The Next Step in Transforming

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Dr. Deborah Gober and Dr. Anna Wan Columbus State University
MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.
Teacher Appraisal in Australia
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
An Overview of Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures Georgia Assessment Directors’ Association Fall 2013 Meeting Chuck McCampbell.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted only pursuant.
Teacher Preparation Presentation to the Higher Education Coordinating Council May 2, 2012 Kathy Hebda, Deputy Chancellor for Educator Quality.
C ERTIFICATION IN G EORGIA NASDTEC Conference June 2015.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Feed-up, Feedback, and Feed-Forward PPT available at Click “Resources” Feed Up Back Forward Champaign Nancy.
Components of a Quality Induction Program Shirley P. Andrews Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Lynne Weisenbach Vice Chancellor Educational Access and Success Teacher Preparation Program Accountability Report RACAA February 26, 2014.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
1 Session B1: edTPA Policies and Implementation GaPSC Certification and Program Officials’ Conference November 12, 2013.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Educator Effectiveness Update January Agenda 1.Overview of CDE’s Educator Effectiveness Work 2.Focusing Funding Streams to Support Educator Effectiveness.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
What is ? Nationally available, subject-specific performance assessment Focuses on student learning and principles from research and theory Designed.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Sara Hagen August 31,  Summer Institute Observation - August  Interview teachers – September & November  Survey to sample of teachers - December.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
TCSG at Wiregrass Transforming Educator Preparation Grant TCSG at Wiregrass Transforming Educator Preparation Grant.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
Implementing edTPA: Best Practices for Capacity Building and Using Data to Inform Decisions 2015 GaPSC Certification and Program Officials Conference December.
1 Disclaimer This resource is provided for informational and support purposes only. There is no requirement that it be used as- is or as a template by.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Implementing edTPA An Overview.
Who is Involved? Partners.
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Georgia Educator Preparation
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
Welcome Journey to Excellence.
The Wicked Problem of Measuring the Impact of Teacher Preparation: Increasing Rigor in Documenting Preparation Practices Larry Maheady, Buffalo State University.
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Oregon Teacher Standards & Practices Commission July 24, 2013
Sustaining Continual Progress Across Policy Levers
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Teacher Performance Assessment edTPA™
Implementing Race to the Top
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Standard one: revisions
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
GA Association of School Personnel Administrators
Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2
Tennessee edTPA Conference
Making it meaningful A continuous cycle to ensure improved outcomes and impact of careers encounters.
Presentation transcript:

The Next Step in Transforming Georgia Educator Prep The Next Step in Transforming Educator Preparation

Georgia Wants Beginning teachers who are ready to teach To accelerate the time it takes for new teachers to become effective To support new teacher induction and retention 2

Educator Preparation Reform Induction Certificate Teacher Induction Program Accountability Educator Preparation Program Improvement As part of the multi-system reform efforts, edTPA is an integral part of Georgia’s efforts to improve initial teacher certification, new teacher induction, program accountability and educator preparation program improvement. Induction Certificate is the initial certificate signifying that the candidate is ready to enter the teaching profession. We believe that edTPA, our newly chosen performance assessment, will improve our ability to predict a candidate’s teaching effectiveness and impact on student learning. Teacher Induction - Novice teachers need support early in their careers. We believe that the edTPA will accelerate the time it takes for new teachers to become effective. Information from edTPA communicated from preparation programs could provide timely and targeted induction support for new teachers. Program Accountability - Adding a nationally scaled externally scored assessment on classroom teaching performance, in addition to the GACE, allows Georgia to have more confidence in determining this program effectiveness component. Since edTPA is administered during student teaching, the results are more directly attributable to program impact than measures taken years later. Program Improvement -edTPA provides meaningful data to support teacher education programs as they evaluate, reflect on and continually improve their programs. 3

edTPA State Policy Required for all Georgia state-approved EPP candidates in initial teaching fields (for which an edTPA has been state-adopted) and for all out-of-state candidates who are completing clinical field experience in Georgia’s schools Not required for service fields (Education Leadership, Curriculum & Instruction, etc.), even though there are edTPA handbooks for some service fields 4

Benefits Educative to inform candidates and program improvement Collaboration: Providers & LEA Informing induction programs Program Accountability 5

Benefits to Candidates An authentic, educative assessment Charts their early professional development progression Prepares them for the new teacher evaluation systems Identifies areas of strength and areas for development 6

Benefits to Providers Feedback regarding program effectiveness Clear performance criteria and performance data Examine claims about what is “infused throughout the curriculum” Collaboration across institutions via shared outcomes Independent, objective affirmation regarding quality of our programs Actionable evidence to support program change 7

State Support Structures EPP edTPA Coordinators’ Webinars Steering Committee Policy Development and Implementation Advisory Committee State and Regional Summits/Workshops/Conferences edTPA Regional Coordinators 8

Implementation Timeline 2013: Finalized policy incorporating edTPA 2013-14: Exploratory/Scaling up year for providers 2014-15: Partial Implementation (each provider implements edTPA with a subset/all of programs, but not consequential yet) 2015-16: Full Implementation (each provider implements edTPA for all programs, consequential) 9