Calving Earlier In the Calving Season

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Replacement Heifer Management: A coordinated management concept
Advertisements

COST OF DEVELOPING BRED HEIFERS DR. CURT LACY EXTENSION ECONOMIST-LIVESTOCK.
Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Rick.
Sow Longevity – Its Improvement and Economic Importance Ken Stalder Department of Animal Science Iowa State University.
Yearling heifer mating Rebecca Hickson. Profitability of calving heifers Beef cow efficiency Why calve heifers Why not calve heifers Performance of heifers.
Backgrounding Cattle Larry C. Hollis, D.V.M., M.Ag.
BISON BENCHMARK STUDY Cost of Production Results 2009 – 2010 Production Cycle Gerard Woynarski Terry Kremeniuk November 21, 2011.
What is the value of TGM to the consultant and a producer?
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand the reproduction cycle  Assess herd reproductive efficiency  Understand the decisions involved.
Beef cow reproductive management
The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service A Decision Tool for Improved Beef Cattle Production, Management and Marketing System Analysis.
Beef Cow-Calf Profitability, CREC, Steve Metzger Farm Business Management Carrington Research Extension Center Carrington, ND.
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Cow Fertility How can we affect it?. Objectives Identify three management areas Make a vaccination calendar Have a basic understanding of the body condition.
Reproductive Tract Scoring
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Cow-Calf Outlook and Profitability Kenny Burdine and Greg Halich UK Ag Economics.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Show-Me-Select Replacement ™ Heifer Program Dr. Joe Parcell University of Missouri – Columbia.
Improving Beef Cattle Reproductive Rates Through Management Part 1 Dr. Tom R. Troxel Professor and Associate Department Head – Animal Science.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Continuous Calving: Are Economic Incentives Large Enough to Eliminate the Traditional Practice? by D. Doye and M. Popp INTRODUCTION Why, despite expert.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Charolais By: Maria and Aaron. Breed Characteristics They are usually white in color with a pink muzzle and pale hooves. There are now Charolais cattle.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis.
Overview of Pasture to Plate Program 2016 DARRH BULLOCK UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY.
Beef Marketing Update Kenny Burdine UK Agricultural Economics Economics.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Herd Health DL Step, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM Elisabeth J. Giedt, DVM, MBA
Sustainable Agriculture
Utilizing Enterprise Budgets in Beef Cattle Operations
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
PigCHAMP Care 3000 Action Lists
Gerard Woynarski Terry Kremeniuk November 21, 2011
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Wallace Center Pasture Project Rotational Grazing
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
AAA Reproductive Database
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Beef Cattle Andrew Brock
Exploring the Beef Industry
IRM Farm Program Dr. Les Anderson.
How does beef get From a cattle Farm to our Fork?
How to Feed the Cow Herd When There Is No Feed
Where do calves go after weaning?
Calving Earlier In the Calving Season
Pre-weaned calf management and weaning outlets
Lecture outline Characteristics of ag production that make agricultural marketing different from manufacturing. Nature of product and production Cycle.
Disease risks and disease management during weaning
From Conception to Carcass
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle, Sheep and Goats
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cattle
Current Practices in Weaned Sheep Marketing
Preconditioning Elective
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows. Body condition score is an indicator of stored energy reserves Fat tissue Protein tissue (muscle and organs)
Developing Heifers Earl H. Ward.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Presentation transcript:

Calving Earlier In the Calving Season Using calving distributions as a component of production management Katherine Whitman, DVM, MS

Minimum Database What data points? What info do you need to collect? Pregnancy percentage Calving percentage Weaning percentage Pounds weaned per cow exposed What info do you need to collect? Breeding female inventory Pregnancy diagnosis Calvings Number and pounds weaned

Data Driven Decision Making: Why calving distributions? Critical evaluation-piece of data driven decision making Veterinarian involvement Health management Increase impact Producers understanding impacts: economics and beyond Useful, simple information that is only a very small piece of the management pie. Could offer a gateway for veterinarians to become more involved in management practices. Improve reproductive efficiency utilizing data driven decisions. Create a “team” approach for the producer; increase the relevance of a veterinarian on the operation-not just calls, more consistent interaction (+cash flow for practice)

Calving Distributions 21 day periods during the calving season Start date: 3rd term calf Minimum: #born for each period Better: Cow ID Cow age Calf birth date Adapted from BIF Guidelines, 2002 Important to emphasis that construction of these distributions requires very little input; maximal impact

Recognizing the Impact of Calving Earlier in the Calving Season Evidence based on DATA Not only immediate, but long term impacts on progeny and longevity. Financial implications for ensuring that she stays in the herd, and that her steer progeny produce.

Weaning Weight (lb) Differences Calving Period 1 Calving Period 2 Calving Period 3 Lesmeister et. al, 1973 -46 -71 Funston et. al, 2012 (steer calves) -28.7 -74.7 Cushman et. al, 2013 -45.64 -97.02 NDSU Dickinson Research Center, 2002 -40 -88 *First calf heifer progeny

Calving early as a heifer increases progeny weaning weights * P=<0.0001 In addition to a longer lifespan, those cows calving in the first 21 d as a heifer weaned heavier calves through the sixth calving season. This difference equates to approx. 1-2 extra calves over her lifespan. Thus the effect of calving early is two fold: longer productive lifespan and more beef per calving season. This effect was first documented in the 1970’s by Lesmiester and is still true today. Weaning weights are a function of both management and genetics Parity Cushman et al. (2013) JAS (91): 4486

Calving early as a heifer increases reproductive longevity *P=<0.01, n = 16,594 * * * * * Calving day in the first calving season Three were no differences in birth weight between the three groups. Birth date of heifers in the first 21 days was 2 and 3 days older than heifers calving in the second and third 21 days (P<0.05) Cushman et al. (2013) JAS (91): 4486

Calving period improves daughter reproductive performance… B P≤ 0.03 C A B C C B A A A A C B B A B B A B C SEMs are pooled Adapted from Funston et al. (2012) JAS (90): 5118

…and son performance on the farm, the feedlot and at the packing plant B A C B C P≤ 0.03 A B C A B C C SEMs are pooled in Funston 2012 B A A B A, B Adapted from Funston et al. (2012) JAS (90): 5118

…and son performance on the farm, the feedlot and at the packing plant B P<0.01 C Calving Period 1 Calving Period 2 Calving Period 3 Carcass Value -$25.00 -$74.00 SEMs are pooled in Funston 2012 Adapted from Funston et al. (2012) JAS (90): 5118

Calving early in the calving season improves the viability of the operation Increased pounds at weaning with more desirable carcass characteristics Potentially more income per year and may recover development costs faster Produce more beef during her reproductive life Improve the sustainability of the operation Increase production longevity More likely to recover her development costs and reduces the replacement rate

EFFICIENCY!! Other Benefits? Labor utilization Feed utilization Scheduling-farming Scheduling-veterinarian Herd health Marketing strategies EFFICIENCY!!

Calendar Calving Season Graph to show veterinarians their calving season in Nebraska. Encouragement to help their producers tighten their calving season to 1. Take advantage of non-harvested forages; 2. Potentially improve health of calves; 3. Improve veterinary and producer lifestyle: short, intense calving season, challenging for a bit, but over with quickly

Initial Calving Distribution

Initial Pounds Weaned

Missed Opportunity

Missed Opportunity 11,705.40 lb difference

**Repeatable data becomes important!** Skewed Distribution Not the goal of the operation! Retaining late calving females Bull battery management Nutrition Anovulatory-why? Disease Etc., etc. **Repeatable data becomes important!** Operation goals: logistical problems Price of replacements-keep everything Bulls-left in too long, bull injuries, etc. Cows not cycling: could be reason for dip in 3 year olds, nutritionally related, exacerbates post-calving interval

Tactics Data interpretation to assess herd status Opportunity to assess overall management Define future goals What is the end game? What area to address first? One thing at a time… Tools Implementation of resources First step is convincing the owner that there could be changes made, if a problem exists. Can the logistics be managed (calving pasture, labor, facilities)? What is the producer’s target? Weaning calves, yearlings, retained ownership, replacements. There is a benefit to calving earlier for every production stage. Can we improve our goals, even if we think we are “good?” Important not to try and rebuild Rome in 3 days…in nutrition is an issue, tackle that the first year, and demonstrate the results with additional data collection. Follow the next year with a synchronization program to tighten the calving window. Etc. etc. Resources: if the producer is willing to comply, GPVEC, UNL, USMARC, etc. are resources to guide you. Nutritionists available, refereed articles for evidence-based decision making

Potential Interventions Synchronization Marketing of late-born females Disease investigation and management Breeding season management Nutrition evaluation

Limitations? Facilities Weather concerns? Labor Feed resources Both producer and veterinarian Feed resources Marketing Tradition Pandora’s box

Data Collection Challenges Time from first to final data collection: 83 days July-September Data submission methods Non-computerized: 25/40 (62.5%) Excel: 15/40 (37.5%) Time spent data entry and reporting: 24.6 sec/head Time spent data entry and reporting: 1 hr 29 min/herd Range per herd: 35 min-3 hr 30 min One year of data-enough info to intervene? Mention feedback from data collection process: Complicated forms not used Challenging to collect from producers Timing?

Case background 2 Year Olds 1560 3 Year Olds 1242 Matures 5894 Calving season began March 21 Pregnancy percentage 91%, heifers AI’d Calving percentage 85% How many opens at preg check? At calving? 10230 exposed, 9309 preg, 8696 calved

Estimated Total Pounds Weaned: 5,145,902.20

Total Pounds Weaned: 4,953,415.00

Total Pounds Weaned: 5,317,972.60

Questions?