Still River Study 2004-2005 Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Historical Hydro-Quebec Phase II Flow and Transfer Capability Limit Data Peter Wong, ISO New England Power Supply Planning Committee Meeting June 4, 2007.
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Phosphorus Fate and Transport in an Impounded River System Implications for TMDL Stakeholders and Extension Educators Dean Baas MSU Geological Sciences.
Suspended Sediment Loads from Bay Area Small Tributaries Mikolaj Lewicki and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loading Workgroup May 14 th 2008 Item #3a.
1 PCBs and PBDEs on the Guadalupe River WYs 2003 – 2006 John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup November.
Comparative Analysis of Loads of Mercury in Coyote Creek and Guadalupe River Lester McKee RMP SPLWG Chair San Francisco Estuary Institute
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Storm Water General Permit For Construction Activities(OKR10) Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting December 15, 2011 Watershed Planning and Storm.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
4. What is the boundary between two drainage basins called?
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
1 Update on Water Issues in Wyoming IPAMS Summer 2007 Meeting Vail, Colorado Brian Jeffries Executive Director Wyoming Pipeline Authority.
Ocean Vocabulary The energy is being passed through the water as a wave. 2.Wave: the movement of energy through a body of water.
LOWER YUBA RIVER ACCORD Monitoring and Evaluation Program Redd Surveys Casey Campos PSMFC.
Photo by J.d. Richey. To determine spatial and temporal distributions immigration period (spring) holding period (spring through fall) spawning period.
7. PV System Sizing Herb Wade Consultant
© S Haughton more than 3?
VOORBLAD.
1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.
Dam Control of Flow Rates on the Scioto and Olentangy Rivers 1.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Update on the Niagara River U.S. RAP Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Implementers Session April 10, 2013.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Houghton Lake Management Plan Michigan Lake and Stream Associations April 2009.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee August 24, 2010 Metro Permit Reissuance Proposed.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Steve McLaughlin, PE Virginia Beach Public Works October 2012.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Upstream and Downstream Passage of American Eels at the Medway Project, Penobscot River, Maine Scott Hall ————————————— PPL Maine, LLC Milford, Maine Steve.
1. The name for an agent that causes disease is a(n) A.Antibody B.Antigen C.Bacteria D.Pathogen.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
LESSONS LEARNED PILOT STUDY MAY 12, 2009 – SEPTEMBER 13, 2009 Leslie Alber.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
FIGURE 3-1 Basic parts of a computer. Dale R. Patrick Electricity and Electronics: A Survey, 5e Copyright ©2002 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Essex Region Conservation Authority Brad Arsenault & Kaylyn Boyd.
Lake County Water Authority Nutrient Reduction Facility (NuRF) Lance Lumbard Water Resources Project Manager.
Stormwater Runoff Pollution enters water from stormwater runoff after rains Stormwater runoff from inside this line can end up in Tampa Bay via creeks,
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
The Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay by the Numbers The watershed includes parts of six states and the District of Columbia, with headwaters in Cooperstown,
Where the Missouri River Meets the Mississippi River Edward "Ted" and Pat Jones-Confluence Point State Park.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
1 Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek Watershed Strategic Action Plan Forum Briefing #2 January 27, 2009.
Water Quality or Carrying Capacity Loading (legacy N + new N – environmental denitrification) Residence Time Carrying Capacity.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Beth Kacvinsky - Lead Project Manager Office of Everglades Policy and Coordination March 1, 2016 IRL-S / C-44 Overview.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Presentation transcript:

Still River Study Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005

2 Background From its headwaters in the Housatonic River in New Milford, Lake Lillinonah extends 12 miles to the Shepaug Dam Lake covers 1900 acres to a maximum depth of 110 feet with 45 miles of shoreline. Connecticut Light and Power created Lake Lillinonah in 1955 as a source of hydroelectricity and flood control. The dam's 57,000-horsepower turbine drives a 43,000- kilowatt generator in what is Connecticut's newest and largest hydroelectric plant.

3 Determination of Influence by the Still River Tributary to the Water Quality & Algae Blooms in Lake Lillinonah Lake Lillinonah suffers algae blooms due to infusion of nutrients (primarily phosphorus and nitrogen compounds) from both non-point stormwater and point source pollution. It was postulated that a significant loading of nutrients to the lake is the result of the Still River contribution directly into Lake Lillinonah. The Friends of the Lake contracted Hydro Technologies, Inc. to design and perform the comprehensive Still River Study to pinpoint the source(s) of nutrient loading in the urban watershed that includes Danbury and the narrow corridor flowing north along Route 7 through Brookfield and New Milford to enter the top of Lake Lillinonah at Lovers Leap.

4 Upper Still – Site 1 Below STP –Site 4 Lovers Leap

5 Water Sampling Sites Site 1 - Still River above Limekiln Brook Site 2 - Limekiln Brook at Bennet Park above Sewage Treatment Plant Site 3 - Limekiln Brook below Sewage Treatment Plant Site 4 - Confluence of Still River and Limekiln Brook Site 5 - Harry Brook Park Site 6 - Lovers Leap Gorge Site 7 - Housatonic River at Addis Park Site 8 - Housatonic River at Boardman Bridge above New Milford

6

7

8 Danbury Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) DEP permit issued Feb, 2003, Valid for 5 years Design capacity = 15.5 mgd. Typical discharge = 10 At 10 mgd = 15.5 cfs flow for 24 hours every day Permit allows STP to discharge daily avg of 1.0 mg/L T-Phos in season (April 1 – September 30), no limit other 6 months Nitrogen credits (fine) bought by Danbury (highest or 2 nd most $ in CT) = $378,000 in 2003

9

10 Site 7 Addis ParkSite 8 – Boardman Bridge Still River Inlet Housatonic - New Milford Site 6 - Lovers Leap

11 GIS Mapping and AVI by Northwest Conservation District

12 USGS Gage in Brookfield records flows constantly. There appears to be a daily variance of discharge of approx. 10 cfs. Note the spikes on this graph showing storm effects in urban watershed of Danbury. This is a result of a high % of impervious cover.

13 Flow in Cubic Ft/Sec Site 3 – Below STPSite 5 – Harrybrook Park

Data

Data

Data used for Fertilizer Equivalent

17 Comparison of Data from 2004 & 2005 Data sets for four summer months only May - August

18 Recommendations Year round removal of phosphorus, not just seasonal. Lower the phosphorus level of 1.0 mg/L allowed by the Danbury STP discharge permit to a Technology-Based Permit Limit achieved now by sewage treatment plants in other states (0.3 mg/L) Look at Lake Champlain, Chesapeake Bay and others where Sewage Treatment Plants have invested in infrastructure where mandated by regulating agencies.

19