Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients among KRAS wild type, p.G13D and other mutations: Results from a multicenter, cross-sectional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Advertisements

Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening NEJM April 3, 2014 Vol 3 Imperiale, T.F. et al Presented by Melissa Spera, MD.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
How to get more nodes in laparoscopic colon surgery John Marks MD Chief Division of Colorectal Surgery Lankenau Hospital and Institute of Medical Research.
KRAS testing in colorectal cancer: an overview. 2 What is KRAS? KRAS is a gene that encodes one of the proteins in the epidermal growth factor receptor.
CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of FOLFIRI or FOLFOX with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab for patients w/ KRAS wild type untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma.
Procedures used by CHTN
Genetic Alterations of TP53 Gene in Brain Astrocytic Tumours Methodology Θ Eighty-three brain tumor biopsies were collected and used in this study. Thirty.
Dr. Efraim Idelevich MD, PhD, Dr. Efraim Idelevich MD, PhD, Gastrointestinal Oncology Unit Kaplan Medical Center RehovotIsrael June 2011 Multimodal Treatment.
G.Liguori,G.Pirozzi^, I. Forte, G.Botti, R.Franco, A.La Rocca*, G.Rocco* Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli Dip.Anatomia Patologica; Dip.Onc.Sperimentale^;
Stem Cells In Clinical Practice: STELLA Experience Manolo D’Arcangelo Department of Oncology Ospedale Civile di Livorno.
Therapeutic Significance of D-dimer Cut-off Level of more than 3 µg/ml in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Standard Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab.
Japanese Approach to colon cancer and the Outcome Dep. of Surgical Oncology Tokyo Medical and Dental University Kenichi Sugihara.
Outcome of Primary Tumor in Patients With Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy Without Surgery As Initial Treatment.
Pfetin, as a Prognostic Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Revealed by Proteomics Yoshiyuki Suehara 1 3 4, Kunihiko Seki 2, Kiyonaga Fujii 1,
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Annals of Oncology 23: 298–304, 2012 종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 / prof. 김시영.
R3 정상완. Introduction  EGC : Tumor invasion is limited to the mucosa or submucosa, regardless of lymph node involvement.  Accumulated histopathological.
Sex-specific trends in lung cancer incidence and survival : a population study of cases 호흡기 내과 R3 조주희 Thorax 2011;66: Camilla M T Sagerup,
Dr. Marco Matos JOURNAL CLUB GCUH 4/07/14.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Genetic and Histological Assessment of Surgical Margins.
Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre 1 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase III MF07-01 Trial: Impact of Initial Local Resection on Stage.
Patient & tumor characteristics (n=39)
Statin use and risk of endometrial cancer:
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Correlation of tumor mutation burden and chemotherapy outcomes
Immunoscore Prognostic in Colon Cancer
Prognostic Factors for First-line Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
Presented By Michael Lee at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Gender difference in age, risk factors and histological characteristics of lung cancer patients, presented to the Respiratory Unit of Teaching Hospital.
Figure 1. (A) Forest plot of common odds ratios (adjusted for ECOG PS) for best overall response by a priori subgroups in patients with KRAS wild-type.
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
MCW Regional Cancer Therapy Program
Lung Cancer Screening: Do Individual Health Beliefs Matter?
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
CLINICAL AND BUDGET IMPACT OF USING A MOLECULAR TEST TO DETECT KRAS MUTATIONS IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES Cheng I1, Hertz.
Clinicopathological features in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS wild type versus codon 12 and codon 13 mutant: Results from a multicenter,
Introduction. TREATMENT BASED ON TUMOR SIDEDNESS IN mCRC: THE EVIDENCE AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
Axel Grothey Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester
徐慧萍1 羅竹君1,2 郭耀隆1 李國鼎1 國立成功大學醫學院附設醫院外科部1 國立成功大學醫學院臨床醫學研究所2
Improved survival outcomes after resection of ductal adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: A single center 10 years’ experience Seong.
Colorectal Cancer: Current “Standard” Uses for Molecular Testing
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Colon Cancer Stages I-III
Patients´ perspective on palliative chemotherapy of colorectal and non - colorectal tumors # 581 M. Rehm 1, K. Trautmann 1, A. Rentsch 2, B. Hornemann.
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Surveillance of Tuberculosis
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
HISTOLOGY-SPECIFIC NOMOGRAM FOR PATIENTS AFFECTED BY PRIMARY RSTS
10th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, June 25-28, 2008
Ali Shamseddine,MD,FRCP
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Activation of MET by Gene Amplification or by Splice Mutations Deleting the Juxtamembrane Domain in Primary Resected Lung Cancers  Ryoichi Onozato, MD,
The 22 study patients: overall survival (first patient enrolled 9 May 2014, last patient enrolled 26 August 2015, censoring date 9 May 2016); primary tumour.
MET amplification is selected in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer samples from patients who developed resistance to anti-EGFR treatment. MET amplification.
Presentation transcript:

Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients among KRAS wild type, p.G13D and other mutations: Results from a multicenter, cross-sectional study by the Japan Study Group of KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Hiroyuki Uetake1, Toshiaki Watanabe2, Takayuki Yoshino3, Kentaro Yamazaki4, Megumi Ishiguro1, Kenichi Sugihara1, Yasuo Ohashi5 1Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan, 2Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan, 4Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, 5Public Health Research Foundation, Tokyo, Japan ASCO 2011 #3605 Background Summary of the previous presentation Results: KRAS WT, KRAS MT (G13D), KRAS MT (others) Conclusions Many studies have reported that 30-40% of CRC patients have KRAS mutations and they lacked in response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies.1-3 Recently, improved outcomes for association of KRAS p.G13D mutation (p.G13D MT) in patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab have been reported.4, 5 We have previously reported the correlation between KRAS mutation rate and sample backgrounds;6, 7 however, the clinicopathological features of KRAS p.G13D mutation have not been fully clarified. Study profile Gender Clinicopathological features: WT, MT (G13D), MT (others) KRAS p.G13D mutation was remarkably higher in female (P<0.0001). KRAS p.G13D mutation occurred at a constant rate regardless of age (P=0.5285); however, KRAS other mutations increased with age (P=0.0002). In contrast, KRAS wild type decreased with age (P=0.0001). KRAS p.G13D mutation seemed remarkably higher in right-sided colon than left-sided colon (right:9.9%, left:4.7%, P=0.0515). KRAS p.G13D mutation was tend to be higher in lung metastasis (9.5%) compared to other metastatic sites; however, this is uncertain because the sample size has varied through the metastatic sites. Other KRAS MT  had similar trend with KRAS p.G13D in primary tumor site. This study suggested that clinicopathological features were not similar among KRAS wild type, KRAS p.G13D and other mutations. It suggests a possibility that KRAS p.G13D mutation might be a different tumor than other KRAS mutations, since some different trends were seen between those mutations. Presently, any KRAS mutation is regarded to be the same; however, this study suggests that it might be an aggregation from different tumors.   Sample registration, n=5,887   from 389 facilities From Oct. 2009 to Mar. 2010 Cut-off: Apr. 2010 KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P<0.0001 n KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) (others) Gender Male 3,475 2,243 (64.5%) 222 ( 6.4%) 1,010 (29.1%) Female 2,257 1,334 (59.1%) 198 ( 8.8%) 725 (32.1%) Age < 50 560 389 (69.5%) 42 ( 7.5%) 129 (23.0%) 50-59 1,258 798 (63.4%) 91 ( 7.2%) 369 (29.3%) 60-69 2,081 1,289 (61.9%) 140 ( 6.7%) 652 (31.3%) 70 =< 1,833 1,101 (60.1%) 147 ( 8.0%) 585 (31.9%) Primary tumor site appendix 25 9 (36.0%) 2 ( 8.0%) 14 (56.0%) right-sided colon 1,713 887 (51.8%) 169 ( 9.9%) 657 (38.4%) left-sided colon 2,160 1,528 (70.7%) 102 ( 4.7%) 530 (24.5%) rectum 1,817 1,142 (62.9%) 147 ( 8.1%) 528 (29.1%) others* 17 11 (64.7%) 0 ( 0.0%) 6 (35.3%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 5,258 3,281 (62.4%) 385 ( 7.3%) 1,592 (30.3%) Metastasis 474 296 (62.4%) 35 ( 7.4%) 143 (30.2%) liver 216 146 (67.6%) 13 ( 6.0%) 57 (26.4%) lung 74 48 (64.9%) 7 ( 9.5%) 19 (25.7%) lymph node 37 22 (59.5%) 2 ( 5.4%) 13 (35.1%) local 45 29 (64.4%) 3 ( 6.7%) 13 (28.9%) dissemination 70 34 (48.6%) 6 ( 8.6%) 30 (42.9%) 32 17 (53.1%) 4 (12.5%) 11 (34.4%) KRAS WT vs. KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (G13D) vs. KRAS MT (others) Odds-ratio 95%CI P value 1.500 1.224 - 1.838 <0.0001 0.805 0.650 - 0.997 0.0465 0.667 0.544 - 0.817 1.243 1.003 - 1.539 1.098 0.785 - 1.536 0.3549 1.383 0.960 - 1.994 0.1992 1.038 0.813 - 1.327 1.024 0.790 - 1.327 1.127 0.910 - 1.396 0.831 0.663 - 1.040 0.826 0.668 - 1.022 1.059 0.846 - 1.324 0.527 0.114 - 2.448 0.588 0.133 - 2.598 0.0558 0.490 0.397 - 0.604 1.105 0.889 - 1.374 2.325 1.842 - 2.934 0.729 0.571 - 0.932 0.871 0.704 - 1.077 1.231 0.983 - 1.542 - 1.008 0.699 - 1.453 0.9673 0.988 0.672 - 1.454 0.9514 0.992 0.688 - 1.431 1.012 0.688 - 1.489 1.332 0.749 - 2.371 0.5733 0.940 0.510 - 1.734 0.8520 0.803 0.361 - 1.785 1.531 0.639 - 3.666 1.293 0.303 - 5.520 0.634 0.143 - 2.819 1.136 0.345 - 3.746 0.953 0.270 - 3.359 0.662 0.276 - 1.587 0.824 0.341 - 1.992 0.497 0.166 - 1.483 1.507 0.478 - 4.756 100% Excluded, n=97   Cancelation 14   Ineligible 1   Uncollected 82  90% 80%   KRAS test, n=5,790    Direct sequencing 5,479    Luminex 311 70% 1,334 2,243 60% Undetectable samples, n=58   Direct sequencing 56   Luminex 2  Mutation 50% 40.9% KRAS test detectable, n=5,732    Direct sequencing 5,423    Luminex 309 35.5% 40% 30% Objective 20% 923 1,232 10% Sample Background This study aimed to examine whether the clinicopathological features of tumors with p.G13D MT is more similar to those of KRAS wild type or other KRAS mutations in large-scale Japanese population (n=5,887). 0% n Gender Male 3,475 (60.6%) Female 2,257 (39.4%) Age < 50 560 ( 9.8%) Median:65 (12-92) 50-59 1,258 (21.9%) 60-69 2,081 (36.3%) 70 =< 1,833 (32.0%) Type of sample Surgically resected 5,364 (93.6%) Biopsy 368 ( 6.4%) Year < 2006 748 (13.0%) 2006 445 ( 7.8%) 2007 761 (13.3%) 2008 1,255 (21.9%) 2009 1,843 (32.2%) 2010 312 ( 5.4%) < 2009 110 ( 1.9%) 2009 =< 258 ( 4.5%) Stage I 166 ( 2.9%) II 814 (14.2%) III 1,765 (30.8%) IV 2,805 (48.9%) recurrence 152 ( 2.7%) unknown 30 ( 0.5%) Male Female n=3,475 n=2,257 Age Methods KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P=0.0007 100% 90% * not included in the logistic regression Key eligibility criteria Histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma Adequate tumor samples 80% Gender Primary tumor site Comparison of KRAS mutation results 70% 798 1,289 1,101 389 60% KRAS MT G13D KRAS MT (others) G12D G12V G12C G12S G12A Gender Male 205 (52.0%) 424 (56.8%) 270 (59.0%) 102 (67.1%) 61 (54.5%) 55 (54.5%) Female 189 (48.0%) 323 (43.2%) 188 (41.0%) 50 (32.9%) 51 (45.5%) 46 (45.5%) Age < 60 127 (32.2%) 206 (27.6%) 141 (30.8%) 40 (26.3%) 33 (29.5%) 28 (27.7%) 60-69 128 (32.5%) 279 (37.3%) 172 (37.6%) 61 (40.1%) 42 (37.5%) 43 (42.6%) 70 =< 139 (35.3%) 262 (35.1%) 145 (31.7%) 51 (33.6%) 37 (33.0%) 30 (29.7%) Primary tumor site* right-sided colon 158 (40.1%) 316 (42.3%) 155 (33.8%) 76 (50.0%) 32 (28.6%) 32 (31.7%) left-sided colon 98 (24.9%) 215 (28.8%) 154 (33.6%) 39 (25.7%) 48 (42.9%) 36 (35.6%) rectum 138 (35.0%) 216 (28.9%) 149 (32.5%) 37 (24.3%) 33 (32.7%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 362 (91.9%) 683 (91.4%) 427 (93.2%) 136 (89.5%) 106 (94.6%) 94 (93.1%) Metastasis 32 ( 8.1%) 64 ( 8.6%) 31 ( 6.8%) 16 (10.5%) 6 ( 5.4%) 7 ( 6.9%) liver 11 (34.4%) 26 (40.6%) 13 (41.9%) 8 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 4 (57.1%) lung 7 (21.9%) 4 ( 6.3%) 5 (16.1%) 2 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%) 2 (28.6%) others 14 (43.8%) 34 (53.1%) 6 (37.5%) 2 (33.3%) 1 (14.3%) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) Sample size: 5,000 Data collection: Sample for KRAS test Surgically resected specimen or biopsy from primary tumor or metastases Paraffin-embedded tumor blocks or thinly sliced tumor sections Patients and sample backgrounds Gender, age Primary tumor site Type of sample (surgically resected / biopsy) Date of the sample obtained Site of the sample obtained (primary tumor / metastases) Stage (l / ll / lll / IV / recurrence / unknown) Duration of formalin fixation (<24h / 24-48h / 48h< / unknown) Formalin concentration (10% / 20% / unknown) Mutation 50% 39.9% 40% 36.6% 38.1% appendix n=25 36.0% 8.0% 56.0% 30.5% 30% Male n=3,475 6.4 % 64.5% 29.1% 20% 460 792 732 171 right-sided colon n=1,713 10% 51.8% 9.9% 38.4% Primary tumor site appendix 25 ( 0.4%) right-sided colon 1,713 (29.9%) left-sided colon 2,160 (37.7%) rectum 1,817 (31.7%) others 17 ( 0.3%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 5,258 (91.7%) Metastasis 474 ( 8.3%) liver 216 (45.6%) lung 74 (15.6%) lymph node 37 ( 7.8%) local 45 ( 9.5%) dissemination 70 (14.8%) 32 ( 6.8%) 0% <50 50-59 60-69 70=< n=560 n=1,258 n=2,081 n=1,833 left-sided colon n=2,160 70.7% 4.7 % 24.5% References Primary tumor site Female n=2,257 59.1% 8.8% 32.1% 1. Karapetis CS. et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757-1765. 2. Amado RG. et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626-1634. 3. Van Cutsem E. et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408-1417. 4. De Roock W. et al. JAMA. 2010;304:1812-1820. 5. Bando H., Yoshino T. et al. ASCO-GI 2011 #448 6. Yamazaki K. et al. ESMO 2010 #595P 7. Yoshino T. et al. ASCO-GI 2011 #407 KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P<0.0001 100% rectum n=1,817 62.9% 8.1% 29.1% 90% 80% 887 70% 1,142 1,528 KRAS mutation 60% Age Site of the sample obtained * G13D vs. G12V P=0.0171, vs. G12C P=0.0399, vs. G12S P=0.0009 Send formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks or thinly sliced tumor sections to commercial laboratories (10µm 5 slices and 3µm 1 slice for HE staining) Investigate KRAS point mutations in the codon 12 and 13 by following laboratories’ SOP 48.2% Mutation 50% No. of sample KRAS WT KRAS MT n % 95%CI All 5,732 3,577 62.4 61.1-63.7 2,155 37.6 36.3-38.9   Codon12   Codon13 1,714 441 29.9 7.7 28.7-31.1 7.0-8.4 Summary of the results 37.1% KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) 40% 29.3% Hospitals Laboratories Data center 1. Sample registration 2. Enrollment confirmation 6. Result 3. Sample 2’. Registration information 5. Result 4. KRAS test KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (Others) Gender Male > Female 64.5% 59.1% Male < Female 6.4% 8.8% 29.1% 32.1% P< 0.0001 P=0.0465 Age Young > Old 69.5%/63.4%/61.9%/60.1%* Young ≒ Old 7.5%/7.2%/6.7%/8.0%* Young < Old 23.0%/29.3%/31.3%/31.9%* P=0.3549 P=0.1992 Primary tumor site Right < Left 51.8% 70.7% Right > Left 9.9% 4.7% 38.4% 24.5% P<0.0001 P=0.0558 Site of the sample obtained Liver ≒ Lung 67.6% 64.9% Liver < Lung 6.0% 9.5% 26.4% 25.7% P=0.5733 P=0.8520 Acknowledgement 30% P=0.0001* P=0.5285* P=0.0002* Primary tumor n=5,258 62.4% 7.3% 30.3% 826 <50 n=560 20% 69.5% 7.5% 23.0% This study was funded by Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research (CSPOR) of Public Health Research Foundation. The research institutes are Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Teikyo University School, and National Cancer Center Hospital East. We would like to thank the 389 sample providing hospitals. 675 632 Metastasis n=474 10% 62.4% 7.4% 30.2% n % Codon12 1,714 GAT (G12D) GTT (G12V) TGT (G12C) AGT (G12S) GCT (G12A) CGT Others 814 493 162 120 107 15 3 47.5 28.8 9.5 7.0 6.2 0.9 0.1 Codon13 441 GAC (G13D) TGC CGC GAG 420 11 6 1 95.2 2.5 1.4 0.2 0.7 0% others 30.3% (n=1,735) right-sided colon left-sided colon rectum 50-59 n=1,258 liver n=216 63.4% 7.2% 29.3% 67.6% 6.0% 26.4% n=1,713 n=2,160 n=1,817 lung n=74 64.9% 9.5% 25.7% KRAS MT 37.6% (n=2,155) The frequency of KRAS mutation (37.6%) in Japanese CRC patients is similar to those reported in previous studies from western countries. There are the significant difference of the frequency of KRAS mutation between male (35.5%) and female (40.9%) left-sided colon (29.3%) and right-sided colon (48.2%).    As the age is higher there is more frequent KRAS mutation. 60-69 n=2,081 61.9% 6.7% 31.3% lymph node n=37 59.5% 5.4% 35.1% KRAS WT 62.4% (n=3,577) local n=45 64.4% 6.7% 28.9% G13D 7.3% (n=420) 70=< n=1,833 60.1% 8.0% 31.9% dissemination n=70 48.6% 8.6% 42.9% *Cochran-Armitage trend test *< 50/50-59/60-69/70=<

Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients among KRAS wild type, p.G13D and other mutations: Results from a multicenter, cross-sectional study by the Japan Study Group of KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Hiroyuki Uetake1, Toshiaki Watanabe2, Takayuki Yoshino3, Kentaro Yamazaki4, Megumi Ishiguro1, Kenichi Sugihara1, Yasuo Ohashi5 1Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan, 2Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan, 4Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, 5Public Health Research Foundation, Tokyo, Japan ASCO 2011 #3605 Background Summary of the previous presentation Results: KRAS WT, KRAS MT (G13D), KRAS MT (others) Conclusions Many studies have reported that 30-40% of CRC patients have KRAS mutations and they lacked in response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies.1-3 Recently, improved outcomes for association of KRAS p.G13D mutation (p.G13D MT) in patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab have been reported.4, 5 We have previously reported the correlation between KRAS mutation rate and sample backgrounds;6, 7 however, the clinicopathological features of KRAS p.G13D mutation have not been fully clarified. Study profile Gender Clinicopathological features: WT, MT (G13D), MT (others) KRAS p.G13D mutation was remarkably higher in female (P<0.0001). KRAS p.G13D mutation occurred at a constant rate regardless of age (P=0.5285); however, KRAS other mutations increased with age (P=0.0002). In contrast, KRAS wild type decreased with age (P=0.0001). KRAS p.G13D mutation seemed remarkably higher in right-sided colon than left-sided colon (right:9.9%, left:4.7%, P=0.0515). KRAS p.G13D mutation was tend to be higher in lung metastasis (9.5%) compared to other metastatic sites; however, this is uncertain because the sample size has varied through the metastatic sites. Other KRAS MT  had similar trend with KRAS p.G13D in primary tumor site. This study suggested that clinicopathological features were not similar among KRAS wild type, KRAS p.G13D and other mutations. It suggests a possibility that KRAS p.G13D mutation might be a different tumor than other KRAS mutations, since some different trends were seen between those mutations. Presently, any KRAS mutation is regarded to be the same; however, this study suggests that it might be an aggregation from different tumors.   Sample registration, n=5,887   from 389 facilities From Oct. 2009 to Mar. 2010 Cut-off: Apr. 2010 KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P<0.0001 n KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) (others) Gender Male 3,475 2,243 (64.5%) 222 ( 6.4%) 1,010 (29.1%) Female 2,257 1,334 (59.1%) 198 ( 8.8%) 725 (32.1%) Age < 50 560 389 (69.5%) 42 ( 7.5%) 129 (23.0%) 50-59 1,258 798 (63.4%) 91 ( 7.2%) 369 (29.3%) 60-69 2,081 1,289 (61.9%) 140 ( 6.7%) 652 (31.3%) 70 =< 1,833 1,101 (60.1%) 147 ( 8.0%) 585 (31.9%) Primary tumor site appendix 25 9 (36.0%) 2 ( 8.0%) 14 (56.0%) right-sided colon 1,713 887 (51.8%) 169 ( 9.9%) 657 (38.4%) left-sided colon 2,160 1,528 (70.7%) 102 ( 4.7%) 530 (24.5%) rectum 1,817 1,142 (62.9%) 147 ( 8.1%) 528 (29.1%) others* 17 11 (64.7%) 0 ( 0.0%) 6 (35.3%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 5,258 3,281 (62.4%) 385 ( 7.3%) 1,592 (30.3%) Metastasis 474 296 (62.4%) 35 ( 7.4%) 143 (30.2%) liver 216 146 (67.6%) 13 ( 6.0%) 57 (26.4%) lung 74 48 (64.9%) 7 ( 9.5%) 19 (25.7%) lymph node 37 22 (59.5%) 2 ( 5.4%) 13 (35.1%) local 45 29 (64.4%) 3 ( 6.7%) 13 (28.9%) dissemination 70 34 (48.6%) 6 ( 8.6%) 30 (42.9%) 32 17 (53.1%) 4 (12.5%) 11 (34.4%) KRAS WT vs. KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (G13D) vs. KRAS MT (others) Odds-ratio 95%CI P value 1.500 1.224 - 1.838 <0.0001 0.805 0.650 - 0.997 0.0465 0.667 0.544 - 0.817 1.243 1.003 - 1.539 1.098 0.785 - 1.536 0.3549 1.383 0.960 - 1.994 0.1992 1.038 0.813 - 1.327 1.024 0.790 - 1.327 1.127 0.910 - 1.396 0.831 0.663 - 1.040 0.826 0.668 - 1.022 1.059 0.846 - 1.324 0.527 0.114 - 2.448 0.588 0.133 - 2.598 0.0558 0.490 0.397 - 0.604 1.105 0.889 - 1.374 2.325 1.842 - 2.934 0.729 0.571 - 0.932 0.871 0.704 - 1.077 1.231 0.983 - 1.542 - 1.008 0.699 - 1.453 0.9673 0.988 0.672 - 1.454 0.9514 0.992 0.688 - 1.431 1.012 0.688 - 1.489 1.332 0.749 - 2.371 0.5733 0.940 0.510 - 1.734 0.8520 0.803 0.361 - 1.785 1.531 0.639 - 3.666 1.293 0.303 - 5.520 0.634 0.143 - 2.819 1.136 0.345 - 3.746 0.953 0.270 - 3.359 0.662 0.276 - 1.587 0.824 0.341 - 1.992 0.497 0.166 - 1.483 1.507 0.478 - 4.756 100% Excluded, n=97   Cancelation 14   Ineligible 1   Uncollected 82  90% 80%   KRAS test, n=5,790    Direct sequencing 5,479    Luminex 311 70% 1,334 2,243 60% Undetectable samples, n=58   Direct sequencing 56   Luminex 2  Mutation 50% 40.9% KRAS test detectable, n=5,732    Direct sequencing 5,423    Luminex 309 35.5% 40% 30% Objective 20% 923 1,232 10% Sample Background This study aimed to examine whether the clinicopathological features of tumors with p.G13D MT is more similar to those of KRAS wild type or other KRAS mutations in large-scale Japanese population (n=5,887). 0% n Gender Male 3,475 (60.6%) Female 2,257 (39.4%) Age < 50 560 ( 9.8%) Median:65 (12-92) 50-59 1,258 (21.9%) 60-69 2,081 (36.3%) 70 =< 1,833 (32.0%) Type of sample Surgically resected 5,364 (93.6%) Biopsy 368 ( 6.4%) Year < 2006 748 (13.0%) 2006 445 ( 7.8%) 2007 761 (13.3%) 2008 1,255 (21.9%) 2009 1,843 (32.2%) 2010 312 ( 5.4%) < 2009 110 ( 1.9%) 2009 =< 258 ( 4.5%) Stage I 166 ( 2.9%) II 814 (14.2%) III 1,765 (30.8%) IV 2,805 (48.9%) recurrence 152 ( 2.7%) unknown 30 ( 0.5%) Male Female n=3,475 n=2,257 Age Methods KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P=0.0007 100% 90% * not included in the logistic regression Key eligibility criteria Histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma Adequate tumor samples 80% Gender Primary tumor site Comparison of KRAS mutation results 70% 798 1,289 1,101 389 60% KRAS MT G13D KRAS MT (others) G12D G12V G12C G12S G12A Gender Male 205 (52.0%) 424 (56.8%) 270 (59.0%) 102 (67.1%) 61 (54.5%) 55 (54.5%) Female 189 (48.0%) 323 (43.2%) 188 (41.0%) 50 (32.9%) 51 (45.5%) 46 (45.5%) Age < 60 127 (32.2%) 206 (27.6%) 141 (30.8%) 40 (26.3%) 33 (29.5%) 28 (27.7%) 60-69 128 (32.5%) 279 (37.3%) 172 (37.6%) 61 (40.1%) 42 (37.5%) 43 (42.6%) 70 =< 139 (35.3%) 262 (35.1%) 145 (31.7%) 51 (33.6%) 37 (33.0%) 30 (29.7%) Primary tumor site* right-sided colon 158 (40.1%) 316 (42.3%) 155 (33.8%) 76 (50.0%) 32 (28.6%) 32 (31.7%) left-sided colon 98 (24.9%) 215 (28.8%) 154 (33.6%) 39 (25.7%) 48 (42.9%) 36 (35.6%) rectum 138 (35.0%) 216 (28.9%) 149 (32.5%) 37 (24.3%) 33 (32.7%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 362 (91.9%) 683 (91.4%) 427 (93.2%) 136 (89.5%) 106 (94.6%) 94 (93.1%) Metastasis 32 ( 8.1%) 64 ( 8.6%) 31 ( 6.8%) 16 (10.5%) 6 ( 5.4%) 7 ( 6.9%) liver 11 (34.4%) 26 (40.6%) 13 (41.9%) 8 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 4 (57.1%) lung 7 (21.9%) 4 ( 6.3%) 5 (16.1%) 2 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%) 2 (28.6%) others 14 (43.8%) 34 (53.1%) 6 (37.5%) 2 (33.3%) 1 (14.3%) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) Sample size: 5,000 Data collection: Sample for KRAS test Surgically resected specimen or biopsy from primary tumor or metastases Paraffin-embedded tumor blocks or thinly sliced tumor sections Patients and sample backgrounds Gender, age Primary tumor site Type of sample (surgically resected / biopsy) Date of the sample obtained Site of the sample obtained (primary tumor / metastases) Stage (l / ll / lll / IV / recurrence / unknown) Duration of formalin fixation (<24h / 24-48h / 48h< / unknown) Formalin concentration (10% / 20% / unknown) Mutation 50% 39.9% 40% 36.6% 38.1% appendix n=25 36.0% 8.0% 56.0% 30.5% 30% Male n=3,475 6.4 % 64.5% 29.1% 20% 460 792 732 171 right-sided colon n=1,713 10% 51.8% 9.9% 38.4% Primary tumor site appendix 25 ( 0.4%) right-sided colon 1,713 (29.9%) left-sided colon 2,160 (37.7%) rectum 1,817 (31.7%) others 17 ( 0.3%) Site of the sample obtained Primary tumor 5,258 (91.7%) Metastasis 474 ( 8.3%) liver 216 (45.6%) lung 74 (15.6%) lymph node 37 ( 7.8%) local 45 ( 9.5%) dissemination 70 (14.8%) 32 ( 6.8%) 0% <50 50-59 60-69 70=< n=560 n=1,258 n=2,081 n=1,833 left-sided colon n=2,160 70.7% 4.7 % 24.5% References Primary tumor site Female n=2,257 59.1% 8.8% 32.1% 1. Karapetis CS. et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757-1765. 2. Amado RG. et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626-1634. 3. Van Cutsem E. et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408-1417. 4. De Roock W. et al. JAMA. 2010;304:1812-1820. 5. Bando H., Yoshino T. et al. ASCO-GI 2011 #448 6. Yamazaki K. et al. ESMO 2010 #595P 7. Yoshino T. et al. ASCO-GI 2011 #407 KRAS WT KRAS MT Mutation rate P<0.0001 100% rectum n=1,817 62.9% 8.1% 29.1% 90% 80% 887 70% 1,142 1,528 KRAS mutation 60% Age Site of the sample obtained * G13D vs. G12V P=0.0171, vs. G12C P=0.0399, vs. G12S P=0.0009 Send formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks or thinly sliced tumor sections to commercial laboratories (10µm 5 slices and 3µm 1 slice for HE staining) Investigate KRAS point mutations in the codon 12 and 13 by following laboratories’ SOP 48.2% Mutation 50% No. of sample KRAS WT KRAS MT n % 95%CI All 5,732 3,577 62.4 61.1-63.7 2,155 37.6 36.3-38.9   Codon12   Codon13 1,714 441 29.9 7.7 28.7-31.1 7.0-8.4 Summary of the results KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (others) 40% 37.1% 29.3% Hospitals Laboratories Data center 1. Sample registration 2. Enrollment confirmation 6. Result 3. Sample 2’. Registration information 5. Result 4. KRAS test KRAS WT KRAS MT (G13D) KRAS MT (Others) Gender Male > Female 64.5% 59.1% Male < Female 6.4% 8.8% 29.1% 32.1% P< 0.0001 P=0.0465 Age Young > Old 69.5%/63.4%/61.9%/60.1%* Young ≒ Old 7.5%/7.2%/6.7%/8.0%* Young < Old 23.0%/29.3%/31.3%/31.9%* P=0.3549 P=0.1992 Primary tumor site Right < Left 51.8% 70.7% Right > Left 9.9% 4.7% 38.4% 24.5% P<0.0001 P=0.0558 Site of the sample obtained Liver ≒ Lung 67.6% 64.9% Liver < Lung 6.0% 9.5% 26.4% 25.7% P=0.5733 P=0.8520 Acknowledgement 30% P=0.0001* P=0.5285* P=0.0002* Primary tumor n=5,258 62.4% 7.3% 30.3% 826 <50 n=560 20% 69.5% 7.5% 23.0% This study was funded by Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research (CSPOR) of Public Health Research Foundation. The research institutes are Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Teikyo University School, and National Cancer Center Hospital East. We would like to thank the 389 sample providing hospitals. 675 632 Metastasis n=474 10% 62.4% 7.4% 30.2% n % Codon12 1,714 GAT (G12D) GTT (G12V) TGT (G12C) AGT (G12S) GCT (G12A) CGT Others 814 493 162 120 107 15 3 47.5 28.8 9.5 7.0 6.2 0.9 0.1 Codon13 441 GAC (G13D) TGC CGC GAG 420 11 6 1 95.2 2.5 1.4 0.2 0.7 0% others 30.3% (n=1,735) right-sided colon left-sided colon rectum 50-59 n=1,258 liver n=216 63.4% 7.2% 29.3% 67.6% 6.0% 26.4% n=1,713 n=2,160 n=1,817 lung n=74 64.9% 9.5% 25.7% KRAS MT 37.6% (n=2,155) The frequency of KRAS mutation (37.6%) in Japanese CRC patients is similar to those reported in previous studies from western countries. There are the significant difference of the frequency of KRAS mutation between male (35.5%) and female (40.9%) left-sided colon (29.3%) and right-sided colon (48.2%).    As the age is higher there is more frequent KRAS mutation. 60-69 n=2,081 61.9% 6.7% 31.3% lymph node n=37 59.5% 5.4% 35.1% KRAS WT 62.4% (n=3,577) local n=45 64.4% 6.7% 28.9% G13D 7.3% (n=420) 70=< n=1,833 60.1% 8.0% 31.9% dissemination n=70 48.6% 8.6% 42.9% *Cochran-Armitage trend test *< 50/50-59/60-69/70=<