PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERPOSITION OF WAVES Waves of different k vector, same frequency Counter-propagating waves Intersecting waves Waves mixing (AOM) Co-propagating, random.
Advertisements

FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Versatile simulation software for user-defined interferometer topologies. Fast, easy to use.
Class question: Why do we use Gaussian beams? One clue: there was no Gaussian beam before Answer 1: It is the simplest fundamental solution that.
Laser Physics EAL 501 Lecture 6 Power & Frequency.
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Nanophotonics Class 6 Microcavities. Optical Microcavities Vahala, Nature 424, 839 (2003) Microcavity characteristics: Quality factor Q, mode volume V.
1.3 Cavity modes Axial modes λ = 2d / n ν = nc / 2d n = 2d / λ
EM Radiation Sources 1. Fundamentals of EM Radiation 2. Light Sources
Optical Pumping Intense light source at h  (e.g. flash lamp) Excites to a metastable state to achieve population inversion With fast flashing, initial.
Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt. 13;
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 9 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 3) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 5)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 10) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
1 Electromagnetic waves: Multiple beam Interference Wed. Nov. 13, 2002.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 11) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 9) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 12) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 16) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
§3.3 Optical Resonators with Spherical Mirrors We will show the field solutions inside the spherical mirror resonator are Gaussian Beams Z=0 00 z R2R2.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 19) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
Wave propagation in optical fibers Maxwell equations in differential form The polarization and electric field are linearly dependent.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 6) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 20) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 8)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 7)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 12)
Announcements Final exam day events (Friday, May 12, 10:00am to 12:00pm) 50-point multiple choice end-material test (covering material from chapters 33-36).
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 3)
Optical Characterization Techniques
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 15)
Microwave Engineering by David M. Pozar Ch. 4.1 ~ 4 / 4.6
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 16)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 21)
Chapter III Optical Resonators
Really Basic Optics Instrument Sample Sample Prep Instrument Out put
Interaction of radiation with atoms and ions (I)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 15)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 8)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 14)
Introduction to physics
Reading Quiz In the text’s treatment of the double boundary problem, in the middle region all of the reflections that end up traveling to the right are.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
Young’s Double Slit Experiment.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 2)
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 7)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 14)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 18)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 9)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 10)
Fabry-Perot Resonator
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 5)
Lasers, resonators, Gaussian beams
Laser oscillation Laser is oscillator
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 4)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 18)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 2)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 6)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 11)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 20)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 21)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 19)
Waves Chapter 11 part 2.
Presentation transcript:

PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17) Jan-April 2016 Edition Jeff Young AMPEL Rm 113

Quick review of key points from last lecture There are a continuum of Gaussians with different l and W0 values that can be supported by a given set of R1, R2, and d that satisfy the cavity stability criterion: i.e. that propagate self-consistently with the same q value from round trip to round trip. For an arbitrary l, the circulating Gaussian would have a different phase every round trip at any given location in the cavity, so the field strength would be quite low due to destructive interference. Only Gaussians with wavelengths such that the round trip phase is an integer multiple of 2p, generate significant fields due to repeated constructive interference. The resulting mode criterion is equivalent to that which one could alternately derive using boundary conditions at perfectly reflecting mirrors. There are a host of modified Hermite-Gaussian beams that have q values that transform the same was as the simple Gaussian, but their transverse intensity patterns are very different, and characterized by the number of nodes in the x and y directions. Their z-direction phase is also different, but only slightly.

Impact on Free Spectral Range and Allowed Mode Frequencies? DxuF/p DxuF/p

Real cavities What is the lifetime of all these modes we have solved for so far? Answer: Infinite…as per the definition of a mode (recall?) What has been left out of all in all of this generic mode stability and phase criteria so far, when comparing to real physical systems? Guide them through deriving photon lifetime, FWHM, Imax/Imin, Imax/Iinc as per notes Answer: reflectivity of at least one of the mirrors must be <1 to allow one to use the modes (intrinsic, unitary) Material imperfections (scattering losses, absorption etc.) (extrinsic, non-unitary)

Intrinsic lifetimes What system have we already studied that must reveal the impact of non-unity reflectivity on cavity mode behaviour? Want S matrix for entire system a b c d 1 2 3 Recall algorithm Get them to derive t13 in terms of r Sab=Sba=Scd=Sdc assuming the mirror is symmetric

Symmetric system Only one r and one t, r2+t2=1 More generally Hint for exam…you should fully understand/be able to derive these!! What is |t|^2?

Fabry-Perot Cavity Equations How many transverse modes represented?

Physical interpretation(s) of Finesse What are the two most intuitive/important physical interpretations of the Finesse of a quasi-mode? Cavity lifetime Internal intensity enhancement Make this pre-reading assignment for Friday Calculate the cavity lifetime Calculate the internal field enhancement factor

Extrinsic sources of loss Suggestions? Finite mirror size Shape of reflected beam? Gaussian?