AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
2014 External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
District Accreditation February 20, 2015 Colleen Rohowsky Office of the Director, DoDDS-Europe,
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Crown Point Schools Systems Accreditation November 24, 2014.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Sailing To District Accreditation External Review: October 6-9, 2013… but the journey begins now!
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Accreditation Collier County Public Schools Fall 2015.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Recognizing Quality School Systems Billy K. Floyd, Director Mary Ann Keeley, Director Richard Parkins, Assoc. Director Southeast Region Northeast Region.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Lee Kolbert; Manager, Accreditation
AdvancED Accreditation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
District Accreditation
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
AdvancED Accreditation Timeline for Huntsville City Schools
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Catoosa County Schools
“Where Learners Become Leaders!”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
SCALED LEADERSHIP MEETING
Deer Valley USD Work Team November 15, 2017
Overview of AdvancEd Continuous Improvement System
District Improvement plan
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Roles and Responsibilities
February 21-22, 2018.
Roles and Responsibilities
Building a Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update Improvement Journey AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update Presented on behalf of: Dr. Morcease Beasley, Superintendent Presenter: Dr. Monika M. Wiley

Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement Clayton County Public Schools ~Strategic Improvement Plan ~Comprehensive Needs Assessment ~AdvancED/SACS Coherent Instructional System – The major system of the complex school organization that articulates and guides the what and how of instruction. Professional Capacity – A major system of complex school organization that develops a quality staff to reduce the variance of quality in instruction throughout the school. Supportive Learning Environment – A major system of the complex school organization that ensures students’ school participation and willingness to expend major effort on classroom learning. Family & Community Engagement – A major system of the complex school organization that develops quality links between local school professionals and the parents and community the school is intended to serve. Effective Leadership – A major system of the complex school organization that sets the direction for the school, ensures that the school’s staff is capable of meeting that direction, and makes sure the organization functions according to its mission.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment AdvancED Surveys eleot Observations Identifying Needs Mission and Vision Goals and Core Beliefs Comprehensive Needs Assessment AdvancED Surveys eleot Observations At various times of the year, we will discuss the different improvement components. Today we are going to discuss where we are with identifying our needs. Consult many different sources to determine the needs of the schools.

Committees: 1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment Committee (District) 2. Improvement Journey Committee (Accreditation and Strategic Improvement Plan) a. Board Members (2) b. Assistant Principals c. Teachers d. Comprehensive Needs Assessment Committee (System Quality Factors)

Strategic Improvement Plan

Community/Staff Meeting: Input and engagement with the Strategic Improvement Plan and AdvancED. Participants will develop the “new” Mission/Vision, Strategic Goals, and Core Beliefs. Board of Education Input The BOE will have the opportunity to give input on the proposed Mission/Vision, Strategic Goals, and Core Beliefs. Strategic Improvement Plan Survey All stakeholders will have the opportunity to review the work of the community. Superintendent’s Recommendation – November 6, 2017

Functions independently but its results impact the other elements Functions independently but its results impact the other elements. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Currently Moving Forward Institutions are REQUIRED to conduct an Internal Review process in the year proceeding their External Review. As part of that process they MUST use the following: AdvancED Parent, Student, & Staff Surveys Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic Student Performance Diagnostic Self Assessment Executive Summary Institutions are EXPECTED to engage in a process of continuous improvement that: is authentic and inclusive considers that beliefs, perspectives and experiences of all stakeholder groups Addresses research-based factors of school quality and diagnoses areas in need of improvement supports the attainment of clearly defined goals and measurable objectives Institutions are REQUIRED to submit an AdvancED Prescribed Internal Review Report at least 6-8 weeks prior to their scheduled External Review. The report MUST include the following: Assurances AdvancED highly RECOMMENDS institutions leverage the suite of research-based tools and resources provided as part of their improvement journey: Surveys (beliefs/perspectives) Inventories (Experiences) Observations – eleot School Quality Factors Diagnostic AdvancED WILL NOT conduct the External Review until the institution submits their Internal Review Report. Institutions are ENCOURAGED to provide the Engagement Review Team with evidence and information 3-4 weeks prior to the Engagement Review that demonstrates their commitment to continuous improvement. Institutions are REQUIRED to demonstrate adherence with Accreditation policies/procedures through completion of AdvancED Assurances. The Engagement Review Team will leverage any evidence and information provided by the institution to prepare for the Engagement Review.

Schools/School Systems will not rate themselves on the Standards Schools/School Systems will not rate themselves on the Standards. Standards used only by the Engagement Review Team.

Will explain each component during training. ~Separate but aligned institution (internal) and review team (external) tools and resources ~Comprehensive but more easily digestible ~This is where districts/schools upload evidence/artifacts ~Need two Board members to serve on a committee

Culture/Climate (new) Student Engagement (new) Purpose Surveys Culture/Climate (new) Student Engagement (new) Purpose Capture the overall culture of the institution through the lens of eight important areas Taken by - Students (Grades 3-12) - Teachers - Staff - Parents No longer percentage requirements District/Schools

Experiences Types of Inventories Inventories Purpose Provide opportunity to voice relevant experiences Indicate frequency of experiences Types of Inventories Elementary Middle School High School Teacher

Equitable Learning Environment High Expectations Environment Conduct meaningful classroom observations focused on student engagement. Equitable Learning Environment High Expectations Environment Supportive Learning Environment Active Learning Environment Progress Monitoring and Feedback Environment Well-Managed Learning Environment Digital Learning Environment 4 – Very Evident 3 – Evident 2 – Somewhat Evident 1 – Not Observed

AdvancED System Assurances AdvancED Policies and Procedures Substantive Changes Security and Crisis Management Plan Financial Transactions Improvement Plan AdvancED Standards for Schools Required

Effective Board Governance Observation Items Physical Setting Meeting Protocol Learning Resources Rating Guide: Very Evident – 4 Evident – 3 Somewhat Evident – 2 Not Observed - 1 Draft Form – Will conduct observations for at least one hour within three months of our review.

Improvement Journey Components

Align Suite of Tools and Resources for Engagement Review Teams Diagnostics Standards Diagnostic(s) Interview Polls* Student Interview Teacher/Staff Interview Parent Interview Leader Interview Observation Tools Effective Learning Environments Observation Tool (eleot) Board Observations At least one hour The team may conduct more than one within three months *Whole group interviews are not required for the new Engagement Review. The Lead Evaluator will determine if the whole group interviews are needed.

Improvement Journey Timeline

July 19, 2017 Improvement Journey Committee Meeting (Initial) July 31, 2017 Board Presentation – Information regarding new Accreditation process and Strategic Improvement Plan August 7-25, 2017 AdvancED Surveys (Parents, Students, Teachers/Staff) August 15, 2017 Principals’ Meeting – Information regarding new Accreditation process August 16, 2017 Assistant Principals’ Meeting – Information regarding new Accreditation process August 17, 2017 Principals’ designee training on eleot and new website portal August 22, 2017 CFT – Standards training and rating (District) August 28, 2017 Board Presentation – Update (AdvancED Surveys and Training) September 1-15, 2017 AdvancED Inventories (Teachers and students) September 1-30, 2017 eleot observations (School and district personnel) September 12, 2017 Principals’ Meeting – Standards review & rating September 13, 2017 Assistant Principals’ Meeting – Standards review and rating

September 19, 2017 CFT – Analysis of Surveys/Inventories September 21, 2017 School/District Quality Factors leadership meeting and training September 25, 2017 Board Presentation – Update (AdvancED Inventories) September 30, 2017 Community Staff/Meeting – Input and Engagement with Strategic Plan and AdvancED (participants will development “new” mission/vision, Strategic goals, core believes, etc.) – 9:00AM-4:00PM October 2-31, 2017 School/District Quality Factors individual team meetings October 10, 2017 CFT – Analysis of eleot observations October 17, 2017 (week of) Board input on proposed mission/vision, goals, and beliefs (multiple meeting sessions at BOE) October 23-November 3, 2017 Strategic Plan survey – Mission/Vision, Beliefs, and Goals October 30, 2017 Board Presentation – Update (AdvancED eleot and Community Meeting) November 6, 2017 District SQF Report due to Dr. Monika Wiley from leadership team November 7, 2017 CFT Meeting to discuss proposed mission/vision, beliefs and goals

November 13, 2017 Cabinet Meeting to discuss proposed mission/vision, beliefs and goals. November 27, 2017 Board Presentation – Update (District SQF Report) Board Presentation – Recommendation for Mission/Vision, Beliefs and Goals December 4, 2017 Board Vote – Mission/Vision, Beliefs and Goals December 15, 2017 Electronic artifacts due to Dr. Monika Wiley Schools’ SQF Due in eProve January 1-31, 2018 eleot observations (School and district personnel) January – April 2018 Strategic Plan – District Committees (Performance Objections, Initiatives, and Action Steps) January 2018 Board Presentation (Work Session) – Update on AdvancED submissions February 1-18, 2018 Submit AdvancED Documents February 20, 2018 CFT – Analysis of eleot observations March 18-21, 2018 District’s Engagement Review April 2018, 2018 Board Presentation (Work Session) – Update on completed Strategic Plan

Superintendent’s Recommendation The Superintendent recommends that the BOE nominate and vote upon persons to serve on the District’s AdvancED/Strategic Improvement Plan Committee.

Questions