Flexible Infrastructure Bulkhead Track Improvements Final briefing to NSRP SWSI Panel March 29, 2018 John Walks Ingalls Shipbuilding Mechanical Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heavy Concrete Construction Formwork
Advertisements

Fasteners Used to join together the various parts of the automobile.
Aerospace Fastener Applications
RockOn! Canister Integration RockOn! 2009.
Click on this image to open the full PDF document.
Motor Leveling MECH 1200 Soft foot Condition: One or more of the mounting feet is not level with the others. Nuts loosen, vibration, misalignment Metal.
Topics Introduction Terminology Thread Specifications Bolts and Screws
HFT PXL Mechanical WBS 1.2 March 2010 Howard Wieman LBNL 1.
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM)
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
Masonry Wall Bracing A Simplified Approach To Bracing Masonry Walls Under Construction Produced by the Masonry Bracing Task Force.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Pedestal BaseTiller Strut Track Platform ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Final Achievements Project Overview The goal of this project is to re-design, build, and test.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
Pipe Supports and Restraints
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
PIT Crew Design Concepts By Dan Chapman, Tim Wilson, and Jon Miller December 11, 2002.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
LESSON TOPIC 1.2 SHORING.
© DIAMOND SA / / 1 DIAMOND AVIM Connector Fiber optic connector for aero-space applications.
Final Presentation Crew: Mike Lanteigne Wallace Barkhouse Scott Donahoe Blair MacKay Captain: Dr. Jimmy Chuang April 4 th 2012.
TT Assembly Structure Reference-Reinforcement System: 1.Description of the system 2.Assembling Procedure 3.Production Project Board, march 2005 D.Orlandi.
Plans for Pan-type Bed Shapers
VC Training Table Setup and Floating Agenda General –Air Supply Requirements Assembly –Assembling the System –Leveling the Table –Isolating.
Eglin 1 Design of Acoustic Sensor Eye Housing Eglin 1 Design of Acoustic Sensor Eye Housing Group Members: Erik Fernandez Kevin Garvey William Heffner.
Plans for the 2015 Invention Challenge Target Paul MacNeal August 9,
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
Structural Design Considerations Small or 0° turn radius Given size restriction and ground clearance Friction Type of drive-train Weight and center of.
Chapter 43 Common Commercial Construction Materials.
Engineering Division 1 HHMI 8.2.X Endstation Modification Review Allan DeMello 12/13/2006.
LAT Environmental Test PDR1 GLAST LAT Project3-4 May 2005 LAT Environmental Test Planning and Design Review 3-4 May 2005 Operations and Logistics LAT Environmental.
1 Manufacturing process II. Manufacturing process II. Sándor Pálinkás Ph.D. assistant lecturer University of Debrecen, Faculty of Engineering, Department.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
4.4 Size of a Horizontal Boring Machine:  Conventionally, the size of a horizontal boring machine is specified by the spindle diameter in mm.  The spindle.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration RPD 151 (RPA S5.1) Evaluation of In-Pavement Light Fixture Designs and Performance REDAC Subcommittee.
Courtesy Eric Witherspoon, Sonex plans #815 Photo 1: What it is. Photo 2: How it works. Sonex Wing Stand Answer to photos 3 and 4: Want leading.
RockOn! RockOn! Structure Build RockOn! 2009.
Chapter 14 – Vibrations and Waves. Every swing follows the same path This action is an example of vibrational motion vibrational motion - mechanical oscillations.
Emily Cobbs Ben Donoghue Dan O’Hare.  Dr. Koorosh Naghshineh ◦ Faculty Mentor  Steven Lentz ◦ Industry Mentor, Whirlpool Corporation  Mark Christensen.
VIEW SERIES with Sliding Door
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Annex 4 - Moving Frame and Whiffletree assembly
Fetal Heart Rate Monitor V&V Presentation Group 35 Grace Lee Matt Brown Varun Rao Client Professor Naegle.
Identification terminology various aircraft hardware
SuperQuest Salem Arms – Best Practices.
General overview Place : Institue of Space Astrophysic (IAS, Orsay)
Objectives Describe the fasteners, anchors, and adhesives used in construction and explain their uses. a. Identify various types of nails and cite uses.
Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot
1-9/16” & 1-3/4” HAMMERS NEW PRODUCT D25501K 1 9/16” SDS Max Combi
Common Small Pedestal Motor and Bearing Requirements. Introduction
Things You Should Know About Cantilever Rack
Teacher training resource: Robotic Assembly
C Air Compressor Up-fit and Plumbing Guide For LDI B3
The Challenges of Electronic Enclosures for US Navy Ships
NSA-7000 Stylish flush mount Network Sensors
UN-Regulation No. 80 Additional Information to GRSP-62-35
Drawing of stud.
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Mechanical hardware.
Mechanical hardware.
Self-sealing Cable Transit Panel Project Update
Ship Design & Material Technologies Panel
Donald Hamadyk Director, Research and Development
SWSI Panel Meeting March 14, 2019 Charleston, SC.
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
Cost Reduction of Shock Application Project Overview for NSRP Panel Meeting July 16, 2019 Kristi Carroll and John Walks.
Presentation transcript:

Flexible Infrastructure Bulkhead Track Improvements Final briefing to NSRP SWSI Panel March 29, 2018 John Walks Ingalls Shipbuilding Mechanical Engineer V

Shock and Vibration Testing

History Flexible Infrastructure (FI) (deck, overhead and bulkhead track) has been previously tested and qualified by Newport News Shipbuilding for use aboard CVN class ships. These NSRP projects attempt qualification of FI for all other surface ships. Deck, overhead and bulkhead track payloads were shock tested in July 2015 at NTS Rustburg with satisfactory results (FI Qualification RA project). Vibration testing was conducted on the bulkhead track items at NTS Rustburg in June 2016. Half of the test items failed during the test series (FI Qualification RA project). HII received funding (FI Bulkhead Track Improvements Panel project) to modify and retest the bulkhead track failures. Testing commenced in February 2017.

Bulkhead Track Testing (February 2017) Modifications Upgraded attachment hardware (saddle nuts and hex head bolts) from 3/8” to 1/2” for larger payloads All vertical track to horizontal track connections upgraded to 1/2” hardware (1/2” saddle nuts and socket head cap screws) Utilized HII designed T-brackets for large dummy weights Changed the test requirement to 4-25 Hz to attempt qualification for LHA, LPD, DDG and CVN applications (most failures occurred above 30 Hz) Test Procedure Two vibration test series performed on 11 test items Exploratory (4 – 25 Hz in increments of 1 Hz, for 15 seconds each) Variable (4 -25 Hz in increments of 1 Hz, for 5 minutes each) Endurance (at least 2 hours at resonant frequency or 1 hour at each resonance if two exist, if more than two, each frequency at 40 minutes) Major failure classified by the following Dummy masses attached to Flexible Infrastructure becomes adrift Flexible Infrastructure tracks become detached from test pedestal

Test Items / Results Item # Item Description Dummy Weight Result 5a Qty 2 Saddle Nuts (3/8") with Flat Bar, Vertical Track, Max CG 6" 10 PASSED (see note - stronger strut connections) 6a 15 11 Z mount 11" - 1 pair Vertical Track, 2 Tracks 22" Spacing, 1/2" Saddle Nuts, Max CG 6.5" 80 FAILED - 18 Hz Resonance caused the vertical track to split 14 Z mount 11" - 1 pair Horizontal Track, 2 Tracks 22" Spacing, 1/2" Saddle Nuts, Max CG 6.5" PASSED by reducing the CG of the dummy weight to 6.5" 17 Qty 8, 1/2" Saddle Nuts (4 per track) on 2 Horizontal Tracks Spaced 22" Apart 300 PASSED 18 Qty 2 Horizontal Hilti Tracks Spaced 22" Apart Installed on 3" Tall EFPMs (5/8" studs, 3/8" Hardware) with 200 lb Dummy Mass, 1/2" Saddle Nuts 200 19 Qty 2 Horizontal Hilti Tracks Spaced 22" Apart Installed on 6" Tall EFPMs (5/8" studs, 3/8" Hardware) with 200 lb Dummy Mass, 1/2" Saddle Nuts 23 Qty 2 Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 1 Vertical Hilti Track, Method 816-NG 40 PASSED - upgraded 3/8" to 1/2" hardware attachment to track 24 Qty 4 Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart, mounted on T-brackets 150 PASSED - added T brackets, doubling connections to track 24a Qty 4 Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart PASSED - proved T brackets not required 25 Qty 4 Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart, mounted on T-brackets, cantilevered on Vertical Track PASSED - added T brackets, doubling connections to track. T-brackets required for cantilevered situations? Note: Vertical Track was attached to Horizontal Track using 1/2" Saddle Nuts, socket head cap screws, lock / flat washers; torqued to 60 ft-lbs Saddle Nut Hardware: All 1/2" bolts were torqued to 60 ft-lbs. All 3/8" bolts were torqued to 30 ft-lbs.

Vertical Track Connection Test Setup 6” EFPM 3” EFPM T-Bracket Vertical Track Connection

Vertical Track Connection Test Setup – Test #1 3” EFPM 6” EFPM Vertical Track Connection

Vertical Track Connection Test Setup – Test #2 3” EFPM 6” EFPM Vertical Track Connection

Results / Conclusions 3/8” attachment hardware may be used for items up to 25lbs 1/2” hardware must be used for items heavier than 25lbs and for all vertical to horizontal track connections A pair of horizontal bulkhead tracks can support payloads up to 300 lbs A pair of vertical bulkhead tracks can support payloads up to 150 lbs Tracks installed on EFPMs can support payloads up to 200 lbs. The new EFPM designs were successful. They can vary in length between 3 and 9 inches T-brackets are only required for large cantilevered payloads Z-mount pairs cannot be used on vertical track

BHD Items that Survived Shock and Vibration Tests Item No. Description Dummy Weight 2 Qty 1, 3/8” Saddle Nut on Vertical Track 10 & 15 lbs 4 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts (3/8") w Flat Bar on Horizontal Track 6 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts (3/8") with Flat Bar, Vertical Track, Max CG 6" 8 Qty 1, 3/8” Saddle Nut on Horizontal Track 10 Single Z-mount 11” on Horizontal Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 20 & 40 lbs 13 Single Z-mount 11” on Vertical Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 14 Qty 2, Z mount 11" - 1 pair on Horizontal Track, 22" spacing, 1/2" Saddle Nuts, Max CG 6.5" 80 lbs 16 Single Z-mount 7.5” on Vertical Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 17 Qty 8, 1/2" Saddle Nuts (4 per track) on Horizontal Tracks Spaced 22" Apart 300 lbs 18 Qty 2, Horizontal Hilti Tracks Spaced 22" Apart installed on 3" Tall EFPMs (5/8" studs, 3/8" hardware) with 200 lb Dummy Mass, 1/2" Saddle Nuts. 200 lbs 19 2 Horizontal Hilti Tracks Spaced 22" Apart installed on 6" Tall EFPMs (5/8" studs, 3/8" hardware) with 200 lb Dummy Mass, 1/2" Saddle Nuts. 22 Qty 4, Z- mounts -7.5” on Horizontal Tracks- 22” spacing (1/2" saddle nuts) 100 lbs 23 Qty 2, 1/2” Saddle Nuts on 1 Vertical Hilti Track, Method 816-NG 40 lbs 24 Qty 4, 1/2” Saddle Nuts on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart, mounted on T-brackets 150 lbs Qty 4, 1/2” Saddle Nuts on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart 25 Qty 4, 1/2” Saddle Nuts on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks spaced 12" apart, mounted on T-brackets, cantilevered on Vertical Track 26 Qty 1, 3/8” Saddle Nut with Method 817-NG 10 lbs 27 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts with Method 806-NG mounted vertical (3/8") 25 lbs

Method Mount Groups Based on Testing QTY of Saddle Nuts Saddle Nut Size * MAX Payload Weight MAX horizontal CG of equipment Strut Configuration MIN Spacing between Saddle Nuts Possible Method Mounts EFPMs Allowed? Single Strut A 1 3/8" or 1/2" 15 lbs 6" Horizontal or Vertical N/A 817-NG or Custom Interface Plate Yes B 2 25 lbs 1.5" 806-NG, 7.5" Z-Mount, 11" Z-Mount or Custom Interface Plate C 1/2" 40 lbs 2.5" 816-NG, 7.5" Z-Mount, 11" Z-Mount or Custom Interface Plate Two Rows or Columns of Strut D 4 80 lbs Horizontal Only Set of Z-Mounts, 1 per strut (7.5" or 11") (2 per strut) E 150 lbs 3.6" Custom Interface Plate F 6 200 lbs 4" (3 per strut) G 8 1/2” 100 lbs 6” Qty 4 Z-Mounts, 2 per strut (7.5" or 11") (4 per strut) H 300 lbs 4.5" No I ** 4, 6 or 8 Vertical, Cantilevered Custom Interface Plate or T-Brackets to double the amount of attachment points * Payload Weight = Equipment weight plus method mount / interface plate weight ** Payloads mounted on cantilevered vertical track (between 25 and 150lbs) must double the amount of saddle nuts outlined in Groups C through E. Groups A and B may be mounted to cantilevered vertical track without modification. Cantilever may be up to 12" past horizontal strut connection.

Additional Shock Testing of FI Bulkhead Track Further shock testing on Ingalls’ Lightweight Shock Machine was conducted to qualify FI Bulkhead Track for hull applications (different shock criteria than what was tested under the RA project - structural bulkheads below the waterline). Objective: further expand the range of potential applications of FI Bulkhead Track

Test Fixture for Lightweight Testing of Bulkhead Track

Lightweight Shock Testing of FI Bulkhead Track

Lightweight Shock Testing of Bulkhead Track The following configurations were tested for hull qualification – All passed Item No. Description Dummy Weight 2 Qty 1, 3/8” Saddle Nut on Vertical Track 15 lbs 4 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts (3/8") with Flat Bar on Horizontal Track 6 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts (3/8") with Flat Bar, Vertical Track, Max CG 6" 8 Qty 1, 3/8” Saddle Nut on Horizontal Track 10 Single Z-mount 11” on Horizontal Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 40 lbs 13 Single Z-mount 11” on Vertical Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 14 Qty 2, Z-mount 11" - 1 pair on Horizontal Track, 22" Spacing, 1/2" Saddle Nuts, Max CG 6.5" 80 lbs 16 Single Z-mount 7.5” on Vertical Track (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 17 Qty 8, 1/2" Saddle Nuts (4 per track) on Horizontal Tracks Spaced 22" Apart 300 lbs 18, 19, 20 Qty 2, Horizontal Hilti Tracks Spaced 22" Apart installed on 3”, 6” and 9” EFPMs 200 lbs 22 Qty 4, Z-mounts 7.5” on Horizontal Tracks - 22” Spacing (1/2" Saddle Nuts) 100 lbs 23 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 1 Vertical Hilti Track, Method 816-NG 24 Qty 4, Saddle Nuts (1/2") on 2 Vertical Hilti Tracks Spaced 12" apart 150 lbs 26 Qty 1, Saddle Nut (3/8") with Method 817-NG 10 lbs 27 Qty 2, Saddle Nuts with Method 806-NG mounted vertical (3/8") 25 lbs

Remaining Efforts for Implementation of BHD Track Ingalls has submitted a shock qualification CDRL for the foundation portions of Flexible Infrastructure Bulkhead Track for LPDs. Once qualification is obtained, Ingalls will extend qualification to other surface ships. A shock qualification CDRL was submitted for method mounts and attachments to FI Bulkhead Track. Resiliently mounted items need to be addressed with the Technical Warrant Holders.

Questions? Michael J. Poslusny Mechanical Engineer Ingalls Shipbuilding Office: 228-935-7440 Mike.Poslusny@hii-ingalls.com