current Monitor Alessandro D’Elia CERN- Geneve.
Microwave Schottky Pickups at Fermilab Ralph J. Pasquinelli January 14, 2004.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
An Inductive Pick-Up (IPU) for Beam Position and Current Measurement
1 Cold L-Band Cavity BPM: Design Status July 2006 Gennady Romanov Linda Valerio Manfred Wendt Fermilab July 21, 2006.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
CARE Steering Committee, Paris, 5 septembre 2005O. Napoly, CEA/Saclay 1 SRF Work Packages 2 Improved Standard Cavity Fabrication 2.1 Reliability analysis.
Fermilab BPM R&D Activities Nikolay Solyak, Manfred Wendt Fermilab Nicolas Chritin, Lars Soby CERN Nobuhiro Terunuma, Junji Urakawa KEK March 26-30, 20101LCWS10.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
Accelerator Activities at Spain Madrid CIEMA T CMAM Valencia IFIC Bilbao ESS Barcelona ALBA UPC Sevilla CNA 1 PAC-ILC May 2010.
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
16/01/12DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors Reentrant Beam Position Monitors DITANET Topical Workshop on Beam Position Monitors 16 th –
LCLS-II Button-type BPM (Review) Nikolay Solyak Review, FNAL, Dec. 12, 2014.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
Sub-Task HOM-BPM HOM based Beam Position Monitors – Planned and Extant Measurements N. Baboi, DESY, Hamburg EuCARD WP 10: SRF, Annual Review Meeting.
Cavity BPM for CALIFES C. Simon, M. Luong, D. Bogard, W. Farabolini, J
Status of SCRF Accelerator Activities at CEA-Saclay
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
CAVITY BPM FOR CALIFES Claire Simon, Michel Luong, D. Bogard, P
Franck Peauger, Riccardo Zennaro
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
IPBPM test results at the LINAC end
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Electric Field Amplitude (MV/m)
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Fabrication of KEK-ATF2 Q-BPM
Non-invasive Beam Position Monitor Research in HUST-PTF
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3 1 CEA DSM/DAPNIA/SACM, Saclay, France, 2 DESY Hamburg, Germany, 3 CNRS IN2P3 –IPN Orsay, France Contact: claire.simon@cea.fr - michel.luong@cea.fr Abstract Two designs of high resolution beam position monitor, based on a radiofrequency re-entrant cavity, are developed at CEA/Saclay. The first monitor is developed in the framework of the European CARE/SRF program. It is designed to work at cryogenic temperature, in a clean environment and get a high resolution with the possibility to perform bunch to bunch measurements. Two prototypes with a large aperture (78 mm) are installed in the Free electron LASer in Hamburg (FLASH), at DESY. The other design with an aperture of 18 mm and a large frequency separation between monopole and dipole modes, as well as a low loop exposure to the electric fields is developed for the Clic Test Facility (CTF3) probe beam CALIFES at CERN. It is operated in single bunch and multi-bunches modes. This poster presents the mechanical and signal processing designs of both systems. Re-entrant Cavity BPM BPM installed in the FLASH linac Coaxial re-entrant cavities have been chosen for the beam orbit measurement because of their mechanical simplicity and excellent resolution. Passing through the cavity, the beam excites electromagnetic fields (resonant modes), which are coupled by four feedthroughs to the outside. Main radio-frequency modes excited by the beam in the cavity: the monopole mode signal is proportional to beam intensity and does not depend on the beam position the dipole mode signal is proportional to the distance of the beam from the centre axis of the monitor. Spring 2006, the re-entrant BPM (Fig. 4) was installed in a warm part in the FLASH linac (Fig. 5) at DESY. Cu-Be RF contact welded in the inner cylinder of the cavity to ensure electrical conduction. Figure 5: RF Cavity installed in the FLASH linac Twelve holes of 5 mm diameter drilled at the end of the re-entrant part for a more effective cleaning. BPM designed for the CTF3 probe beam A design, with a large frequency separation between monopole and dipole modes, as well as a low loop exposure to the electric fields, has been developed (Fig. 1) for the CTF3 probe beam CALIFES. Figure 4: Drawing of the cavity BPM 124.8 mm 18 mm 35 mm 28.8 mm RF characteristics are presented in the Table 3. Six BPMs will be installed on the CTF3 probe beam CALIFES. Dipole mode frequency chosen around 5.997 GHz for a resonant operation with 64 bunches. The mechanical dimension Ø 28.8 mm will be adjusted to have the dipole mode frequency close to 5.997 GHz. Eigen modes F (GHz) Ql R/Ql (Ω) Measured Offset 5 mm Offset 10 mm Monopole mode 1.255 23.8 12.9 Dipole mode 1.724 59 0.27 1.15 Figure 6 :New design for the XFEL cold re-entrant BPM Table 3: RF characteristics of the re-entrant BPM Figure 1: Re-entrant cavity designed for CALIFES The signal processing uses a single stage downconversion to obtain Δ/Σ (Fig. 7) . The resonant cavity was designed with the software HFSS (Ansoft). The RF measurements presented in the Table 1 Eigen modes F (GHz) Ql R/Ql (Ω) Measured in lab Measured in lab Offset 2 mm 10 mm Monopole mode 3976.2 27.09 22.3 22.2 Dipole mode 5964.4 51.49 1.1 7 are an average of the frequencies and external Q measured on the six BPMs . The cross_talk is quite high, it was measured in laboratory better than 28 dB on each BPM. Figure 7 : Signal processing electronics Beam measurements with the BPM installed in the FLASH linac Table 1: RF characteristics of the CTF3 probe beam BPM The position measured by the re-entrant BPM vs the calculated position was plotted for the horizontal and vertical steerings (Fig. 8). Signal processing uses a single stage downconversion (Fig. 2). - Isolation of the hybrids can be adjusted by phase shifters to reject the monopole mode Figure 8. Calibration results in LINAC frame from horizontal (left) and vertical (right) steerings Good linearity in a range  15 mm RMS resolution : 4 µm measured on the vertical channel 8 µm measured on the horizontal channel Figure 2 : Signal processing electronics RMS resolution limited by the electromagnetic contamination in the experimental hall To assess the performances of the system (Table 2), a model is elaborated with Mathcad. - RF re-entrant cavity model is a resonant RLC circuit - The transfer functions of different devices composing the signal processing are determined by the S parameters measured with a network analyzer. Main features of the BPM installed in the FLASH linac: - Measured resolution ~ 4 µm with a dynamic range  5 mm - Time resolution 40 ns (Fig. 9)  bunch to bunch measurements (Fig. 10) - Large aperture 78 mm - Operated at cryogenic temperature in a clean environment - 2008  New prototype for the XFEL 20 ns 20 mV 40 ns Systems Level on the Δ channel with a beam offset of 5 µm (V) Noise level (V) Simulated resolution (µm) Time resolution (ns) CALIFES BPM (single bunch) 6*10-1 5*10-4 3.2 ~ 10 CALIFES BPM (64 bunches) ~ 40 Table 2. CALIFES BPM RMS resolution Figure 9 : Output signal from signal processing Resolution ~ 3.2 µm with dynamic range +/- 5 mm Operated in single and multi-bunches modes (226 bunches) 2008 6 BPMs (Fig. 3) installed in the CTF3 probe beam Sept. 2008  first beam tests ΔT =1µs 30 BPMs will be installed in the XFEL cryomodules. Figure 3 : CALIFES BPM Figure 10: RF signal measured at one pickup